A new technique using mesh for extensor reconstruction after proximal tibial resection

Survival and functional outcomes after hemiarthroplasty in children with proximal tibial osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for correcting limb-length discrepancy after limb-salvage reconstruction for proximal tibial osteosarcoma in children have several limitations. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility, complications, prognosis, and clinical outcomes of reconstruction using hemiarthroplasty after tumor resection in pediatric patients with proximal tibial osteosarcoma.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive retrospective analysis of the data of pediatric patients with osteosarcoma of the proximal tibia who underwent surgery between December 2008 and November 2018 at our center. We enrolled 49 consecutive patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty. The cruciate ligaments of all patients were reconstructed using special spacers, and the medial and lateral collateral ligaments of the knee and joint capsule were reconstructed using a mesh. Postoperatively, if the unequal length of both lower limbs exceeded 4 cm or knee instability occurred, a second-stage surgery was performed for limb lengthening and replacing the distal femoral prosthesis. We analyzed the oncological prognosis, complications of hemiarthroplasty, postoperative stability, and postoperative function.

RESULTS

The follow-up period ranged between 11 and 159 months, with a median of 84 (62, 129) months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 83.2%. Thirty-nine patients survived at the end of the follow-up period with 34 prostheses (87.2%). The overall prosthesis survival rate was 87.4% after 5 years, indicating the long-term benefits of the procedure. Limb length was measured in 28 adult patients. The average limb-length discrepancy was 33 ± 15 mm with a median of 33 mm (21, 47); the femur and tibia caused a discrepancy of 8.5 ± 9.9 mm and 24.8 ± 15.5 mm, respectively. The patients had 30-135° of knee motion, with a mean of 82 ± 24°. The femoral tibial angle was greater on the affected side than on the healthy side, with a mean difference of 4.5°±3.6°. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was 25 ± 3. Five patients underwent second-stage distal femoral prosthesis replacement, with mean MSTS scores of 24 ± 2 and 28 ± 1 before and after second-stage surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemiarthroplasty in children reduces limb-length discrepancy in adulthood by rebuilding cruciate ligaments, lateral collateral ligaments, and the joint capsule, thereby improving knee stability.

Comparison of reconstructive techniques for nonprimary malignancies in the proximal humerus

BACKGROUND

Endoprostheses (EPC) are often utilized for reconstruction of the proximal humerus with either hemiarthroplasty (HA) or reverse arthroplasty (RA) constructs. RA constructs have improved outcomes in patients with primary lesions, but no studies have compared techniques in metastatic disease. The aim of this study is to compare functional outcomes and complications between HA and RA constructs in patients undergoing endoprosthetic reconstruction for proximal humerus metastases.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed our institutional arthroplasty database to identify 66 (56% male; 38 HA and 28 RA) patients with a proximal humerus reconstruction for a non-primary malignancy. The majority (88%) presented with pathologic fracture, and the most common diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma (48%).

RESULTSS

Patients with RA reconstructions had better postoperative forward elevation (74° vs. 32°, p < 0.01) and higher functional outcome scores. HA patients had more complications (odds ratio 13, p < 0.01), with instability being the most common complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with nonprimary malignancies of the proximal humerus had improved functional outcomes and fewer complications after undergoing reconstruction with a reverse EPC compared to a HA EPC. Preference for reverse EPC should be given in patients with good prognosis and ability to complete postoperative rehabilitation.

Management of Pathologic Fractures around the Knee: Part 2-Proximal Tibia

Metastatic disease affecting the proximal tibia is rarer than disease affecting the femur; however, it presents unique challenges that the orthopaedic surgeon must address to ensure successful outcomes and return the patient to an ambulatory status. The essential workup for evaluating and treating these patients is addressed briefly in this review as a summary of the information is provided in part 1 of this series. Part 2 of this series will focus on the surgical treatment of these lesions, which can be complex and is not as well described in the literature. Procedures ranging from open reduction internal fixation with cement augmentation to complex endoprosthetic reconstruction can be employed to address proximal tibia metastatic disease. An awareness of these various treatment modalities allows the orthopaedic surgeon to plan the most effective operation for the patients under their care.

Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism augmented with reverse transferred iliotibial band after proximal tibia tumor resection and mega-prosthetic replacement

BACKGROUND

The optimal procedure for functional reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after proximal tibia mega-prosthetic replacement remains unclear.

METHODS

Since 2006, 14 consecutive patients with aggressive bone tumors in the proximal tibia who underwent mega-prosthetic replacement were prospectively treated with reconstruction of the extensor mechanism using an ipsilateral iliotibial band. The surgical procedure consisted of wrapping the reversed iliotibial band around the tibia component, firmly suturing it to the remaining patellar tendon and tibialis anterior fascia, and covering it with a muscle flap. At the last follow up, the function was assessed based on extensor lag, active flexion of the knee, and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Patellar height was measured with the Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR) preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow up.

RESULTS

At the last follow up, the extensor lag and active flexion in 14 patients averaged 2.5° and 86°, respectively. Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score could be obtained in nine surviving patients at the last follow up and was a mean of 20.7 points. The mean ISR preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the last follow up was 1.04, 0.75, and 0.89, respectively. The extensor lag was not associated with the ISR value at any points, while reduced active flexion significantly correlated with a low ISR at the last follow up (P = 0.015). Four patients underwent additional surgeries due to postoperative infection, but none required eventual revision or amputation.

CONCLUSION

The extensor mechanism reconstruction with the reverse transferred iliotibial band for mega-prosthetic replacement after proximal tibia resection yielded reliable outcomes with functional benefit to stabilize active knee extension.

Functional and radiologic results of extensor mechanism reconstruction methods following proximal tibial modular endoprosthetic reconstructions: Direct versus medical textile augmented reattachment

BACKGROUND

Following proximal tibial resection and modular endoprosthetic reconstruction, extensor mechanism can be reconstructed with different techniques. This study compares direct reattachment (DR) with medical textile augmented reattachment (MTAR) methods in terms of functional results and radiological results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients (34 male, 21 female) operated between 1990 and 2015 with a minimum follow up of 24 months in a single center were evaluated retrospectively. The median age was 18 years (range: 9-64). The reconstruction was performed via MTAR (polypropylene mesh, Trevira) in 23 patients and DR in 32 patients. Incidence and degree of extension lag, degree of flexion and development of postoperative patella alta were evaluated at 3, 6 and 24 months.

RESULTS

The mean follow up was 78.5 months. Extension lag incidence at 24 months was 71.9% in the DR group compared with 43.5% in the MTAR group (P < 0.05).Theextensionlagratiosat 24 months in DR was 0-5° in 8.7% (n = 2), 6-10° in 21.7% (n = 5), 11-15° in 17.4% (n = 4) and > 15° in 52.2% (n = 12), respectively. Extension lag ratios at 24 months in MTAR were 0-5° in 12.5% (n = 4), 6-10° in 6.3% (n = 2), 11-15° in 6.3% (n = 2) and > 15° in 6.3% (n = 2). The mean MSTS score in DR group was 20.7 compared with 23.2 in the MTAR group (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

MTAR is associated with a lower incidence as well as a lower degree of extension lag. The flexion range and the incidence of patella alta are not statistically different between the groups. MSTS scores of MTAR group are significantly higher than DR group at 2-year follow up.

The results of patellar stainless steel wire extensor mechanism reconstruction in proximal tibial tumour excision mega-prosthesis surgeries for proximal tibial sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Extensor mechanism function after a proximal tibial tumour excision is the major determining factor for the limb function. However, problems of extensor lag, delayed healing and poor functional outcomes exist with the previous methods of its reconstruction. We describe a novel technique of using a patellar stainless steel (SS) wire to reconstruct the extensor apparatus of the knee in non-porous coated implants and examine the functional outcome and associated complications.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analytical interventional study. Twenty-six patients operated between 2011 and 2019 were included. Extensor lag measured at 6 months and 12 months postoperative, total range of motion at 12 months and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at the final visit were retrieved. Complications that occurred during the follow up period were noted. Patellar position was measured using comparative patellar-position-ratio.

