Asymmetric ground reaction forces and knee kinematics during squat after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction

Analysis of Limb Loading and Lower Extremity Strength Recovery Across Time After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Evidence as to how patient thigh muscle strength and limb loading (LL) during a squatting task recovers throughout rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is lacking.

HYPOTHESIS

Patients will improve LL and strength throughout rehabilitation. Changes in LL and strength over time will be positively correlated.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

A total of 60 participants (28 male/32 female; age, 22.5 ± 9.35 years) participated in 2 visits post-ACLR, assessing LL and strength. Using an instrumented pressure mat, patients completed 3 sets of 3 repetitions of bodyweight squats. Peak force (N), unilateral cumulative load (%), and quadriceps and hamstring isokinetic peak torque (N·m) were calculated and recorded bilaterally. LL and peak torque were compared over time and between limbs.

RESULTS

A significant limb-by-time interaction was observed for LL peak force (N), where patients underloaded the ACLR limb at visit 1 compared with the contralateral limb (P < 0.01). Patients increased their ACLR LL across visits (P = 0.04). A limb-by-time interaction for quadriceps peak torque (N·m) was observed where the ACLR limb increased peak torque across visits (P < 0.01); however, strength deficits persisted at visit 2 (P < 0.01) when compared with the nonoperative limb. Weak correlations were observed between all change scores metrics (r, 0.20-0.25).

CONCLUSION

Patients recovering from ACLR exhibited more symmetric loading during a squatting task and improved their lower extremity strength over time. Changes in strength were not related to changes in LL during a squatting task over time.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Squatting tasks are safe and easily implemented throughout ACLR recovery. As changes in functional LL and strength recovery are not related, both should be considered in serial postoperative testing for more comprehensive function and strength assessments.

The effects of fatigue on linear and angular kinematics during bilateral squat

This study was aimed to analyze in detail how the fatigue effects to kinematic parameters of body weight squat exercise (BSQ) by dividing a squat cycle into four different regions. Twenty-one male athletes participated in this study. Participants were divided into two groups according to their lower limb muscle ratio (LLMR). The BSQ was performed until participants were unable to continue the exercise due to the fatigue. Linear and angular kinematics were obtained by motion analysis software which has high validity and reliability. There was no significant but had large effect size interaction between fatigue conditions and LLMR groups in terms of knee ROM in the extension phase and hip angular velocity in braking phase of the flexion (0.08 > p >0.05, 0.18 > [Formula: see text] > 0.16). Fatigue condition did not have a significant effect on the duration in the acceleration and braking phases of BSQ (p > 0.05). There were many significant main effects on kinematics in the different regions due to the fatigue (0.01 < p <0.05, 0.44 > [Formula: see text] > 0.14). In the fatigue condition, there was a polynomial relationship between velocity of shoulder and hip joints (R2flex = 0.82, R2ext = 0.72) rather than linear (R2flex = 0.64, R2ext = 0.53) and coefficient correlations also decreased (rflex = 0.88 to 0.80, rext = 0.92 to 0.73). The sticking region was observed in the non-fatigue condition and disappeared when fatigue occurred. These results suggest that LLMR may be taken into consideration in the squat exercises, joint tracking may vary for velocity-based squat training and pre-test for sticking region observation may be apply with the BSQ.

Pelvic Rotation Is Associated With Asymmetry in the Knee Extensor Moment During Double-Leg Squatting After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Asymmetry in knee extensor moment during double-leg squatting was observed after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, even after the completion of the rehabilitation program for return to sports. The purpose of this study was to clarify the association between asymmetry in the knee extensor moment and pelvic rotation angle during double-leg squatting after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Twenty-four participants performed double-leg squatting. Kinetics and kinematics during squatting were analyzed using a 3-dimensional motion analysis system with 2 force plates. The limb symmetry index of knee extensor moment was predicted by the pelvic rotation angle (R2 = .376, P = .001). In addition, the pelvic rotation and the limb symmetry index of the vertical ground reaction force independently explained the limb symmetry index of the knee extensor moment (R2 = .635, P < .001, β of pelvic rotation = -0.489, β of vertical ground reaction force = 0.524). Pelvic rotation toward the involved limb was associated with a smaller knee extensor moment in the involved limb than in the uninvolved limb. The assessment of pelvic rotation would be useful for partially predicting asymmetry in the knee extensor moment during double-leg squatting. Minimizing pelvic rotation may improve the asymmetry in the knee extensor moment during double-leg squatting after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Medial-lateral hip positions predicted kinetic asymmetries during double-leg squats in collegiate athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

