Does flexion of the femoral implant in total knee arthroplasty increase knee flexion: a randomised controlled trial

Addressing sagittal plane imbalance in primary total knee arthroplasty

Aims

Sagittal plane imbalance (SPI), or asymmetry between extension and flexion gaps, is an important issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare SPI between kinematic alignment (KA), mechanical alignment (MA), and functional alignment (FA) strategies.

Methods

In 137 robotic-assisted TKAs, extension and flexion stressed gap laxities and bone resections were measured. The primary outcome was the proportion and magnitude of medial and lateral SPI (gap differential > 2.0 mm) for KA, MA, and FA. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of knees with severe (> 4.0 mm) SPI, and resection thicknesses for each technique, with KA as reference.

Results

FA showed significantly lower rates of medial and lateral SPI (2.9% and 2.2%) compared to KA (45.3%; p < 0.001, and 25.5%; p < 0.001) and compared to MA (52.6%; p < 0.001 and 29.9%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in medial and lateral SPI between KA and MA (p = 0.228 and p = 0.417, respectively). FA showed significantly lower rates of severe medial and lateral SPI (0 and 0%) compared to KA (8.0%; p < 0.001 and 7.3%; p = 0.001) and compared to MA (10.2%; p < 0.001 and 4.4%; p = 0.013). There was no difference in severe medial and lateral SPI between KA and MA (p = 0.527 and p = 0.307, respectively). MA resulted in thinner resections than KA in medial extension (mean difference (MD) 1.4 mm, SD 1.9; p < 0.001), medial flexion (MD 1.5 mm, SD 1.8; p < 0.001), and lateral extension (MD 1.1 mm, SD 1.9; p < 0.001). FA resulted in thinner resections than KA in medial extension (MD 1.6 mm, SD 1.4; p < 0.001) and lateral extension (MD 2.0 mm, SD 1.6; p < 0.001), but in thicker medial flexion resections (MD 0.8 mm, SD 1.4; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Mechanical and kinematic alignment (measured resection techniques) result in high rates of SPI. Pre-resection angular and translational adjustments with functional alignment, with typically smaller distal than posterior femoral resection, address this issue.

Relationship between the Femoral and Tibial Component Positions and Postoperative Knee Range of Motion after Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty in Varus-Aligned Knees

This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the femoral and tibial component positions and postoperative knee range of motion after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Forty-four patients (48 knees in total: 9 men, 9 knees; 35 women, 39 knees) who underwent posterior-stabilized TKA using a navigation system were included. The femoral and tibial component positions were measured from the preoperative and postoperative computed tomography data with three-dimensional evaluation software. We investigated the relationship between the knee range of motion, including extension restriction and maximum flexion angles at 2 years postoperatively, and the femoral and tibial component positions. Patients with knee extension restriction of 10° or more at 2 years postoperatively showed greater posterior flexion position of the tibial component than those with knee extension restriction less than 10° (6.2° and 3.9°, respectively, p=0.018). The postoperative knee flexion angle was positively associated with the internal rotational position of the femoral component (p=0.032, 95% confidence interval: 0.105-2.178). Patients with a knee flexion angle more than 120° at 2 years postoperatively had greater internal rotational position of the femoral component than those with 120° or less (5.2° and 1.5°, respectively, p=0.002). In conclusions, after posterior-stabilized TKA, the postoperative knee extension restriction angle was associated with the posterior flexion position of the tibial component, and the knee flexion angle was positively related to the internal rotational position of the femoral component.

Does mild flexion of the femoral prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty result in better early postoperative outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to measure the femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using three-dimensional reconstruction, and to assess the differences in early clinical efficacy between patients with different degrees of flexion.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study. From June 2019 to May 2021, 113 patients admitted for TKA due to osteoarthritis of the knee were selected. The patients' postoperative knee joints were reconstructed in three dimensions according to postoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) scans. The FPFA was measured, and the patients were divided into 4 groups: anterior extension group (FPFA < 0°), mildly flexed group (0° ≤ FPFA < 3°), moderately flexed group (3° ≤ FPFA < 6°) and excessively flexed group (6° ≤ FPFA). The differences in the Knee Society Score (KSS), knee Range of Motion (ROM), and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were measured and compared between the four groups at each postoperative time point.

