Overall survival in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer using different tyrosine kinase inhibitors in The Netherlands: a retrospective, nationwide registry study

All-In-One OsciDrop Digital PCR System for Automated and Highly Multiplexed Molecular Diagnostics

Digital PCR (dPCR) holds immense potential for precisely detecting nucleic acid markers essential for personalized medicine. However, its broader application is hindered by high consumable costs, complex procedures, and restricted multiplexing capabilities. To address these challenges, an all-in-one dPCR system is introduced that eliminates the need for microfabricated chips, offering fully automated operations and enhanced multiplexing capabilities. Using this innovative oscillation-induced droplet generation technique, OsciDrop, this system supports a comprehensive dPCR workflow, including precise liquid handling, pipette-based droplet printing, in situ thermocycling, multicolor fluorescence imaging, and machine learning-driven analysis. The system's reliability is demonstrated by quantifying reference materials and evaluating HER2 copy number variation in breast cancer. Its multiplexing capability is showcased with a quadruplex dPCR assay that detects key EGFR mutations, including 19Del, L858R, and T790M in lung cancer. Moreover, the digital stepwise melting analysis (dSMA) technique is introduced, enabling high-multiplex profiling of seven major EGFR variants spanning 35 subtypes. This innovative dPCR system presents a cost-effective and versatile alternative, overcoming existing limitations and paving the way for transformative advances in precision diagnostics.

CRISPR/Cas13a-based supersensitive circulating tumor DNA assay for detecting EGFR mutations in plasma

Despite recent technological advancements in cell tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutation detection, challenges persist in identifying low-frequency mutations due to inadequate sensitivity and coverage of current procedures. Herein, we introduce a super-sensitivity and specificity technique for detecting ctDNA mutations, named HiCASE. The method utilizes PCR-based CRISPR, coupled with the restriction enzyme. In this work, HiCASE focuses on testing a series of EGFR mutations to provide enhanced detection technology for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), enabling a detection sensitivity of 0.01% with 40 ng cell free DNA standard. When applied to a panel of 140 plasma samples from 120 NSCLC patients, HiCASE exhibits 88.1% clinical sensitivity and 100% specificity with 40 μL of plasma, higher than ddPCR and Super-ARMS assay. In addition, HiCASE can also clearly distinguish T790M/C797S mutations in different positions at a 1% variant allele frequency, offering valuable guidance for drug utilization. Indeed, the established HiCASE assay shows potential for clinical applications.

Overall Survival From the EORTC LCG-1613 APPLE Trial of Osimertinib Versus Gefitinib Followed by Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Osimertinib has been established as a standard of care for patients with common sensitizing EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) although the sequential approach (first-generation inhibitor gefitinib followed by osimertinib) has not been formally compared. The phase II APPLE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02856893) enrolled 156 treatment-naïve patients, and two treatment strategies were evaluated: osimertinib up front or the sequential treatment approach with gefitinib up front followed by osimertinib at the time of progression, either molecular progression (detection of plasma T790M resistance mutation) regardless of the radiologic status or just at the time of radiologic progression. Patients' characteristics were well balanced, except for the higher proportion of baseline brain metastases in the sequential approach (29% v 19%). Per protocol, 73% of patients switched to osimertinib in the sequential arm. Up-front treatment with osimertinib was associated with a lower risk of brain progression versus the sequential approach (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.34 to 0.86]), but a comparable overall survival was observed between both strategies (HR, 1.01 [90% CI, 0.61 to 1.68]), with the 18-month survival probability of 84% and 82.3%, respectively. The APPLE trial suggests that a sequential treatment approach is associated with more frequent progression in the brain but a similar survival in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Uncommon Blepharitis

Blepharitis is a common chronic inflammatory condition affecting the eyelid margins; the pathophysiology of blepharitis is complex and not fully understood. The disease is anatomically divided into anterior (inflammation of eyelashes) and posterior (meibomian gland dysfunction) types. Diagnosis relies on clinical examination, revealing characteristic features like scurf, vascular changes, and meibomian gland dysfunction. The main goals of blepharitis treatment are symptom relief, recurrence prevention, and complication risk minimization. Treatment options include lid hygiene, topical and systemic antibiotics, topical corticosteroids, and omega-3 supplements. However, it is important to highlight reported cases of blepharitis as side effects of systemic therapies, particularly in the context of chemotherapy, bortezomib, cetuximab, TNFα inhibitors, and dupilumab. It is crucial to monitor patients undergoing such treatments regularly and attentively in order to promptly set up adequate supportive therapy. Of even more importance is future research on the pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the occurrence of these ocular side effects in order to find a nosological cure for the issue.

