Clinical outcomes of medial meniscus posterior root repair: A midterm follow-up study

Meniscal healing status after medial meniscus posterior root repair negatively correlates with a midterm increase in medial meniscus extrusion

PURPOSE

The second-look arthroscopic score of pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) is associated with contemporaneous clinical scores and progression of cartilage damage. However, the relationship among these scores, midterm clinical scores and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations is unknown. The relationship between the second-look arthroscopic score at 1 year and the clinical scores or MRI at 3 years was evaluated.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients were included. Medial meniscus extrusion (MME) was evaluated preoperatively and at 3 years postoperatively. Clinical scores were evaluated preoperatively, and 1 and 3 years postoperatively. Meniscal healing status was assessed using the semiquantitative second-look arthroscopic score at 1 year postoperatively. Correlation coefficients between patient characteristics, postoperative clinical scores or second-look arthroscopic score and the change in MME (ΔMME) were evaluated. Multiple regression analysis was performed on the ΔMME to evaluate the effects of patient characteristics and second-look arthroscopic scores.

RESULTS

No significant correlation was observed between patient characteristics and ΔMME. In contrast, a significant correlation was found between the second-look arthroscopic score and ΔMME (p < 0.001) and visual analogue scale pain score (p = 0.016) at 3 years postoperatively. In the subitems of the second-look arthroscopic score, width (p < 0.001) and stability (p = 0.009) scores also showed significant correlations with ΔMME. Multiple regression analysis showed a significant association between the second-look arthroscopic score and ΔMME (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The second-look arthroscopic score at 1 year postoperatively correlated with the ΔMME and clinical score at 3 years postoperatively. Second-look arthroscopic scores predict midterm meniscal function after pullout repair of MMPRTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Accurate tibial tunnel position in transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears delays the progression of medial joint space narrowing

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between the progression of medial joint space (MJS) narrowing, medial meniscus extrusion (MME) and clinical scores and the tibial tunnel position in pullout repairs for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs).

METHODS

This retrospective study examined 54 patients. Changes in MJS (ΔMJS), MME (ΔMME) and clinical scores and their relationship with the tibial tunnel position were evaluated using correlation coefficients. The distance from the anatomical to technical attachment position in the tibial tunnel position was measured in the anterior and medial directions, and the direct distance was measured using the Pythagorean theorem.

RESULTS

The mean ΔMJS and ΔMME were 0.6 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 1.3 mm, respectively, and the mean anterior, medial and direct distances were 1.4 ± 2.3, 2.2 ± 1.7 and 3.4 ± 1.7 mm, respectively. ΔMJS had a significant positive correlation with the medial (r = 0.580, p < 0.001) and direct (r = 0.559, p < 0.001) distances, while ΔMME had a significant positive correlation with direct distance (r = 0.295, p = 0.030). Several clinical scores were significantly negatively correlated with these distances.

CONCLUSION

In transtibial pullout repair for MMPRTs, accurate tibial tunnel position delayed the progression of MJS narrowing and MME, leading to improved clinical outcomes. The progression of MJS narrowing was associated with the mediolateral direction of the tibial tunnel position, while the clinical scores were associated with the anteroposterior direction of the tibial tunnel position. These findings indicate the need to orient the tip of the guide in a more posterolateral direction when creating the tibial tunnel.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Signal intensity of repaired posterior roots after transtibial pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root tears in stable knees: Magnetic resonance imaging evaluations at 3 years postoperatively

BACKGROUND

Only a few studies have assessed signal intensity after pullout repair for medial meniscus posterior root (MMPR) tears (MMPRTs) based on mid-term magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the quantitative signal intensity of repaired posterior roots over time, up to 3 years postoperatively, and the related factors.

METHODS

This study included 36 patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRTs and MRI examinations using the same MRI system. The signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots was quantitatively evaluated using the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ). Medial meniscus extrusion (MME), the SNQ for MMPR, and clinical scores were assessed over 3 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

MME progressed over time until 3 years postoperatively, and its progression during this period was 1.61 ± 1.44 mm. The SNQ for MMPR decreased over time until 3 years postoperatively, and the change in the SNQ from 3 months to 3 years postoperatively (ΔSNQ) was 2.69 ± 1.69. All clinical scores significantly improved (p < 0.001). ΔSNQ was significantly correlated with body weight (correlation coefficient = -0.424, p = 0.010) and body mass index (correlation coefficient = -0.330, p = 0.050). However, ΔSNQ was not significantly correlated with preoperative or postoperative clinical scores.

CONCLUSION

After pullout repair for MMPRTs, MME progressed to 3 years postoperatively. However, the signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots decreased, and clinical scores improved over time until 3 years postoperatively. Patient weight and body mass index were significantly correlated with the reduced signal intensity of the repaired posterior roots, suggesting that weight assessment in patients with MMPRTs is crucial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Arthroscopic Transtibial Pullout Repair and Tibial Condylar Valgus Osteotomy for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear With Varus Knee

As an important structure for maintaining the hoop tension of the medial meniscus of the knee joint, the posterior root is receiving increasing attention. Medial meniscus posterior root tear is an important reason for the occurrence, development, and kinematics changes of knee osteoarthritis. It is necessary to repair the posterior root of meniscus for restoring joint kinematics and improving clinical efficacy. This Technical Note reports a medial meniscus posterior root tear repair technique using arthroscopic transtibial pullout repair (ATPR) combined with tibial condylar valgus osteotomy. The aim of this technique is to repair the posterior root of the medial meniscus while correcting the force line through osteotomy, opening the joint gap, improving the joint surface fit, providing a good mechanical environment for meniscus repair, thereby improving the healing rate of the posterior root of the meniscus and reducing the risk of retear. Although clinical evidence is currently limited, we believe that this technology may have more clinical advantages compared with ATPR alone or ATPR combined with high tibial osteotomy.

Intercondylar notch width and osteophyte width impact meniscal healing and clinical outcomes following transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the relationship between intercondylar notch width (ICNW), osteophyte width (OW), and the healing of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) following arthroscopic pullout repair.

METHODS

The study included 155 patients diagnosed with MMPRTs who underwent transtibial pullout repair. Meniscal healing status was evaluated on second-look arthroscopy using a previously reported meniscus healing score. Patients were divided into two groups based on this score: the high healing score (group HH, healing score ≥ 8 points) and suboptimal healing score (group SO, healing score ≤ 6 points) groups. Computed tomography scans were performed on patients 1 week postsurgery. ICNW and OW widths were measured and relatively evaluated based on their ratio to the intercondylar distance (ICD), represented as the ICNW/ICD ratio (%) and OW/ICD ratio (%), respectively. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and on second-look arthroscopy using the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

There were no significant demographic differences between the SO and HH group (n = 35 and 120 patients, respectively). Regarding radiographic measurements, significant differences were observed in the ICNW/ICD ratio (group SO, 24.2%; group HH, 25.2%; p = 0.024), OW (group SO, 2.6 mm; group HH, 2.0 mm; p < 0.001), and OW/ICD ratio (group SO, 3.5%; group HH, 2.7%; p < 0.001). Both groups had similar preoperative clinical scores, but postoperative clinical scores, including KOOS-activities of daily living (group SO, 83.4; group HH, 88.7; p = 0.035) and VAS (group SO, 19.1; group HH, 11.3; p = 0.005), were significantly better in group HH.

CONCLUSION

The study suggests that ICNW and OW may play a crucial role in MMPRT healing following arthroscopic pullout repair, as evidenced by the worse clinical outcomes associated with a narrower ICNW and wider OW. These findings highlight the potential significance of ICNW and OW assessments when evaluating meniscal repair indications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Younger patients, lower BMI, complete meniscus root healing, lower HKA degree and shorter preoperative symptom duration were the independent risk factors correlated with the good correction of MME in patients with repaired MMPRTs

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopically assisted tendon graft anatomic reinforced reconstruction of the medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) and identify relevant factors affecting the correction of medial meniscal extrusion (MME).

METHODS

Fifty-three MMPRTs patients who underwent arthroscopically assisted tendon graft reconstruction of the meniscal root between 2018 and 2020 were evaluated retrospectively. the patients were divided into 2 groups according to the correction of MME (maintained MME group: 32 cases vs. increased MME group: 21 cases). The clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopically assisted tendon graft reconstruction of the meniscal root, including postoperative correction of MME and functional recovery of the knee were assessed in this study, and potential independent risk factors that could influence the correction of MME were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The functional recovery of the knee was significantly improved at the end of follow-up (P < 0.001; respectively), furthermore, a comparison of the final functional outcomes between the groups showed that the mean Lysholm score and IKDC score of the maintained MME group were significantly improved than those of increased MME group. 60.4% had good correction of MME, and patients with complete healing had better extrusion correction than those with partial healing and non-healing. Binary logistic regression models analysis indicated that the age (OR = 1.053, P = 0.048), BMI (OR = 1.376, P = 0.004), meniscus root healing status (OR = 7.701, P = 0.005), HKA degree (OR = 1.891, P = 0.011) and preoperative symptom duration (OR = 1.055, P = 0.013) were the independent risk factors correlated with correction of MME. Additionally, the ROC curve demonstrated the cut-off values of the Age, BMI, HKA degree and preoperative symptom duration were 46.0 years, 22.5 kg/m2, 3.2° and 9.5 months, respectively, CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopically assisted tendon graft anatomic reinforced reconstruction of the meniscal root showed clinical improvement and prevented the progression of postoperative MME. Additionally, younger patients, lower BMI, complete meniscus root healing, lower HKA degree and shorter preoperative symptom duration were the independent risk factors correlated with the good correction of MME in patients with repaired MMPRTs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.