Contact kinematics of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty

Lateral Subvastus Lateralis versus Medial Parapatellar Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Outcomes and Kinematics Analysis

The conventional approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a medial parapatellar approach (MPA). We aimed to study patient outcomes and kinematics with a quadriceps sparing lateral subvastus lateralis approach (SLA). Patients with neutral/varus alignment undergoing primary TKA were consented to undergo the SLA. At 1-year postoperative, patients underwent radiostereometric analysis. Patients were administered the Short Form 12 (SF-12), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Knee Society Score (KSS). Kinematics and outcome data were compared to a group undergoing TKA via conventional MPA. Fourteen patients underwent TKA via SLA with a mean age 71.5 ± 8.0 and mean body mass index (BMI) 31.0 ± 4.5. The MPA group had 13 patients with mean age 63.4 ± 5.5 (p = 0.006) and mean BMI 31.2 ± 4.6 (p = 0.95). The SLA resulted in a significantly more posterior medial contact point at 0 (p = 0.011), 20 (p = 0.020), and 40 (p = 0.039) degrees of flexion. There was no significant difference in medial contact point from 60 to 120 degrees, lateral contact point at any degree of flexion, or axial rotation. There was no difference in improvement in postoperative WOMAC, SF-12, KSS function, and total KSS knee scores between groups. The MPA group had a significantly greater improvement in KSS knee scores at 3 months (p < 0.001), 1 year (p = 0.003), and 2 years (p = 0.017). The SLA resulted in increased medial femoral rollback early in flexion. Although both approaches resulted in improved postoperative outcomes, the MPA group showed significantly greater improvements in KSS knee scores at 3 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Further studies are required to identify any benefits that the SLA may offer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:  Therapeutic Level II.

Effect of Surgical Technique, Implant Design, and Time of Examination on Contact Kinematics: A Study of Bicruciate-Stabilized and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs attempt to approximate natural knee mechanics. Multiple surgical techniques, including gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR), have been developed to provide optimal implant positioning and soft-tissue balance. The goal of this study was to determine the effect of surgical technique on BCS TKA contact kinematics. Secondary goals included investigating the change of kinematics over time and comparing BCS TKA kinematics to a posterior-stabilized (PS) design.

METHODS

The study included the BCS-GB, BCS-MR, and PS-MR groups. The BCS-GB and BCS-MR groups underwent weight-bearing radiostereometric analysis for multiple knee flexion angles at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively, whereas the PS-MR group was imaged at 1 year postoperatively. The medial and lateral contact kinematics were determined from implant poses.

RESULTS

There were no differences in BCS TKA kinematics between the GB and MR techniques. There were differences in the mid-flexion ranges when comparing the 3-month and 1-year kinematics of the BCS design; however, they were less than 1.5 mm. Differences existed between the kinematics of the BCS and PS designs at all flexion angles for the medial condyle (P < .0006) and at 0° of flexion on the lateral condyle (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contact kinematics for a BCS design were similar for both surgical techniques, suggesting both are appropriate for this design. Small, likely clinically insignificant differences were found between 3-month and 1-year kinematics. The BCS TKA kinematics differed from the PS design; however, it is unclear whether these differences improve clinical outcomes.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of VISIONAIRE patient-specific instrumentation with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Malalignment and resulting complications are major challenges in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) which patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) is proposed to alleviate. Previous PSI meta-analyses of TKA outcomes typically do not differentiate between PSI systems and assess relatively few outcomes, so the value of their findings is limited. VISIONAIRE™ cutting guides (Smith + Nephew Inc., Memphis, TN, USA) is a PSI system based on preoperative magnetic resonance and X-ray imaging. A systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis, focussed specifically on VISIONAIRE, were conducted to assess TKA accuracy, intraoperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes, compared with conventional instrumentation (CI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The SLR was performed using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant studies published until March 2022. Depending on statistical heterogeneity, meta-analyses were performed for outcome measures with fixed effect (I2 < 50%) or random-effects models (I2 ≥ 50%). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratios and continuous outcomes were reported as mean differences. Descriptive analyses were performed for outcomes not amenable to meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Outcomes for VISIONAIRE versus CI were reported in 25 studies. Compared with CI, VISIONAIRE reduced odds of mechanical outliers by 40% (p < 0.0001), with no statistically significant differences in odds of overall coronal, sagittal, or rotational plane component outliers. VISIONAIRE improved surgical efficiency (operating room, turnover, and tourniquet times reduced by 7.3% (p = 0.02), 42% (p = 0.022), and 15.9% (p = 0.01), respectively), lowering the odds of blood transfusion by 53% (p = 0.01) and shortening patients' hospital stays (11.1% reduction; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between groups in incidence of postoperative complications and (descriptively analyzed) return-to-function outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Options for PSI in TKA differ substantially, and it is important to assess the outcomes of individual systems. The current findings suggest that VISIONAIRE guides can lead to improved alignment accuracy and surgical efficiency compared with CI, without compromising postoperative safety and return-to-function outcomes.