RESULTS

Postoperative KSS, ROM, and VAS were significantly improved in all groups compared to the preoperative period. At 1 year postoperatively, the ROM was significantly greater in the mildly flexed group (123.46 ± 6.51°) than in the anterior extension group (116.93 ± 8.05°) and the excessively flexed group (118.76 ± 8.20°) (P < 0.05). The KSS was significantly higher in the mildly flexed group (162.68 ± 12.79) than in the other groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The higher KSS (174.17 ± 11.84) in the mildly flexed group was maintained until 1 year postoperatively, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05). No significant difference in VAS scores was observed between groups at each time point.

CONCLUSIONS

A femoral prosthesis flexion angle of 0-3° significantly improved postoperative knee mobility, and patients could obtain better Knee Society Scores after surgery, which facilitated the postoperative recovery of knee function.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ChiCTR2100051502, 2021/09/24.

Clinical three-dimensional anatomy of the femur considering navigation-aided surgery of total knee arthroplasty in Japanese patients

PURPOSE

Few studies exist regarding sagittal alignment describing femur morphology in navigation-aided surgery. This study investigated the three-dimensional (3D) sagittal femoral alignment of the whole femur.

METHODS

Seventy-three consecutive patients (59 females, 14 males, mean age: 76.1 years), yielding 140 femurs, were included in this study. A computed-tomography-based patient-specific 3D femur model was used to define a mechanical axis-based reference plane. Proximal and distal femoral axis angles (PFA, DFA) to the reference plane were measured in 3D using custom software. PFA and DFA represent the proximal and distal inclination of the femoral anatomical axis in sagittal plane, respectively.

RESULTS

PFA (10.6 ± 1.5°) was greater than DFA (2.6 ± 1.6°; P < 0.0001). DFA in females (2.3 ± 1.4°) was smaller than in males (3.9 ± 1.7°; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of measurement of femoral sagittal alignment related to both 3D anatomy and decision making of femoral flexion angle using navigation surgery for total knee arthroplasty. This report shows a robust DFA measurement that could be used as a template for femoral implants flexion angle when performing both conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty.

Sagittal mechanical ratio: A novel technique to define sagittal alignment of the femur independent of distal anatomic landmarks

BACKGROUND

Radiographic measurements to study sagittal alignment in the setting of knee are frequently difficult to evaluate due the presence of a prosthesis or implant that obscures traditional radiographic landmarks. In this paper we present a novel method of determining sagittal femoral alignment in the presence of obscuring implants.

METHODS

98 full-length femoral radiographs were reviewed and divided into two groups. In Group 1, the Distal Mechanical Point (DMP) was used to calculate the Distal Mechanical Ratio (DMR), defined as the ratio of the linear distance from the DMP to the anterior cortical axis divided by the distance from the anterior cortical axis to posterior condylar cortex. In group 2, the sagittal mechanical axis was measured using the true DMP (tDMP) and then separately measured using the DMR to find the calculated DMP (cDMP), and the angular variance between the calculated (cSMA) and true (tSMA) sagittal mechanical axis was calculated, as well as the linear distance between the tDMP and cDMP. Twenty additional patients with knee replacements were then selected and two observers used a cSMA to determine a femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA), with intraobserver correlation calculated.

RESULTS

The mean DMR was found to be 0.24, with high intraobserver correlation and normal distribution. Validation of the model demonstrated angular variance between tSMA and cSMA less than 1 degree and linear distance between tDMP and cDMP less than 1 mm. Calculation of cCMA in the presence of total knee arthroplasty revealed very strong intraobserver correlation of 0.89.

CONCLUSION

The Distal Mechanical Ratio reliably predicted the true Sagittal Mechanical Axis within 1 degree and true Distal Mechanical Point within 1 mm, indicating that it may be a valuable tool for evaluating sagittal femoral alignment in cases where anatomic landmarks may be absent or obscured.

Inaccuracy of the intramedullary femoral guide: traditional instrumentation lacks precision and accuracy

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to utilize a large-scale biomorphometric computer tomography (CT) database to determine the desirable starting point and angle for placement of the femoral intramedullary rod in the sagittal plane.

