Do we need to do fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in myelodysplastic syndromes as often as we do?

Integrated analysis of genotype and phenotype reveals clonal evolution and cytogenetically driven disruption of myeloid cell maturation in myelodysplastic syndromes

BACKGROUND

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a heterogenous collection of clonal bone marrow diseases characterized by cytopenias, abnormal karyotypes, molecular abnormalities, and dysplasia by flow cytometry and/or morphology. The progression of MDS to severe cytopenias and/or overt leukemia is associated with the accumulation of additional cytogenetic abnormalities, suggesting clonal evolution. The impact of these accumulated abnormalities on myeloid maturation and the severity of the disease is poorly understood.

METHODS

Bone marrow specimens from 16 patients with cytogenetic abnormalities were flow cytometrically sorted into three myeloid populations: progenitors, immature myeloid cells, and mature myeloid cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was performed on each to determine the distribution of chromosomal abnormalities during myeloid maturation.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed three distinct distributions of cytogenetic abnormalities across myeloid maturation, each of which corresponded to specific cytogenetic abnormalities. Group 1 had continuous distribution across all maturational stages and contained patients with a single cytogenetic aberration associated with good-to-intermediate prognosis; Group 2 had accumulation of abnormalities in immature cells and contained patients with high-risk monosomy 7; and Group 3 had abnormalities defining the founding clone equally distributed across maturational stages while subclonal abnormalities were enriched in progenitor cells and contained patients with multiple, non-monosomy 7, abnormalities with evidence of clonal evolution.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that low-risk abnormalities (e.g., del(20q) and trisomy 8) occurring in the founding clone display a markedly different disease etiology, with respect to myeloid maturation, than monosomy 7 or abnormalities acquired in subclones, which result in a disruption of myeloid cell maturation in MDS.

Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Utility for Risk Score Assessment in Patients With MDS With Normal Metaphase Karyotype

BACKGROUND

Cytogenetic profile is an essential parameter in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) risk stratification by both International Prognostic Symptom Score (IPSS) and Revised (R)-IPSS. Almost one-half of patients with MDS have normal cytogenetics by metaphase karyotype. Here we report the yield of MDS fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel detecting cytogenetic abnormalities in these patients and its impact on risk stratification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among patients with normal metaphase karyotype, we assessed those patients who had cytogenetic abnormalities detected by an MDS FISH panel, which included probes for del (5), del (7), del (20), trisomy 8, and del (17p). Risk stratification was calculated by both IPSS and R-IPSS.

RESULTS

Of 1600 patients with MDS with normal metaphase karyotype, 53 (3%) patients had cytogenetic abnormality detected by MDS FISH panel. Integrating the MDS FISH panel cytogenetics (IPSS + FISH restaging) resulted in upstaging the score, where 53% of low-risk IPSS were upstaged to intermediate (int)-1, 56% of int-1 were upstaged to int-2, and 78% of int-2 were upstaged to high risk. Based on the R-IPSS, 61% of very low-risk patients, all low-risk patients, 92% of intermediate-risk patients, and 50% of high-risk patients with FISH abnormalities were upstaged, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The yield of MDS FISH panel detecting cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with normal karyotype by G-banding is low and may not warrant ordering the panel in all patients. Among the 3% of patients with normal karyotype who had cytogenetic abnormality detected by FISH, the risk score assignment by IPSS and R-IPSS was upstaged.

Chromosomal Abnormalities in Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients in Upper Northern Thailand

Objective:

Chromosome detection is important in the diagnosis and prognosis of Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. About 50% of MDS patients have chromosomal abnormalities. Moreover, chromosome 5 and 7 are common genetic abnormalities in MDS patients and use to identify prognosis risk group and the proper treatment in MDS patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate chromosomal abnormalities and clinical features of MDS patients in upper northern Thailand.

Methods:

Fifty bone marrow (BM) specimens were examined by conventional cytogenetic (CC) technique and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for detected chromosome 5 and 7 abnormalities. The clinical features were comparison between MDS patients with chromosomal abnormalities and those with normal karyotype.

Results:

Chromosomal abnormalities were detected in 8/50 MDS patients by CC and 17/50 cases by FISH technique. When the CC and FISH techniques were combined, chromosomal abnormalities increased to 21/50 cases. Abnormalities of isolated chromosome 5 were found in 13 cases and were associated with lower level of percentage blast of BM (p = 0.003) and higher level of hemoglobin (p = 0.019). Moreover, abnormalities of chromosome 7 were found in 3 cases, 1 case of isolated del(7q) and 2 cases of -7 and del(7q) with complex abnormalities. These three cases were associated with higher level of percentage blast of BM (p = 0.010).

Conclusion:

This study showed the frequency and pattern of chromosomal abnormalities of MDS patients in upper northern Thailand were different from other populations. MDS with isolated chromosome 5 abnormalities had clinical characteristics corresponding with patients in good prognosis risk group. However, MDS patients with chromosome 7 and complex abnormalities showed higher percentage blast of BM which high risk to progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Combined CC and FISH techniques detect chromosomal abnormalities with greater frequency than when either technique is used alone.

