DNA extraction of urinary bladder swabs collected from carbonized and decomposing corpses: Possible application in disaster victim identification

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for COVID-19 host genetics studies

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in global shortages in supplies for diagnostic tests, especially in the developing world. Risk factors for COVID-19 severity include pre-existing comorbidities, older age and male sex, but other variables are likely play a role in disease outcome. There is indeed increasing evidence that supports the role of host genetics in the predisposition to COVID-19 outcomes. The identification of genetic factors associated with the course of SARS-CoV-2 infections relies on DNA extraction methods. This study compared three DNA extraction methods (Chelex®100 resin, phenol-chloroform and the QIAamp DNA extraction kit) for COVID-19 host genetic studies using nasopharyngeal samples from patients. The methods were compared regarding number of required steps for execution, sample handling time, quality and quantity of the extracted material and application in genetic studies. The Chelex®100 method was found to be cheapest (33 and 13 times cheaper than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), give the highest DNA yield (306 and 69 times higher than the commercial kit and phenol-chloroform, respectively), with the least handling steps while providing adequate DNA quality for downstream applications. Together, our results show that the Chelex®100 resin is an inexpensive, safe, simple, fast, and suitable method for DNA extraction of nasopharyngeal samples from COVID-19 patients for genetics studies. This is particularly relevant in developing countries where cost and handling are critical steps in material processing.

Recommendations for the successful identification of altered human remains using standard and emerging technologies: Results of a systematic approach

Successful DNA-based identification of altered human remains relies on the condition of the corpses and varies between tissue types. Therefore, the aim of this prospective multicenter study was to generate evidence-based recommendations for the successful identification of altered remains. For this, 19 commonly used soft and hard tissues from 102 altered human bodies were investigated. The corpses' condition was categorized into three anatomical regions using a practical scoring system. Besides other data, DNA yields, degradation indices, and short tandem repeat (STR) profile completeness were determined in 949 tissue samples. Additionally, varying degrees of alteration and tissue-specific differences were evaluated using the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platform MiSeq FGx™. Selected challenging samples were sequenced in parallel with the Ion S5™ platform to assess platform-specific performances in the prediction of the deceased's phenotype and the biogeographic ancestry. Differences between tissue types and DNA extraction methods were found, revealing, for example, the lowest degradation for vertebral disc samples from corpses with initiating, advanced and high degrees of decomposition. With respect to STR profile completeness, blood samples outperformed all other tissues including even profoundly degraded corpses. NGS results revealed higher profile completeness compared to standard capillary electrophoresis (CE) genotyping. Per sample, material and degradation degree, a probability for its genotyping success, including the "extended" European Standard Set (eESS) loci, was provided for the forensic community. Based on the observations, recommendations for the alteration-specific optimal tissue types were made to improve the first-attempt identification success of altered human remains for forensic casework.

Which tissue to take? A retrospective study of the identification success of altered human remains

In forensic medicine, deceased are usually identified by comparing ante- and post-mortem dental or radiological features. However, in severe putrefaction, burning or absent reference data, the remaining tool for identifying human remains is DNA genotyping. But even a DNA-based identification can be challenging when confronted with a high post-mortem interval or heat impacts because it can lead to undesirable degradation of the DNA that varies among tissue types. This retrospective study investigated the identification success in 402 altered human corpses over seven years by comparing the examined tissue types from decomposed, skeletonised and burnt corpses as well as bodies found in water. For each tissue, the STR genotyping results and the number of additional or parallel genetic analyses were evaluated. By comparing the amplification success in samples from altered and unaltered remains, condition-based and tissue-specific differences were observed. With a mean number of 1.6 additional amplifications in cases with well-preserved corpses and 4.5 in altered corpses, the results showed significantly more DNA analyses for altered remains. In 83% of the cases, extra amplifications were performed to identify the corpse. The tissue-specific differences revealed an uncertainty in choosing suitable material from altered corpses for a successful DNA profile. Especially for bone and muscle samples, the genotyping success was the most unpredictable. Furthermore, comparing the retrospective outcome with other research findings, a remarkable variety of recommendations for the "best tissue choice" exists in the forensic community. Thus, our survey highlights the advantages of a broader and systematic approach on hard and soft tissues for successful DNA-based identification of altered human remains at first attempt.

Potential authentication of various meat-based products using simple and efficient DNA extraction method

BACKGROUND

The growth of halal food consumption worldwide has resulted in an increase in the request for halal authentication. DNA-based detection using powerful real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique has been shown to be highly specific and sensitive authentication tool. The efficient DNA extraction method in terms of quality and quantity is a backbone step to obtain successful real-time PCR assays. In this study, different DNA extraction methods using three lysis buffers were evaluated and developed to recommend a much more efficient method as well as achieve a successful detection using real-time PCR.

RESULTS

The lysis buffer 2 (LB2) has been shown to be the best lysis buffer for DNA extraction from both raw and processed meat samples comparing to other lysis buffers tested. Hence, the LB2 has been found to be ideal to detect meat and porcine DNAs by real-time PCR using pairs of porcine specific primers and universal primers which amplified at 119 bp fragment and 93 bp fragment, respectively. This assay allows detection as low as 0.0001 ng of DNA. Higher efficiency and sensitivity of real-time PCR via a simplified DNA extraction method using LB2 have been observed, as well as a reproducible and high correlation coefficient (R²  = 0.9979) based on the regression analysis of the standard curve have been obtained.

CONCLUSION

This study has established a fast, simple, inexpensive and efficient DNA extraction method that is feasible for raw and processed meat products. This extraction technique allows an accurate DNA detection by real-time PCR and can also be implemented to assist the halal authentication of various meat-based products available in the market. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.