Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Customized oligonucleotide array-based comparative genomic hybridization as a clinical assay for genomic profiling of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chromosome gains and losses used for risk stratification in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are commonly assessed by multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies. We designed and validated a customized array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) platform as a clinical assay for CLL genomic profiling. A 60-mer, 44,000-probe oligonucleotide array with a 50-kb average spatial resolution was augmented with high-density probe tiling at loci that are frequently aberrant in CLL. Aberrations identified by aCGH were compared with those identified by a FISH panel, including locus-specific probes to ATM (11q22.3), the centromeric region of chromosome 12 (12p11.1-q11), D13S319 (13q14.3), LAMP1 (13q34), and TP53 (17p13.1). In 100 CLL samples, aCGH/FISH concordance was seen for 89% of FISH-called aberrations at the ATM (n=18), D13S319 (n=42), LAMP (n=12), and TP53 (n=22) loci and for chromosome 12 (n=14). Eighty-four percentage of FISH/aCGH discordant calls were in samples either at or below the limit of aCGH sensitivity (10% to 25% FISH aberration-containing cells). Therefore, aCGH profiling is a feasible routine clinical test with comparable results to multiprobe FISH studies; however, it may be less sensitive than FISH in cases with low-level aberrations. Further, a customized array design can provide comprehensive genomic profiling with additional accuracy in both identifying and defining the extent of small aberrations at target loci.

High-resolution oligonucleotide array-CGH pinpoints genes involved in cryptic losses in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Although recurrent chromosomal alterations occur in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), relatively few affected tumor suppressors and oncogenes have been implicated. To improve genetic characterization of CLL, we performed high-resolution gene copy number analysis of 20 CLL patients using oligonucleotide array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). The most recurrent losses were observed in 13q and 11q with variable sizes. The 11q losses varied between 7.44 Mb and 41.72 Mb in size and targeted ATM among others. Lost regions in 13q were generally smaller, spanning from 0.79 Mb to 29.33 Mb. The minimal common region (158 kb) in 13q14.3, which was also homozygously deleted in some cases, harbored five genes: TRIM13, KCNRG, DLEU2, DLEU1, and FAM10A4. Additionally, two micro-RNA genes (MIRN15A and MIRN16-1) locate to the region. New cryptic losses were detected in 1q23.2-->q23.3, 3p21.31, 16pter-->p13.3, 17p13.3-->p13.2, 17q25.3-->qter, and 22q11.22. In conclusion, our oligonucleotide aCGH study revealed novel aberrations and provided detailed genomic profiles of the altered regions.