Comparative assessment of conventional chromosomal analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the evaluation of suspected myelodysplastic syndromes: A single institution experience

Background:

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic neoplasms, roughly half of which harbor cytogenetic abnormalities with diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the most commonly seen abnormalities (5/5q, –7/7q, +8, and –20/20q–) is routinely performed alongside conventional cytogenetics (CC) in the evaluation of suspected MDS despite conflicting reports of its relative contribution compared to CC alone.

Objectives:

To assess the additional diagnostic and prognostic value of performing concurrent FISH versus CC alone in cases of suspected MDS.

Materials and Methods:

A total of 127 bone marrow samples submitted to our cytogenetic laboratory with a presumptive diagnosis of MDS were evaluated by concurrent CC and an MDS FISH panel.

Results:

CC was used as the gold standard method with 100% sensitivity in detecting suspected MDS-associated cytogenetic abnormalities. FISH alone had a sensitivity of 76%, whereas CC alone achieved a sensitivity of 97%. The addition of FISH did not change the diagnosis nor change the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System score in any patient. Moreover, in 12 cases identified as positive by both CC and FISH, CC identified multiple chromosomal aberrations of clinical significance not interrogated by the FISH probe panel.

Conclusion:

CC alone is sufficiently sensitive in detecting suspected MDS-associated cytogenetic abnormalities that influence clinical decision-making. Routine FISH testing does not provide a significant increase in test sensitivity when an adequate karyotype is obtained. Therefore, FISH testing is best reserved for suspected MDS cases lacking sufficient metaphases.

Is fluorescence in-situ hybridization sufficient in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and insufficient cytogenetic testing?

Chromosome banding analysis (CBA) in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remains the 'gold standard' for identification of chromosomal abnormalities, while interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization (I-FISH) is mainly used to complement CBA. This study, retrospectively, evaluated CBA and I-FISH results in 600 patients with suspected MDS and determined the effect of CBA/FISH reallocation on IPSS-R. Our result demonstrated that in 7/586 (1.2%) patients with satisfactory karyotype, I-FISH provided additional information. In 25/453 (5.5%) of the patients with normal I-FISH, CBA detected chromosomal abnormalities, and in 68/147 (46%) of the patients with abnormal I-FISH, CBA detected additional chromosomal aberrations. When 5q- aberration was alone or accompanied by additional abnormalities by I-FISH, CBA revealed a complex karyotype (16/25;64%, 35/43;81%, respectively). Our results suggest that in cases of karyotype failure, if I-FISH is used alone, patients are at risk of being misclassified into the wrong cytogenetic risk groups and a repeat sample for CBA should be attempted.

Evaluation of the Utility of Bone Marrow Morphology and Ancillary Studies in Pediatric Patients Under Surveillance for Myelodysplastic Syndrome

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the utility of flow cytometry, karyotype, and a fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel in screening children for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

METHODS

Bone marrow morphology, flow cytometry, karyotype, and FISH reports from 595 bone marrow specimens (246 patients) were analyzed.

RESULTS

By morphology, 8.7% of cases demonstrated at least unilineage dysplasia and/or increased blasts. Flow cytometry identified definitive abnormalities in 2.8% of cases, all of which had abnormal morphology. Of the 42 cases (7.2%) with acquired karyotypic abnormalities, 26 had no morphologic dysplasia. With a 98.2% concordance between karyotype and MDS FISH, FISH only identified two additional cases, both with low-level (<4%) abnormalities. Peripheral blood count evaluation only identified the absence of thrombocytopenia to correlate with an absence of abnormal ancillary tests.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of morphologic evaluation and karyotype with judicious use of flow cytometry and MDS FISH is sufficient to detect abnormalities for these indications.

Comparison of Diagnostic Yield of a FISH Panel Against Conventional Cytogenetic Studies for Hematological Malignancies: A South Indian Referral Laboratory Analysis Of 201 Cases

Objectives:

Genetic markers are crucial fort diagnostic and prognostic investigation of hematological malignancies (HM). The conventional cytogenetic study (CCS) has been the gold standard for more than five decades. However, FISH (Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization) testing has become a popular modality owing to its targeted approach and the ability to detect abnormalities in non-mitotic cells. We here aimed to compare the diagnostic yields of a FISH panel against CCS in HMs.

Methods:

Samples of bone marrow and peripheral blood for a total of 201 HMs were tested for specific gene rearrangements using multi-target FISH and the results were compared with those from CCS.

