Revision for stiffness following TKA: a predictable procedure?

Identifying Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Diagnoses That Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State

BACKGROUND

Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) defines a meaningful clinical change in patient-reported outcome measures. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) provides a patient-reported outcome measures threshold value to indicate a satisfactory clinical state. MCID and PASS for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) are ill-defined. Moreover, it is unknown whether diagnosis influences the likelihood of achieving MCID or PASS. The purpose of this study was to calculate MCID for aseptic rTKA and compare the percentage of patients achieving MCID and PASS per diagnosis.

METHODS

An institutional registry of rTKA was used. First-time aseptic rTKA were included. Demographics, revision diagnosis, preoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Jr (KOOS Jr), and 1-year postoperative KOOS Jr were recorded. The 1-year postoperative KOOS Jr PASS score was available. MCID was calculated using distribution-based methods. Three hundred fifty eight first-time aseptic rTKAs were analyzed. The 3 most common diagnoses were aseptic loosening (n = 156), instability (n = 109), and stiffness (n = 37).

RESULTS

The mean KOOS Jr 1-year postoperative MCID for rTKA was 10.3. Overall, 75.4% achieved MCID and 56.9% achieved PASS. The percentage of patients per diagnosis achieving MCID and PASS, respectively, were periprosthetic fracture (100, 44), aseptic loosening (94, 60), implant fracture (88, 63), stiffness (60, 38), instability (59, 61), polyethylene wear/osteolysis (57, 57), and metal allergy (44, 33).

CONCLUSION

Aseptic rTKA MCID is 10.3 for KOOS Jr at 1 year postoperatively. rTKA outcomes vary depending on preoperative diagnosis. Even in diagnoses with a high proportion of MCID achieved, less than 2/3 of patients achieved PASS, suggesting rTKA provides noticeable improvement but may not return patients to a satisfactory state.

Allergy Testing Has No Correlation with Intraoperative Histopathology from Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Implant-Related Metal Allergy

Lymphocyte transformation testing (LTT) is often used in the workup for possible metal allergy after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but the correlation of this test with other diagnostic metal-allergy findings in patients undergoing revision TKA for suspected metal allergy has not been established. A single-center, single-surgeon cohort of 19 TKAs in which both components were revised for presumed implant-related metal allergy based on history, physical, and LTT testing, to nonnickel-containing implants were retrospectively identified. Histopathologic samples obtained intraoperatively were semiquantitatively analyzed using both the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) synovial pathology score and the Campbell aseptic lymphocyte-dominant vasculitis-associated lesion (ALVAL) score. As histopathology control group, we included in the study an additional cohort of 17 patients who received aseptic revision TKA and had no history of reported or tested metal sensitivity. All preoperative LTT results were highly reactive to nickel. However, this did not correlate with local periarticular tissue response in 18 of 19 cases which demonstrated a low HSS synovial score (mean: 3.8 ± 2.8, of a maximum score of 28) and the low Campbell ALVAL scores (mean: 2.5/10 ± 1.3, of a maximum score of 10). There were not any significant differences between the study group (suspected implant-related metal allergy) and the control group (nonsuspected implant-related metal allergy) in regard to (1) the Campbell score and (2) the HSS synovial inflammatory score. Knee Society Clinical Rating System (KSCRS) function score improved significantly after revision (mean postoperative increase: 34.0 ± 17. 2; p < 0.001), as well as mean visual analog scale (VAS) pain (mean postoperative decrease: 33.3 ± 26.4; p < 0.01) score. The short-term survival rate (at mean follow-up of 26.1 months) of this patient cohort was 100%. In this cohort of revised TKA patients with suspected nickel allergy based on clinical presentation and LTT positive results, intraoperative histopathology was essentially normal. However, all patients with suspected nickel allergy showed a significant clinical and functional improvement with excellent short-term survival rates. The clinical significance of a positive LTT needs further study.