Differential efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors according to the types of EGFR mutations and agents in non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Both first and second-generation EGFR-TKIs are recommended in advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutations. However, there are few data on the difference in efficacy of EGFR-TKIs based on the type of EGFR mutation and agents.

METHODS

This retrospective real-world study evaluated the outcomes and clinicopathologic characteristics, including the type of EGFR mutations, of 237 advanced NSCLC patients treated with first- or second-generation (afatinib) EGFR-TKIs as first-line therapy.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all patients were 11 months (M) and 25M, respectively. In the univariate analysis, patients with exon 19 deletion (del) (n=130) had significantly longer median OS compared to those with other mutations (L858R: 84, others: 23) (30 vs. 22 M, p=0.047), without a difference in PFS (p=0.138). Patients treated with afatinib (n=60) showed significantly longer median OS compared to those treated with first-generation TKIs (gefitinib: 159, erlotinib: 18) (30 vs. 23 M, p=0.037), without a difference in PFS (p=0.179). In patients with exon 19 del, there was no significant difference in median PFS (p=0.868) or OS (p=0.361) between patients treated with afatinib and those treated with first-generation TKIs, while significantly better PFS (p=0.042) and trend in OS (p=0.069) were observed in patients receiving afatinib in other mutations. Exon 19 del was independently associated with favorable OS (p=0.028), while age >70 years (p=0.017), ECOG performance status ≥2 (p=0.001), primary metastatic disease (p=0.007), and synchronous brain metastasis (p=0.026) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGFR exon 19 del was associated with favorable OS in advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, in patients with exon 19 del, first-generation TKIs seem to be a reasonable treatment option if osimertinib is unavailable.

Breathing in danger: how particulate matter pollution is putting the public at risk of lung cancer†

We are constantly exposed to chemicals and other agents in our environment that can influence our risk of tumorigenesis, but exactly how these factors contribute to cancer development is largely unknown. Fine particulate matter measuring ≤2.5 μm (PM2.5 ) from air pollution can accumulate in alveoli, contributing to inflammation and tissue damage. Despite prior correlative studies highlighting the mortality risk, there has been a historical reluctance to lower national standards for safe PM2.5 exposure. A recent publication further highlights the attributable risk of PM2.5 exposure with lung cancer - particularly in 'never-smokers' with EGFR-driven non-small cell lung cancer. Importantly, it also elucidates a mechanistic link between PM2.5 exposure and tumorigenesis using in vivo models of EGFR non-small cell lung cancer. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

EGFR-mutated non-small lung cancer brain metastases and radiosurgery outcomes with a focus on leptomeningeal disease

PURPOSE

Patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC represent a unique subset of lung cancer patients with distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. Previous studies have shown a higher incidence of brain metastases (BM) in this subgroup of patients, and neurologic death has been reported to be as high as 40% and correlates with leptomeningeal disease (LMD).

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2021, a retrospective review of our prospective registry identified 606 patients with BM from NSCLC, with 170 patients having an EGFR mutation. Demographic, clinical, radiographic, and treatment characteristics were correlated to the incidence of LMD and survival.

RESULTS

LMD was identified in 22.3% of patients (n = 38) at a median follow-up of 19 (2-98) months from initial SRS. Multivariate regression analysis showed targeted therapy and a cumulative number of metastases as significant predictors of LMD (p = 0.034, HR = 0.44), (p = .04, HR = 1.02). The median survival time after SRS of the 170 patients was 24 months (CI 95% 19.1-28.1). In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, RPA, exon 19 deletion, and osimertinib treatment were significant predictors of overall survival. The cumulative incidence of neurological death at 2 and 4 years post initial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was 8% and 11%, respectively, and correlated with LMD.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that current-generation targeted therapy for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients may prevent the development and progression of LMD, leading to improved survival outcomes. Nevertheless, LMD is associated with poor outcomes and neurologic death, making innovative strategies to treat LMD essential.