RESULTS

Mean extensor lag at 6 months was 18.5° which improved to 8.7° at 12 months. Patellar malposition and deep infection were found to be the causes of poor functional outcome. A patellar-position-ratio between 0.9 and 1.1 led to a well-functioning extensor apparatus. Four patients underwent above-knee amputations. Deep infection and amputations reduced the MSTS score. An SS wire give way after 6 months did not affect the extensor power. A medial gastrocnemius flap reduced the infection rates.

CONCLUSION

Patellar SS wiring is an effective technique for reconstructing the knee extensor apparatus following a proximal tibial tumour excision mega-prosthesis. Proper position of the SS wire prevents wire-related complications. For a well-functioning extensor apparatus, use of a gastrocnemius flap cover intra-operatively is pertinent along with lack of infection for a pain-free, stable and mobile limb.

Outcomes of major musculoskeletal oncological reconstructions using prolene mesh-a retrospective analysis from a tertiary referral centre

BACKGROUND

Adequate reconstruction of the soft tissue defect following resection of bone tumors is challenging. Prolene mesh, despite being a useful tool, is not widely used due to the fear of deep infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional outcome and complications of using a Prolene mesh in oncological reconstructions.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in bone tumor patients with soft tissue reconstruction using Prolene mesh between January 2017 and June 2019. Functional evaluation was done using MSTS 93 score. Complications were recorded and were classified as mechanical (dislocation and extension lag) or biological failure (wound problems and deep infection). Comparison was performed between groups with and without biological failure to identify predictive variables.

RESULTS

Of 116 patients, 68 were males and 48 were females, with median age of 22.5 years. Thirty nine patients had tumors of proximal tibia, 23 of proximal femur, 25 of proximal humerus, 24 of pelvis, and five tumors at other sites. Approximately two-thirds (62.9%) of our patients underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction while the rest underwent either biological or cement spacer reconstructions. Excellent or good functional outcomes were reported in 98.3% patients as per MSTS 93 scoring. Complications were noted in 22 patients (18.9%), of which 16 had biological failure, with four patients requiring debridement and mesh removal. Dislocation of prosthesis occurred in 2 patients of proximal femur replacement. Overall re-surgery rate was 5.1% (6 patients). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with or without biological failure with respect to demographics, site of tumor, type of procedure, blood loss, duration of surgery and history of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Prolene mesh is a useful tool to reconstruct the soft tissue defects following bone tumor resections. It is readily available, reliable and provides reproducible results, with no added risk of wound complications.

Use of hamstring autograft to reconstruct the patellar tendon after endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for bone sarcomas

The surgical treatment of bone sarcoma involves wide surgical resection and endoprosthetic replacement. Surgical resection for proximal tibia bone sarcoma includes the patellar tendon. The secondary extension lag is a common complication and, although many have been described, the options for reconstruction of the patellar tendon are suboptimal. We propose adding a biological reinforcement, the hamstring tendons, to our extensor mechanism reconstruction technique (polyprolene mesh and gastrocnemius flap). We describe the surgical technique and, using an illustrative case, compare the outcome of this technique with the outcome following reconstruction without reinforcement. Level of evidence: Level III.

