Mid-term survival analysis of closed wedge high tibial osteotomy: A comparative study of computer-assisted and conventional techniques

Effect of Meniscal Tear Patterns and Preoperative Cartilage Status on Joint Space Width After Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) is performed to treat young adults with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis associated with varus deformity. However, factors influencing joint space width (JSW) vary according to the type of medial meniscal tear and have not yet been completely elucidated.

PURPOSE

To examine changes in JSW according to the type of medial meniscal tear after MOWHTO and analyze the influencing factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

This study was conducted on 134 patients who underwent MOWHTO for medial osteoarthritis and were followed up for >2 years. The patients were classified into 3 groups based on medial meniscal status: intact, nonroot tear, and root tear. The authors then measured the JSW preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and >2 years postoperatively; analyzed whether the change in JSW varied according to meniscal status; and determined the association of these changes with the preoperative cartilage grade of the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and medial tibial plateau (MTP). International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores were used to evaluate clinical function.

RESULTS

Of the 134 patients, the medial meniscus was intact in 29 patients, a nonroot tear was observed in 58 patients, and a root tear was observed in 47 patients. Postoperatively, JSW increased for all groups, but the timing of the increase varied between the groups (P < .001). JSW increased the most 6 months postoperatively in the intact group and 3 months postoperatively in the nonroot tear and root tear groups (P < .001). Additionally, the increase in JSW was the greatest in the root tear group. Preoperatively, MFC and MTP cartilage status differed among the groups; MTP status did not affect the JSW, but MFC status did (P < .001). The IKDC score increased from the preoperative to postoperative time point in all groups, but there was no significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSION

The authors observed that the amount and timing of increase in JSW were dependent on the pattern of medial meniscal tear observed when MOWHTO was performed. In addition, the cartilage grade of MFC before surgery was associated with changes in JSW. The IKDC score was not significantly different between groups. However, a longer follow-up period is needed to analyze the correlation with the meniscal tear pattern and JSW.

High rates of outliers in computer-assisted high tibial osteotomy with excellent mid-term outcomes

PURPOSE

The primary aim was to evaluate the accuracy of navigation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The secondary aim was to examine mid-term outcomes after HTO.

METHODS

Inclusion criteria were patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis who underwent computer-assisted HTOs. Mechanical axis (MA), percentage MA (%MA), and change in posterior tibial slope (ΔPTS) were displayed on the navigation screen. Radiographic examinations included hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), and PTS. Preoperative and 5 weeks postoperative standing radiographs of the whole lower extremity and knee were used. Clinical evaluations were performed using American Knee Society knee score and function score both preoperatively and at last follow-up. Radiographic evaluations were performed by orthopedic surgeons. Intraoperative navigation after osteotomy and postoperative standing radiograph were compared. MA (HKA), %MA, and ΔPTS were compared. Outliers were defined as > 3° in MA, > 10% in %MA, and > 10° in ΔPTS. Outlier and non-outlier groups were compared. The rate of conversion to arthroplasty was examined.

RESULTS

This study involved 38 patients (44 knees) and last follow-up was at a mean of 5 years (range, 1-9 years). Mean American Knee Society knee score and function score improved significantly from 59 to 69 preoperatively to 95 and 85 at last follow-up, respectively. Absolute values of mean errors for MA, %MA, and ΔPTS were 2.1°, 9.3%, 1.2°, respectively. Outlier rates were 18% in MA, 39% in %MA, and 5% in ΔPTS. No significant factors were found in MA and ΔPTS. In %MA, preoperative JLCA was significantly higher in the outlier group compared to the non-outlier group. No knees underwent conversion to total knee arthroplasty. No differences in outcomes were found between outlier and non-outlier groups.

CONCLUSION

Although rates of outlier values in computer-assisted opening wedge HTO were high, mid-term outcomes were excellent.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

[High tibial osteotomy with computer navigation for medial gonarthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To study significance of computer navigation for improving clinical and radiological results of medial gonarthritis treatment compared to non-invasive methods of lower limb axis correction control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 73 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The main group included 40 patients, the control group - 33 patients. In the main group, high tibial osteotomy was performed using computer navigation, in the control group - using non-invasive techniques. Clinical assessment was carried out according to the KSS, KOOS and VAS scales. We assessed the main reference angles of the lower limb considering X-ray data.