The effect of losartan on range of motion and rates of manipulation in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective matched cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Arthrofibrosis remains a common cause of patient dissatisfaction and reoperation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Losartan is an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with inhibitory effects on transforming growth factor beta, previously implicated in tissue repair induced fibrosis, and has been studied to prevent stiffness following hip arthroscopy. This study aimed to evaluate pre- and postoperative range of motion (ROM) and the incidence of manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) following primary TKA in patients taking Losartan preoperatively for hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 170 patients from 2012 to 2020 who underwent a primary, elective TKA and were prescribed Losartan at least three months prior to surgery. All patients who were prescribed Losartan and had a preoperative and postoperative ROM in their chart were included and were matched to a control group of patients who underwent TKA and had no Losartan prescription. ROM, MUA, readmissions, reoperations, and revisions were assessed using chi-square and independent sample t tests.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. Preoperative ROM was similar between patients on Losartan and the control group (103.59° ± 16.14° vs. 104.59° ± 21.59°, respectively; p = 0.745). Postoperative ROM and ΔROM were greater for patients prescribed Losartan (114.29° ± 12.32° vs. 112.76° ± 11.65°; p = 0.429 and 10.57° ± 14.95° vs. 8.17° ± 21.68°; p = 0.422), though this difference did not reach statistical significance. There was no difference in readmission, rate of manipulation for stiffness, or all-cause revision rates.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found that the use of Losartan did not significantly improve postoperative ROM, reduce MUA or decrease revision rates. Further prospective studies using Losartan are required to elucidate the potential effects on ROM and incidence of arthrofibrosis requiring MUA.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study.

Kinematic Alignment of Failed Mechanically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty Restored Constitutional Limb Alignment and Improved Clinical Outcomes: A Case Report of 7 Patients

Background: Stiffness and mid-flexion instability (MFI) is a recognized complication of mechanically aligned (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Kinematic alignment (KA) has been proposed as a means by which to restore normal joint motion following TKA and potentially avoid stiffness and MFI. Several studies have documented improved function with KA when compared to MA. The aim of this study was to determine if revising MA TKAs failed for either MFI or stiffness into KA resolves MFI, achieves better range of motion, and improves clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective, single surgeon review was performed. All consecutive TKAs revised from MA into KA for MFI (def: >5 mm opening between 10° and 45° of flexion) or stiffness (def: flexion ≤90°) between January 2017 and May 2021 were included. The constitutional limb alignment of the operated knee was “reverse engineered” by measuring the coronal alignment of the contralateral healthy knee or pre-operative x-rays. Femoral Rotation was set at 3 degrees internal to the trans epicondylar axis. All coronal and sagittal angles were digitally measured on pre- and post-operative long leg and maximum flexion radiographs (minimum 12 month follow-up). The Knee Society Score (KSS) and range of motion assessments were collected preoperatively and at final follow-up. Comparisons between groups were done with a paired T test. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Seven patients were included. Two were male, the mean age was 70.1 years (±9.3), mean follow-up was 32 months (±26). Three patients were revised for MFI and 4 for stiffness. Constitutional limb alignment was restored within 2 degrees for all patients. The mean total KSS gain was 65.9 (±18.1). The total KSS was significantly improved in all patients (p < 0.001). The mean maximum flexion gain was 30 deg (±23°) (p = 0.01). MFI was absent in all patients. Conclusion: In a limited series of patients, revision of stiff or unstable TKA from MA to KA resulted in improved range of motion by 30° on averages, resolved instability without the use of constrained liners, improved clinical outcomes with a mean gain of 75 points on the KSS, and restored constitutional limb alignment within 2 degrees in all patients. As these short term results are promising, further study is warranted.

Treatment of arthrofibrosis and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: an updated review of the literature

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the increased utilization of value-based models, it is important to determine the most effective treatments that will reduce the need for further intervention and additional expenditure. A systematic review was performed to compare the outcomes of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (aLOA), and revision TKA (rTKA) for arthrofibrosis and stiffness following TKA.

METHODS

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were reviewed for articles published through October 2020. Studies were included if they reported patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA, aLOA, or rTKA. The primary endpoint was PROMs, while secondary outcomes included range of motion and the percentage of patients who pursued further treatment for stiffness.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included: 21 on rTKA, 7 on aLOA, and 14 on MUA. The mean or median post-operative arc ROM was > 90° in 6/20 (30%) rTKA, 5/7 (71%) aLOA, and 7/10 (70%) MUA studies. Post-operative Knee Society (KSS) clinical and functional scores were the greatest in patients who underwent MUA and aLOA. As many as 43% of rTKA patients required further care compared to 25% of aLOA and 17% of MUA patients.

