Candidate methylated genes in osteoarthritis explored by bioinformatics analysis

From polarity to pathology: Decoding the role of cell orientation in osteoarthritis

Cell polarity refers to the orientation of tissue and organelles within a cell and the direction of its function. It is one of the most critical characteristics of metazoans. The development, growth, and functional tissue distribution are closely related to holistic tissue or organ homeostasis. However, the connection between cell polarity and osteoarthritis (OA) is less well-known. In OA, multiple chondrocyte clusters and tissue disorganisation can be observed in the degraded cartilage tissue. The excessive upregulation of the planar cell polarity (PCP) signalling pathway leads to the loss of cell polarity and organisation in OA progression and aetiology. Recent research has become increasingly aware of the importance of cell polarity and its correlation with OA. Several cell polarity-related treatments have shed light on OA. A thorough understanding of cell polarity and OA would provide more insights for future investigations to treat this worldwide disease.

The translational potential of this article

Understanding cell polarity, associated signalling pathways, organelle changes, and cell movement in the development of OA could lead to advances in precision medicine and enhanced treatment strategies for OA patients.

Whole-genome RNA sequencing identifies distinct transcriptomic profiles in impingement cartilage between patients with femoroacetabular impingement and hip osteoarthritis

Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has a strong clinical association with the development of hip osteoarthritis (OA); however, the pathobiological mechanisms underlying the transition from focal impingement to global joint degeneration remain poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to use whole-genome RNA sequencing to identify and subsequently validate differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in femoral head articular cartilage samples from patients with FAI and hip OA secondary to FAI. Thirty-seven patients were included in the study with whole-genome RNA sequencing performed on 10 gender-matched patients in the FAI and OA cohorts and the remaining specimens were used for validation analyses. We identified a total of 3531 DEGs between the FAI and OA cohorts with multiple targets for genes implicated in canonical OA pathways. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction validation confirmed increased expression of FGF18 and WNT16 in the FAI samples, while there was increased expression of MMP13 and ADAMTS4 in the OA samples. Expression levels of FGF18 and WNT16 were also higher in FAI samples with mild cartilage damage compared to FAI samples with severe cartilage damage or OA cartilage. Our study further expands the knowledge regarding distinct genetic reprogramming in the cartilage between FAI and hip OA patients. We independently validated the results of the sequencing analysis and found increased expression of anabolic markers in patients with FAI and minimal histologic cartilage damage, suggesting that anabolic signaling may be increased in early FAI with a transition to catabolic and inflammatory gene expression as FAI progresses towards more severe hip OA. Clinical significance:Cam-type FAI has a strong clinical association with hip OA; however, the cellular pathophysiology of disease progression remains poorly understood. Several previous studies have demonstrated increased expression of inflammatory markers in FAI cartilage samples, suggesting the involvement of these inflammatory pathways in the disease progression. Our study further expands the knowledge regarding distinct genetic reprogramming in the cartilage between FAI and hip OA patients. In addition to differences in inflammatory gene expression, we also identified differential expression in multiple pathways involved in hip OA progression.

Low Expression of ADCY4 Predicts Worse Survival of Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma Based on Integrated Analysis and Immunohistochemical Verification

Purpose

The molecular mechanism underlying the carcinogenesis and development of lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) has not been sufficiently elucidated. This analysis was performed to find pivotal genes and explore their prognostic roles in LUSC.

Methods

A microarray dataset from GEO (GSE19188) and a TCGA-LUSC dataset were used to identify differentially co-expressed genes through Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) and differential gene expression analysis. We conducted functional enrichment analyses of differentially co-expressed genes and established a protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. Then, we identified the top 10 hub genes using the Maximal Clique Centrality (MCC) algorithm. We performed overall survival (OS) analysis of these hub genes among LUSC cases. GSEA analyses of survival-related hub genes were conducted. Ultimately, the GEO and The Human Protein Atlas (THPA) databases and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results from the real world were used to verify our findings.

