Assessment of isometricity before and after total knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study

The implications of mechanical alignment on soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

We hypothesized that the individual bone geometry is the most important variable to achieve acceptable soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

Long-standing 3-foot films and computer navigation data from 90 patients with varus (n = 45) or valgus deformity (n = 45) were utilized who underwent navigated total knee arthroplasty. Mean age was 65 ± 8 years with 50 women and 40 men. Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured and ranged from 23° varus to 21.5° of valgus. Three additional measurements were made: lateral distal femoral angle (DFA), the intraarticular angle (IAA), and the medial proximal tibial angle (PTA). Intra-operative computer navigation data were obtained. Knees were then stressed with both a maximum varus/valgus moment in 10° flexion. Values were compared with the angle measurements of 3-foot films. Maximum varus/valgus measurements were correlated with HKA for both varus and valgus knees.

RESULTS

Varus knees: Mean HKA measured 9° ± 5°, and the maximum varus stress measured intraoperatively was 12° ± 4°. The mean DFA, PTA, and IAA were 88° ± 2.5°, 84° ± 3.4°, and 4.5° ± 2.5°, respectively. If the HKA was <10°, the deformity was correctable in (16/26) 61 % of cases. Positive correlation exists between the HKA, and maximal varus stress obtained intraoperatively (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001). IAA correlated with increasing HKA (r = 0.80, p < 0.0001). Mean IAA was significantly greater in the varus than valgus group (4.5 ± 2.6 vs 3.2 ± 2.4, respectively, p = 0.01). Valgus knees: Mean HKA measured was 9.4° ± 4°. The mean DFA, PTA, and IAA were 83° ± 2°, 89.5° ± 2°, and 3.2° ± 2.4°, respectively. If the HKA was more than 10°, maximal varus stress of the knee was able to correct the valgus deformity (15/22) 68 % of the time. If the HKA was <10°, the deformity was correctable in (21/23) 91 % of cases. Positive correlation exists between the HKA and maximal valgus stress examination (r = 0.74, p < 0.0001). There was a positive correlation of IAA with increasing HKA (r = 0.61, p < 0.0001). Mean flexion contracture for varus knees was 6.3° ± 6.9° compared with 0.8° ± 7.6° in the valgus group (p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that soft tissues play more of a role in the varus knee deformity than they do in the valgus knee and that the bony contribution may be the main contributing factor to the overall deformity of the valgus knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Restoration of constitutional alignment in TKA leads to more physiological strains in the collateral ligaments

PURPOSE

Currently, controversy exists whether restoration of neutral mechanical alignment should be attempted in all patients undergoing TKA. Our hypothesis was that restoration of constitutional rather than neutral mechanical alignment may in theory lead to a more physiological strain pattern in the collateral ligaments; therefore, it could potentially be beneficial to patients. Thus, the aim of this study was to measure collateral ligament strains during three motor tasks in the native knee and compare them with the strains noted after TKA in different post-operative alignment conditions.

METHODS

Six cadaver specimens (approval number ML4190 from the Research Ethics Committee of University of Leuven, Belgium) were examined using a validated knee kinematics rig under physiological loading conditions. The effect of coronal malalignment was evaluated by using custom-made tibial implant inserts that induced different alignment conditions. The study of six specimens allows us to show that a difference in the mean strains in MCL and LCL of 3.6 and 5.8 %, respectively, was statistically significant with a probability (power) of 0.8.

RESULTS

The results indicated that after TKA insertion, the strains in the collateral ligaments closely resembled the pre-operative pattern of the native knee specimens when constitutional alignment was restored. Restoration to neutral mechanical alignment was associated with greater collateral strain deviations from the native knee.

CONCLUSION

Based upon this study, it was concluded that restoration of constitutional alignment within a "safe zone" of ±2° during TKA leads to more physiological peri-articular soft tissue strains during loaded as well as unloaded motor tasks.

Does joint line elevation after revision knee arthroplasty affect tibio-femoral kinematics, contact pressure or collateral ligament lengths? An in vitro analysis

INTRODUCTION

Correct restoration of the joint line is generally considered as crucial when performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). During revision knee arthroplasty however, elevation of the joint line occurs frequently. The general belief is that this negatively affects the clinical outcome, but the reasons are still not well understood.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this cadaveric in vitro study the biomechanical consequences of joint line elevation were investigated using a previously validated cadaver model simulating active deep knee squats and passive flexion-extension cycles. Knee specimens were sequentially tested after total knee arthroplasty with joint line restoration and after 4 mm joint line elevation.

RESULTS

The tibia rotated internally with increasing knee flexion during both passive and squatting motion (range: 17° and 7° respectively). Joint line elevation of 4 mm did not make a statistically significant difference. During passive motion, the tibia tended to become slightly more adducted with increasing knee flexion (range: 2°), while it went into slighlty less adduction during squatting (range: -2°). Neither of both trends was influenced by joint line elevation. Also anteroposterior translation of the femoral condyle centres was not affected by joint line elevation, although there was a tendency for a small posterior shift (of about 3 mm) during squatting after joint line elevation. In terms of kinetics, ligaments lengths and length changes, tibiofemoral contact pressures and quadriceps forces all showed the same patterns before and joint line elevation. No statistically significant changes could be detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that joint line elevation by 4 mm in revision total knee arthroplasty does not cause significant kinematic and kinetic differences during passive flexion/extension movement and squatting in the tibio-femoral joint, nor does it affect the elongation patterns of collateral ligaments. Therefore, clinical problems after joint line elevation are probably situated in the patello-femoral joint or caused by joint line elevation of more than 4 mm.

No difference between tibia-first and femur-first techniques in TKA using computer-assisted surgery

PURPOSE

The measured resection technique and the gap-balancing technique are two philosophies used in total knee surgery. It is still unknown whether one or the other technique provides superior results when computer-assisted surgery is performed. We hypothesized that the gap-balancing technique improves joint stability because the technique relies primarily on the soft tissue.

METHODS

A prospective controlled study was performed in 116 patients using the tibia-first or femur-first technique. The Columbus(TM) total knee system and the Orthopilot(®) (Aesculap(®) AG, Tuttlingen, Germany) navigation system were used in all cases. Sixty-three patients were allocated to the femur-first technique (group F) and 53 patients to the tibial first technique (group T). The mean follow-up time was 11.4 ± 1.1 months. The KSS, KOOS and SF-36 were taken prior to surgery and at the time of follow-up for clinical assessment. Long-leg weight-bearing radiographs were performed to assess ligament alignment. Radiographs in varus and valgus stress were performed using the Telos(®)-Instrument (Telos(®) GmbH, Greisheim, Germany) under a force of 15 N at the time of follow-up for the assessment of medial-lateral stability. The nonparametric t test (Mann-Whitney U-test) was used in order to compare the ligament stability and the scores between group F and group T.

RESULTS

The lateral joint space opening for groups F and T was 3.4° ± 1.4° and 3.9° ± 1.7°, respectively (n.s.), and the medial joint space opening for groups F and T was 4° ± 1.4° and 4.1° ± 1.7°, respectively (n.s.). The femorotibial mechanical axis for groups F and T revealed 1.4° ± 1.2° and 0.7° ± 2.0° of varus, respectively (p = 0.138). The clinical assessment showed significant improvement according to KSS, KOOS and SF-36 in all subscales. Neither of the sores showed significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The surgeon should use his/her preferred surgical technique providing the implantation is performed with computer assistance. It remains unclear whether the same findings will occur after conventional surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.