RESULTS

Both groups were characterized by postoperative improvement of clinical results according to various scales. Computer navigation provided higher accuracy in most cases. We focused on target correction of 3° valgus.

CONCLUSION

High tibial osteotomy with computer navigation or non-invasive techniques is an effective treatment method for medial gonarthritis. There are no significant differences in clinical results according to the KSS and KOOS scales, as well as X-ray data after correction. We found significant differences in VAS scores.

Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in high tibial osteotomy (HTO): a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Though some studies have reported navigated high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a useful procedure to correct knee deformity. There is still great controversy whether navigated HTO can achieve better accuracy of limb alignment and greater clinical outcomes. Current meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether better radiographic outcomes and clinical outcomes could be acquired in navigated HTO compared with the conventional procedure.

METHOD

We conducted a literature search in the electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We identified studies published before August 2020. We also checked the references of the related articles for any relevant studies. We strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematics reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines in this review. This research was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were included, involving 1399 knees. Our meta-analysis indicated that patients undergoing navigated HTO had significantly better outcomes in outliers of aimed limb alignment (RD=-0.24, 95% CI: =-0.34 to -0.13, p < 0.01), outliers of aimed tibial posterior slope (TPS) (RD=-0.41, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.30, p < 0.01), Range of Motion (ROM) (MD = 6.37, 95%CI: 0.83-11.91, p = 0.02), and American knee society knee score (AKS knee score) (MD = 3.88, 95%CI: 1.37-6.39, p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in Lysholm score (MD = 1.30, 95%CI: -0.31 to 2.90, p = 0.11), American knee society function score (AKS function score) (RD = 1.42, 95%CI: -0.15 to 2.99, p = 0.08), complications (RD=-0.01, 95% CI: = -0.05 to 0.04, p = 0.77), delayed union (RD=-0.01, 95% CI: = -0.02 to 0.03, p = 0.59), and reoperation (RD = 0, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.10, p = 0.98) between the two groups. The operation time in the navigated group was 15.46 min longer than in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

Navigated HTO provided more accurate and reproducible radiographic outcomes in the correction of the malalignment than conventional techniques, and there is no difference in the risk of complications compared with conventional HTO. However, it is unclear whether navigation HTO can achieve better clinical results. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with high quality, large sample size, and sufficient follow-up period are required.

Progress in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) has been used for over 60 years in clinical practice and mainly comprises two major techniques: closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) and open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). However, these have been gradually replaced by total knee arthroplasty (TKA), due to inconsistent clinical results and many complications. With the concept of knee-protection and ladder treatment of osteoarthritis, as an effective minimally invasive treatment for knee osteoarthritis, HTO has once again received attention.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, ClinicalKey, CNKI, and the China Wanfang database. The search terms relating to osteoarthritis and high tibial osteotomy were used. Studies were considered eligible if the participants were adults with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) who had undergone HTO. A total of two reviewers participated in the selection of the studies. Reviewer 1 was assigned to screen titles and abstracts, and reviewer 2 to screen full-text data. Data extraction was completed by reviewer 2, and 30% were checked by the research team. Potential conflicts were resolved through discussion. The methodological quality was assessed using a risk of bias, based on the Cochrane handbook and Newcastle-Ottawa assessment scale. The outcome indicators are (1) posterior slope of tibial plateau, (2) the height of the patella, (3) fracture in the osteotomy plane, (4) survival rate, (5) special surgery knee score (HSS), and (6) the recurrence of varus deformity of the included studies were evaluated according to the guidelines of the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group (Atkins et al., BMJ 328:1490, 2004).