Results

A list of 576 differentially co-expressed genes were selected. Functional enrichment analysis indicated that regulation of vasculature development, cell-cell junctions, actin binding and PPAR signaling pathways were mainly enriched. The top 10 hub genes were selected according to the ranking of MCC scores, and 5 genes were closely correlated with OS of LUSC. Additionally, GSEA analysis showed that spliceosome and cell adhesion molecules were associated with the expression of GNG11 and ADCY4, respectively. The GSE30219 and THPA databases and IHC results from the real world indicated that although GNG11 was not detected, ADCY4 was obviously downregulated in LUSC tissues at the mRNA and protein levels.

Conclusions

This analysis showed that survival-related hub genes are highly correlated to the tumorigenesis and development of LUSC. Additionally, ADCY4 is a candidate therapeutic and prognostic biomarker of LUSC.

Transcriptome analyses identify key genes and potential mechanisms in a rat model of osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common degenerative diseases of the joints worldwide, but still the pathogenesis of OA is largely unknown. The purpose of our study is to clarify key candidate genes and relevant signaling pathways in a surgical-induced OA rat model.

METHODS

The microarray raw data of GSE8077 was downloaded from GEO datasets. GeoDiver were employed to screen differentially-expressed genes (DEGs). Enrichment analyses of DEGs were performed using Metascape. Construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and identification of key genes were conducted using STRING, Cytoscape v3.6.0, and Centiscape2.2. Furthermore, miRDB and Cytoscape v3.6.0 were used for visualization of miRNA-mRNA regulatory network. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis for predicted miRNAs was undertaken using DIANA-miRPath v3.0.

RESULTS

Several DEGs (188 in comparison between OA and sham-operated group and 160 in comparison between OA and contralateral group) were identified. DEGs mainly enriched in vasculature development, regulation of cell migration, response to growth factor (Gene ontology), and ECM-receptor interaction (KEGG). Two comparison cohorts shared 79 intersection genes, and of these, Ccl2, Col4a1, Col1a1, Aldh1a3, and Itga8 were defined as the hub genes. Predicted miRNAs of seven DEGs from sub-networks mainly enriched in MAPK signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

The current study shows that some key genes and pathways, such as Ccl2, Col4a1, Col1a1, Aldh1a3, Itga8, ECM-receptor interaction, and MAPK signaling pathway may be associated with OA progression and act as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for OA.

Analysis of gene expression and methylation datasets identified ADAMTS9, FKBP5, and PFKBF3 as biomarkers for osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a kind of chronic osteoarthropathy and degenerative joint disease. Epigenetic regulation in the gene expression dynamics has become increasingly important in OA. We performed a combined analysis of two types of microarray datasets (gene expression and DNA methylation) to identify methylation-based key biomarkers to provide a better understanding of molecular biological mechanisms of OA.

METHODS

We obtained two expression profiling datasets (GSE55235, GSE55457) and one DNA methylation profiling data set (GSE63695) from the Gene Expression Omnibus. First, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between patients with OA and controls were identified using the Limma package in R(v3.4.4). Then, function enrichment analysis of DEGs was performed using a DAVID database. For DNA methylation datasets, ChAMP methylation analysis package was used to identify differential methylation genes (DMGs). Finally, a comprehensive analysis of DEGs and DMGs was conducted to identify genes that exhibited differential expression and methylation simultaneously.

RESULTS

We identified 112 DEGs and 2,896 DMGs in patients with OA compared with controls. Functional analysis of DEGs obtained that inflammatory responses, immune responses, and positive regulation of apoptosis, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling pathway, and osteoclast differentiation may be involved in the pathogenesis of OA. Cross-analysis revealed 26 genes that exhibited differential expression and methylation in OA. Among them, ADAMTS9, FKBP5, and PFKBF3 were identified as valuable methylation-based biomarkers for OA.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our study identified different molecular features between patients with OA and controls. This may provide new clues for clarifying the pathogenetic mechanisms of OA.