Clinical outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using FiberTape and knotless SwiveLock anchors

Tissue Augmentation Techniques in the Management of Ligamentous Knee Injuries

Despite early reports of high failure rates in knee ligament repair techniques resulting in favor of reconstruction, newer advances in surgical technology have shifted the attention back to repair with the addition of various tissue augmentation techniques. Ligament repair preserves proprioceptors in the native ligament and avoids autograft tendon harvest, minimizing the complications associated with donor site ruptures in reconstruction techniques. Tissue augmentation has been successfully used in knee ligamentous and tendon repair procedures, as well as in some upper extremity procedures. This study provides a clinical update on the surgical techniques, biomechanics, and outcomes with the application of various tissue augmentation techniques in the ligaments surrounding the knee joint.

Clinical efficacy and tendon integrity of patients with subscapularis tear by the technique of arthroscopic single external row repair

Background

With the development of arthroscopic technology and equipment, arthroscopy can effectively repair the tear of the subscapular muscle. However, it is difficult to expose the subscapular muscle and operate it under a microscope. In this study, the SwiveLock® C external row anchor under arthroscopy was applied to repair the tear of the subscapular muscle in a single row, which is relatively easy to operate with reliable suture and fixation, and its efficacy was evaluated.

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and the tendon integrity of patients who had subscapularis tears by adopting the single-row repair technique with a SwiveLock® C external row anchor.

Methods

Patients who had the subscapular muscle tear either with or without retraction were included, and their follow-up time was at least 1 year. The degree of tendon injury was examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and confirmed by arthroscopy. The tendon was repaired in an arthroscopic manner by utilizing the single-row technique at the medial margin of the lesser tuberosity. One double-loaded suture SwiveLock® C anchor was applied to achieve a strong fixation between the footprint and tendon. The range of motion, pain visual simulation score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Constant score of shoulder joint were evaluated for each patient before the operation, 3 months after the operation, and at least 1 year after the operation.

Results

In total, 110 patients, including 31 males and 79 females, with an average age of 68.28 ± 8.73 years were included. Arthroscopic repair of the subscapular tendon with SwiveLock® C external anchor can effectively improve the range of motion of the shoulder joint. At the last follow-up, the forward flexion of the shoulder joint increased from 88.97 ± 26.33° to 138.38 ± 26.48° (P < 0.05), the abduction range increased from 88.86 ± 25.27° to 137.78 ± 25.64° (P < 0.05), the external rotation range increased from 46.37 ± 14.48° to 66.49 ± 14.15° (P < 0.05), and the internal rotation range increased from 40.03 ± 9.01° to 57.55 ± 7.43° (P < 0.05). The clinical effect is obvious. The constant shoulder joint score increased from 40.14 ± 15.07 to 81.75 ± 11.00 (P < 0.05), the ASES score increased from 37.88 ± 13.24 to 82.01 ± 9.65 (P < 0.05), and the visual analog scale score decreased from 5.05 ± 2.11 to 1.01 ± 0.85 (P < 0.05). In the 6th month after the operation, two cases (1.81%) were confirmed to have re-tears via MRI.

Conclusion

In this study, we repaired the subscapularis muscle with a single-row technique fixed by SwiveLock® C anchor and FiberWire® sutures and evaluated its efficacy. The results showed that the clinical effect of single-row arthroscopic repair was satisfactory and that reliable tendon healing could be achieved.

A Simple Technique for Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament With Patellar Soft-Tissue Fixation Using Synthetic Suture Tape Internal Bracing

Recurrent patellar dislocation is most commonly treated with an isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using autograft tissue. Harvest and fixation of these grafts have some theoretical disadvantages. With this Technical Note, we aim to describe a simple reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using high-strength suture tape with a soft-tissue fixation on the patellar side and an interference screw fixation on the femoral side, avoiding some of these possible disadvantages.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using nonresorbable sutures yields comparable outcomes to reconstruction with a pedicled quadriceps tendon autograft when performed in addition to bony risk factor correction

PURPOSE

To evaluate the results for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using synthetic nonresorbable sutures (S-MPFL-R) in comparison to MPFL-R using quadriceps tendon autograft (QT-MPFL-R) in patients undergoing simultaneous correction of anatomic risk factors for lateral patellar instability (LPI) at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Between November 2018 and June 2019, 19 patients (male/female 8/11; mean age 26 ± 7 years) underwent S-MPFL-R (FiberTape^®) in combination with the correction of predisposing risk factors for LPI. The control group of 38 patients (male/female 16/22, mean age 26 ± 6 years) who underwent QT-MPFL-R was matched 1:2 by sex, age, anatomic risk factors, and concomitant surgical correction of bony risk factors. The Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and a numerical analog scale (NAS 0-10) for patellofemoral pain and subjective knee joint function were used to assess patients' reported quality of life before and after surgery.

RESULTS

The BPII 2.0 score increased from 35.0 ± 21.7 points to 79.7 ± 13.3 points (p < 0.0001) in the S-MPRL-R group and from 44.3 ± 19.6 points to 80.9 ± 15 points (p < 0.0001) in the QT-MPFL-R group from preoperatively to postoperatively, respectively, without any significant difference between the groups. In the S-MPFL-R group and QT-MPFL-R group, 95% (18/19) and 92% (35/38) of patients, respectively, crossed the minimally clinically important difference reported for the BPII 2.0. NAS values for pain and subjective knee joint function improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001) without any significant difference between the groups at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that nonresorbable sutures can serve as a viable option for MPFL-R, yielding comparable outcomes compared to quadriceps tendon autograft reconstruction when performed concomitantly with the correction of anatomic risk factors for LPI. This option reduces the need for autologous tendon harvesting or the use of allografts for MPFL-R.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.