RESULTS

Among the 18 articles included, 10 were prospective cohort studies, five were randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, one was prospective comparative study (PCS), one was retrospective comparative study (RCS), and one was retrospective cohort. The earliest publication year was 1999, and the most recent was 2018. A total of 6555 eligible cases were included, comprised of 3351 OWHTO patients and 3204 CWHTO patients. Five RCT were assessed using risk of bias, based on the Cochrane handbook. Eleven cohort studies and two case-control studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment scale. These six outcome indicators for a total of twenty-four evidence individuals were evaluated separately, among which the GRADE classification of 1, 2, and 6 was medium quality, and 3, 4, and 5 were low quality. Based on our systematic review, regardless of whether the chosen procedure was OWHTO or CWHTO, both HSS scores increased significantly as compared with the preoperative scores. Compared with CWHTO, the height of the patella and tibial posterior slope angle increased following OWHTO. Additionally, OWHTO has a better long-term survival rate and lower fracture rate, supporting OWHTO as the first treatment choice.

CONCLUSIONS

For young patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA), high tibial osteotomy (HTO) can be considered as a treatment option to replace total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce the economic burden and promote the reasonable allocation of medical resources. This study shows that compared with CWHTO, OWHTO has certain advantages in long-term survival rate and lower fracture rate, but the level of evidence is lower. In the future, we will need larger sample sizes and longer follow-up randomized controlled trials to improve our research.

Medial joint space width and convergence angle change with time after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

BACKGROUND

Although the medial joint space width (MJSW) is commonly used for radiographic evaluation of knee osteoarthritis, the changes in knee joint space width (JSW) during weight bearing after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) remain unclear. This study aimed to depict how medial and lateral JSWs and convergence angles change gradually after MOWHTO.

METHODS

We retrospectively followed up 81 MOWHTO cases for over 45 months on average. Pre- and postoperative mechanical axes were recorded. The JSWs and convergence angles were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 3-6, 9-12, and 21-24 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcomes were measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

The mean mechanical femoral-tibial angle improved from 8.1° varus to 2.4° valgus. At the aforementioned times, the respective mean values of MJSW were 2.6, 3.5, 3.8, 4.0, and 4.2 mm; mean convergence angles were 4.8°, 2.9°, 2.2°, 2.1°, and 1.9°; and the mean VAS scores were 7.2, 7.8, 4.8, 1.4, and 1.3. The MJSW continued to increase significantly in the first year postoperatively and then plateaued for a minimum of 2 years follow up after MOWHTO. The convergence angle decreased significantly in the first 6 months postoperatively and was then maintained.

CONCLUSIONS

The MJSW, convergence angle, and VAS scores continued to improve through weight bearing during the first year after MOWHTO and were maintained for at least 2 years. Thus, JSW measurement may be an easy and representative way of radiographically monitoring the effect of MOWHTO.

Mid-term lifetime survivals of octogenarians following primary and revision total knee arthroplasties were satisfactory: a retrospective single center study in contemporary period

Background

As life expectancy increases, the number of octogenarians requiring primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing. Recently, primary TKA has become a common treatment option in octogenarians. However, surgeons may still be hesitant about performing revision TKA on octogenarians because of concern about risk and cost benefit. The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and mid-term lifetime survival in octogenarians after primary and revision TKA.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed 231 primary TKAs and 41 revision TKAs performed on octogenarians between 2000 and 2016. The mean age of patients undergoing primary TKA was 81.9 years and that of patients undergoing revision TKA was 82.3 years (p = 0.310). The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index was higher in revision TKA (4.4 vs. 4.8, p = 0.003). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. The incidence of postoperative complications (TKA-related, specific or systemic) and lifetime survival rate (endpoint death determined by telephone or mail communication with patient or family) were investigated.

Results

The WOMAC and ROM improved significantly after primary and revision TKA, although postoperative results were worse in the revision group (33.1 vs. 47.2; 128.9° vs. 113.6°; p < 0.001, respectively). There were no cases of aseptic or septic component failure in either group. One case of periprosthetic fracture was observed in the revision group (0% vs. 2.4%, p = 0.151), and three cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)/pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) (one case of DVT and two cases of PTE) were observed in the primary group (1.3% vs. 0%, p = 1.000). The most common systemic complication in both groups was delirium (7.4% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.131). There were no differences between the two groups in the other systemic complication rates. The 5-year and 10-year lifetime survival rates were 87.2% and 62.9%, respectively, in primary TKA and 82.1% and 42.2%, respectively, in revision TKA (p = 0.017).