Correlating Contact Kinematics to Tibial Component Migration Following Cemented Bicruciate Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Contact kinematics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to affect tibial component migration. However, previous studies correlating kinematic variables to implant migration were completed with older TKA designs. The goal of this study was to determine if there are associations between contact kinematics and tibial component migration for a cemented, bicruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA system.

METHODS

A total of 54 knees implanted with a BCS TKA system were analyzed using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Patients underwent RSA exams at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post operation to measure tibial component migration. At 1 year, contact kinematics was evaluated during a quasi-static deep knee bend. Linear regression analyses were performed between kinematic variables and migration values.

RESULTS

Significant correlations were found between contact kinematics and tibial component migration. Excursion on the lateral condyle was the most consistent variable correlating with implant migration. Six patients had > 0.2 mm migrations from 1 to 2 years post operation indicating continuously migrating tibial components, and most had atypical contact kinematics.

CONCLUSION

Kinematics was shown to influence tibial component migration. Reduced lateral excursion, suggesting a more constrained lateral condyle, resulted in greater implant migration. The 6 patients who had continuously migrating tibial components had demographic factors that may limit the ability to endure unintended force transmissions caused by abnormal kinematics. These results highlight the importance of restoring knee kinematics with this BCS TKA design to minimize improper force transmissions and resultant increased implant migrations.

Validation of a machine learning technique for segmentation and pose estimation in single plane fluoroscopy

Kinematics of total knee replacements (TKR) play an important role in assessing the success of a procedure and would be a valuable addition to clinical practice; however, measuring TKR kinematics is time consuming and labour intensive. Recently, an automatic single-plane fluoroscopic method utilizing machine learning has been developed to facilitate a quick and simple process for measuring TKR kinematics. This study aimed to validate the new automatic single-plane technique using biplanar radiostereometric analysis (RSA) as the gold standard. Twenty-four knees were imaged at various angles of flexion in a dedicated RSA lab and 113 image pairs were obtained. Only the lateral RSA images were used for the automatic single-plane technique to simulate single-plane fluoroscopy. Two networks helped automate the kinematics measurement process, one segmented implant components and the other generated an initial pose estimate for the optimization algorithm. Kinematics obtained via the automatic single plane and manual biplane techniques were compared using root-mean-square error and Bland-Altman plots. Two observers measured the kinematics using the automated technique and results were compared with assess reproducibility. Root-mean-square errors were 0.8 mm for anterior-posterior translation, 0.5 mm for superior-inferior translation, 2.6 mm for medial-lateral translation, 1.0° for flexion-extension, 1.2° for abduction-adduction, and 1.7° for internal-external rotation. Reproducibility, reported as root-mean-square errors between operator measurements, was submillimeter for in-plane translations and below 2° for all rotations. Clinical Significance: The advantages of the automated single plane technique should aid in the kinematic measurement process and help researchers and clinicians perform TKR kinematic analyses.

Comparison of the in-vivo kinematics of three different knee prosthesis designs during a step-up movement

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the importance of the kinematics of the prosthetic joint for the clinical outcome after total knee arthroplasty. A 3-armed randomized controlled trial was done to determine and compare the in vivo kinematics of a posterior cruciate-retaining and two posterior cruciate-sacrificing (Anterior-Stabilized and Posterior-Stabilized) prosthetic designs from the same total knee arthroplasty system. Since the anterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized designs are posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing designs, we hypothesized they would have similar contact-point kinematics. Further, we hypothesized that the cruciate-retaining design would have contact-point kinematics different from the anterior-stabilized and the posterior-stabilized designs, but comparable to a native knee.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients with a well-functioning total knee arthroplasty one year postoperatively underwent kinematic analysis of a weight-bearing step-up movement under fluoroscopic recording. Model-based radiostereometric analysis was used to determine anteroposterior contact-point translations and rotations through the movement path to assess knee kinematics.

FINDINGS

The cruciate-retaining and anterior-stabilized groups' medial and lateral contact-points displayed similar paradoxical posterior translations during step-up in the magnitude of 7 and 2 mm, respectively. In contrast, the posterior-stabilized group's contact-points translated anteriorly by 4 and 10 mm throughout the movement and were significantly more posterior than the cruciate-retaining and the anterior-stabilized groups from >100° to 40° of flexion. The femur rotated internally with all designs.

INTERPRETATION

The cruciate-retaining and anterior-stabilized designs displayed similar contact-point translation patterns during a step-up movement. Only the posterior-stabilized design showed a pattern comparable to native knees. Conversion from a cruciate-retaining to an anterior-stabilized design because of posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency will not change knee kinematics.