CONCLUSION

Stiffness following TKA remains a challenging condition to treat. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that patients who undergo rTKA have poorer clinical outcomes and a greater need for further treatment compared to patients who undergo MUA or aLOA.

Results of revision knee replacement for patients with isolated fixed flexion deformity after primary or revision knee replacement

BACKGROUND

Postoperative fixed flexion deformity is a known complication of knee replacement surgery. We present our results of revision surgery for treatment of isolated fixed flexion deformity after knee replacement.

METHODS

32 patients had revision knee replacement for fixed flexion deformity and were included in this retrospective study. Minimum follow up period was 28 months.

RESULTS

Two different surgical interventions had been done in these patients. Group 1 (15 patients) had revision of the femoral component, posterior capsular release and tibial component was not revised. Group 2 (18 Patients) had revision of both femoral and tibial components. One patient was included in both groups as she had both interventions. The extent of preoperative flexion deformity in group 1 was from 15 to 40 deg (mean 20.6 deg). Postoperative range of extension was 0 to 20 deg (mean 8.2 deg). In group 2, preoperative flexion deformity was 10 to 25 deg (mean 16.9 deg) and postoperative flexion deformity was 0 to 20 deg (mean 4.2 deg). The difference in improvement between the two groups was not statistically significant on Mann Whitney U test (two tailed p value 0.181) for non normal distribution. Improvement in Oxford knee score following surgery was only 1 point in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Revision for isolated fixed flexion deformity leads to improvement in range of extension, but improvement in clinical score is marginal. The choice of preservation or revision of the tibial component did not make a significant difference to the outcome.

Why do knees after total knee arthroplasty fail in different parts of the world?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this narrative review was to provide an overview of failure modes after total knee arthroplasty in different parts of the world based on data from worldwide representative studies and National Joint Registries.

METHODS

A review of the available literature was performed using the keyword terms "total knee arthroplasty", "revision", "failure", "reasons", "causes", "complications", "epidemiology", "etiology"; "assessment", "painful knee", "registry" and "national" in several combinations. The following databases were assessed: Pubmed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), Cochrane Reviews (https://www.cochrane.org), Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com). In addition, registry data were obtained directly from national registry archives. Due to the heterogeneity of available data it was decided to present the review in a narrative manner.

RESULTS

Current literature report that infection has become the primary acute cause of TKA failure, while aseptic loosening and instability remain the overall most frequent reasons for revisions. Based on national registries certain tendencies can be deducted. The predominant overall failure mode of aseptic loosening is particularly found in Japan, United Kingdom, New Zealand and Switzerland. Leading early TKA failure mode represents infection with percentages of 20-30% in Sweden, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and the United States. Higher numbers could only be found in clinical studies on the Asian continent such as Korea (38%), China (53%), Iran (44%) and India (87%).

CONCLUSION

Although there are regional differences in TKA failure modes, TKA fails worldwide especially due to infections and aseptic loosening. It is important to diagnose these in good time and reliably using appropriate, standardized diagnostics in order to recommend the best possible therapy to the patient.

Why Reintervention After Total Knee Arthroplasty Fails? A Consecutive Cohort of 1170 Surgeries

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to analyze why contemporary reintervention after total knee arthroplasty (RiTKA) fails.

METHODS

Between January 2006 and December 2010, from a multicenter cohort of 1170 RiTKAs, we assessed all failures of RiTKA requiring additional surgery. All indications for the index reintervention were included. The minimum follow-up period was 3 years.

RESULTS

A total of 192 (16.4%) patients required additional surgery after RiTKA (re-reintervention). The mean follow-up period was 7.7 years. Mean age was 69.2 years. The mean time to re-reintervention was 9.6 months with 90.1% of rTKA failure occurring within the first two years. Infection was the main cause of new surgery after RiTKA (47.9%; n = 92/192). Other causes included extensor mechanism pathology (14.6%), stiffness (13.5%), pain (6.8%), aseptic loosening (5.2%), laxity (5.2%), periprosthetic fracture (3.6%), and wound pathology (3.1%). In four groups, the main indication for re-reintervention was recurrence of the pathology leading to the first reintervention: RiTKA for infection (59/355, 16.6%, P < .05), stiffness (18/174, 10.3%, P < .05), extensor mechanism failure (9/167, 5.4%, P < .05), and RiTKA for pain (4/137, 2.9%, P = .003). Global survival curve analysis found 87.9% survivorship without re-reintervention at one year and 83% at eight years.

