Psychotropic medication utilisation in adult cancer patients in China: A cross-sectional study based on national health insurance database

Use of antipsychotic drugs during radiotherapy in adult cancer patients in Korea: a nationwide retrospective cohort study based on the national health insurance service database

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs (APDs) are used for treating mental illnesses and are also used by cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate APD use in adult cancer patients who received radiotherapy (RT) in South Korea and assess the effects of APD use during RT on survival.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Health Insurance Service database database of Korea. We included adult cancer patients who underwent RT or chemotherapy (CTx, cisplatin, or 5-Fluorouracil) between 2010 and 2020. The APDs included in the analysis were aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, haloperidol, and chlorpromazine.

RESULTS

Overall, 725,897 patients received RT, and 115,500 received concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT). Of them, 41,118 (5.6%) took APDs during RT, and 8,129 (7%) took APDs during CCRT. Overall, 27,789 (67.58%) patients who took APDs during RT were men, and 28,004 (68.2%) were aged ≥ 60 years. The most frequently used APD during RT was quetiapine (64.93%). Patients who took APDs during RT and during CCRT had higher mortality rates (HR: 3.45 and 1.72, p < 0.0001, respectively) compared to the non-APD patients. Of the patients who used APDs during RT, patients accompanying psychiatric diagnosis, taking high-dose APD, and taking APD for more than 3 months had lower mortality than patients without psychiatric diagnosis, taking low-dose APD, and taking APD for less than 3 months, respectively (HR: 0.88, 0.87 and 0.80, respectively, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Only 5.6% of patients who underwent RT used APDs, and quetiapine was the most frequently prescribed APD during RT. The use of APD during RT may adversely affect survival. Further studies are required to elucidate the effects of APDs on cancer patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is retrospectively registered.

The impact of government reimbursement negotiation on targeted anticancer medicines use and cost in China: A cohort study based on national health insurance data

Background

High prices of targeted anticancer medicines (TAMs) result in financial toxicity for patients and the health insurance system. How national price negotiation and reimbursement policy affect the accessibility of TAMs for cancer patients remains unknown.

Methods

In this population-based cohort study, we used national health insurance claims data in 2017 and identified adult patients with cancer diagnoses for which price-negotiated TAMs were indicated. We estimated the half-month prevalence of price-negotiated TAMs use before and after the policy implementation in September 2017. We calculated direct medical costs, out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, and the proportion of OOP cost for each cancer patient to measure their financial burden attributable to TAMs use. We performed segmented linear and multivariable logistic regression to analyse the policy impact.

Results

We included 39 391 of a total 118 655 cancer beneficiaries. After September 2017, the prevalence of price-negotiated TAMs use increased from 1.4%-2.1% to 2.9%-3.1% (P = 0.005); TAMs users' daily medical costs increased from US$261.3 to US$292.5 (P < 0.001), while median daily OOP costs (US$68.2 vs US$65.7; P = 0.134) and OOP costs as a proportion of daily medical costs persisted (28.5% vs 28.5%; P = 0.995). Compared with resident beneficiaries, the relative probability of urban employee beneficiaries on TAMs uses decreased after the policy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.4 vs aOR = 2.2).

Conclusions

The government price negotiation and reimbursement policy improved patient access to TAMs and narrowed disparities among insurance schemes. China's approach to promoting the affordability of expensive medicines provides valuable experience for health policy decision-makers.

The epidemiology of new persistent hypnotic/sedative use after surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study

The use of hypnotic and sedative medication for sleep improvement is common and long-term use has been associated with an increased risk of adverse events and mortality. A proportion of patients might develop long-term use after initiating new persistent use following surgery. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the incidence of new persistent hypnotic/sedative use after surgical procedures and associated patient and procedural factors. Data on prescriptions for hypnotic and sedative medications used for sleep improvement were retrieved from the National Prescription Medicine Registry. Medication naivety was defined as not filling a prescription for hypnotics/sedatives from 365 days through 31 days preceding surgery, new use was defined as medication naivety followed by filling a prescription for hypnotic/sedative medication from 30 days before surgery through 14 days after surgery. New persistent hypnotic/sedative use was defined as new use followed by filling another hypnotic/sedative prescription from 15 days through 365 days after surgery. Of 55,414 patients included in the study, 43,297 were naive to hypnotic/sedative medications. Of those naive patients, 4.6% met the criteria for new peri-operative use, of whom 51.6% developed new persistent hypnotic/sedative use. Patient and procedural factors associated with increased risk of new persistent use were older age; female sex; the presence of malignant neoplasm; ischaemic heart disease; and having undergone either cardiac or thoracic surgery. The hazard of long-term mortality was higher for patients with new persistent use (1.39, 95%CI 1.22-1.59) compared with patients who remained naive. While a small ratio of surgical patients initiates the use of hypnotics/sedatives in the peri-operative period, a substantial proportion of these develop persistent use, which is associated with adverse outcomes. Over time, the proportion of patients using hypnotics/sedatives has declined, but the risk of persistent use within this group has remained stable.

Overcoming Therapy Resistance in Colon Cancer by Drug Repurposing

Simple Summary

Despite improvements in standardized screening methods and the development of promising therapies for colorectal cancer (CRC), survival rates are still low. Drug repurposing offers an affordable solution to achieve new indications for previously approved drugs that could play a protagonist or adjuvant role in the treatment of CRC. In this review, we summarize the current data supporting drug repurposing as a feasible option for patients with CRC.

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world. Despite improvement in standardized screening methods and the development of promising therapies, the 5-year survival rates are as low as 10% in the metastatic setting. The increasing life expectancy of the general population, higher rates of obesity, poor diet, and comorbidities contribute to the increasing trends in incidence. Drug repurposing offers an affordable solution to achieve new indications for previously approved drugs that could play a protagonist or adjuvant role in the treatment of CRC with the advantage of treating underlying comorbidities and decreasing chemotherapy toxicity. This review elaborates on the current data that supports drug repurposing as a feasible option for patients with CRC with a focus on the evidence and mechanism of action promising repurposed candidates that are widely used, including but not limited to anti-malarial, anti-helminthic, anti-inflammatory, anti-hypertensive, anti-hyperlipidemic, and anti-diabetic agents.