Influence of tissue fixation on the microextraction and identification of amyloid proteins

Diagnostic challenges in systemic amyloidosis: a case report with clinical and laboratorial pitfalls

Currently, there is growing evidence in the literature warning of misdiagnosis involving amyloidosis and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Although inducing clinical manifestations outside the peripheral nervous system, light chain and transthyretin amyloidosis may initially present with peripheral neuropathy, which can be indistinguishable from CIDP, leading to a delay in the correct diagnosis. Besides, the precise identification of the amyloid subtype is often challenging. This case report exemplifies clinical and laboratory pitfalls in diagnosing amyloidosis and subtyping amyloid, exposing the patient to potentially harmful procedures.

Proteomic developments in the analysis of formalin-fixed tissue

Retrospective proteomic studies, including those which aim to elucidate the molecular mechanisms driving cancer, require the assembly and characterization of substantial patient tissue cohorts. The difficulty of maintaining and accessing native tissue archives has prompted the development of methods to access archives of formalin-fixed tissue. Formalin-fixed tissue archives, complete with patient meta data, have accumulated for decades, presenting an invaluable resource for these retrospective studies. This review presents the current knowledge concerning formalin-fixed tissue, with descriptions of the mechanisms of formalin fixation, protein extraction, top-down proteomics, bottom-up proteomics, quantitative proteomics, phospho- and glycoproteomics as well as imaging mass spectrometry. Particular attention has been given to the inclusion of proteomic investigations of archived tumour tissue. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Medical Proteomics.

Comparison of different tissue sampling methods for protein extraction from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue specimens

AIMS

Protein extracts from formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue for proteomic analysis has recently gained attention. In this study, we explored the possibility to standardize tissue sampling from paraffin blocks and compared the protein extracts with those obtained from fresh frozen material.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fresh frozen and FFPE material was obtained from five patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma either by cutting sections with a microtome or by stamping a cylinder with tissue micro-array technology. All samples were weighed, forwarded to protein extraction and analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blotting. Immunohistochemistry allocated proteins in tissue sections.

RESULTS

Sampling of tissue was highly reproducible, as assessed by sample weight. While protein concentrations were significantly higher in fresh frozen material compared to FFPE material, equal amounts of protein were extracted from FFPE using either paraffin sections or core cylinders in SDS-PAGE, all three procedures showed comparable protein patterns. In Western blotting, annexin I had the same molecular weight independent of the sample source and sampling procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The sampling of FFPE specimens for protein extraction and analysis can be standardized, uncovering equal amounts of tissue and protein. In addition, the proteins extracted from FFPE tissue seem to be the same compared with those extracted from fresh frozen tissue.

Immunohistochemical Classification of Amyloid in Surgical Pathology Revisited

We aimed to reassess the suitability of immunohistochemical classification of amyloid in surgical pathology. One hundred sixty-nine biopsies from 121 patients diagnosed with amyloid during the period from 1994 to 2004 were included. Amyloid was classified immunohistochemically, using antibodies directed against amyloid P-component, AA amyloid, apolipoprotein AI, fibrinogen, keratoepithelin, lactoferrin, lysozyme, beta2-microglobulin (beta2M), immunoglobulin-derived lambda-light and kappa-light chains, and transthyretin. Amyloid was most commonly present in biopsies from the hepatogastrointestinal tract. The deposits were classified immunohistochemically in 156 (92%) biopsies. In 13 biopsies of 12 patients, amyloid remained unclassified. AL amyloidosis was diagnosed in 76 (45%) biopsies and was further categorized into AL amyloid of kappa-light chain origin [32 (42%) biopsies] or lambda-light chain origin [20 (26%)]. In 24 (32%) biopsies, the amyloid deposits did not show unequivocal staining for lambda-light or kappa-light chain. However, these cases were categorized as "probably AL amyloid, not otherwise specified", because no other antibody showed unequivocal staining of the amyloid deposits. AA amyloidosis was diagnosed in 32, ATTR amyloidosis in 21, and AApoAI amyloidosis in 3 biopsies. Other types of amyloid included AKer and ALac amyloids each in 1, and ALys and ACal amyloids each in 2 biopsies. Abeta2M amyloid was not diagnosed in any case. Immunohistochemical classification of amyloid still poses problems. Although classification of AA, AApoAI, ALys, ALac, and ATTR amyloids is relatively straightforward, classification of AL amyloid and rare hereditary amyloidoses is a serious obstacle and sometimes even impossible when conclusive clinical information or additional protein biochemical or molecular biologic studies are not available.