ACL re-injury rates are high in collegiate athletes, and double-leg squats have been used as a functional weight-bearing exercise to strengthen the lower extremities and assess bilateral kinetic asymmetries. The primary purpose was to quantify the correlations between medial-lateral shoulder/hip positions and lateral bending angles and bilateral asymmetries in vertical ground reaction forces (VGRF) and knee extension moments during double-leg squats in collegiate athletes at two assessments following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Seventeen National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I athletes performed double-leg squats between 0 and 6 months and/or between 6 and 12 months following their ACLR while kinematic and kinetic data were collected. Medial-lateral shoulder positions strongly and significantly correlated with VGRF asymmetries at both assessments (p ≤ 0.007, r ≥ 0.68). Medial-lateral hip positions strongly and significantly correlated with VGRF asymmetries and knee moment asymmetries at both assessments (p ≤ 0.018, r ≥ 0.62). Additionally, participants demonstrated decreased VGRF asymmetries and knee moment asymmetries, more neutral shoulder and hip positions, and increased knee moments for the injured leg at the second assessment compared to the first assessment with large effect sizes (p ≤ 0.008, Cohen's d ≥ 1.06). In conclusion, medial-lateral hip positions correlated and predicted VGRF and knee moment asymmetries during double-leg squats in collegiate athletes at two assessments (0-6 and 6-12 months) following ACLR. The bilateral asymmetries support the need for an individual approach for kinetic asymmetry assessments. A commercially available camera can be utilized as a low-cost and convenient tool to monitor and potentially train bilateral kinetic symmetries during double-leg squats in patients following ACLR.

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches

Purpose

Our primary objectives were to (1) describe current approaches for kinetic measurements in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) suggest considerations for methodological reporting. Secondarily, we explored the relationship between kinetic measurement system findings and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

We followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O’Malley’s 6-stage framework. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2020. Original research papers reporting parameters measured by kinetic measurement systems in individuals at least 6-months post primary ACLR were included.

Results

In 158 included studies, 7 kinetic measurement systems (force plates, balance platforms, pressure mats, force-measuring treadmills, Wii balance boards, contact mats connected to jump systems, and single-sensor insoles) were identified 4 main movement categories (landing/jumping, standing balance, gait, and other functional tasks). Substantial heterogeneity was noted in the methods used and outcomes assessed; this review highlighted common methodological reporting gaps for essential items related to movement tasks, kinetic system features, justification and operationalization of selected outcome parameters, participant preparation, and testing protocol details. Accordingly, we suggest considerations for methodological reporting in future research. Only 6 studies included PROMs with inconsistency in the reported parameters and/or PROMs.

Conclusion

Clear and accurate reporting is vital to facilitate cross-study comparisons and improve the clinical application of kinetic measurement systems after ACLR. Based on the current evidence, we suggest methodological considerations to guide reporting in future research. Future studies are needed to examine potential correlations between kinetic parameters and PROMs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-021-00397-0.

Assessments of Ground Reaction Force and Range of Motion in Terms of Fatigue during the Body Weight Squat

The purpose of this study was to analyse in detail body weight squat (BWS)’ fatigue effect on the range of motions (ROM) of the hip, knee, ankle and ground reaction forces (GRF). Twenty male recreational athletes (24.0 ± 3.1 years, 178.85 ± 7.12 cm and 78.7 ± 11.45 kg) participated in this study. BWS were performed on four load cell platforms until the participants failed to continue. Participants performed 73 ± 27 repetitions and the duration to complete of the repetitions was 140.72 ± 62.28 s during the BWS exercise. The forefoot and hindfoot of the feet were on two load cells, thus, there were two under each foot. All of the data collected was divided into three sections for analysis (24 ± 9 repetitions for each). In terms of GRF of the fore feet and hind feet, significant differences and medium to large effect size were found between each section (p = 0.006~0.040, ES = 0.693~0.492). No significant differences were found between right and left leg in all sections. Significant differences were found in the ROM of the hip between the sections of first-third (p = 0.044, ES = 0.482) and second-third (p = 0.034, ES = 0.510), the ROM of the knee first-third (p = 0.014, ES = 0.602) and second-third (p = 0.005, ES = 0.701) and for the ROM of the ankle first-second (p = 0.045, ES = 0.479). As a result, end-of-exercise fatigue caused an increase in the ROM of the hip, knee and ankle. Thus, it is observed that fatigue induced increased ROM, also increases the GRF towards the forefeet.