METHODS

A CT-based modeling and analytics system (SOMA, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ) was used to evaluate 1029 entire-femur CT scans. From this, 19,464 simulations were run to test whether a 20 cm intramedullary rod, with a radius of 4 mm, would successfully pass through the femoral canal before contacting cortical bone. First, modelling included varying angles from 0-6 degrees in the sagittal plane, at 1-degree intervals. Next, the start point was adjusted with an assumed 3 degrees of induced flexion in comparison to the mechanical axis.

RESULTS

A total of 5012 simulations were able to place the femoral intramedullary rod 20 cm into the canal. The angle of the rod that created the highest proportion of successful jig placement was at a 3-degree angle of induced flexion to the orthogonal plane of the transepicondylar axis (TEA), with 33.7% successful jig placements. The starting point for the greatest proportion of successful guide placements was 48.5% along the distance between the sTEA, slightly closer to the lateral side. In the AP plane, the average distance to the ideal start point was 12.1 mm anterior to the PCL.

CONCLUSION

By examining over a thousand femoral CT scans, an angle of 3 degrees of induced flexion was identified in the sagittal plane with the highest proportion of successful placement of an intramedullary rod before cortical contact. It is important to note the high rate of failure in completely inserting the 20 mm rod.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

This is a prospective computer based model.

A Flexible Intramedullary Guide Can Reduce the Anteroposterior Oversizing of Femoral Components Used in Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteoarthritis and Severe Distal Femoral Sagittal Bowing

Traditionally, a rigid intramedullary rod has been used as the reference guide for femoral cutting in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, correct positioning of this rigid rod is difficult, especially in the knees with severe distal femoral sagittal bowing. A flexible intramedullary rod has been developed to address this problem. This study was performed to compare the sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes of TKAs performed with flexible and rigid femoral intramedullary guides. Thirty-eight knees that underwent primary TKAs with flexible intramedullary rods as femoral cutting guides were matched according to patient height and sex with 38 knees that underwent TKAs using conventional rigid rods. Clinical outcomes, including the range of motion and functional scores, and radiological variables, including the distal femoral bowing angle (DFBA), femoral component flexion angle (FFA), and mediolateral overhang and anteroposterior (AP) oversizing of femoral components, were evaluated. Clinical and radiological outcomes did not differ significantly between the flexible rod and conventional rigid rod groups. A subgroup analysis of knees with severe distal femoral sagittal bowing (DFBA >4 degrees) showed that the FFA was significantly larger in the flexible rod group than in the rigid rod group, with an average difference of 3 degrees (5.2 ± 2.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.6 degrees, respectively, p = 0.022). In addition, the incidence of AP oversizing of femoral components was lower in the flexible rod group than in the rigid rod group (11.1 vs. 60.0%, respectively, p = 0.027). Relative to TKA with a rigid rod, TKA performed with a flexible femoral intramedullary guide resulted in more flexed sagittal alignment of femoral components in patients with severe distal femoral sagittal bowing. This greater flexion of the femoral component resulted in less AP oversizing. However, the use of a flexible rod had no impact on short-term clinical outcomes.

Is high flexion total knee arthroplasty a rewarding procedure? An updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study is to provide an updated meta-analysis comparing the benefits and clinical outcomes between high flexion (HF)-TKA and standard (S)-TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A detailed database analysis was carried out using Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and Clinicaltrial.gov, to identify eligible studies. The meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were performed using Review Manager 5.3 software and STATA 12.0.

RESULTS

Twenty-two randomized control trials (RCTs), including 2841 patients and 4268 knees, were eligible for the meta-analysis. The pooled results of subgroup analysis reveal that there was significant difference between HF-TKA and S-TKA in each subgroup in terms of postoperative ROM, with a higher degree of knee flexion for HF-TKA than S-TKA. However, no statistical difference was identified between HF-TKA and S-TKA in other clinical outcomes including various functional scores and complications.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this meta-analysis, we can recommended HF-TKA as an alternative choice to S-TKA for patients requiring higher knee flexion in their daily activities.

