Bi-cruciate substituting total knee arthroplasty provides varus-valgus stability throughout the midflexion range

Comparison of accuracy and early outcomes in robotic total knee arthroplasty using NAVIO and ROSA

This study aimed to compare the cutting and component placement accuracies and early outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between an image-free handheld robotic system (NAVIO) and a radiography-based robotic system (ROSA). This retrospective study included 88 patients (88 knees) who underwent TKA using the NAVIO (40 patients) or ROSA (48 patients) robotic systems. The accuracies of the robotic systems were compared. Clinical scores were evaluated using the Knee Society Score 2011 (KSS 2011) and the forgotten joint score (FJS)-12 at 1 year postoperatively. The femoral sagittal cutting error was smaller in the NAVIO group than in the ROSA group. The other cutting errors were not statistically different in both groups. Implantation errors did not differ between the groups. Regarding the clinical outcomes of the KSS 2011 subscales, the symptoms score was higher in knees operated using ROSA than in those using NAVIO. The other KSS 2011 subscales and the FJS-12 showed no differences between the two groups. In conclusion, the femoral sagittal cutting error was smaller in the NAVIO group than in the ROSA group, and the KSS 2011 symptom score subsection at one year was higher in the knees operated using ROSA than in those using NAVIO.

Improvement of rotational arc during deep flexion range of a novel designed polyethylene insert for posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

One of the remaining issues in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is achieving sufficient rotational arc during deep flexion range of the knee for specific postures such as the 'seiza' or cross-legged sitting. This study aimed to evaluate whether there was a change in the actual in vivo rotational arc during deep flexion range before and after a design change of polyethylene (PE) inserts.

METHODS

In 50 posterior-stabilised TKA cases, knee kinematics, including rotational movement, were measured intraoperatively using an image-free navigation system to compare a newly designed PE insert with reduced the posterior lip with a conventional PE insert. Femoral-tibial rotational angles at 30°, 45°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 130° knee flexion were evaluated. Varus/valgus instability, knee range of motion, and femoral rollback were also measured. Obtained parameters were compared between new and conventional PE inserts. The independent factors associated with rotational arc during deep flexion range (120° and 130° knee flexion) were analysed using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The newly designed PE insert demonstrated a significant increase in the rotational arc at 120° (22.9 ± 8.7° vs. 30.1 ± 11.9°, P < 0.001) and 130° (24.3 ± 9.5° vs. 32.5 ± 12.4°, P < 0.001) knee flexion compared with that with the conventionally designed posterior-stabilised insert. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that using the newly designed PE insert was an independent predictor of improved rotational arc during deep flexion range: regression coefficient was 11.2 (95% confidence interval 7.1-15.3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The design change, which reduced the posterior lip of the PE insert, contributed to improved rotational arc in 120° and 130° deep flexion ranges.

The modification of bone cut angle and joint line obliquity did not change the tibiofemoral kinematics and stability of knee joint after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Previous reports using cadaveric knees and musculoskeletal computer simulation have shown that kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides more natural and physiological tibiofemoral kinematic patterns than mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. These reports suggested that the modification of joint line obliquity improve the knee kinematics. This study aimed to determine whether joint line obliquity change the intraoperative tibiofemoral kinematics in TKA candidates with knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive knees with varus osteoarthritis that underwent TKA using a navigation system were evaluated. Two types of trial components were prepared: (1) MA TKA model: component trial in which articulating surface was parallel to the bone cut surface (2) KA TKA model: the femoral component trial, which mimicked the KA TKA method of Dossett et al. was designed 3° valgus and 3° internal rotation to the femoral bone cut surface, and the tibial component trial was designed 3° varus to the tibial bone cut surface. These two trials were set on the same knees during the operation, and the tibiofemoral rotational kinematics and varus-valgus laxity were measured from 0° to 120° of knee flexion using a navigation system.

RESULTS

The joint gap was 20 ± 2 mm and 3° ± 1° varus in extension and 20 ± 2 mm and 3° ± 1°varus in flexion. The differences in femoral component rotation between KA TKA and MA TKA were not statistically significant for any knee flexion angle. The differences in varus-valgus laxity between KA TKA and MA TKA were also not statistically significant for any knee flexion angle.