New insights into the biology and development of lung cancer in never smokers-implications for early detection and treatment

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Despite never smokers comprising between 10 and 25% of all cases, lung cancer in never smokers (LCNS) is relatively under characterized from an etiological and biological perspective. The application of multi-omics techniques on large patient cohorts has significantly advanced the current understanding of LCNS tumor biology. By synthesizing the findings of multi-omics studies on LCNS from a clinical perspective, we can directly translate knowledge regarding tumor biology into implications for patient care. Primarily focused on never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma, this review details the predominance of driver mutations, particularly in East Asian patients, as well as the frequency and importance of germline variants in LCNS. The mutational patterns present in LCNS tumors are thoroughly explored, highlighting the high abundance of the APOBEC signature. Moreover, this review recognizes the spectrum of immune profiles present in LCNS tumors and posits how it can be translated to treatment selection. The recurring and novel insights from multi-omics studies on LCNS tumor biology have a wide range of clinical implications. Risk factors such as exposure to outdoor air pollution, second hand smoke, and potentially diet have a genomic imprint in LCNS at varying degrees, and although they do not encompass all LCNS cases, they can be leveraged to stratify risk. Germline variants similarly contribute to a notable proportion of LCNS, which warrants detailed documentation of family history of lung cancer among never smokers and demonstrates value in developing testing for pathogenic variants in never smokers for early detection in the future. Molecular driver subtypes and specific co-mutations and mutational signatures have prognostic value in LCNS and can guide treatment selection. LCNS tumors with no known driver alterations tend to be stem-like and genes contributing to this state may serve as potential therapeutic targets. Overall, the comprehensive findings of multi-omics studies exert a wide influence on clinical management and future research directions in the realm of LCNS.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of second- and third-generation TKIs for non-small-cell lung cancer with uncommon EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of definite for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has been preliminarily demonstrated. However, there is a paucity of data with which to compare the efficacy and safety of second- and third-generation TKIs in patients with NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

We compared the efficacy and safety of second- and third-generation TKIs in all NSCLC patients in whom next-generation sequencing confirmed uncommon EGFR mutations, including G719X, S768I, and L861Q. The parameters analyzed included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The rate of treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reflected the safety of these TKIs.

RESULTS

Eighty-four NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations were enrolled between April 2016 and May 2022 at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, including 63 treated with second-generation TKIs and 21 treated with third-generation TKIs. The ORR for all patients receiving TKIs was 47.6%, and the DCR was 86.9%. The median PFS for NSCLC patients with uncommon EGFR mutations receiving TKIs was 11.9 months and OS was 30.6 months. There was no significant difference in PFS after treatment with second- or third-generation TKIs (13.3 vs. 11.0 months, respectively, P = 0.910) or in OS (30.6 vs. 24.6 months, respectively P = 0.623). The third-generation TKIs showed no severe toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of second- and third-generation TKIs for NSCLC with uncommon EGFR mutations does not differ, and so can be used to treat NSCLC patients with these mutations.

Best first-line therapy for people with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status

BACKGROUND

Most people who are newly diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have advanced disease. For these people, survival is determined by various patient- and tumor-related factors, of which the performance status (PS) is the most important prognostic factor. People with PS 0 or 1 are usually treated with systemic therapies, whereas people with PS 3 or 4 most often receive supportive care. However, treatment for people with PS 2 without a targetable mutation remains unclear. Historically, people with a PS 2 cancer are frequently excluded from (important) clinical trials because of poorer outcomes and increased toxicity. We aim to address this knowledge gap, as this group of people represents a significant proportion (20% to 30%) of the total population with newly diagnosed lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the best first-line therapy for advanced lung cancer in people with performance status 2 without a targetable mutation or with an unknown mutation status.