CONCLUSION

Contemporary RiTKA failures mainly occur in the first two postoperative years. Infection is the main cause of failure in RiTKA. Recurrence of the initial pathology occurs in four groups of RiTKA and is the main indication for re-reintervention in these groups; infection (16.6%), stiffness (10.3%), extensor mechanism failure (5.4%), and pain (2.9%).

Same-Day Surgery Does Not Increase the Manipulation Under Anesthesia and Reoperation Rates for Stiffness Following Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data on the incidence of stiffness and need for subsequent manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and reoperation following same-day bilateral total knee arthroplasty (BTKA). We compared the rates of at least 1 MUA, bilateral knee involvement, single and multiple MUA rates, and stiffness-related reoperation rates between patients undergoing same-day, same-admission staged, and staged within 1 year BTKA in a tertiary institution.

METHODS

We analyzed institutional data for 3175 same-day (group A), 153 same-admission staged (group B), and 1226 staged within 1 year BTKA patients (group C) from 1998 to 2009. Several variables, including patient demographics, comorbidity profile, Charlson-Deyo index, and range of motion at different time points, were tabulated. Follow-up was minimum 1 year after first MUA. Univariate analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis test, and Fisher exact or the chi-square test for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to check the bilateral knee involvement rate across groups.

RESULTS

Overall, 2.2% (98/4554) of BTKA patients required MUA. The rate of at least 1 MUA was similar across groups but the percentage of bilateral knee involvement was higher in group A. The single MUA rate was comparable among groups. Both no revision and revision reoperation rates were similar among the manipulated groups.

CONCLUSION

Same-day BTKA was not associated with increased incidence of single or multiple MUA and stiffness-related reoperation rates. These findings may facilitate preoperative counseling in patients with symptomatic bilateral knee disease, eligible for same-day BTKA.

Efficacy of manipulation under anesthesia beyond three months following total knee arthroplasty

Background

Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated with manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) to improve range of motion (ROM). However, many authors recommend against MUA beyond 3 months after TKA. This study investigates the timing of MUA for stiffness after TKA, focusing on MUA performed at >12 weeks.

Methods

In total, 142 MUAs were retrospectively reviewed. “Early” MUAs were at <12 weeks after TKA; “Late” MUAs were >12 weeks. MUAs were further subdivided into 4 groups: 83 “Group I” cases at <12 weeks, 34 “Group II” between 12 and 26 weeks, 12 “Group III” between 26 and 52 weeks, and 13 “Group IV” at >52 weeks. Gains in ROM were compared between groups.

Results

Gains in flexion and overall ROM were statistically equivalent in Early vs Late MUA when controlling for pre-MUA ROM. ROM gains between the early Group I and the later Groups II-IV were also statistically comparable. Overall ROM gain in Group I was 24.1°, 17.9° in Group II, 20.8° in Group III, and 11.1° in Group IV. There were no significant complications.

Conclusions

Early and late MUA resulted in statistically equivalent gains in ROM, regardless of timing after TKA. All groups showed an average improvement in ROM of ≥11°. MUA performed beyond 3 months, and even beyond 1 year, appears to be safe and may improve ROM and allow select patients to avoid revision surgery.

Protocol-Driven Revision for Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Motion and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Stiffness after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a difficult problem without a well-defined treatment algorithm. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of revision TKA for stiffness within the context of differential component replacement.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent revision TKA were retrospectively identified and included those who received debridement and polyethylene liner exchange alone, revision of only one of the femoral or tibial fixed components, or revision of all components. Preoperative and postoperative range of motion and Knee Society score (KSS) were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine knees were included in the study group with a mean follow-up of 43 months (range, 12-205 months). The mean prerevision flexion contracture of 17° improved to 5° after surgical intervention (P < .001). Similarly, mean flexion and motion arc improved from 70° to 92° and from 53° to 87°, respectively (P < .001). Mean KSS knee scores improved from 42 to 70 and KSS function scores improved from 41 to 68 (P < .001). Mean arc of motion improved by 45° in patients who underwent complete component revision, 32° with component retention, and 29° with single component revision (P = .046). KSS knee scores improved by 34, 25, and 28 points in these respective groups (P = .049). KSS function scores improved by 33, 27, and 25 points (P = .077).