Influence of Variation in Sagittal Placement of the Femoral Component after Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Prosthetic alignment is an important factor for long-term survival in cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of sagittal placement of the femoral component on tibiofemoral (TF) kinematics and kinetics in CR-TKA. Five sagittal placements of femoral component models with -3, 0, 3, 5, and 7 degrees of flexion are developed. The TF joint kinematics, quadriceps force, patellofemoral contact force, and posterior cruciate ligament force are evaluated using the models under deep knee-bend loading. The kinematics of posterior TF translation is found to occur with the increase in femoral-component flexion. The quadriceps force and patellofemoral contact force decrease with the femoral-component flexion increase. In addition, extension of the femoral component increases with the increase in posterior cruciate ligament force. The flexed femoral component in CR-TKA provides a positive biomechanical effect compared with a neutral position. Slight flexion could be an effective alternative technique to enable positive biomechanical effects with TKA prostheses.

Sagittal Alignment of the Femoral Component and Patient Height Are Associated With Persisting Flexion Contracture After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of our retrospective case-control study is to identify risk factors associated with a persisting flexion contracture after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This is an important clinical issue as a flexion contraction can lead to poor long-term clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after TKA.

METHODS

The study group included 120 knees treated for a varus osteoarthritic deformity of the knee using a posterior cruciate-retaining TKA. We evaluated the association between a flexion contracture >10°, 2 years after surgery, and the following potential risk factors, using logistic regression analysis: age, body height, body mass index, preoperative knee extension and hip-knee-ankle angle, and radiological parameters of component alignment, namely the femoral component medial angle, the femoral component flexion angle (FFA), the tibial component medial angle, and the posterior tibial slope.

RESULTS

Of the 120 knees, a persisting flexion contracture >10° was identified in 33 (28%). The mean FFA in these cases was 7.3° (standard deviation, 1.4) compared to 4.2° (standard deviation, 1.2) for cases with a contracture of ≤10° (P = .034). On multivariate analysis, the FFA (odds ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-17.81; P = .034) and body height (odds ratio, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.57; P = .041) were independent predictive risk factors for a residual flexion contracture >10°.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians should be aware that flexed position of the femoral component, particularly in patients of short stature, is associated with increased occurrence of persistent flexion contracture.

Flexed femoral component improves kinematics and biomechanical effect in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The kinematics and biomechanics of the knee joint are important in ensuring patient satisfaction and functional ability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There has been no study on knee joint mechanics with regard to the sagittal alignment of the femoral component. The objective of this study is to determine the extent of the impact of the femoral component's sagittal alignment on kinematics and biomechanics.

METHODS

A validated computational TKA model was used. The femoral component was simulated at - 3°, 0°, 5°, and 7° of flexion in the sagittal plane. This study evaluated the tibiofemoral (TF) joint kinematics, contact point, quadriceps force, and contact stress on the patellofemoral (PF) joint under a deep-knee-bend condition.

RESULTS

The kinematics of the TF joint in the posterior direction increased with the flexion of the femoral component position. For all tasks, the overall posterior locations of the TF contact points were observed in the medial and lateral compartments as the femoral component flexion angle increased. The quadriceps force and contact stress on the PF joint decreased with the femoral component flexion.

CONCLUSION

This study found that the femoral component sagittal position is an important factor in knee joint mechanics. In this study, the flexion of femoral component showed a stable reconstruction of the knee extensors' mechanism. Surgeons may consider neutral-to-mild flexed femoral component position, without concerns of anterior notching of the femoral cortex.

An innovative three-dimensional method for identifying a proper femoral intramedullary entry point in total knee arthroplasty

Background:

Identification of the proper femoral intramedullary (IM) access point is an important determinant of final implant position in IM-guided total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to identify the optimal entry point in Chinese participants using a new three-dimensional method.

Methods:

A series of computed tomography scans of 44 femurs in Chinese participants from October 2014 to October 2015 were imported into Mimics 17.0 software to identify the optimal entry point. The apex of the intercondylar notch (AIN) was used as the reference bony anatomical landmark to identify the proper entry point to insert the IM rod. The statistical significance was calculated on the basis of a 5% level (P < 0.05) using the Student's t-test.

Results:

For the males, the average ideal entry point was 1.49 mm medial and 13.39 mm anterior to the AIN. The values were 1.77 mm medial and 15.29 mm anterior to the AIN in females. A significant difference was present between males and females (13.39 ± 2.46 mm vs. 15.29 ± 3.44 mm, t = 2.124, P = 0.040). When using the recommended location as the entry point for the IM rod, the mean potential error differed significantly from the femoral trochlear groove (the potential error of IM in males in coronal plane: 0.93° ± 0.24° vs. 1.27° ± 0.32°, t = −4.166, P < 0.001; the potential error of IM in males in sagittal plane: 1.40° ± 0.42° vs. 2.79° ± 0.70°, t = −7.155, P < 0.001; the potential error of IM in females in coronal plane: 0.73° ± 0.28° vs. 1.15° ± 0.35°, t = −3.940, P < 0.001; and the potential error of IM in females in sagittal plane: 1.48° ± 0.47° vs. 2.76° ± 0.83°, t = −5.574, P < 0.001). A significant difference was present between the recommended point and the point 10 mm anterior to the origin of the posterior cruciate ligament (the potential error of IM in males in coronal plane: 0.93° ± 0.24° vs. 1.53° ± 0.43°, t = −5.948, P < 0.001; the potential error of IM in males in sagittal plane: 1.40° ± 0.42° vs. 2.15° ± 0.75°, t = −3.152, P = 0.003; the potential error of IM in females in coronal plane: 0.73° ± 0.28° vs. 1.28° ± 0.42°, t = −4.632, P < 0.001; and the potential error of IM in females in sagittal plane: 1.48° ± 0.47° vs. 2.40° ± 0.93°, t = −3.763, P = 0.001).

Conclusions:

The technique described here is an innovative method for swift, easy, and accurate access to the medullary canal during TKA, and it can optimize the position and orientation of the prosthetic components in knee arthroplasty.

Bone-femoral component interface gap after sagittal mechanical axis alignment is filled with new bone after cementless total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively evaluated the fate of mismatch between an uncemented femoral component and each femoral cut surface (i.e., wedge-shaped gap) relative to sagittal mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Primary TKA was performed on 99 consecutive knees. The femoral components were aligned to the sagittal mechanical axis with CT-based navigation. All patients were assessed with postoperative true lateral radiographs. Bone-side surfaces of the uncemented femoral component were divided into five zones: anterior flange, anterior chamfer, posterior chamfer, posterior part, and distal part, which were defined as zones 1 to 5, respectively. Bone filling of wedge-shaped gaps in each zone was evaluated after 1 year.

RESULTS

Femoral anterior notching did not occur. However, wedge-shaped gaps were observed in at least one zone in 23 of 99 knees (23%), most frequently in zone 5 (18%). There were 9 and 7 gaps in zones 1 and 2, respectively. The femoral component showed malpositioning of approximately 3° of flexion in cases with wedge-shaped gaps in zones 2 and/or 5. After one year, 67% (6/9) of zone 1, 100% (7/7) of zone 2, and 94% (17/18) of zone 5 wedge-shaped gaps were filled in with new bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral alignment relative to sagittal mechanical axis caused wedge-shaped gaps due to unstable anterior bone cutting through hard bone, but the small gaps were not clinically significant and filled in within one year. Sagittal setting of the femoral component should aim for the anatomical axis rather than the mechanical axis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Flexing and downsizing the femoral component is not detrimental to patellofemoral biomechanics in posterior-referencing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

When downsizing the femoral component to prevent mediolateral overhang, notching of the anterior femoral cortex may occur, which could be solved by flexing the femoral component. In this study, we investigated the effect of flexion of the femoral component on patellar tendon moment arm, patellofemoral forces and kinematics in posterior-referencing CR-TKA. Our hypothesis was that flexion of the femoral component increases the patellar tendon moment arm, reduces the patellofemoral forces and provides stable kinematics.

METHODS

A validated musculoskeletal model of CR-TKA was used. The flexion of the femoral component was increased in four steps (0°, 3°, 6°, 9°) using posterior referencing, and different alignments were analysed in combination with three implant sizes (3, 4, 5). A chair-rising trial was analysed using the model, while simultaneously estimating quadriceps muscle force, patellofemoral contact force, tibiofemoral and patellofemoral kinematics.