Limb dominance influences energy absorption contribution (EAC) during landing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the role of limb dominance on energy absorption contribution (EAC) during a jump landing (JL) task at return to sport (RTS) after ACL-R.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Clinical Research Laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eight participants (age = 16.19 ± 1.74, Height = 172.25 ± 9.96 cm, Weight = 72.61 ± 15.48 kg).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Participants were grouped into two groups: those who injured their dominant limb ACL (D-ACL) and those who injured their non-dominant limb ACL (ND-ACL). A multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess for between group differences in EAC across the three joints.

RESULTS

In the surgical limb, D-ACL demonstrated smaller hip (D-ACL = 32.23 ± 10.44%, ND-ACL = 69.68 ± 8.51%, p < 0.008) and greater knee (D-ACL = 45.86 ± 10.36%, ND-ACL = 9.41 ± 5.68%, p < 0.008) EAC than ND-ACL. In the non-surgical limb, D-ACL demonstrated greater hip (D-ACL = 62.59 ± 9.03%, ND-ACL = 25.95 ± 7.15%, p < 0.008), and smaller knee (D-ACL = 13.79 ± 5.57%, ND-ACL = 58.01 ± 7.86%, p < 0.008), EAC than ND-ACL.

CONCLUSION

After ACL-R, eccentric loading strategies during a JL task at RTS are different depending upon limb dominance. D-ACL demonstrated a greater knee loading strategy on the surgical side compared to ND-ACL.

Vertical ground reaction force and knee muscle activation asymmetries in patients with ACL reconstruction compared to healthy individuals

PURPOSE

Gait analysis is an important index in the clinical treatment of people with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Following unilateral ACL reconstruction (ACLR), the knee kinetic asymmetries are likely to affect the gait cycle. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the symmetries of vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) and select the knee muscle activity in gait cycles in participants with and without unilateral ACLR.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, vGRF and muscle activity data in difference gait cycles were collected from 56 male subjects (28 with unilateral ACLR and 28 healthy subjects) using force plate and electromyography (EMG), respectively. MATLAB software was used for data analysis and independent t test was employed to compare the two groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference was seen between the two groups in the variable of first peak force symmetry (n.s). However, there was a significant difference in the second-peak force symmetry index between the two groups (p ≤ 0.001). Regarding muscle activity symmetry in the braking phase of gait, a significant difference was observed in rectus femoris between the two groups (p ≤ 0.001), while no difference was seen in medial gastrocnemius and biceps femoris activity (n.s). In the propulsive phase of gait, there was a significant difference in medial gastrocnemius and biceps femoris muscles activity between the two groups (p ≤ 0.001), while no difference was found in rectus femoris muscle activity (n.s).

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that unilateral ACLR creates asymmetry in vGRF and muscle activities in different phases of the gait cycle. So, more attention should be paid to this problem in clinical settings, and also to the use of therapeutic interventions to reduce the amount of kinetic asymmetries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Knee Loading After ACL-R Is Related to Quadriceps Strength and Knee Extension Differences Across the Continuum of Care

Background:

Quadriceps strength and knee extension are believed to be important in the ability to effectively load the knee after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R).

Purpose:

To compare quadriceps strength (QUADS), side-to-side knee extension difference (ExtDiff), and knee energy absorption contribution (EAC) in patients preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively, and at return to sport (RTS). A secondary aim was to determine how the factors of QUADS and ExtDiff contributed to the ability to load the knee (knee EAC) at each of the 3 time points.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Overall, 41 individuals (mean ± SD age, 15.95 ± 1.63 years) were enrolled in this study. QUADS, ExtDiff, and knee EAC during a double-limb squat were collected preoperatively, 12 weeks postoperatively, and at RTS. Isokinetic QUADS was collected at 60 deg/s, normalized to body mass, and averaged across 5 trials. Knee extension was measured with a goniometer, and ExtDiff was calculated for analyses. Knee EAC was measured during double-limb squat descent and was calculated as a percentage of total energy absorption for the limb. Observations were obtained from both the surgical and nonsurgical limbs at the 3 time points. A mixed regression model with random intercept to compare change over the 3 time points was used, and a model selection was conducted with Akaike information criteria. Significance was set at P < .05.