CONCLUSION

Revision surgery with or without component revision can improve motion and function in patients with stiffness after TKA. Complete component revision may offer the largest improvements in these outcome measures in properly selected patients.

Efficacy of Revision Surgery for the Treatment of Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Knee stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may cause pain and reduced functionality, contributing to unsatisfactory surgical outcomes. Revision surgery remains a possible treatment for refractory postoperative stiffness. However, the efficacy of the procedure has not been systematically evaluated.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to identify studies that reported on outcomes for patients who underwent revision surgery for postoperative stiffness after TKA.

RESULTS

Ten studies (including 485 knees) were reviewed. The most common etiologies of stiffness requiring revision TKA were component malposition, malalignment, overstuffing, aseptic loosening, arthrofibrosis, patella baja, and heterotopic ossification. Of 9 studies reviewing range of motion outcomes after revision TKA, 7 studies documented significant improvement and 2 found trends toward improvement. Seven of 8 studies documenting Knee Society knee scores and 7 of 9 studies documenting functional scores found improvement after revision TKA. All studies reporting on pain found improvement at final follow-up after revision TKA.

CONCLUSION

Revision TKA results in increased range of motion, improved functionality, and reduced pain in most patients who require surgery for stiffness. The present literature is inadequate to predict which patients will achieve adequate outcomes from revision TKA based on the specific etiology of their stiffness, although identification of the etiology may help in surgical planning. Surgeons performing revision TKA should counsel patients on the risks and benefits of undergoing revision surgery, with the understanding that outcomes for well-selected patients are generally favorable.

Arthrofibrosis Associated With Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis is a debilitating postoperative complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is one of the leading causes of hospital readmission and a predominant reason for TKA failure. The prevalence of arthrofibrosis will increase as the annual incidence of TKA in the United States rises into the millions.

METHODS

In a narrative review of the literature, the etiology, economic burden, treatment strategies, and future research directions of arthrofibrosis after TKA are examined.

RESULTS

Characterized by excessive proliferation of scar tissue during an impaired wound healing response, arthrofibrotic stiffness causes functional deficits in activities of daily living. Postoperative, supervised physiotherapy remains the first line of defense against the development of arthrofibrosis. Also, adjuncts to traditional physiotherapy such as splinting and augmented soft tissue mobilization can be beneficial. The effectiveness of rehabilitation on functional outcomes depends on the appropriate timing, intensity, and progression of the program, accounting for the patient's ability and level of pain. Invasive treatments such as manipulation under anesthesia, debridement, and revision arthroplasty improve range of motion, but can be traumatic and costly. Future studies investigating novel treatments, early diagnosis, and potential preoperative screening for risk of arthrofibrosis will help target those patients who will need additional attention and tailored rehabilitation to improve TKA outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Arthrofibrosis is a multi-faceted complication of TKA, and is difficult to treat without an early, tailored, comprehensive rehabilitation program. Understanding the risk factors for its development and the benefits and shortcomings of various interventions are essential to best restore mobility and function.

Revision Arthroplasty for the Management of Stiffness After Primary TKA

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of revision surgery for the treatment of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

An IRB-approved retrospective review was performed to identify patients who were revised due to stiffness after a primary TKA. Patients were included when at least one major component had to be revised due to stiffness after primary TKA with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients with history of previous infection and those treated with isolated polyethylene exchange were excluded.

RESULTS

The study group involved 42 knees. Mean follow-up was 47 months (24-109 months). Mean flexion contracture improved from 9.7° (0°-35°) preoperatively to 2.3° (0°-20°) postoperatively (P < .00). Mean flexion improved from 81.5° (10°-125°) preoperatively to 94.3° (15°-140°) postoperatively (P .02). Mean range of motion improved from 72.0° preoperatively (10°-100°) to 92° (15°-140°) postoperatively (P < .00). Mean Knee Society knee scores improved from 43.9 points (15-67) preoperatively to 72.0 points (50-93) at latest follow-up and mean Knee Society Function scores improved from 48.7 (35-80) preoperatively to 70.1 points (30-90) postoperatively. Pain improved in 73% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Revision surgery appears to be a reasonable option for patients presenting with pain and stiffness after TKA. However, the benefits may be modest as the outcomes still do not approach those achieved with primary TKA.