Conclusions

Both primary and revision TKA are viable options for octogenarians, based on the satisfactory clinical outcomes, TKA-related complication rates, and mid-term lifetime survival. Delirium needs to be managed appropriately as the most common systemic complication in both primary and revision TKA in octogenarians.

Level of evidence

IV

The Ability to Achieve a Specific Target Angle on Weightbearing Radiographs After Valgus High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Arthritis Is Not Predictable

Purpose

Standing radiographs are commonly used to plan angular correction in valgus tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis. Most clinical studies have reported postoperative alignment as overall averages or means. The purpose of this study was to compare the preoperatively planned angle of correction measured on weight-bearing radiographs to the follow-up angle measured on weightbearing radiographs in individual patients 6 weeks after surgery and to analyze factors that could potentially affect achieving the planned degree of surgical correction. Our objective was to analyze factors potentially affecting the accuracy and ability to achieve the preoperatively planned correction angle (the target angle) in the individual patient.

Methods

We studied 35 tibial osteotomies (13 Coventry closing wedge osteotomies and 22 Maquet barrel vault osteotomies) performed for varus gonarthrosis between 1981 and 2019 to determine how accurately the target angle, based on preoperative standing weight-bearing radiographs, was achieved according to the postoperative radiographs in each individual. We reviewed 35 knees in 34 patients who had complete pre- and postoperative radiographs for review.

Results

Overall, only 14 of 35 (40%) of the patients were corrected to within ± 2° of the planned target angle. Valgus tibial osteotomy based on preoperative weightbearing radiographs is unpredictable in its ability to achieve the target angle on postoperative weightbearing radiographs when using either the Coventry or the Maquet surgical technique. The tendency was to undercorrect with either of the techniques. Larger (greater than 10°) preoperative varus alignment did not make it more difficult to achieve the target angle. Male or female sex and body mass index had no effect on the ability to achieve the target angle.

Conclusions

Valgus tibial osteotomy planning based on preoperative weightbearing is unpredictable in its ability to achieve the target angle on postoperative weightbearing radiographs. Overall, only 40% of our patients were corrected to within ± 2° of the planned target angle. The tendency was to undercorrect, with either the Coventry or the Maquet technique. Contrary to our hypothesis, larger preoperative varus alignment (greater than 10°) did not make it more difficult to achieve the target angle. The Coventry technique was as accurate as the Maquet technique.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Complications, Additional Surgery, and Joint Survival Analysis After Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

The reported incidence of complications following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) varies. The authors sought to assess the complications, additional surgeries, and joint survival following MOWHTO in patients with isolated medial compartment arthrosis during a mean follow-up of 10 years. This retrospective study involved patients implanted with spacer plates, angle adjustable plates, or inverse L-type plates with wedges between 2000 and 2010. A total of 504 knees from 441 patients were examined. Mean age of the study population was 52.6±7.0 years, with 56 (11.1%) knees from men and 448 (88.9%) from women. The 10-year Kaplan-Meier joint survival rate was 94.8%. Overall complication rate for MOWHTO was 63.7%, with complications in 20.3% of treated knees requiring additional surgery. In this population, although the overall complication rate and the need for additional surgery were high, the need for additional surgery resulting from serious complications was low (2.6%). The high joint survival rate and low rate of additional surgery for serious complications indicate that MOWHTO can be safely applied in patients with isolated medial gonarthrosis. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5):303-314.].

An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities

PURPOSE

In the present study, the early results of sensor-assisted versus manually balanced posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis with varus deformities were prospectively compared.

METHODS

Fifty patients undergoing sensor-assisted TKA (group S) and 50 patients receiving manually balanced TKA (group M) were prospectively compared. The groups did not differ in terms of demographics, preoperative clinical status, or severity of deformity. The knee and function scores (KS and FS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated clinically. The mechanical axes and positions of components were assessed radiographically. In sensor-assisted TKA, the medial and lateral compartment loads were compared based on the patellar positions of inversion and eversion.

