Joint-preserving tumour resection around the knee with allograft reconstruction using three-dimensional preoperative planning and patient-specific instruments

Combined Correction of Coronal and Rotational Deformities of the Femur With Distal Femoral Osteotomy Using Patient-Specific Instrumentation

BACKGROUND

Distal femoral osteotomy (DFO) can be used to simultaneously correct coronal and rotational deformities. Patient-specific instruments (PSIs) are known to be helpful in such complex osteotomies, but data on surgical accuracy for the combined correction of coronal and rotational deformities of the femur are missing.

PURPOSE

To investigate the radiological results of DFO for simultaneous correction of coronal and rotational deformities using PSIs.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

All included patients underwent DFO (34 patients, 36 knees) using PSIs for combined correction of coronal and rotational deformities. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was measured in weightbearing long-leg radiographs, and the femoral torsion was assessed using computed tomography scans, both pre- and postoperatively. The achieved corrections of HKA and femoral torsion were determined for each knee, and surgical accuracy was calculated.

RESULTS

HKA and femoral torsion changed significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively (from 2.4° ± 3.6° vs 0.1° ± 1.8° [P < .001] and 31.2° ± 17.2° vs 18.7° ± 7.4° [P < .001]). The difference from planned to achieved correction was statistically greater for HKA (-2.9° ± 3.8° vs -2.3° ± 3.5°; P = .018) than for femoral torsion (-12.4° ± 11.8° vs -12.3° ± 12.2°; P = .771), which did not reach significance. The accuracies of HKA and femoral torsion correction were 1.1° ± 1° and 2.4° ± 1.9°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Coronal and rotational deformities of the femur can accurately be corrected simultaneously by a DFO, utilizing PSIs. High accuracy was achieved for the correction of both coronal and rotational deformities, with absolute mean differences from planned to achieved correction of 1.1° and 2.4°, respectively.

Does Freehand, Patient-specific Instrumentation or Surgical Navigation Perform Better for Allograft Reconstruction After Tumor Resection? A Preclinical Synthetic Bone Study

BACKGROUND

Joint-sparing resection of periarticular bone tumors can be challenging because of complex geometry. Successful reconstruction of periarticular bone defects after tumor resection is often performed with structural allografts to allow for joint preservation. However, achieving a size-matched allograft to fill the defect can be challenging because allograft sizes vary, they do not always match a patient's anatomy, and cutting the allograft to perfectly fit the defect is demanding.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there a difference in mental workload among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation approaches? (2) Is there a difference in conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft), elapsed time during reconstruction, and qualitative assessment of goodness-of-fit of the allograft reconstruction among the approaches?

METHODS

Seven surgeons used three modalities in the same order (freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation) to fashion synthetic bone to reconstruct a standardized bone defect. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) mental task load index questionnaires and procedure time were captured. Cone-beam CT images of the shaped allografts were used to measure conformance (quantitative measure of deviation from the ideal bone graft) to a computer-generated ideal bone graft model. Six additional (senior) surgeons blinded to modality scored the quality of fit of the allografts into the standardized tumor defect using a 10-point Likert scale. We measured conformance using the root-mean-square metric in mm and used ANOVA for multipaired comparisons (p < 0.05 was significant).

RESULTS

There was no difference in mental NASA total task load scores among the freehand, patient-specific instrumentation, and surgical navigation techniques. We found no difference in conformance root-mean-square values (mean ± SD) between surgical navigation (2 ± 0 mm; mean values have been rounded to whole numbers) and patient-specific instrumentation (2 ± 1 mm), but both showed a small improvement compared with the freehand approach (3 ± 1 mm). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.5 to 1.1; p = 0.01). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the mean difference was 1 mm (95% CI -0.1 to 0.9; p = 0.02). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the mean difference was 0 mm (95% CI -0.5 to 0.2; p = 0.82). In evaluating the goodness of fit of the shaped grafts, we found no clinically important difference between surgical navigation (median [IQR] 7 [6 to 8]) and patient-specific instrumentation (median 6 [5 to 7.8]), although both techniques had higher scores than the freehand technique did (median 3 [2 to 4]). For freehand versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 4 (p < 0.001). For freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation, the difference of medians was 3 (p < 0.001). For patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation, the difference of medians was 1 (p = 0.03). The mean ± procedural times for freehand was 16 ± 10 minutes, patient-specific instrumentation was 14 ± 9 minutes, and surgical navigation techniques was 24 ± 8 minutes. We found no differences in procedure times across three shaping modalities (freehand versus patient-specific instrumentation: mean difference 2 minutes [95% CI 0 to 7]; p = 0.92; freehand versus surgical navigation: mean difference 8 minutes [95% CI 0 to 20]; p = 0.23; patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation: mean difference 10 minutes [95% CI 1 to 19]; p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Based on surgical simulation to reconstruct a standardized periarticular bone defect after tumor resection, we found a possible small advantage to surgical navigation over patient-specific instrumentation based on qualitative fit, but both techniques provided slightly better conformance of the shaped graft for fit into the standardized post-tumor resection bone defect than the freehand technique did. To determine whether these differences are clinically meaningful requires further study. The surgical navigation system presented here is a product of laboratory research development, and although not ready to be widely deployed for clinical practice, it is currently being used in a research operating room setting for patient care. This new technology is associated with a learning curve, capital costs, and potential risk. The reported preliminary results are based on a preclinical synthetic bone tumor study, which is not as realistic as actual surgical scenarios.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgical navigation systems are an emerging technology in orthopaedic and reconstruction surgery, and understanding their capabilities and limitations is paramount for clinical practice. Given our preliminary findings in a small cohort study with one scenario of standardized synthetic periarticular bone tumor defects, future investigations should include different surgical scenarios using allograft and cadaveric specimens in a more realistic surgical setting.

Midfoot Tarsectomy in Cavovarus: Why PSI Makes a Difference?

The cavovarus foot is a complex deformity that can be treated using multiple surgical procedures, ranging from soft tissue surgery to triple arthrodesis. Among these options, anterior midfoot tarsectomy is a three-dimensional closed-wedge osteotomy, traditionally performed slowly and progressively in a blind fashion, and remaining a challenge for unexperimented surgeons with variable outcomes. As such, we investigated and discussed the use of patient-specific cutting guides (PSCGs) in computer-assisted anterior midfoot tarsectomy in terms of accuracy, reproducibility, and safety.

What to choose in bone tumour resections? Patient specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation: a systematic review

Patient specific instrumentation (PSI) and intraoperative surgical navigation (SN) can significantly help in achieving wide oncological margins while sparing bone stock in bone tumour resections. This is a systematic review aimed to compare the two techniques on oncological and functional results, preoperative time for surgical planning, surgical intraoperative time, intraoperative technical complications and learning curve. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023422065). 1613 papers were identified and 81 matched criteria for PRISMA inclusion and eligibility. PSI and SN showed similar results in margins (0-19% positive margins rate), bone cut accuracy (0.3-4 mm of error from the planned), local recurrence and functional reconstruction scores (MSTS 81-97%) for both long bones and pelvis, achieving better results compared to free hand resections. A planned bone margin from tumour of at least 5 mm was safe for bone resections, but soft tissue margin couldn't be planned when the tumour invaded soft tissues. Moreover, long osteotomies, homogenous bone topology and restricted working spaces reduced accuracy of both techniques, but SN can provide a second check. In urgent cases, SN is more indicated to avoid PSI planning and production time (2-4 weeks), while PSI has the advantage of less intraoperative using time (1-5 min vs 15-65 min). Finally, they deemed similar technical intraoperative complications rate and demanding learning curve. Overall, both techniques present advantages and drawbacks. They must be considered for the optimal choice based on the specific case. In the future, robotic-assisted resections and augmented reality might solve the downsides of PSI and SN becoming the main actors of bone tumour surgery.

What are the resection accuracy and guide-fitting errors associated with 3D-printed, patient-specific resection guides for bone tumour resections?

AIMS

This study aimed to analyze the accuracy and errors associated with 3D-printed, patient-specific resection guides (3DP-PSRGs) used for bone tumour resection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 29 bone tumour resections that used 3DP-PSRGs based on 3D CT and 3D MRI. We evaluated the resection amount errors and resection margin errors relative to the preoperative plans. Guide-fitting errors and guide distortion were evaluated intraoperatively and one month postoperatively, respectively. We categorized each of these error types into three grades (grade 1, < 1 mm; grade 2, 1 to 3 mm; and grade 3, > 3 mm) to evaluate the overall accuracy.

RESULTS

The maximum resection amount error was 2 mm. Out of 29 resection amount errors, 15 (51.7%) were grade 1 errors and 14 (38.3%) were grade 2 errors. Complex resections were associated with higher-grade resection amount errors (p < 0.001). The actual resection margins correlated significantly with the planned margins; however, there were some discrepancies. The maximum guide-fitting error was 3 mm. There were 22 (75.9%), five (17.2%), and two (6.9%) grade 1, 2, and 3 guide-fitting errors, respectively. There was no significant association between complex resection and fitting error grades. The guide distortion after one month in all patients was rated as grade 1.

CONCLUSION

In terms of the accurate resection amount according to the preoperative planning, 3DP-PSRGs can be a viable option for bone tumour resection. However, 3DP-PSRG use may be associated with resection margin length discrepancies relative to the planned margins. Such discrepancies should be considered when determining surgical margins. Therefore, a thorough evaluation of the preoperative imaging and surgical planning is still required, even if 3DP-PSRGs are to be used.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):190-197.

Review and Future/Potential Application of Mixed Reality Technology in Orthopaedic Oncology

In orthopaedic oncology, surgical planning and intraoperative execution errors may result in positive tumor resection margins that increase the risk of local recurrence and adversely affect patients’ survival. Computer navigation and 3D-printed resection guides have been reported to address surgical inaccuracy by replicating the surgical plans in complex cases. However, limitations include surgeons’ attention shift from the operative field to view the navigation monitor and expensive navigation facilities in computer navigation surgery. Practical concerns are lacking real-time visual feedback of preoperative images and the lead-time in manufacturing 3D-printed objects. Mixed Reality (MR) is a technology of merging real and virtual worlds to produce new environments with enhanced visualizations, where physical and digital objects coexist and allow users to interact with both in real-time. The unique MR features of enhanced medical images visualization and interaction with holograms allow surgeons real-time and on-demand medical information and remote assistance in their immediate working environment. Early application of MR technology has been reported in surgical procedures. Its role is unclear in orthopaedic oncology. This review aims to provide orthopaedic tumor surgeons with up-to-date knowledge of the emerging MR technology. The paper presents its essential features and clinical workflow, reviews the current literature and potential clinical applications, and discusses the limitations and future development in orthopaedic oncology. The emerging MR technology adds a new dimension to digital assistive tools with a more accessible and less costly alternative in orthopaedic oncology. The MR head-mounted display and hand-free control may achieve clinical point-of-care inside or outside the operating room and improve service efficiency and patient safety. However, lacking an accurate hologram-to-patient matching, an MR platform dedicated to orthopaedic oncology, and clinical results may hinder its wide adoption. Industry-academic partnerships are essential to advance the technology with its clinical role determined through future clinical studies.

Point your SmartPhone at the code above. If you have a QR code reader the video abstract will appear. Or use:

https://youtu.be/t4hl_Anh_kM

Revision surgeries for tumor endoprostheses around the knee joint: a mid-long-term follow-up of 20 cases

Background

Tumor endoprostheses of the knee joint after limb salvage surgery is associated with high rates of complications, which has introduced great challenges to a delayed revision surgery. The aim of the study was to summarize the failures, functional outcomes and prosthetic survival in revision tumor endoprostheses of the knee joint.

Methods

The clinical data of 20 patients with malignant tumors who received prosthetic revisions after limb salvage surgery from January, 2000 until January, 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort was constituted of 11 male and 9 female patients with a mean age of 34.1 years (range, 16 to 66 years). Infection cases received two-stage revisions after removing prostheses initially, while all other cases received one-stage revisions. Revision reasons and complications were well documented and analyzed.

Results

All patients received complete follow-up with a mean time of 64.7 months (range, 27 to 155 months). A total of 6 (6/20, 30.0%) patients experienced a second complication after revision surgery, of whom, one patient with deep infection experienced repeated infections after prosthetic revision and received amputation surgery; one patient revised of prosthetic fracture experienced an infection and received a second-stage infection revision; one case revised of prosthetic loosening had deep infection receiving anti-infective therapy with prostheses still in position; one case having wound complication healed after receiving two times of debridement surgery; one MBGCT patient experienced a second aseptic loosening 6 years after the initial loosening thus undergoing a second revision; a recurrent osteosarcoma patient died of pulmonary metastasis 3 years after revision surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival curve indicated a 5-year survival rate of initial prostheses was 75%. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS-93) score [20.9 (range, 15 to 27 scores)] at 1 year after revision surgeries was significantly improved (p < 0.001) when compared with the score [17.2 (range, 13 to 21 scores)] before revisions.

Conclusion

Prosthetic mechanical problems, aseptic loosening and infections were primary reasons for revisions after tumor endoprostheses of the knee joint. Although revision surgeries were complicated while still associated with high risk of failure, which remains the remedy strategy for limb salvage and functional recovery in those patients.

Osteochondral Allograft Reconstruction of the Tibia Plateau for Posttraumatic Defects-A Novel Computer-Assisted Method Using 3D Preoperative Planning and Patient-Specific Instrumentation

Background  Surgical treatment of posttraumatic defects of the knee joint is challenging. Osteochondral allograft reconstruction (OCAR) is an accepted procedure to restore the joint congruity and for pain relief, particularly in the younger population. Preoperative three-dimensional (3D) planning and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) are well accepted for the treatment of posttraumatic deformities for several pathologies. The aim of this case report was to provide a guideline and detailed description of the preoperative 3D planning and the intraoperative navigation using PSI in OCAR for posttraumatic defects of the tibia plateau. We present the clinical radiographic results of a patient who was operated with this new technique with a 3.5-year follow-up.

Materials and Methods  3D-triangular surface models are created based on preoperative computer tomography (CT) of the injured side and the contralateral side. We describe the preoperative 3D-analysis and planning for the reconstruction with an osteochondral allograft (OCA) of the tibia plateau. We describe the PSI as well as cutting and reduction techniques to show the intraoperative possibilities in posttraumatic knee reconstructions with OCA.

Results  Our clinical results indicate that 3D-assisted osteotomy and OCAR for posttraumatic defects of the knee may be beneficial and feasible. We illustrate the planning and execution of the osteotomy for the tibia and the allograft using PSI, allowing an accurate anatomical restoration of the joint congruency.

Discussion  With 3D-planning and PSI the OCAR might be more precise compared with conventional methods. It could improve the reproducibility and might allow less experienced surgeons to perform the precise and technically challenging osteotomy cuts of the tibia and the allograft. Further, this technique might shorten operating time because time consuming intraoperative steps such as defining the osteotomy cuts of the tibia and the allograft during surgery are not necessary.

Conclusion  OCAR of the tibia plateau for posttraumatic defects with 3D preoperative planning and PSI might allow for the accurate restoration of anatomical joint congruency, improve the reproducibility of surgical technique, and shorten the surgery time.

Correction of complex three-dimensional deformities at the proximal femur using indirect reduction with angle blade plate and patient-specific instruments: a technical note

BACKGROUND

Corrective osteotomies for complex proximal femoral deformities can be challenging; wherefore, subsidies in preoperative planning and during surgical procedures are considered helpful. Three-dimensional (3D) planning and patient-specific instruments (PSI) are already established in different orthopedic procedures. This study gives an overview on this technique at the proximal femur and proposes a new indirect reduction technique using an angle blade plate.

METHODS

Using computed tomography (CT) data, 3D models are generated serving for the preoperative 3D planning. Different guides are used for registration of the planning to the intraoperative situation and to perform the desired osteotomies with the following reduction task. A new valuable tool to perform the correction is the use of a combined osteotomy and implant-positioning guide, with indirect deformity reduction over an angle blade plate.

RESULTS

An overview of the advantages of 3D planning and the use of PSI in complex corrective osteotomies at the proximal femur is provided. Furthermore, a new technique with indirect deformity reduction over an angle blade plate is introduced.

CONCLUSION

Using 3D planning and PSI for complex corrective osteotomies at the proximal femur can be a useful tool in understanding the individual deformity and performing the aimed deformity reduction. The indirect reduction over the implant is a simple and valuable tool in achieving the desired correction, and concurrently, surgical exposure can be limited to a subvastus approach.

Complex joint-preserving bone tumor resection and reconstruction using computer navigation and 3D-printed patient-specific guides: A technical note of three cases

In selected extremity bone sarcomas, joint-preserving surgery retains the natural joints and nearby ligaments with a better function than in traditional joint-sacrificing surgery. Geometric multiplanar osteotomies around bone sarcomas were reported with the advantage of preserving more host bone. However, the complex surgical planning translation to the operating room is challenging.

Using both Computer Navigation and Patient-Specific Guide may combine each technique's key advantage in assisting complex bone tumor resections. Computer Navigation provides the visual image feedback of the pathological information and validates the correct placement of Patient-Specific Guide that enables accurate, guided bone resections. We first described the digital workflow and the use of both computer navigation and patient-specific guides (NAVIG) to assist the multiplanar osteotomies in three extremity bone sarcoma patients who underwent joint-preserving bone tumor resections and reconstruction with patient-specific implants. The NAVIG technique verified the correct placement of patient-specific guides that enabled precise osteotomies and well-fitted patient-specific implants. The mean maximum deviation errors of the nine achieved bone resections were 1.64 ​± ​0.35 ​mm (95% CI 1.29 to 1.99). The histological examination of the tumor specimens showed negative resection margin. At the mean follow-up of 55 months (40–67), no local recurrence was noted. There was no implant loosening that needed revision. The mean MSTS score was 29 (28–30) out of 30 with the mean knee flexion of 140° (130°–150°).

The excellent surgical accuracy and limb function suggested that the NAVIG technique might replicate the surgical planning of complex bone sarcoma resections by combining the strength of both Computer Navigation and Patient-Specific Guide. The patient-specific approach may translate into clinical benefits. The translational potential of this article:

The newly described technique enhances surgeons’ capability in performing complex joint-preserving surgery in bone sarcoma that is difficult to be achieved by the traditional method. The high precision and accuracy may translate into superior clinical outcomes.

The clinical value of three-dimensional measurement in the diagnosis of thoracic myelopathy caused by ossification of the ligamentum flavum

Background

Thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) is a major cause of thoracic myelopathy, which is often accompanied by multiple segmental stenosis or other degenerative spinal diseases. However, in the above situations, it is difficult to determine the exact segment responsible. The objective of this study was to analyze three-dimensional (3D) radiological parameters in order to establish a novel diagnostic method for discriminating the responsible segment in OLF-induced thoracic myelopathy, and to evaluate its superiority compared to the conventional diagnostic methods.

Methods

Eighty-one patients who underwent surgery for thoracic myelopathy caused by OLF from 2016 to 2020 were enrolled in this study as the myelopathy group, and 79 patients who had thoracic OLF but displayed no definite neurological signs from 2018 to 2020 were enrolled as the non-myelopathy group. We measured the one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), and 3D radiological parameters, calculated their optimal cutoff values, and compared their diagnostic values.

Results

Significant differences were observed in the 1D, 2D, and 3D radiological parameters between the myelopathy and non-myelopathy groups (P<0.01). As a 3D radiological parameter, the OLF volume (OLFV) ratio (OLFV ratio = OLFV/normal canal volume × 100%) was the most accurate parameter for diagnosing OLF-induced thoracic myelopathy, with a diagnostic coincidence rate of 88.1%. We also found that an OLFV ratio of 26.3% could be used as the optimal cutoff value, with a sensitivity of 87.7% and a specificity of 88.6%. Moreover, the OLFV ratio [area under the curve (AUC): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.95] showed a statistically higher diagnostic value than the 1D and 2D parameters (AUC: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.67-0.81; AUC: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89, respectively) (P<0.05). Pearson correlation analysis illustrated that the OLFV ratio was significantly negatively correlated with preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score (r=-0.73, 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.60, P<0.01).

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate the superiority of the OLFV ratio over the conventional 1D and 2D computed tomography (CT)-based radiological parameters for the diagnosis of OLF-induced thoracic myelopathy. The novel diagnostic method based on the OLFV ratio will help to determine the responsible segment in multi-segmental thoracic OLF or when thoracic OLF coexists with other degenerative spinal diseases. The OLFV ratio also accurately reflects the clinical state of symptomatic patients with thoracic OLF.

Revision of total knee arthroplasty with the use of patient-specific instruments: an alternative surgical technique

INTRODUCTION

Accuracy in the placement of components in revision total knee arthroplasty (R-TKA) surgery is sometimes challenging. The applicability of patient‑specific instruments (PSI) in knee surgery has progressively expanded to types of surgery other than primary arthroplasty. Could this assistive technology be used to facilitate accurate R-TKA surgery? The aim of the current manuscript is to describe this new application of PSI for revision of TKA-to-TKA and to provide a step-by-step technical guideline for use.

AREAS COVERED

We will describe the application and a detailed description of PSI technology to TKA revision surgery, step-by-step, from CT images acquisition for preoperative planning and PSI blocks production to the surgery.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The system can facilitate the accomplishment of the bony cuts for optimal implant placement and that can be useful in minimally altering the femoral and the tibial joint line. It is obvious that technology alone will not replace surgical skill and that accuracy of the system will also depend on the quality of the CT images and the ability of the software to prevent metal artifacts. Despite that, our initial results are promising and prove that the concept of applying PSI technology to the R-TKA surgery is feasible.

Recent advances in the surgical treatment of malunions in hand and forearm using three-dimensional planning and patient-specific instruments

Malunions of the forearm and hand cause significant disability. Moreover, intraarticular deformities may contribute to early onset osteoarthritis. Such conditions require precise surgical correction in order to improve functional outcomes and prevent early or late complications. The purpose of this study was to describe the technical advantages of accurate anatomical reconstruction using 3D guided osteotomies and patient specific instruments (PSI) in multiple joints of the hand and forearm. Acquisition of three-dimensional (3D) datasets and surgical implementation of PSI was performed in a series of patients between December 2014 and July 2017. Patients had intra- or extra-articular malunions of the forearm, radiocarpal joint, trapeziometacarpal joint, or proximal interphalangeal joint. A previously described 3D surface model that incorporates CT data was used for segmentation (Mimics®, Materialise™, Belgium). For all the cases, CT scans of both forearms were acquired to use the contralateral uninjured side as the anatomic reconstruction template. Computer-assisted assessment of the deformity, the preoperative plan, and the design of PSI are described. Outcomes were determined by evaluating step-off correction, fusion, changes in range of motion (ROM) and grip strength. Six patients were included in the study; all achieved fusion. Improved clinical outcomes including pain reduction, better ROM and grip strength were obtained. Complete correction of intraarticular step-off was achieved in all cases with intraarticular malunions. 3D guided osteotomies are an established surgical treatment option for malunions of the hand and forearm. 3D analysis is a helpful diagnostic tool that provides detailed information about the underlying deformity. PSI can be developed and used for surgical correction with maximal accuracy for both intraarticular step-off and angular deformity.

Computer-Based 3D Simulations to Formulate Preoperative Planning of Bridge Crane Technique for Thoracic Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum

Background

The bridge crane technique is a novel surgical technique for the treatment of thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF), but its preoperative planning has not been studied well, which limits the safety and efficacy of surgery to some extent. The purpose of this study was to investigate the method of application and effect of computer-aided preoperative planning (CAPP) on the bridge crane technique for TOLF.

Material/Methods

This retrospective multi-center included 40 patients with TOLF who underwent the bridge crane technique from 2016 to 2018. According to the utilization of CAPP, patients were divided into Group A (with CAPP, n=21) and Group B (without CAPP, n=19). Comparisons of clinical and radiological outcomes were carried out between the 2 groups.

Results

The patients in Group A had higher post-mJOA scores and IR of neurological function than those in Group B (p<0.05). Group A had shorter surgery time, fewer fluoroscopic images, and lower incidence of complications than Group B. In Group A, there was a high consistency of all the anatomical parameters between preoperative simulation and postoperative CT (p>0.05). In Group B, there were significant differences in 3 anatomical parameters between postoperative simulation and postoperative CT (p<0.05). In Group B, the patients with no complications had higher post-SVOR and lower SVRR and height of posterior suspension of LOC in postoperative CT than those in postoperative simulation (p<0.05).

Conclusions

CAPP can enable surgeons to control the decompression effect accurately and reduce the risk of related complications, which improves the safety and efficacy of surgery.