Revision surgery for the stiff total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine the results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) undertaken for stiffness in the absence of sepsis or loosening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present the results of revision surgery for stiff TKA in 48 cases (35 (72.9%) women and 13 (27.1%) men). The mean age at revision surgery was 65.5 years (42 to 83). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Stiffness was defined as an arc of flexion of < 70° or a flexion contracture of > 15°. The changes in the range of movement (ROM) and the Western Ontario and McMasters Osteoarthritis index scores (WOMAC) were recorded.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 59.9 months (12 to 272) there was a mean improvement in arc of movement of 45.0°. Mean flexion improved from 54.4° (5° to 100°) to 90° (10° to 125°) (p < 0.05) and the mean flexion contracture decreased from 12.0° (0° to 45°) to 3.5° (0° to 25°) (p < 0.05). The mean WOMAC scores improved for pain, stiffness and function. In patients with extreme stiffness we describe a novel technique, which we have called the 'sloppy' revision. This entails downsizing the polyethylene insert by 4 mm and using a more constrained liner to retain stability.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest series of revision surgeries for stiffness reported in the literature where infection and loosening have been excluded.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Whilst revision surgery is technically demanding, improvements in ROM and outcome can be achieved, particularly when the revision is within two years of the primary surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:622-7.

Moderate clinical improvement after revision arthroplasty of the severely stiff knee

PURPOSE

Revision of the severe stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging, and clinical outcome is inferior to other indications for revision. The purpose of the present study was to determine clinical outcome of TKA revision in patients with severe stiffness (range of motion (ROM) ≤ 70°) and evaluate a possible influence of accompanying findings, such as component malposition, aseptic loosening or instability.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 40 patients with a preoperative ROM ≤ 70° and a minimum of 2-year follow-up after total system revision (Genesis or Legion stemmed condylar implant) was evaluated. ROM, Knee Society Scoring System (KSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained preoperatively and at 2 years. Patient satisfaction and complication rate were assessed. Component malposition was most frequently reported as accompanying finding (n = 27). Comparisons between pre- and postoperative outcome (p < 0.05) and between different subgroups (component malposition, aseptic loosening, and instability) based on accompanying findings were made (no statistical comparison).

RESULTS

ROM, KSS and VAS pain scores improved significantly (p < 0.001): median ROM at two years 85° (range 10-125) and median gain 25° (range -10 to +85). Median VAS satisfaction was 53.5 points (range 15-98). Seventeen patients reported at least one complication, including one re-revision. Six patients underwent manipulation under anaesthesia, and five were referred to the pain clinic. No clear differences between subgroups were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

TKA revision in patients with severe stiffness resulted in a moderate but significant improved clinical outcome after 2 years. Accompanying abnormalities such as component malposition, aseptic loosening or instability did not influence clinical outcome. Realistic patient counselling on the moderate outcome and possible remaining limitations in daily life might help to improve patient satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic studies-case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?

The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and cause of failure after total knee arthroplasty and compare the results with those reported by our similar investigation conducted 10 years ago. A total of 781 revision TKAs performed at our institution over the past 10 years were identified. The most common failure mechanisms were: loosening (39.9%), infection (27.4%), instability (7.5%), periprosthetic fracture (4.7%), and arthrofibrosis (4.5%). Infection was the most common failure mechanism for early revision (<2 years from primary) and aseptic loosening was the most common reason for late revision. Polyethylene (PE) wear was no longer the major cause of failure. Compared to our previous report, the percentage of revisions performed for polyethylene wear, instability, arthrofibrosis, malalignment and extensor mechanism deficiency has decreased.

Pre-operative patient education is associated with decreased risk of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty: a case control study

The purpose was to investigate risk factors for postoperative stiffness and long-term outcome following manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). In one of the five Danish regions, all patients in a 4-year period who received MUA following total knee arthroplasty (N=36) were included in two case-control studies. Data on potential risk factors were extracted from the Danish Knee arthroplasty Register and from a postal questionnaire including long-term outcome measures regarding pain, function and quality of life (Oxford Knee Score and EQ-5D). Previous knee surgery and a high preoperative Knee Society Function Score were significant risk factors, whereas attending a preoperative information meeting was associated with a significantly decreased risk of postoperative stiffness requiring MUA (P<0.001). The long-term results following MUA (1-5 years) were equivalent to patients without postoperative stiffness.