Results:

Surgical limb QUADS was significantly lower preoperatively (mean ± SD, 1.37 ± 0.49 N·m/kg; P = .0023) and at 12 weeks (1.11 ± 0.38 N·m/kg; P < .0001) than at RTS (1.58 ± 0.47 N·m/kg). Nonsurgical limb QUADS was also significantly lower preoperatively (2.01 ± 0.54 N·m/kg; P < .0256) and at 12 weeks (2.03 ± 0.48 N·m/kg; P < .0233) than at RTS (2.18 ± 0.54 N·m/kg). Knee EAC for the surgical limb was significantly lower at 12 weeks than at RTS (40.98% ± 13.73% vs 47.50% ± 12.04%; P < .0032), and ExtDiff was significantly greater preoperatively than at RTS (–2.68° ± 3.19° vs –0.63° ± 1.43°; P < .0001). Preoperatively, QUADS for both the surgical (P < .0003) and nonsurgical (P = .0023) limbs was a significant predictor of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 33.99% of the variance. At 12 weeks, surgical limb QUADS was a significant predictor (P < .0051) of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 18.83% of the variance. At RTS, ExtDiff was a significant predictor (P = .0201) of surgical limb knee EAC, explaining 12.92% of the variance.

Conclusion:

The ability to load the knee after ACL injury changes across the continuum of care and is related to QUADS and ExtDiff. These results provide clinicians with insight into potential contributing factors that may limit knee loading during the rehabilitation process.

Assessing lower extremity coordination and coordination variability in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during walking

BACKGROUND

Despite our knowledge of several biomechanical risk factors related to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, such as decreased knee flexion, increased knee abduction, and increased hip flexion, adduction and internal rotation during walking, jogging, and landing from a jump, the incidence of ACL tears remains high. Quantifying variability in the lower extremity provides a continuous measure of joint coordination and function that may elicit an additional aspect of ACL injury mechanisms.

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim of this study was to assess joint coordination patterns and variability in individuals following ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Twenty participants with unilateral ACLR and twenty uninjured participants matched by sex and body mass index (BMI) walked over-ground at self-selected speed. Two force plates embedded in the walking platform recorded ground reaction forces (GRF), and a motion capture system collected kinematic data. Vector coding was used to describe coordination patterns and measure coordination variability in hip-knee and knee-ankle coupled motion.

RESULTS

Individuals with ACLR had greater variability in hip-knee coordination compared to their healthy counterparts for both the reconstructed and contralateral limbs. The individuals with ACLR also exhibited altered coordination patterns, one of which was characterized by constrained hip motion.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results are evidence that differences in joint coordination exist between individuals with and without ACLR, even after the former are cleared to return to sport. This new insight into coordinative function after ACLR may be useful for improving rehabilitation strategies as well as identifying those at risk of injury during return to sport testing.

Reporting of acute programme variables and exercise descriptors in rehabilitation strength training for tibiofemoral joint soft tissue injury: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Strength training acute programme variables (APVs) can impact tibiofemoral joint injury outcomes. Exercise descriptors (EDs; e.g. patient-position) specify configurations within which APVs are applied. Evidence-based practice depends on adequate reporting of APVs and EDs to replicate strength training interventions in clinical practice. This systematic review assessed APV and ED reporting for adults with tibiofemoral joint injury (anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)/posterior cruciate ligament (PCL)/medial collateral ligament (MCL)/lateral collateral ligament (LCL)/meniscus/hyaline cartilage (HC)).

METHODS

PRISMA guidelines were followed. Specific key-term combinations were employed and database searches performed. Descriptive/observational/experimental studies were included (2006-2018). Studies needed to report pre-defined APVs or EDs for ≥51% of all exercises to be included. Frequency counts were made of studies adequately reporting APVs and EDs.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles were included (ACL = 13; meniscus = 3). No PCL/MCL/LCL/HC articles were identified. Of nine APVs, five and four were consistently reported by the majority of ACL (≥7) and meniscal (≥2) studies, respectively. Of eight EDs, four were consistently reported by the majority of both ACL (≥8) and meniscal (≥2) studies.

CONCLUSION

Many APVs and EDs were not adequately reported. Future studies should better document APVs and EDs for higher standards of intervention reporting and enhanced translation of research to clinical practice.

Participants at three months post-operative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) demonstrate differences in lower extremity energy absorption contribution and quadriceps strength compared to healthy controls

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare hip and knee energy absorption contribution (EAC) during a double limb squat (DLS) and quadriceps strength in patients three months post-operative ACL-R versus matched healthy controls.

METHODS

Twenty-four ACL-R participants (Age = 15.5 ± 1.3 yrs; Ht = 1.66 ± .07 m; Mass = 66.3 ± 15.5 kg) were compared to 24 age, sex, limb, and activity-matched healthy controls (Age = 15.5 ± 1.2 yrs; Ht = 1.65 ± .08 m; Mass = 59.0 ± 9.8 kg). Lower extremity biomechanical data was collected at three months post-operative ACL-R during five consecutive DLS. EAC was calculated during DLS descent. Isokinetic quadriceps strength was collected at 60°/s. Normalized quadriceps peak torque (QUADS) was averaged across five trials. Independent t-tests examined differences in group hip and knee EAC during each task. Separate Pearson product-moment correlations examined the relationship between QUADS and hip and knee EAC during the DLS.