Proximal Tibial Reconstruction After Tumor Resection: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

The proximal part of the tibia is a common location for primary bone tumors, and many options for reconstruction exist following resection. This anatomic location has a notoriously high complication rate, and each available reconstruction method is associated with unique risks and benefits. The most commonly utilized implants are metallic endoprostheses, osteoarticular allografts, and allograft-prosthesis composites. There is a current lack of data comparing the outcomes of these reconstructive techniques in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review of peer-reviewed observational studies evaluating outcomes after proximal tibial reconstruction was conducted, including both aggregate and pooled data sets and utilizing a Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) review for quality assessment. Henderson complications, amputation rates, implant survival, and functional outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,643 patients were identified from 29 studies, including 1,402 patients who underwent reconstruction with metallic endoprostheses, 183 patients who underwent reconstruction with osteoarticular allografts, and 58 patients who underwent with reconstruction with allograft-prosthesis composites. The mean follow-up times were 83.5 months (range, 37.3 to 176 months) for the metallic endoprosthesis group, 109.4 months (range, 49 to 234 months) for the osteoarticular allograft group, and 88.8 months (range, 49 to 128 months) for the allograft-prosthesis composite reconstruction group. The mean patient age per study ranged from 13.5 to 50 years. Patients with metallic endoprostheses had the lowest rates of Henderson Type-1 complications (5.1%; p < 0.001), Type-3 complications (10.3%; p < 0.001), and Type-5 complications (5.8%; p < 0.001), whereas, on aggregate data analysis, patients with an osteoarticular allograft had the lowest rates of Type-2 complications (2.1%; p < 0.001) and patients with an allograft-prosthesis composite had the lowest rates of Type-4 complications (10.2%; p < 0.001). The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores were highest in patients with an osteoarticular allograft (26.8 points; p < 0.001). Pooled data analysis showed that patients with a metallic endoprosthesis had the lowest rates of sustaining any Henderson complication (23.1%; p = 0.009) and the highest implant survival rates (92.3%), and patients with an osteoarticular allograft had the lowest implant survival rates at 10 years (60.5%; p = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoarticular allograft appears to lead to higher rates of Henderson complications and amputation rates when compared with metallic endoprostheses. However, functional outcomes may be higher in patients with osteoarticular allograft. Further work is needed using higher-powered randomized controlled trials to definitively determine the superiority of one reconstructive option over another. In the absence of such high-powered evidence, we encourage individual surgeons to choose reconstructive options based on personal experience and expertise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The role of mesh technology with tumor prosthesis reconstruction to reconstruct the extensor mechanism of knee joint after resection of proximal tibial tumors

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of mesh technique in the reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after resection of proximal tibial tumors.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 14 patients who were diagnosed with proximal tibial tumors at our center and reconstructed with tumor prosthesis, gastrocnemius muscle, and mesh between 2012 and 2017. The treatment strategies for patellar tendon reconstruction primarily involve gastrocnemius reconstruction to cover the tumor prosthesis and mesh reconstruction for the patellar ligament.

RESULTS

Among the 14 patients, the mean was 1.57° (range 0-12°) for active extension versus 105.00° (range 80-120°) for active flexion. The mean for passive extension was 0°. The passive flexion mean was 115.00° (range 90-120°). The extensor lag averaged 1.57° (range 0-12°), and the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score (MSTS) was 23.57 (range 19-27). The average follow-up for all patients was 23.50 months (range 14-37). During the recent follow-up, all patients were able to walk without crutches. Two patients underwent above-the-knee amputation for local recurrence of the tumor, and lung metastasis occurred in three patients after operation. There were no postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Extensor lag was remarkably reduced in the surgery group in comparison to previous study reports. Surgical resection is a simple, reliable, and effective method to remove and control the tumor. Mesh reconstruction of patellar ligament is effective to reconstruct the extensor mechanism of the knee after excision of tumor.

Reconstructive Science in Orthopedic Oncology

Limb salvage is widely practiced as standard of care in most cases of extremity bone sarcoma. Allograft and endoprosthesis reconstructions are the most widely utilized modalities for the reconstruction of large segment defects, however complication rates remain high. Aseptic loosening and infection remain the most common modes of failure. Implant integration, soft-tissue function, and infection prevention are crucial for implant longevity and function. Macro and micro alterations in implant design are reviewed in this manuscript. Tissue engineering principles using nanoparticles, cell-based, and biological augments have been utilized to develop implant coatings that improve osseointegration and decrease infection. Similar techniques have been used to improve the interaction between soft tissues and implants. Tissue engineered constructs (TEC) used in combination with, or in place of, traditional reconstructive techniques may represent the next major advancement in orthopaedic oncology reconstructive science, although preclinical results have yet to achieve durable translation to the bedside.

