Return to activity among athletes with a symptomatic bipartite patella: a systematic review

Accessory fragment migration in a professional baseball player with bipartite patella: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Bipartite patella (BP) is usually recognized as an incidental radiographic finding. Therefore, no reports have observed the process of accessory fragment migration. We present the case of a professional baseball pitcher with significant migration of the fragment during follow-up.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 26-year-old man was diagnosed with symptomatic BP and underwent conservative therapy. Eleven months later, he was unable to play baseball because of gradually worsening knee pain without obvious trauma. On radiographs, the accessory fragment which had located at the superolateral pole 11 months earlier migrated posterolaterally. The diagnosis of Saupe's type III BP was established, and open excision of the accessory fragment was performed. Postoperatively, full-weight-bearing walking and range-of-motion exercises were started the day after surgery. Three months after surgery, he could pitch with all his power without pain.

DISCUSSION

Since our patient was a professional baseball right-handed pitcher who needed to step strongly on his left knee during pitching, strong traction force from the vastus lateralis was likely to have been repeatedly applied to the accessory fragment. It might lead to migration of the accessory fragment. The open excision of the accessory fragment was performed because the accessory fragment had migrated away from the patella body.

CONCLUSION

We report a case of professional baseball player with symptomatic BP, in which case the chronological migration of the accessory fragment was observed without obvious trauma. When the accessory fragment is identified without obvious trauma, one of the differential diseases could be a BP.

Outcomes of surgical treatment of symptomatic bipartite patella in teenage athletes

Bipartite patella affects about 2% of people. Most cases are asymptomatic; however, some develop anterior knee pain during sports. When conservative treatment fails, surgery can be considered. This study reports the outcomes of fragment excision with or without lateral release in teenage athletes with symptomatic bipartite patella. The study was approved by the College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. A retrospective review was performed. Patients were excluded if age >18 or had prior knee surgery. Data collected included age, gender, BMI, sports played, Saupe classification, conservative and surgical treatment, advanced imaging used, duration of follow-up, Lysholm Score and postoperative complications. Five teenage patients were studied. The average age was 15.6 years and BMI was 23. Sports played included basketball, football, track-and-field and soccer. All patients complained of anterior knee pain exacerbated by sports. All patients failed >6 months of conservative treatment. Saupe classification included four type III (superolateral) and one type II (lateral). Two patients had an MRI. Surgical treatment included two open excisions and three arthroscopic-assisted open excisions with lateral releases. The average Lysholm Score was 97. Postoperatively, all patients returned to presurgery sporting activity at an average of 9.8 weeks (range, 6-13 weeks). A 16-year-old male treated by open excision developed a postoperative wound infection. He was successfully treated with irrigation & debridement and antibiotics and returned to sports at 6 weeks. Symptomatic bipartite patella is an uncommon cause of anterior knee pain in adolescent athletes. When pain persists despite conservative care, fragment excision with or without lateral release resulted in excellent pain relief and return to full sporting activity in all cases.

Painful bipartite patella following injury: a case report

Bipartite patella is a normal variation in ossification development. This variation is usually asymptomatic but can cause persistent and debilitating anterior knee pain with an injury. We report the case of a 56-year-old man complaining of persistent anterior left knee pain following trauma. Standard knee radiographs show a bilateral Bipartite Patella appearance, and magnetic resonance imaging shows discrete bony edema of the cancellous bone of the accessory bone and about the synchondrosis explaining the anterior knee pain, associated with a crack in the posterior compartment of the medial meniscus. Conservative care including medical treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy was used. Magnetic resonance imaging is the most valuable diagnostic tool for evaluating detailed morphologic and pathologic changes in patients with the bipartite patella.

Arthroscopic Excision of Bipartite Patella

A bipartite patella usually presents as an incidental finding on radiographs because most cases are asymptomatic. However, some patients may present with pain and functional limitations. Conservative treatment is sufficient to resolve symptoms in most cases; however, a small minority of patients may require surgical management. Recent studies have reported excellent results with an arthroscopic approach. This Technical Note details our procedure for treating a symptomatic bipartite patella that has not resolved with conservative care.