RESULTS

Compared to the reference case (size 4 and 0° flexion), for every 3° of increase in flexion of the femoral component the patellar tendon moment arm increased by 1% at knee extension. The peak quadriceps muscle force and patellofemoral contact force decreased by 2%, the patella shifted 0.8 mm more anteriorly and the remaining kinematics remained stable, with knee flexion. With the smaller size, the patellar tendon moment arm decreased by 6%, the quadriceps muscle force and patellofemoral contact force increased by 8 and 12%, and the patellar shifted 5 mm more posteriorly. Opposite trends were found with the bigger size.

CONCLUSION

Flexing the femoral component with posterior referencing reduced the patellofemoral contact forces during a simulated chair-rising trial with a patient-specific musculoskeletal model of CR-TKA. There seems to be little risk when flexing and downsizing the femoral component, compared to when using a bigger size and neutral alignment. These findings provide relevant information to surgeons who wish to prevent anterior notching when downsizing the femoral component.

Clinical outcomes of kinesio taping applied in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare kinesio taping along with conventional treatment to conventional treatment alone and to report the results of both a single and repetitive kinesio taping application applied on quadriceps femoris and hamstring muscles on pain, range of motion, muscle strength, and functional status in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Fifty-four patients with knee osteoarthritis were randomly allocated to two groups. A total of 28 patients were included in kinesio taping group, others were included in the control group. Before and after intervention, pain was measured with visual analog scale, range of motion was measured with universal goniometer, muscle strength was measured with dynamometer, and functional status was measured with Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant improvements in measures of pain, range of motion, quadriceps muscle strength and functional status between pre- and post-treatment in both groups (p< 0.05). In comparison, there were no significant differences with these parameters between groups (p> 0.05). It was also found that significant difference was observed in terms of range of motion, pain, functional status between pre-treatment and post-taping in intervention group (p< 0.017).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we could report that kinesio taping has significant immediate effects after a single kinesio taping application on range of motion, pain and functional status in patients with knee osteoarthritis. We could also report that KT in addition to conventional treatment is not superior to conventional treatment alone in terms of clinical outcomes over 3 weeks later.

Morphological evaluation of the sagittal plane femoral load-bearing surface in computer-simulated virtual total knee arthroplasty implantation at different flexion angles

PURPOSE

To examine the effect of implantation of the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system in 0°, 3°, and 6° of flexion on the sagittal plane morphology of the femoral load-bearing surfaces. It was hypothesized that increasing the flexion angle would result in undersizing of the anterior surface without changing the flexion gap.

METHODS

Computer simulation of a TKA using three-dimensional models of 10 healthy knees, matched to three different sized femoral components. Size discrepancy in the sagittal plane anterior, distal, and posterior joint surfaces between the native and prosthetic knees was calculated at 0°, 3°, and 6° of flexion.

RESULTS

The required component size varied with the angle of implantation: 0°, size 3/size 4 (N = 7/3), 3°, size 3 (N = 10); and 6°, size 2/size 3 (N = 4/6). Component undersizing ranged between 4.4-6.3 mm at the anterior lateral surface, with a significant difference between 0° and 6° (p < 0.05), and 1.2-3.5 mm at the anterior medial surface. Component oversizing of the distal surface of the lateral condyle (2.9 mm) and undersizing of the medial surface of the posterior condyle (1.6-2.3 mm) were comparable at all three flexion angles of component implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the flexion angle of implantation increased the incidence of using a smaller size of femoral component without significant interference with the flexion gap. However, the effect of a smaller femoral component on undersizing of the anterior surface of the condyle and the impact on the extensor mechanism need to be considered.

Influence of sagittal plane component alignment on kinematics after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Knee kinematics is pivotal to patient satisfaction and functional ability after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study is to examine the influence of sagittal plane component alignment as defined by femoral component angle (FCA), tibial slope (TS) and posterior condylar offset (PCO) on knee kinematics as defined by maximum extension angle (MEA), maximum flexion angle (MFA) and range of motion (ROM) after TKA.