SEARCH METHODS

We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 17 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different chemotherapy (with or without angiogenesis inhibitor) or immunotherapy regimens, specifically designed for people with PS 2 only or studies including a subgroup of these people.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. overall survival (OS), 2. health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and 3. toxicity/adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 4. tumor response rate, 5. progression-free survival, and 6. survival rates at six and 12 months' treatment. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 22 trials in this review and identified one ongoing trial. Twenty studies compared chemotherapy with different regimens, of which 11 compared non-platinum therapy (monotherapy or doublet) versus platinum doublet. We found no studies comparing best supportive care with chemotherapy and only two abstracts analyzing chemotherapy versus immunotherapy. We found that platinum doublet therapy showed superior OS compared to non-platinum therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 0.78; 7 trials, 697 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no differences in six-month survival rates (risk ratio [RR] 1.00, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.41; 6 trials, 632 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), whereas 12-month survival rates were improved for treatment with platinum doublet therapy (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97; 11 trials, 1567 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). PFS and tumor response rate were also better for people treated with platinum doublet therapy, with moderate-certainty evidence (PFS: HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.77; 5 trials, 487 participants; tumor response rate: RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.67 to 3.05; 9 trials, 964 participants). When analyzing toxicity rates, we found that platinum doublet therapy increased grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicities, all with low-certainty evidence (anemia: RR 1.98, 95% CI 1.00 to 3.92; neutropenia: RR 2.75, 95% CI 1.30 to 5.82; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.96, 95% CI 1.73 to 9.06; all 8 trials, 935 participants). Only four trials reported HRQoL data; however, the methodology was different per trial and we were unable to perform a meta-analysis. Although evidence is limited, there were no differences in 12-month survival rates or tumor response rates between carboplatin and cisplatin regimens. With an indirect comparison, carboplatin seemed to have better 12-month survival rates than cisplatin compared to non-platinum therapy. The assessment of the efficacy of immunotherapy in people with PS 2 was limited. There might be a place for single-agent immunotherapy, but the data provided by the included studies did not encourage the use of double-agent immunotherapy.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review showed that as a first-line treatment for people with PS 2 with advanced NSCLC, platinum doublet therapy seems to be preferred over non-platinum therapy, with a higher response rate, PFS, and OS. Although the risk for grade 3 to 5 hematologic toxicity is higher, these events are often relatively mild and easy to treat. Since trials using checkpoint inhibitors in people with PS 2 are scarce, we identified an important knowledge gap regarding their role in people with advanced NSCLC and PS 2.

Biological insights in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung oncogenesis relies on intracellular cysteine to overcome oxidative stress. Several tumor types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), upregulate the system xc- cystine/glutamate antiporter (xCT) through overexpression of the cystine transporter SLC7A11, thus sustaining intracellular cysteine levels to support glutathione synthesis. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) serves as a master regulator of oxidative stress resistance by regulating SLC7A11, whereas Kelch-like ECH-associated protein (KEAP1) acts as a cytoplasmic repressor of the oxidative responsive transcription factor NRF2. Mutations in KEAP1/NRF2 and p53 induce SLC7A11 activation in NSCLC. Extracellular cystine is crucial in supplying the intracellular cysteine levels necessary to combat oxidative stress. Disruptions in cystine availability lead to iron-dependent lipid peroxidation, thus resulting in a type of cell death called ferroptosis. Pharmacologic inhibitors of xCT (either SLC7A11 or GPX4) induce ferroptosis of NSCLC cells and other tumor types. When cystine uptake is impaired, the intracellular cysteine pool can be sustained by the transsulfuration pathway, which is catalyzed by cystathionine-B-synthase (CBS) and cystathionine g-lyase (CSE). The involvement of exogenous cysteine/cystine and the transsulfuration pathway in the cysteine pool and downstream metabolites results in compromised CD8+ T cell function and evasion of immunotherapy, diminishing immune response and potentially reducing the effectiveness of immunotherapeutic interventions. Pyroptosis is a previously unrecognized form of regulated cell death. In NSCLCs driven by EGFR, ALK, or KRAS, selective inhibitors induce pyroptotic cell death as well as apoptosis. After targeted therapy, the mitochondrial intrinsic apoptotic pathway is activated, thus leading to the cleavage and activation of caspase-3. Consequently, gasdermin E is activated, thus leading to permeabilization of the cytoplasmic membrane and cell-lytic pyroptosis (indicated by characteristic cell membrane ballooning). Breakthroughs in KRAS G12C allele-specific inhibitors and potential mechanisms of resistance are also discussed herein.