RESULTS

ACL-R demonstrated greater injured limb hip EAC (46.4 ± 16.0) than Healthy (31.7 ± 11.0) during a DLS (p = 0.001). ACL-R demonstrated less injured limb knee EAC (42.7 ± 14.6) than Healthy (60.6 ± 8.9) during DLS (p < 0.001). No differences were seen between uninjured limb hip (ACL-R = 0.0 ± 14.2; Healthy = 33.4 ± 9.1, p = 0.629) or knee (ACL-R = 56.9 ± 15.6; Healthy = 59.1 ± 9.8, p = 0.561) EAC and matched limbs. ACL-R injured limb QUADS was decreased compared to Healthy (ACL-R = 1.1 ± 0.5; Healthy = 2.0 ± 0.5, p < 0.001). No differences were seen in QUADS on the uninjured and matched limbs (ACL-R = 2.0 ± 0.6; Healthy = 1.9 ± 0.5, p = 0.894). There was a weak, negative correlation between injured limb QUADS and hip EAC (r = -0.471, p = 0.001) and moderate, positive correlation between injured limb QUADS and knee EAC (r = 0.615, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ACL-R participants demonstrate different eccentric loading strategies during a DLS at three months postoperative compared to matched healthy controls.

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves tibial rotational instability: analysis of squatting motion using a 2D/3D registration technique

Background

The anterior cruciate ligament-deficient (ACLD) knee requires appropriate treatment for the patient to return to sports. The purpose of this study was to clarify the kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee in squatting motion before and after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (DB-ACLR) using a 2D/3D registration technique.

Methods

The subjects of this study were 10 men with confirmed unilateral ACL rupture who underwent DB-ACLR. Computed tomography (CT) of the knee joints was performed before DB-ACLR. Fluoroscopic imaging of the knee motion in squatting before and after DB-ACLR was also performed. The 2D/3D registration technique is a method of calculating positional relationships by projecting the 3D bone model created from the CT data onto the image extracted from the fluoroscopic images. The tibial anteroposterior (AP) and rotational positions were analyzed with reference to the femur.

Results

The tibial AP position of the ACLD knees was significantly anterior to the contralateral knees (p = 0.015). The tibial rotational position of the ACLD knees was significantly internally rotated compared to the contralateral knees (p < 0.001). Both tibial AP and rotational positions improved after DB-ACLR (p < 0.001), with no significant differences compared to the contralateral knees.

Conclusion

DB-ACLR improved not only tibial AP instability but also tibial rotational instability at knee flexion with weight-bearing. DB-ACLR appears to be a useful technique for normalizing the knee joint kinematics of ACLD knees.

Phase-Specific Ground Reaction Force Analyses of Bilateral and Unilateral Jumps in Patients With ACL Reconstruction

Background:

In patients who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there is a weak correlation between subjective evaluation of knee function on questionnaires and clinical or biomechanical test results.

Hypothesis:

Patients with lower subjective knee function will demonstrate lower ground-reaction forces (GRFs) in the operated leg and greater GRF asymmetries in both phase-specific and functional data analysis (FDA) approaches compared with patients with higher subjective knee function.

Study Design:

Descriptive laboratory study.

Methods:

The GRFs of the operated and nonoperated legs of 40 patients who previously underwent ACL reconstruction (patellar tendon) were analyzed during unilateral and bilateral countermovement jumps at a mean 2.5 years after surgery. The patients were separated into 2 groups depending on their International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Form score: low IKDC and high IKDC.

Results:

Both phase-specific and FDA approaches showed lower GRF values in the operated compared with the nonoperated leg within the low-IKDC group during bilateral jumps. Moreover, lower GRF values were also present in the operated and nonoperated legs in the low-IKDC group compared with those of the high-IKDC group. Differences in GRFs were predominantly observed during the eccentric deceleration phase of jumping.

Conclusion:

Patients with previous ACL reconstruction who have limited subjective knee function have lower GRF values and greater GRF asymmetries, suggesting the use of interlimb compensation strategies.

Clinical Relevance:

The study results lead to a better understanding of the motor control needed during the eccentric and concentric movement phases of unilateral and bilateral jumps in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction.