Knee laxity in anterolateral complex injuries versus lateral meniscus posterior horn injuries in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees: A cadaveric study

Lower anxiety level to perform movements after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anxiety level to perform movements in patients after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) compared to patients after revision ACLR without LET.

METHODS

Ninety patients who underwent revision ACLR with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and with a minimum of 12 months follow-up were included in this study. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who received revision ACLR in combination with LET (revision ACLR_LET group; mean follow-up: 29.4 months, range: 12-80 months), and patients who received revision ACLR without LET (revision ACLR group; mean follow-up: 61.1 months, range: 22-192 months). All patients filled in a questionnaire about anxiety level related to physical activity and sports, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (IKDCsubjective), and the Tegner Activity Score.

RESULTS

Patients in the revision ACLR_LET group had a significantly lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients in the revision ACLR group (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in KOOS, IKDCsubjective, and Tegner Activity Scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who received LET in addition to revision ACLR have a lower anxiety level to perform movements than patients with revision ACLR alone, despite non-different subjective functional outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study, Level of evidence: III.

The "Bankart knee": high-grade impression fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau lead to increased translational and anterolateral rotational instability of the ACL-deficient knee

PURPOSE

The aim of this biomechanical cadaver study was to evaluate the effects of high-grade posterolateral tibia plateau fractures on the kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient joints; it was hypothesized that, owing to the loss of the integrity of the osseous support of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM), these fractures would influence the biomechanical function of the lateral meniscus (LM) and consequently lead to an increase in anterior translational and anterolateral rotational (ALR) instability.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic setup (KR 125, KUKA Robotics, Germany) with an attached optical tracking system (Optotrack Certus Motion Capture, Northern Digital, Canada). After the passive path from 0 to 90° was established, a simulated Lachman test and pivot-shift test as well as external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) were applied at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion under constant 200 N axial loading. All of the parameters were initially tested in the intact and ACL-deficient states, followed by two different types of posterolateral impression fractures. The dislocation height was 10 mm, and the width was 15 mm in both groups. The intraarticular depth of the fracture corresponded to half of the width of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus in the first group (Bankart 1) and 100% of the meniscus width in the second group (Bankart 2).

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in knee stability after both types of posterolateral tibial plateau fractures in the ACL-deficient specimens, with increased anterior translation in the simulated Lachman test at 0° and 30° of knee flexion (p = 0.012). The same effect was seen with regard to the simulated pivot-shift test and IR of the tibia (p = 0.0002). In the ER and posterior drawer tests, ACL deficiency and concomitant fractures did not influence knee kinematics (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that high-grade impression fractures of the posterolateral aspect of the tibial plateau increase the instability of ACL-deficient knees and result in an increase in translational and anterolateral rotational instability.

Association Between Anterior Tibial Subluxation of Lateral Compartment and High-Grade Knee Laxity in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

BACKGROUND

High-grade knee laxity and excessive anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) are correlated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency and share similar risk factors; however, the association between excessive ATS and high-grade knee laxity remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To identify the association between excessive ATS and high-grade knee laxity in patients with ACL deficiency and determine the possibility that ATS can predict high-grade knee laxity.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 226 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between May 2018 and March 2022 were analyzed in the present study; the high-grade group consisted of 113 patients who had a grade 3 result on the preoperative anterior drawer test, Lachman test, or pivot-shift test while under anesthesia, and the low-grade group consisted of 113 matched patients. The ATS values for medial and lateral compartments (ATSMC and ATSLC) were measured on magnetic resonance imaging while patients relaxed the quadriceps in the supine position under no anesthesia. The optimal cutoff values of ATSMC and ATSLC for high-grade knee laxity were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses with stratification were performed to identify the association between excessive ATS and high-grade knee laxity.

RESULTS

Compared with the low-grade group, the high-grade group had a longer time from injury to surgery; higher rates of medial meniscus posterior horn tear (MMPHT), lateral meniscus posterior horn tear (LMPHT), and anterolateral ligament (ALL) abnormality; and larger lateral tibial slope, ATSMC, and ATSLC. The optimal cutoff value was 2.6 mm (sensitivity, 52.2%; specificity, 76.1%) for ATSMC and 4.5 mm (sensitivity, 67.3%; specificity, 64.6%) for ATSLC in predicting high-grade knee laxity. After adjustment for covariates, ATSLC ≥4.5 mm (odds ratio [OR], 2.94; 95% CI, 1.56-5.55; P = .001), MMPHT (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.35-5.08; P = .004), LMPHT (OR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.20-4.78; P = .014), and ALL abnormality (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.13-3.89; P = .019) were associated with high-grade knee laxity. The association between excessive ATSLC and high-grade knee laxity was validated in patients with acute ACL injury as well as those with chronic ACL injury.

CONCLUSION

Excessive ATSLC was associated with high-grade knee laxity in patients who had ACL deficiency, with a predictive cutoff value of 4.5 mm. This study may help surgeons estimate the degree of knee instability more accurately before anesthesia and may facilitate preliminary surgical decision-making, such as appropriate graft choices and consideration of extra-articular augmentation.

Role of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Anterolateral Complex, and Lateral Meniscus Posterior Root in Anterolateral Rotatory Knee Instability: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), Kaplan fibers (KFs), anterolateral capsule/ligament (C/ALL), and lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) have been separately linked to anterolateral instability.

PURPOSE

To investigate the contributions of the ACL, KFs, C/ALL, and LMPR to knee stability and to measure instabilities resulting from their injury.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen human knees were tested robotically to determine restraints of knee laxity at 0° to 90° of flexion. An 88-N anterior-posterior force (anterior and posterior tibial translation), 5-N·m internal-external rotation, and 8-N·m valgus-varus torque were imposed and intact kinematics recorded. The kinematics were replayed after sequentially cutting the structures (order varied) to calculate their contributions to stability. Another 10 knees were tested in a kinematics rig with optical tracking to measure instabilities after sequentially cutting the structures across 0° to 100° of flexion. One- and 2-way repeated-measures analyses of variance with Bonferroni correction were used to find significance (P < .05) for the robotic and kinematics tests.

RESULTS

The ACL was the primary restraint for anterior tibial translation; other structures were insignificant (<10% contribution). The KFs and C/ALL resisted internal rotation, reaching 44% ± 23% (mean ± SD; P < .01) and 14% ± 13% (P < .05) at 90°. The LMPR resisted valgus but not internal rotation. Anterior tibial translation increased after ACL transection (P < .001) and after cutting the lateral structures from 70° to 100° (P < .05). Pivot-shift loading increased anterolateral rotational instability after ACL transection from 0° to 40° (P < .05) and further after cutting the lateral structures from 0° to 100° (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

The anterolateral complex acts as a functional unit to provide rotatory stability. The ACL is the primary stabilizer for anterior tibial translation. The KFs are the most important internal rotation restraint >30° of flexion. Combined KFs + C/ALL injury substantially increased anterolateral rotational instability while isolated injury of either did not. LMPR deficiency did not cause significant instability with the ACL intact.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study is a comprehensive biomechanical sectioning investigation of the knee stability contributions of the ACL, anterolateral complex, and LMPR and the instability after their transection. The ACL is significant in controlling internal rotation only in extension. In flexion, the KFs are dominant, synergistic with the C/ALL. LMPR tear has an insignificant effect with the ACL intact.

An Arthroscopic Pull-Out Suture Technique to Repair Incomplete Radial Tears of the Lateral Meniscus Posterior Horn Adjacent to the Root Attachment Combined With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Radial tears of the lateral meniscus posterior horn are one of the most common lateral meniscal injuries accompanied by acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Meniscus-preserving therapy is recommended in the case of a radial lateral meniscal tear to preserve its dynamic behavior. We introduce an arthroscopic pull-out technique for repairing incomplete radial tears of the lateral meniscus posterior horn combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. In this technique, a ring hoop is made through which the tear ends of lateral meniscus on both sides are tightened by adjusting tension of stitches, providing annular and downward tension for lateral meniscus, both of which are critical to the stability of the lateral meniscus. The resident part of lateral meniscus adjacent to the posterior root is not subject to much tension in this technique because of the pull-out fixation of lateral meniscus posterior horn, thus providing support for healing and restoring the hoop action of the lateral meniscus.

Higher return to pre-injury type of sports after revision anterior ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rate of return to pre-injury type of sports (RTS type) in patients after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) compared to patients after revision ACLR without LET.

METHODS

Seventy-eight patients who underwent revision ACLR with an autologous ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft with and without LET were included at least one year after surgery (mean follow-up: 43.9, SD: 29.2 months). All patients filled in a questionnaire about RTS type, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (IKDC_subjective), and the Tegner activity score.

RESULTS

The RTS type for revision ACLR with LET was 22 of 42 (52%), whereas 11 of 36 (31%) of the patients who underwent revision ACLR without LET returned to the pre-injury type of sport (p = 0.05). No significant differences were found in KOOS subscores, IKDC_subjective, and Tegner activity scores.

CONCLUSION

An additional LET increases the rate of RTS type after revision ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Synergistic effect of the anterolateral ligament and capsule injuries on the knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament injured knees: A cadaveric study

INTRODUCTION

There is much controversy about the practical role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and its relation to other anterolateral knee structures including the anterolateral capsule (ALC) and iliotibial band (ITB). The purpose of this cadaveric study was to investigate the effect of the ALL and ALC injuries on knee laxity with the iliotibial band (ITB) preserved in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee.

HYPOTHESIS

The ALL and ALC would contribute to knee joint stability during anterior translation and internal rotation of the tibia in an ACL-injured knee.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, we measured knee laxity with the following state of knee injuries with ITB preserved: (1) intact knee, (2) ACL-sectioned knee (ACL-), (3) additional sectioning of the ALL (ACL-/ALL-), and (4) additional sectioning of the ALC (ACL-/ALL-/ALC-). We did biomechanical measurements in internal-external rotation, anterior-posterior translation, and varus-valgus angulation for each condition at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90°.

RESULTS

After we sectioned the ALL (ACL-/ALL-), the mean IR at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion were significantly increased, compared to the intact knee (p=<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.002) and ACL- (p=<0.001, <0.001, <0.001, and 0.002). The additional transection of the ALC (ACL-/ALL-/ALC-) significantly increased IR laxity from the ACL-/ALL- at 30°, 60°, and 90° (p=0.005, 0.003, and 0.047). For anterior laxity, ACL-/ALL- resulted in significantly increased anterior laxity from the ACL- at 30° and 60° (p=0.003 and 0.019), and ACL-/ALL-/ALC- significantly increased anterior laxity even from the ACL-/ALL- at 30° and 60° (p=0.007 and 0.011). For varus laxity, ACL-/ALL- resulted in significantly increased varus laxity from both the intact knee and ACL- at 60° (p=0.004 and 0.007) and 90° (p=<0.001 and<0.001). ACL-/ALL-/ALC- resulted in significantly increased varus from ACL-/ALL- at 60° and 90° (p=<0.001 and 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The anterolateral ligament and anterolateral capsule injuries in ACL-injured knees even with ITB preserved had a synergistic effect on knee laxity in the aspects of internal rotation, anterior translation, and varus angulation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Controlled laboratory study.

Prevalence of anterolateral ligament injuries and lateral meniscus tear on MR imaging in patients with both-bundle tear vs. selective bundle incomplete tear of the anterior cruciate ligament

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the prevalence of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury and lateral meniscus (LM) tear in cases with both-bundle tear and selective bundle incomplete tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

METHODS

A total of 174 cases of magnetic resonance (MR) images that had an ACL tear and underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were retrospectively reviewed. ACL injury was classified into both bundle, anteromedial bundle, and posterolateral bundle (PL) on arthroscopic finding. The ALL was divided into three portions: femoral, meniscal, and tibial. ALL injury was scored into three groups: grade 0 is intact; grade 1 is stranding and edema surrounds the expected location of the ALL; grade 2 is clear discontinuity of the ALL consistent with rupture. Traumatic LM tear was also assessed on MR images.

RESULTS

The total prevalence of ALL injury was 36.2% (reader 1) and 42.0% (reader 2). ALL injury was statistically related to the selective bundle tear (p = 0.002 and 0.004, readers 1 and 2). PL bundle tear was significantly correlated with the ALL injury (p value < 0.001, readers 1 and 2, both). The location and grade of ALL injury were not significantly correlated with the type of ACL injury. LM tear was not significantly related to the types of ACL tear (p = 0.208 and 0.907, readers 1 and 2) and ALL injury (p value = 0.096 and 0.383, readers 1 and 2).

CONCLUSIONS

ALL injury was significantly related to the PL bundle tear of the ACL. LM tear was not significantly correlated with the types of ACL injury and ALL injury.

KEY POINTS

• Anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury was significantly related to the posterolateral bundle (PL) tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). • Lateral meniscus (LM) tear was not significantly correlated with the types of ACL injury and ALL injury. • Clinicians and radiologists should be aware of these relationships and scrutinize ALL injury in cases with PL bundle tears, even with an incomplete ACL injury.

Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis Is Effective in Restoring Knee Stability in a Chronic, Complex Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Injured Knee Model: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To compare knee stability after intra-articular isolated double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and single-bundle (SB) and DB ACLR combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in a chronic, complex anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured knee model.

METHODS

In 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, we measured knee laxity in the following order: (1) intact knee; (2) ACL-sectioned knee; (3) complex ACL-injured knee model with additional sectioning of the anterolateral complex and the posterior horns of the medial and lateral menisci; (4) SB ACLR plus LET; (5) DB ACLR; and (6) DB ACLR plus LET.

RESULTS

In comparison with the intact knee, significantly increased internal rotation (IR) laxity persisted at 60° and 90° after DB ACLR (P = .002 and P = .003, respectively). SB ACLR plus LET and DB ACLR plus LET resulted in significant reductions in IR laxity at 90° (P = .003 and P = .037, respectively), representing overconstraint in IR. SB ACLR plus LET resulted in persistently increased external rotation (ER) laxity at 30°, 60°, and 90° (P = .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively). The DB ACLR condition persistently showed significant increases in anterior tibial translation laxity at 60° and 90° (P = .037 and P = .024, respectively). A greater increase in ER laxity was seen after SB ACLR plus LET versus DB ACLR plus LET at 30°, 60°, and 90° (P < .001, P < .001, and P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DB ACLR plus LET restored intact knee stability in IR, ER, and anterior tibial translation laxity at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion except for overconstraint in IR at 90° in a chronic, complex ACL-injured knee model.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This cadaveric study provides some biomechanical evidence to support performing DB ACLR combined with LET to restore knee stability after a complex, chronic knee injury involving an ACL tear combined with anterolateral complex injury and irreparable tears of the posterior horns of the medial and lateral menisci.