METHODS

This is a prospective, cross-sectional study of 105 osteoarthritic knees that underwent primary cruciate retaining TKA using a single implant design at a single tertiary institution. The sagittal plane component alignment was measured on weight-bearing true lateral radiographs taken day one post-operation and knee kinematics measured using a goniometer 1 year after TKA by the primary investigator.

RESULTS

Although the MFA was influenced by gender (P = 0.04); age, gender and pre-operative kinematics did not otherwise influence post-operative knee kinematics. The prediction model for MFA was statistically significant (P = 0.03) and accounted for 8.4 % of the variance. FCA (r = 0.3, P = 0.01) and PCO (r = 0.2, P = 0.05) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with MFA. However, the prediction models for ROM and MEA did not achieve statistical significance. FCA (r = 0.2, P = 0.02) demonstrated a statistically significant correlation with ROM.

CONCLUSION

The most important findings of this study are that the FCA demonstrates weak positive correlation with MFA and ROM and that PCO demonstrates weak positive correlation with MFA. However, TS does not contribute significantly to knee kinematics after TKA. This is clinically relevant as orthopaedic surgeons can increase the PCO in cruciate retaining TKA and the FCA within therapeutic limits to improve knee kinematics.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Effect of posterior condylar offset on clinical results after posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of the posterior condylar offset (PCO) on clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a high-flex posterior-stabilized (PS) fixed-bearing prosthesis.

METHODS

We prospectively studied the clinical and radiographic materials of 89 consecutive female patients (89 knees), who had undergone primary TKAs for end-stage osteoarthritis. All operations were performed by a single senior surgeon or under his supervision using the same operative technique. Based on the corrected PCO change, we divided all cases into two groups: group A (corrected PCO change ≥0 mm, 58 knees) and group B (corrected PCO change<0 mm, 31 knees). One-year postoperatively, clinical and radiographic variables from the two groups were compared by independent t-test. The associations between the corrected PCO changes and the improvements of clinical variables in all patients were analyzed by Pearson linear correlation.

RESULTS

One-year postoperatively, the Knee Society Scores, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, non-weight-bearing active and passive range of knee flexion, flexion contracture, extensor lag, and their improvements had no statistical differences between the two groups (all p>0.05). The corrected PCO change was not significantly correlated with the improvement of any clinical variable (all p>0.05). Group A demonstrated greater flexion than group B during active weight bearing (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Restoration of PCO plays an important role in the optimization of active knee flexion during weight-bearing conditions after posterior-stabilized TKA, while it has no benefit to non-weight-bearing knee flexion or any other clinical result.

Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods

PURPOSE

The intraoperative sagittal cutting block alignment when intramedullary alignment rods are used was investigated. Its absolute orthogonal orientation in relation to the mechanical femoral axis should be analysed. It was hypothesized that (1) alignment rods do not ensure a desired deviation within a range between 0° and 3° flexion as it has been shown to be favourable for clinical and functional outcome. Further, the degree of flexion cannot be (2) foreseen by the surgeon or (3) estimated by clinical or radiological parameters.

METHODS

Forty knees allocated to total knee arthroplasty were included. The distal femoral cutting block was aligned using an intramedullary rod. By means of a navigation device, the sagittal alignment of the cutting block in degrees of flexion was measured.

RESULTS

The mean measured flexion of the cutting block was 4.4° (3.6 SD). Twenty-five per cent (10/40) of the values were within a corridor between 0° and 3° of flexion. The mean difference between expected and measured flexion was -1.5° (-7.6 to 4.7 95 % limits of agreement). The dorsoventral diameter of the distal femur showed a significant influence on measured flexion (R (2) = 0.112, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary alignment rods used in the present study do not ensure a distal cutting block alignment between 0° and 3° of flexion in relation to the femoral mechanical axis. The extent of flexion could not be foreseen either by the surgeon. The dorsoventral diameter of the distal femur correlated with measured flexion. However, only limited data is available on influence of femoral component flexion on implant failure or clinical and functional outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II.