CONCLUSION

Although the degree of joint line obliquity varies widely in various KA TKA methods, this study, which mimicked the method of Dossett et al. showed that the modification of joint line obliquity did not change the tibiofemoral kinematics and stability of the knee joint in TKA candidates with knee osteoarthritis.

Difference in implant design affects midflexion rotational laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: a computer navigation study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare midflexion rotational laxity between two different design concept models of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: symmetrical surface design of neutral joint line obliquity and asymmetrical surface design of varus joint line obliquity.

METHODS

Sixty-three knees that underwent cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty were evaluated. Manual maximum passive rotational stress without acceleration was applied to the knees under navigation monitoring. Pre-operative and post-operative internal and external rotational angles were measured at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion.

RESULTS

The post-operative internal rotational laxity was significantly increased compared with pre-operative levels at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° flexion among all subjects (mean 9.7° vs 11.1°, 10.6° vs 11.6°, 11.2° vs 12.9°, and 13.2° vs 14.9°; p = 0.01, 0.04, 0.001, and 0.008, respectively). The post-operative external rotational laxity was significantly decreased compared to pre-operative levels at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° flexion among all subjects (mean 10.8° vs 6.8°, 12.5° vs 9.4°, 12.8° vs 10.0°, and 11.3° vs 9.5°; p < 0.0001, < 0.0001, < 0.0001, and 0.0008, respectively). The post-operative total rotational laxity significantly decreased, compared with pre-operative levels, at 30° and 45° flexion among all subjects (mean 20.4° vs 17.9°, and 23.1° vs 21.1°; p = 0.002 and 0.04, respectively). The post-operative total rotational laxity was significantly smaller in asymmetrically designed total knee arthroplasty than in symmetrically designed total knee arthroplasty at 30°, 45°, and 60° flexion (mean 19.3° vs 15.8°, 22.8° vs 18.7°, and 24.4° vs 20.8°; p = 0.03, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively), whereas no significant difference was observed at 90° flexion.

CONCLUSION

Compared to symmetrical surface design, asymmetrical surface design resulted in lower rotational laxity at the midflexion range in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Association between In Vivo Knee Kinematics and Patient-Reported Outcomes during Squatting in Bicruciate-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

Bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS TKA) has been developed to improve TKA kinematic performance. However, the relationship between in vivo kinematics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has not been well described. This study was performed to clarify the relationship between in vivo kinematics and PROs in a cohort of patients undergoing BCS TKA. Forty knees were evaluated using a two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration technique obtained from sagittal plane fluoroscopy. In vivo kinematics including anteroposterior (AP) translation and tibiofemoral rotation were evaluated. Knee Society scores (KSSs) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOSs) were assessed before and after surgery. Relationships between tibiofemoral kinematics assessed with the knee in different positions of knee flexion and PROs were evaluated using Spearman's correlation analysis. The study demonstrated a significant negative correlation (r =  - 0.33) between medial AP translation from minimum flexion to 30 degrees flexion and postoperative KOOS activities of daily living subscale. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.51) was found between the femoral external rotation from minimum flexion to 30 degrees flexion and improvement of the KOOS pain subscale. No correlation was found between the lateral AP translation and PROs. Achieving medial AP and femoral external rotation stability in early flexion may be important in optimizing postoperative PROs.

Both Intraoperative Medial and Lateral Joint Stabilities at Midflexion Influence Postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Following Bi-Cruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

Bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was developed to approximate normal knee kinematics and is expected to improve clinical outcomes. However, the effects of soft tissue balance at the medial or lateral compartment on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following BCS TKA are unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between the medial or lateral component gaps and PROMs following BCS TKA. One hundred seventeen knees with varus deformities which underwent BCS TKA were included in this study. They were divided into two groups according to the validated Japanese version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for each subscale of pain, symptoms, and activities of daily living (ADL) at 1 year postoperatively: group H consisted of patients with ≥90 points and group L consisted of patients with <90 points. Intraoperative medial and lateral joint laxities at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° flexion measured using a tensor device were compared between the two groups in each subscale. In the pain subscale, the medial joint laxities at 30° (p < 0.05) and 60° flexion (p < 0.05) in group H were significantly smaller than those in group L. In the ADL subscale, the medial joint laxity at 60° flexion in group H was significantly smaller than that in group L (p < 0.05). In the symptom subscale, the lateral joint laxity at 60° flexion in group H was significantly smaller than that in group L (p < 0.05). Surgeons should pay attention to the importance of both medial and lateral joint stabilities to achieve better postoperative PROMs following BCS TKA.