Extensor reconstruction of the knee using the fibular transposition technique after proximal tibial resection

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the extensor mechanism after resection of the proximal tibia is challenging, and several surgical procedures are available. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcome of the fibular transposition technique for reconstruction of the extensor mechanism of the knee after proximal tibial resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed five consecutive patients who underwent resection of the proximal tibia with prosthetic reconstruction and reconstruction of the extensor using fibular transposition between 1997 and 2011. There were two female and three male patients with a mean age of 50years (range, 27 to 76years). A follow-up evaluation included both passive and active range of motion, extensor lag, the MSTS score and complications.

RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 93months (range, 44 to 160months). The mean extensor lag and active flexion were four degrees (range, 0 to 10°) and 103° (range, 85 to 110°), respectively. The mean MSTS score was 80% (range, 73 to 90%). All patients were able to ambulate without crutches at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of the fibular transposition technique is a simple, reliable, and successful procedure for extensor reconstruction after proximal tibial resection.

Reconstruction of patellar tendon following implantation of proximal tibia megaprosthesis for the treatment of post-traumatic septic bone defects

INTRODUCTION

Latest advances made in joint replacement implants allows reconstruction of entire limbs. These special prostheses or megaprostheses were originally designed for the treatment of severe oncological bone loss. Nowadays, however, the indications and applications of these devices are expanding to other orthopaedic and trauma clinical conditions. Since 2008 we have implanted 152 megaprostheses in non-oncological conditions: 87 were implanted for post-traumatic failures aseptic/septic (represented by complex non-unions and critical size bone defects); 26 total femur, 52 distal femur and 9 proximal tibia. In this group of patients bone and soft tissues conditions are completely different compared to patients with oncological back ground. The presence of infection and previous surgeries can lead to adhesion, scar interference, muscular and tendon impairment and skin problems that lead to reduced function and severe joint stiffness. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of treatment of reconstruction of patellar tendon during implantation of proximal tibia megaprosthesis for the treatment of septic post traumatic critical bone defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, we evaluated 9 patients treated with proximal tibia megaprosthesis who underwent patellar tendon reconstruction. All patients presented a complete patellar tendon disruption at the time of prosthesis implantation. Procedures of reconstruction included a tendon-plasty of quadriceps and/or patellar tendons, a pie crusting of quadriceps fascia, a reinforcement of the apparatus with synthetic tendon graft substitutes (LARS) and a medial gastrocnemius muscular flap to reconstruct the extensor mechanism and obtain skin coverage when needed. The average follow up was 18 months (9-36). For each of the cases, we analysed the complications occurred regarding septic recurrence, patellar fracture, quadriceps and patellar tendon rupture and number of reinterventions. The clinical outcome was assessed by the WOMAC Score.

RESULTS

In all cases there was no infection recurrence or skin related problems. None of the patients require prosthesis revision due to loosening or device failure. No patellar fracture or quadriceps tendon failure was recorded. One patient presented a rupture of the reconstructed patellar tendon due to a trauma incident 18 months after the implantation and he required revision surgery. From a clinical point of view the average WOMAC score was 62.4 at 1 month rising to 72.6 at 3 months, 78.2 at 6 months, 76.4 at 1 year and 74.8 at 18 months.

CONCLUSION

When proximal tibia megaprosthesis is implanted and there are soft tissue and patellar tendon deficiency, soft tissue reconstruction can be achieved by appropriate lengthening of the tendon and a gastrocnemius flap reinforced by LARS. Such an approach allows restoration of the extensor mechanism and coverage of the prosthesis in an area where skin problems are frequently very common.