Tibiofemoral Rotation During Sit-to-Stand Activity After TKA

The objective of this study was to describe how tibiofemoral internal/external rotation varies in patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when compared with control participants during a sit-to-stand (STS) maneuver. Motion analysis was used to measure internal/external knee rotation during STS in the control and TKA groups. Fourteen participants were included in the study. Six patients with 7 TKA knees (6 posterior stabilized and 1 cruciate-retaining TKA) were compared with 8 control participants with 8 knees from the current authors' laboratory database. Participants performed 3 STS maneuvers, and the average internal/external rotation of the femur with respect to the tibia was compared. All control participants and 2 TKA participants had internal rotation of the femur with respect to the tibia, whereas 4 TKA participants had external rotation, and 1 had no rotation during STS. Further investigation into the surgical and patient- and implant-related factors that affect this resulting reverse kinematic profile seems to be warranted. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(3):S41-S44.].

Influence of preoperative factors on the gain in flexion after total knee arthroplasty

Final flexion mobility after a total knee arthroplasty is an important factor in patient comfort. Some patients gain in flexion mobility, others do not. Is it possible to identify the clinical factors related to the patient that predicted the final gain in flexion?

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study directed by the Société française de la hanche et du genou (SFHG) was conducted on 1601 cases of total knee arthroplasty that had presented no complications and a minimal follow-up of 2 years. The gain in flexion was assessed by the difference between the preoperative and the final range of flexion. The range of the gain in flexion was tested based on eight factors: age, gender, etiology, body mass index, frontal deformity, preoperative flexum deformity and four levels of preoperative mobility: < 90°, 90°-109°, 110°-129°, and ≥ 130°.

RESULTS

A mean gain in flexion of 8.4°±14° was found for the overall series. In 66% of cases, we found an increase of flexion and in 19% a loss of flexion. In cases with BMI higher than 35, varus deformity with an HKA angle<166°, or flessum greater than 5°, the gain in flexion was significantly higher. A significantly different gain in flexion (P<0.0001) was found in the four levels of preoperative flexion: the greatest gain in flexion was found in the "<90°" group, then this gain was less in the next two groups, to become a significant decrease in the "≥130°" group. A decrease in flexion was noted in 51% of the cases in the latter group. Other factors such as age, sex, and etiology had no influence on the gain in flexion.

DISCUSSION

After TKA, a gain in flexion was often noted. The amount of gain depended on the preoperative range of flexion: the lower this level was, the more flexion increased. The presence of a varus deformity, morbid obesity, or flessum was associated with greater gain in flexion, even if the final flexion was lower than the mean flexion in the overall population. The search for these factors made it possible to predict a gain in flexion and discuss this with the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Multicenter retrospective study.

No Superiority of High-Flexion vs Standard Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Update Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This meta-analysis was performed using a Cochrane systematic review approach to examine published data with an aim to clarify whether standard or high flexion prostheses increase the range of knee motion and clinical outcomes. 1778 patients from 17 randomized controlled trials were identified. No significant differences in the range of motion, weight-bearing flexion and hip functions scores were found between treatment groups. We also found no significant differences in complications with regard to revision, component loosening, deep infection, anterior knee pain, stiffness, post-operative bone fracture and post-operative patella clunk syndrome, but the high flexion prostheses group had a higher incidence of deep venous thrombosis. The results do not support the proposition that high flexion knee prostheses provide substantial clinical advantages over standard knee prostheses.

What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Surgeon-dependent factors such as optimal implant alignment are thought to play a significant role in outcome following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Exact definitions and references for optimal alignment are, however, still being debated. This overview of the literature describes different definitions of component alignment following primary TKA for (1) tibiofemoral alignment in the AP plane, (2) tibial and femoral component placement in the AP plane, (3) tibial and femoral component placement in the sagittal plane, and (4) rotational alignment of tibial and femoral components and their role in outcome and implant survival.

METHODS

We performed a literature search for original and review articles on implant positioning following primary TKA. Definitions for coronal, sagittal, and rotational placement of femoral and tibial components were summarized and the influence of positioning on survival and functional outcome was considered.

RESULTS

Many definitions exist when evaluating placement of femoral and tibial components. Implant alignment plays a role in both survival and functional outcome following primary TKA, as component malalignment can lead to increased failure rates, maltracking, and knee pain.

INTERPRETATION

Based on currently available evidence, surgeons should aim for optimal alignment of tibial and femoral components when performing TKA.