Venous thromboembolism and its prophylaxis in elective knee arthroplasty: an international perspective

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to assess whether administration tranexamic acid (TXA) could reduce blood loss and vascular events in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case control trials (CCT) that compared outcomes of patients who did and did not receive TXA during UKA. We searched Cochrane Central Register of including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wan Fang data, CBM and CNKI for relevant studies. We assessed the risk of bias of the included studies and calculated pooled risk estimates. The primary outcome was operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative HCT, postoperative HB, transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hidden blood loss, total blood loss, postoperative ROM,postoperative VAS score, postoperative complications. Data were using fixed-effects or random-effects models with standard mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Finally, 9 clinical studies with 744 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the control group, TXA group could reduced transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hidden blood loss, and total blood loss, and increased postoperative HB with statistically significance. The main findings of this meta-analysis are that the transfusion rate, dominant blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, hidden blood loss, total blood loss and postoperative HB in the tranexamic acid group were superior to those in the routine group. Additional high-quality RCTs should be conducted in the future.

Protocolo de prevenção do tromboembolismo venoso: Experiência de 2.000 casos em artroplastia total de joelho*

Objetivo O objetivo do presente estudo é avaliar o impacto de um protocolo institucional em um hospital terciário na prevenção do tromboembolismo venoso em 2.005 pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total primária de joelho.

Métodos Os dados dos prontuários de pacientes submetidos a artroplastia total do joelho antes (n = 1.115) e após (n = 890) a implantação do protocolo institucional, totalizando 2.005 pacientes, foram relatados retrospectivamente. Dados demográficos, comorbidades e desfechos foram analisados.

Resultados Não houve alteração significativa nos casos de trombose venosa profunda (TVP) (1,6% versus 2,4%; p = 0,211). Houve um aumento nos casos de embolia pulmonar (EP) (0,2% versus 0,8%; p = 0,049).

Conclusão Apesar da implementação do protocolo de prevenção, não houve redução nos eventos estudados. A pequena incidência global faz com que novos estudos, com séries maiores, sejam necessários para confirmar ou descartar esses achados.

Aspirin for prevention of venous thromboembolism in recipients of major lower-limb orthopedic surgery: a systematic review of Level I evidence

INTRODUCTION

Major lower-limb orthopedic surgery recipients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The optimal strategy for preventing VTE is a topic of ongoing debate. The use of aspirin has been implicated in reducing VTE events and is potentially advantageous compared to other agents in respect to cost, access, route of administration and reduced adverse effects such as bleeding.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search for Level I evidence (systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised-controlled trials) was performed in April 2019 to evaluate the use of aspirin for primary and secondary VTE prophylaxis compared to alternative chemical and mechanical strategies. This search encompassed three electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). All references of included studies were screened for additional studies. Data was compiled and compared to the recommendations and guidelines published by major institutions. Included studies were appraised with the aid of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

In total, 21 studies were included. Interventions and outcomes identified were heterogeneous across studies. Most statistical tests applied found no difference between aspirin and other interventions in regards to deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, bleeding and mortality outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Aspirin may be a viable alternative to established thromboprophylactic regimes for primary prevention of VTE, however in the setting of secondary prevention it is generally less efficacious. Future studies should have clearly identified and comparable outcome measures, with direct comparisons and assessment of intervention combination, dosing and treatment duration.