Comparison of the joint laxity of total knee arthroplasty evaluated by the distraction force and the varus-valgus force

BACKGROUND

Component gap (CG) measurement help surgeons evaluate intraoperative soft-tissue balance. One technique is measuring the CG using tensioner devices with distraction force. Another is to evaluate the laxity under a varus-valgus force using navigation or robotics. The aim was to compare the JL evaluated by CG and varus-valgus force between the different types of total knee arthroplasties.

METHODS

Forty-three bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) knees and 33 bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) knees were included. After bone resection and soft tissue balancing, the CG was measured and after the final implantation and capsule closure, JL under a maximum varus-valgus stress was recorded with navigation. JL evaluated by the CG (JLCG) was defined as CG minus selected thickness of the tibial component and JL under varus-valgus force (JLVV) was defined as difference between varus-valgus angles without stress and maximum varus-valgus angles under varus-valgus force. The evaluations were performed at flexions of 10°, 30°, 60° and 90°.

RESULTS

Although JLCGs of lateral compartment of BCS were larger than those of BCR, no difference was found between JLVVs of BCS and BCR. Although JLCGs of lateral compartment did not change at each knee flexion angle in both BCS and BCR, JLVVs of lateral compartment increased by 3° from 10° to 90° knee flexion.

CONCLUSION

JLVVs of BCS and BCR were equivalent, whereas BCS showed larger JLCGs of lateral compartment. JLVVs of lateral compartment increased by 3° in the range from 10° to 90° knee flexion whereas JLCGs remained stable.

Evaluation of anteroposterior accelerometric change after bi-cruciate stabilized total knee arthroplasty and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is resected. ACL dysfunction causes knee instability and is regarded as one factor in poor TKA outcomes. In bi-cruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA, the implant reproduces ACL function and provides anterior stability. The objective of this study was to evaluate preoperative and postoperative X-rays and accelerometer gait measurements in patients who underwent BCS TKA and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA to assess the postoperative acceleration changes of knees after these procedures and to compare them in terms of joint range of motion (ROM) and the New Knee Society Score (New KSS).

METHODS

The subjects were 60 patients, 30 of whom underwent BCS TKA and 30 PS TKA. Joint ROM, New KSS, lateral X-rays of the standing extended knee, and accelerometer data were evaluated 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in joint ROM between the groups. Both had good New KSS results, but the functional activity score was significantly higher after BCS TKA than after PS TKA. X-rays showed a lower posterior offset ratio after BCS TKA than after PS TKA, with anteroposterior positioning closer to that of the normal knee. Accelerometer data showed that postoperative anteroposterior acceleration on the femoral side in the stance phase and swing phase was lower after BCS TKA than after PS TKA.

CONCLUSION

Compared with PS TKA, BCS TKA resulted in a higher functional activity score, closer positioning to that of the normal knee on lateral X-ray, and lower anteroposterior acceleration on the femoral side.

Comparison of in vivo knee kinematics before and after bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty during squatting

Background

No studies have directly evaluated kinematic changes during squatting before and after bicruciate-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (BCS-TKA) with the dual cam-post mechanism and asymmetric surfaces. This study investigated the effect of BCS-TKA on changes to pre- and postoperative skeletal knee kinematics, to identify factors associated with postoperative skeletal kinematic parameters.

Methods

Seventeen knees in 17 patients were prospectively recruited before primary TKA for advanced medial knee osteoarthritis. Subjects underwent BCS-TKA and were evaluated more than 1 year postoperatively. In vivo dynamic skeletal knee kinematics were evaluated using periodic radiographic images collected during squatting to quantify the tibiofemoral functional extension/flexion angle, anteroposterior (AP) translation, and axial rotation angle using image-matching techniques. Rotational alignments of femoral and tibial components were measured postoperatively using computed tomography images.