RESULTS

There was no between-group difference in the postoperative KS or FS (n.s., respectively). The average postoperative WOMAC score was 17.0 in group S and 18.0 in group M (n.s.). The ROM was 131.2° in group S and 130.8° in group M (n.s.). Neither the postoperative alignment of the mechanical axis nor the component positioning differed between the groups (n.s.). In sensor-assisted TKA, the difference between the medial and lateral compartment loads was less than 15 lbs (6.8 kg) in each knee. The lateral compartment load increased after patellar eversion (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

There are concerns about the cost-benefit ratio of the intraoperative load sensor, despite its advantage of more precisely assessing ligament balance without patellar eversion, which resulted in a smaller lateral gap. A long-term follow-up study with a large cohort is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Long-term survival is similar between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients with similar demographics

PURPOSE

Long-term clinical and radiographic results and survival rates were compared between closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTOs) and fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with similar demographics.

METHODS

Sixty HTOs and 50 UKAs completed between 1992 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. There were no significant differences in pre-operative demographics. The mean follow-up period was 10.7 ± 5.7 years for HTO and 12.0 ± 7.1 years for UKA (n.s.). The Knee Society knee and function scores, WOMAC, and range of motion (ROM) were investigated. The mechanical axis and femorotibial angle were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed (failure: revision to TKA) and the failure modes were investigated.

RESULTS

Most of the clinical and radiographic results were not different at the last follow-up, except ROM; ROM was 135.3° ± 12.3° in HTO and 126.8° ± 13.3° in UKA (p = 0.005). The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year survival rates were 100%, 91.0%, 63.4%, and 48.3% for closed-wedge HTO, respectively, and 90.5%, 87.1%, 70.8%, and 66.4% for UKA (n.s.). The survival rate was higher than that for UKA until 12 years post-operatively but was higher in UKAs thereafter, following a remarkable decrease in HTO. The most common failure mode was degenerative osteoarthritic progression of medial compartment in HTO and femoral component loosening in UKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term survival did not differ significantly between closed-wedge HTO and fixed-bearing UKA in patients with similar pre-operative demographics and knee conditions. The difference in post-operative ROM and failure mode should be considered when selecting a procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Comparison of navigated and conventional high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthritic knees with varus deformity: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a usefully surgical procedure to correct the malalignment and delay the progression of osteoarthritis. It is still controversy whether navigation system can offer more accuracy of targeted alignment and achieve better clinical outcomes than conventional method. The purpose of present meta-analysis was to investigate whether navigation system was superior to conventional method with regard to clinical and radiographic outcomes.

METHOD

The included studies compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes between navigated HTO group and conventional group. The clinical assessments were Lysholm Score, AKS Function Score and Arc of motion, and the radiographic outcomes were Mechanical axis (MA), Weight bearing line ratio (WBL), Outliers of alignment and Change in TPS used to evaluate alignment correction. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3 software. Downs and Black and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to evaluate the study quality.

RESULT

Sixteen studies were eligible in present meta-analysis, including thirteen studies concerning opening wedge HTO and three studies involving closing wedge HTO. Clinical outcomes were only reported in studies which used opening wedge HTO. No significant differences were observed in all clinical outcomes between navigated and conventional HTO. Regarding radiographic outcomes, no significant difference in WBL ratio was observed between navigated and conventional HTO. Patients undergoing navigated HTO were associated with significantly greater in MA and lower in Outliers of alignment compared with those undergoing conventional HTO. Compared with conventional HTO, increase in TPS was significantly lower in navigated HTO group using opening wedge HTO, but decrease in TPS was significantly greater in navigated HTO group using closing wedge HTO.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that navigated HTO offered more accuracy and precision of alignment correction, except WBL ratio. However, better clinical outcomes were not observed in navigation group.

Serial Changes in the Joint Space Width and Joint Line Convergence Angle After Closed-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

BACKGROUND

There have been little data concerning serial changes in the joint space width (JSW) and joint line convergence angle over the course of follow-up periods after closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO).

PURPOSE

To evaluate serial changes in the JSW and joint line convergence angle after CWHTO.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 100 computer-assisted CWHTOs with a minimum follow-up period of 3 years (mean, 4.4 years) were analyzed. Clinically, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score was evaluated. Radiographically, the mechanical axis was measured preoperatively and postoperatively. The minimal JSW was measured as the shortest distance between the femur and the tibia. The convergence angle was measured as the angle between the tangent to the subchondral plates of the femoral condyle and the tibial plateau. Serial changes in these measurements were analyzed preoperatively; at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively; and at the final follow-up. The intraclass correlation coefficients for all measurements were greater than 0.8.

