Influence of stem length on component flexion and posterior condylar offset in revision total knee arthroplasty

Individual Revision Knee Arthroplasty Is a Safe Limb Salvage Procedure

Introduction: Revision total knee arthroplasty after multiple pre-surgeries is challenging. Due to severe bone defects, standard implants for metaphyseal and diaphyseal anchoring may no longer be suitable. The primary aim of this case series is to evaluate the early complication rate for individual knee implants with custom-made cones and stems after two-stage revision with severe bone defects. Methods: Ten patients who were treated with custom-made 3D-printed knee revision implants were included. Inclusion criteria were a two-stage revision due to late-onset or chronic periprosthetic joint infection as well as aseptic loosening. All severe bone defects were AORI type III. All procedure-related complications were evaluated. Postoperative range of motion after one year was measured. The time between the two surgeries was evaluated. Results: The mean follow-up was 21 months (range: 12–40). The mean time between the two-stage surgeries was 71.6 days. No fractures were observed intra- and postoperatively. Two patients were revised without changing metal components due to persistent hematoma (three weeks post-surgery) and persistent PJI (three months post-surgery). The mean passive postoperative range of motion was 92° (range: 80–110°). Conclusions: Individual custom-made implants for rTKA provide a safe procedure for patients with huge bone defects after several pre-surgeries. If standard knee systems with standard cones or sleeves are not suitable anymore, custom-made treatment offers the patient the last option for limb preservation. However, this is associated with increased costs.

Metaphyseal Stem Extension Improves Tibial Stability in Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The goal was to determine if the addition of a metaphyseal stem extension limits micromotion of a cementless tibial component during cyclic loading in primary total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis tested was that the use of a 50-mm stem extension on a cementless tibial component would limit motion compared with an identical cementless component without a stem extension.

METHODS

The study used 3 variations of a tibial component from the same total knee arthroplasty system. Group 1 consisted of a cementless tibial component without a stem extension. Group 2 used the same cementless component as group 1, but with the addition of a short 50-mm stem. Group 3 consisted of a cemented tibial component without a stem extension to serve as a "control" (gold standard). The tibial specimens were implanted into a synthetic bone model and tested using a physiological medial-lateral 60/40 load distribution for 5000 cycles.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated a significant decrease in motion at the anterior region of the cementless stem extension (group 2) components compared with the cementless with no stem extension (group 1). The cementless with stem extension (group 2) demonstrated similar results at all cycles to the cemented (group 3) components at the anterior region.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a short metaphyseal stem (50mm) to a keel plus 4-peg tibial component design provides a significant reduction in micromotion during cyclic loading of a cementless tibial baseplate in a synthetic foam bone model, similar to a cemented implant.

Sagittal alignment of the cemented femoral component in revision total knee arthroplasty influences the anterior and posterior condylar offset: Stem length does not affect these variables

BACKGROUND

The position of the femoral component can influence knee kinematics by altering the posterior (PCO) and anterior condylar offset (ACO). The primary aim of this study was to assess whether the length of the cemented stem influences the sagittal position of the femoral component after revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). The secondary aim was to determine the influence of the sagittal position on PCO and ACO.

METHODS

There were 172 consecutive patients over a seven-year period that underwent rTKA with a cemented semi-constrained prosthesis. The 172 patients were separated into two groups: 115 with short stems (50 mm) and 57 with longer stems (100 or 150 mm). Using rotationally acceptable lateral radiographs, the degree of flexion(+)/extension(-) of the femoral components, PCO, and ACO were measured.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference (p > 0.25) between the two groups for sagittal position, PCO, or ACO. The average flexion of the femoral component with short stems was 2.2 ± 4.1° and 2.2 ± 3.4° for long stems (difference = 0.0, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -1.3 to 1.2). The average PCO ratio was 1.02 ± 0.15 for short stems and 0.99 ± 0.17 for long stems (difference = 0.03, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.08). The average ACO ratio was at 0.07 ± 0.08 for short stems and 0.08 ± 0.08 for long stems (difference = 0.01, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.04). There was a significant correlation between sagittal alignment of the femoral component and PCO (flexion increased PCO, r = 0.39, p < 0.0001) and ACO (flexion decreased ACO, r = -0.34, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented stem length does not influence the position of femoral component in the sagittal axis, PCO, or ACO. Surgical technique and sizing of the femoral component may be more predictive.