Rationale and design of phase II clinical trial of dual inhibition with ramucirumab and erlotinib in EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive treatment-naïve non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression (SPIRAL-3D study)

Background

Osimertinib is a standard treatment option for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, osimertinib monotherapy yields poor clinical outcomes in some patients, necessitating the development of novel treatment strategies. In addition, several studies have suggested that high programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) for osimertinib monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations.

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of erlotinib plus ramucirumab for EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive treatment-naïve NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.

Design

A single-arm, prospective, open-label, phase II study.

Methods and Analysis

Patients with treatment-naïve EGFR exon 19 deletion-positive NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression and a performance status of 0-2 will receive combination therapy with erlotinib plus ramucirumab until evidence of disease progression or development of unacceptable toxicity. High PD-L1 expression is defined as a tumor proportion score of 50% or higher, as determined by PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 22C3 pharmDx testing. The Kaplan-Meier method and the Brookmeyer and Crowley method with the arcsine square-root transformation will be used with PFS as the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints include overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety. A total of 25 patients will be enrolled.

Ethics

The study has been approved by the Clinical Research Review Board, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan, and written informed consent will be obtained from all patients.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to focus on PD-L1 expression in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. If the primary end point is met, combination therapy with erlotinib and ramucirumab could become a potential treatment option for this clinical population.

Trial Registration

This trial was registered with the Japan Registry for Clinical Trials on 12 January 2023 (jRCTs 051220149).

EGFR and ERBB2 exon 20 insertion/duplication in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: genomic profiling and clinicopathologic features

Background

Exon 20 (ex20) in-frame insertions or duplications (ins/dup) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its analog erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) are each detected in 1.5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unlike EGFR p.L858R or ex19 deletions, ex20 ins/dup is associated with de novo resistance to classic EGFR inhibitors, lack of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, and poor prognosis. US Food and Drug Administration has approved mobocertinib and amivantamab for targeting tumors with this aberration, but the number of comprehensive studies on ex20 ins/dup NSCLC is limited. We identified 18 cases of NSCLCs with EGFR/ERBB2 ex20 ins/dup and correlated the findings with clinical and morphologic information including programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

Methods

A total of 536 NSCLC cases tested at our institution between 2014 and 2023 were reviewed. A custom-designed 214-gene next-generation sequencing panel was used for detecting DNA variants, and the FusionPlex CTL panel (ArcherDx) was used for the detection of fusion transcripts from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Immunohistochemistry (IHC)for PD-L1 was performed using 22C3 or E1L3N clones.

Results

Nine EGFR and nine ERBB2 ex20 ins/dup variants were identified from an equal number of men and women, 14 were non- or light smokers, and 15 had stage IV disease. All 18 cases were adenocarcinomas. Seven of the 11 cases with available primary tumors had acinar predominant pattern, two had lepidic predominant pattern, and the remainder had papillary (one case) and mucinous (one case) patterns. Ex20 ins/dup variants were heterogenous in-frame one to four amino acids spanning A767-V774 in EGFR and Y772-P780 in ERBB2 and were clustered in the loop following the C-helix and α C-helix. Twelve cases (67%) had co-existing TP53 variants. Copy number variation in CDK4 amplification was identified in one case. No fusion or microsatellite instability was identified in any case. PD-L1 was positive in two cases, low positive in four cases, and negative in 11 cases.

Conclusions

NSCLCs harboring EGFR/ERBB2 ex20 ins/dup are rare and tend to be acinar predominant, negative for PD-L1, more frequent in non- or light smokers, and mutually exclusive with other driver mutations in NSCLC. The correlation of different EGFR/ERBB2 ex20 ins/dup variants and co-existing mutations with response to targeted therapy and the possibility of developing resistant mutations after mobocertinib treatment warrants further investigation.

Insights into EGFR Mutations and Oncogenic KRAS Mutations in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Genetic mutations can activate different sets of proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressors genes [...].