RESULTS

The mean WOMAC score improved from 41.4 preoperatively to 14.9 at the final follow-up. The preoperative and postoperative mean mechanical axis was 8.1° varus and 1.6° valgus, respectively. The mean minimal JSW was 2.5, 2.9, 2.9, 3.1, 3.2, and 3.1 mm preoperatively and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and the final follow-up, respectively ( P < .001). The mean convergence angle was 4.4°, 3.9°, 4.0°, 4.1°, 4.2°, and 4.3°, respectively, during the same time periods ( P = .068).

CONCLUSION

Cartilage healing, as indicated by the JSW, and clinical improvement were maintained over the minimum 3-year follow-up after CWHTO. Cartilage pressure, as indicated by the convergence angle, remained unchanged after CWHTO.

Survival of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: A meta-analysis

This meta-analysis was designed to compare the longevity of the survivorship of opening versus closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). All studies reporting survival rates in patients who underwent open or closed wedge HTO with more than 5-year follow-up duration were included in the meta-analysis. Survival time was considered as time to conversion to TKA. Twenty three studies were included in meta-analysis, 20 of which were of level IV evidence. The pooled 5-year survival rates were 95.1% (95% CI: 93.1 to 97.1%) in open wedge HTO and 93.9% (95% CI: 93.1 to 94.6%) in closed wedge HTO. Although there was 1.2% greater survival rate in open wedge HTO than in closed wedge HTO, this difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.419). Pooled 10-year survival rates were 91.6% (95% CI: 88.5 to 94.8%) in open wedge HTO and 85.4% (95% CI: 84.0 to 86.7%) in closed wedge HTO, indicating that open wedge HTO had 6.2% greater survival rate 10 years after surgery than did closed wedge HTO (P = 0.002). No difference in 5-year survivorship was found between open- and closed-wedge HTO. However, the survival rate was higher in open-wedge HTOs than in closed wedge HTO at 10 years.

Outcome reporting following navigated high tibial osteotomy of the knee: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluates radiographic and clinical outcome reporting following navigated high tibial osteotomy (HTO). Conventional HTO was used as a control to compare outcomes and furthermore investigate the quality of evidence in studies reporting outcomes for navigated HTO. It was hypothesized that navigated HTO will show superior clinical and radiographic outcomes compared to conventional HTO.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting outcomes following navigated HTO. Titles, abstracts, and full-text were screened in duplicate using an a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Minitab ^® statistical software. Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) and Cochrane Risk of Bias Scores were used to evaluate methodological quality.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies which involved 2216 HTOs were analysed in this review, 1608 (72.6 %) navigated HTOs and 608 (27.4 %) conventional HTOs. The majority of studies were of level IV evidence (16). Clinical outcomes were reported in knee and function scores or range of motion comparisons. Postoperative clinical and functional scores were improved by navigated HTO although it is not demonstrated if there is significant improvement compared to conventional HTO. Most common clinical outcome score reported was Lysholm scores (6) which report postoperative scores of 87.8 (standard deviation 5.9) and 88.8 (standard deviation 5.9) for conventional and navigation-assisted HTO, respectively. Radiographic outcomes reported commonly were weight-bearing mechanical axis, coronal plane angle, and posterior tibial slope angle in the sagittal plane. Studies have shown HTO gives significant correction of mechanical alignment and navigated HTO produces significantly less change in posterior tibial slope postoperatively compared to conventional. The mean MINORS for the 17 non-comparative studies was 9/16, and 15/24 for the 14 non-randomized comparative studies.

CONCLUSION

Navigation HTO results in improved mechanical axis alignment and demonstrates significantly better control over the tibial slope angle change postoperatively compared to conventional methods; however, these improvements have not yet been reflected in clinical outcome scores. Overall the studies report HTO does create significantly improved knee scores and functions compared to patients' preoperative ratings regardless of technique. Future studies on HTO outcomes need to focus on consistency of outcome reporting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.