Ultrasound-guided injection and the pie crust technique for the treatment of symptomatic bipartite patella

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the results of a new treatment procedure (ultrasound-guided injection and the "pie crust" technique for lengthening of capsular tendon structures) for symptomatic bipartite patella.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated patient outcomes following the treatment of symptomatic type III bipartite patella with our new technique. Fifteen knees in 14 boys (mean age, 13.0 ± 1.7 years) were included. The procedure involved the injection of 1% lidocaine (2 mL) and triamcinolone acetonide (5 mg) between the patella and fragment. We then punctured 10 sites from one skin puncture to extend lateral capsular tendon structures. The patients were clinically assessed using the Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment (VISA) score before and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the procedure. Patients were also evaluated for complications.

RESULTS

The average VISA score was 45.7 ± 4.7 before treatment, 70.6 ± 7.3 at 1 week post-treatment, 84.4 ± 16.6 at 1 month post-treatment, and 88.6 ± 18.3 at 3 months post-treatment. The VISA score improvement from before the procedure to 1 week after the procedure was significant (P < 0.01). There were no complications in any of the patients, who returned to sports at a mean of 4.2 ± 2.1 weeks after the procedure. However, two patients (three knees) had poor results and could not return to action; thus, they underwent surgical treatment 4 months after the ultrasonographic procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel method is a potential treatment option for the management of symptomatic bipartite patella in outpatient clinics.

Clinical Outcome of Arthroscopic Lateral Retinacular Release for Symptomatic Bipartite Patella in Athletes

PURPOSE

To report the results of arthroscopic lateral retinacular release without excision of the accessory fragment for treatment of symptomatic bipartite patella with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cases of symptomatic type III bipartite patella confirmed by radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging and treated with arthroscopic lateral release from 2005 to 2015. Patients with history of knee fractures or surgery, concomitant meniscal or anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) procedures, and severe arthritic changes of the patellofemoral joint were excluded. Patients were assessed by Kujala score, visual analog scale (VAS), Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and time to return to sporting activities.

RESULTS

Ten patients (11 knees) were clinically reassessed after 69.6 ± 33.3 (range: 25-132; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 47.29-91.99) months from surgery. There was a significant improvement in Kujala (P < .05) and VAS scores (P < .05), and no differences were found between pre- and postoperative TAS scores (P > .05). No complications occurred during the follow-up period. All patients returned to sport after 42.3 ± 11.3 (range: 30-60; 95% CI: 34.71-49.84) days after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The arthroscopic lateral retinacular release of a symptomatic type III bipartite patella without excision of the accessory fragment allowed early return to sporting activities, with excellent symptom relief. Patients had significantly improved mean Kujala and VAS scores without a decrease in the mean TAS scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Arthroscopic Bony Resection for Treatment of Symptomatic Bipartite Patella

Bipartite patella is a common pathology, affecting 2% to 3% of the population. Usually these cases are bilateral and asymptomatic. However, a patient with a bipartite patella may complain of pain, which is most likely related to fragment mobility. Conservative treatment with physiotherapy, immobilization, and nonsteroidal drugs are encouraged during the initial 6 months following diagnosis. This option is effective in most patients. For patients who do not improve with these conservative measures, surgical intervention is indicated. Many surgical treatment options have been described including excision of the fragment, as well as fixation. Fragment excision has demonstrated positive outcomes and is associated with an asymptomatic return to sport activities. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe our preferred arthroscopic technique for the treatment of symptomatic bipartite patella.

Evaluation and management of knee pain in young athletes: overuse injuries of the knee

Recurrent or chronic activity related knee pain is common in young athletes. Numerous intrinsic conditions affecting the knee can cause such pain. In addition, knee pain can be referred pain from low back, hip or pelvic pathology. The most common cause of knee pain in young athletes is patellofemoral pain syndrome, or more appropriately termed idiopathic anterior knee pain. Although, numerous anatomical and biomechanical factors have been postulated to contribute the knee pain in young athletes, the most common underlying reason is overuse injury. In this paper, we have reviewed selected conditions that case knee pain in athletes, including anterior knee pain syndrome, Osgood-Schlatter disease, Sinding-Larsen-Johanssen syndrome, juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (JOCD), bipartite patella, plica syndrome, and tendonitis around the knee.