Results

The pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral functional extension/flexion angles during squatting were 12.2° ± 6.7°/100.1° ± 16.8° and 9.6° ± 8.6°/109.4° ± 16.8°, respectively, with a significant difference in flexion angle (p < .05). Total AP translation was significantly larger postoperatively than preoperatively (10.8 mm ± 3.7 mm vs. 14.4 mm ± 4.2 mm, respectively; p < .05). The pre- and postoperative total rotation angles were 6.6° ± 3.0° and 6.4° ± 3.7°, respectively, indicating no significant difference. The pre- and postoperative tibiofemoral functional flexion angles were significantly associated with each other (p = .0434, r = .49). The postoperative total rotation angle was significantly smaller when the total component rotational mismatch angle between the femoral and tibial components was above 5° vs. below 5° (4.6° ± 2.7° vs. 8.3° ± 3.9°, respectively; p < .05).

Conclusions

BCS-TKA significantly increased the tibiofemoral functional flexion angles, with larger AP translation postoperatively. Both preoperative skeletal kinematics and surgical techniques affected the skeletal kinematics of the replaced knee. A total component rotational mismatch angle greater than 5° significantly decreased postoperative total knee rotation during squatting.

Knee Prosthesis in the Computer Era

Over the past two decades, computer assistance has revolutionalized surgery and has enabled enormous advancements in knee prosthesis surgery. Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a hot topic of orthopaedic research. Reflecting population dynamics, its use continues to increase, especially in high demand populations. Therefore, efforts to achieve the best fit and precise alignment in TKA continue. Computer assistance is valuable for knee prosthesis surgeons in this regard. This manuscript investigated the use of computer assistance in knee prosthesis surgery. The effects of computer use on important facets of knee prosthesis surgery, such as precision, clinical aspects, and costs, were examined. Moreover, an overall review of the recent literature on the navigation and personalized cutting guides was conducted.

Midflexion instability in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence on the existence of midflexion instability in primary total knee arthroplasty and which factors might contribute to this condition.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Embase databases was conducted since the inception of the database to July 2019. All relevant articles were retrieved, and their bibliographies were hand searched for further references on midflexion instability in primary total knee arthroplasty. The search strategy yielded 28 articles. After duplicate removal titles, abstracts and full text were reviewed. Fifteen studies were assessed for eligibility, 8 studies were excluded because they did not fully comply with the inclusion criteria. Seven articles were finally included in this systematic review. Anteroposterior translation, total knee arthroplasty design such as posterior-stabilized or posterior-cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty, joint line position with posterior condylar offset and joint gaps were considered to significantly influence midflexion stability.

RESULTS

Based on this systematic review anteroposterior translation of ≥ 7 mm was an independent risk factor for midflexion instability at 30° knee flexion. Joint line position can be altered by up to 5 mm without measurable changes in joint stability and both an increase and a decrease in posterior condylar offset led to 30° midflexion instability.

CONCLUSION

Midflexion instability in primary total knee arthroplasty remains to be not entirely understood. Due to the low quality of available evidence, it is difficult to make any definitive conclusions. The factors which can lead to this condition were analyzed in this review, furthermore, we did not find exhaustive evidence on midflexion instability existence as an isolated entity. Nonetheless, this review will form a baseline for future research and creates awareness for the routine assessment of midflexion instability in primary total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Two different posterior-stabilized mobile-bearing TKA designs: navigator evaluation of intraoperative kinematic differences

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare two types of posterior-stabilized (PS) mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The hypothesis was that no major differences were going to be found among the two TKA designs.

METHODS

Two cohorts of patients who were divided according to implant design (Cohort A, new design gradually reducing radius PS MB TKA; Cohort B, traditional dual-radius PS MB TKA) were analyzed by means of intraoperative navigation. All operations were guided by a non-image-based navigation system that recorded relative femoral and tibial positions in native and implanted knees during the following kinematic tests: passive range of motion (PROM), varus-valgus stress test at 0° and 30° (VV0, VV30) and anterior/posterior drawer test at 90° of flexion (AP90).

RESULTS

There were no significative differences in kinematic tests between the two implants. Cohort A, however, showed a different post-implant trend for VV0 and VV30 that were lower than the pre-implant ones, as expected, while for Cohort B, the trend is opposite. However, the gradually reducing radius prosthesis (Cohort A) showed a trend of improving stability (29% compared to the preoperative status) in mid-flexion (VV30) which the traditional dual-radius design (Cohort B) would not. Moreover, we found no differences among postoperative results of the two TKA designs.

CONCLUSION

Despite design variations, no difference has been found among the prostheses in terms of PROM, rotations and translations. Both design kinematics did not show paradoxical external rotations, but an increase in femoral translation in mid-flexion without affecting the functioning of the prosthesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.