Results:

Exhibited a greater diagnostic yield with a positive result in 39.8% of the cases, as compared to 17.9% of cases detected by CCS. Cases of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) benefited the most by FISH testing, which identified chromosomal aberrations beyond the capacity of CCS. FISH was least beneficial in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) where the highest concordance with CCS was exhibited. Acute lymphocytic leukaemia (ALL) demonstrated greater benefit with CCS. In addition, we found the following abnormalities to be most prevalent in HMs by FISH panel testing: RUNX1 (21q22) amplification in ALL, deletion of D13S319/LAMP1 (13q14) in CLL, CKS1B (1q21) amplification in multiple myeloma and deletion of EGR1/RPS14 (5q31/5q32) in MDS, consistent with the literature.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, FISH was found to be advantageous in only a subset of HMs and cannot completely replace CCS. Utilization of the two modalities in conjunction or independently should depend on the indicated HM for an optimal approach to detecting chromosomal aberrations.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: advantages of a combined cytogenetic and molecular diagnostic workup

In this study we present a new diagnostic workup for the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) including FISH, aCGH, and somatic mutation assays in addition to the conventional cytogenetics (CC). We analyzed 61 patients by CC, FISH for chromosome 5, 7, 8 and PDGFR rearrangements, aCGH, and PCR for ASXL1, EZH2, TP53, TET2, RUNX1, DNMT3A, SF3B1 somatic mutations. Moreover, we quantified WT1 and RPS14 gene expression levels, in order to find their possible adjunctive value and their possible clinical impact. CC analysis showed 32% of patients with at least one aberration. FISH analysis detected chromosomal aberrations in 24% of patients and recovered 5 cases (13.5%) at normal karyotype (two 5q- syndromes, one del(7) case, two cases with PDGFR rearrangement). The aGCH detected 10 "new" unbalanced cases in respect of the CC, including one with alteration of the ETV6 gene. After mutational analysis, 33 patients (54%) presented at least one mutation and represented the only marker of clonality in 36% of all patients. The statistical analysis confirmed the prognostic role of CC either on overall or on progression-free-survival. In addition, deletions detected by aCGH and WT1 over-expression negatively conditioned survival. In conclusion, our work showed that 1) the addition of FISH (at least for chr. 5 and 7) can improve the definition of the risk score; 2) mutational analysis, especially for the TP53 and SF3B1, could better define the type of MDS and represent a "clinical warning"; 3) the aCGH use could be probably applied to selected cases (with suboptimal response or failure).

Bone Marrow Conventional Karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization: Defining an Effective Utilization Strategy for Evaluation of Myelodysplastic Syndromes

OBJECTIVES

The current standard of practice for evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) includes peripheral blood and bone marrow morphology review and conventional karyotyping. Karyotype provides a global view of the chromosome complement while fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targets specific abnormalities. The aim of this study was to determine if an MDS-FISH panel would add value beyond karyotype in MDS workup.

METHODS

We studied 505 patients who were evaluated for a possible MDS and had concurrent bone marrow examination, karyotyping, and MDS-FISH performed.

RESULTS

In total, 462 cases had adequate karyotyping (≥20 metaphases) and showed excellent concordance (96%, 445/462) between karyotyping and MDS-FISH. Additional FISH abnormalities had no impact on diagnosis and minimal impact on the cytogenetic prognostic scoring in the myeloid neoplasm cases (2%, 4/206). The concordance rate dropped to 82% (32/39) in the group with insufficient karyotyping (<20 metaphases), and additional FISH findings in this subgroup had no impact on the diagnosis but altered the cytogenetic prognostic scoring in 10% (2/20) of myeloid neoplasm cases.

CONCLUSIONS

In the evaluation of a possible MDS, FISH rarely provides additional value when karyotype is adequate. We propose a value-based, cost-effective algorithmic approach for conventional karyotyping and FISH testing in routine MDS workup.

Frequency of del(12p) is commonly underestimated in myelodysplastic syndromes: Results from a German diagnostic study in comparison with an international control group

In myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), deletion of the short arm of chromosome 12 (del(12p)) is usually a small abnormality, rarely detected as a single aberration by chromosome banding analysis (CBA) of bone marrow metaphases. Del(12p) has been described in 0.6 to 5% of MDS patients at initial diagnosis and is associated with a good to intermediate prognosis as a sole anomaly according to current scoring systems. Here, we present the results of a systematic del(12p) testing in a German prospective diagnostic study (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01355913) on 367 MDS patients in whom CD34+ peripheral blood cells were analysed for the presence of del(12p) by sequential fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. A cohort of 2,902 previously published MDS patients diagnosed by CBA served as control. We demonstrate that, using a sensitive FISH technique, 12p deletion occurs significantly more frequently in MDS than previously described (7.6% by CD34+ PB-FISH vs. 1.6% by CBA, P < 0.001) and is often associated with other aberrations (93% by CD34+ PB-FISH vs. 60% by CBA). Additionally, the detection rate can be increased by repeated analyses in a patient over time which is important for the patient´s prognosis to distinguish a sole anomaly from double or complex aberrations. To our knowledge, this is the first study to screen for 12p deletions with a suitable probe for ETV6/TEL in 12p13. Our data suggest that the supplement of a probe for the detection of a 12p deletion to common FISH probe panels helps to avoid missing a del(12p), especially as part of more complex aberrations.

Conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization: an effective utilization strategy in diagnostic adult acute myeloid leukemia

OBJECTIVES

Cytogenetics defines disease entities and predicts prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Conventional karyotyping provides a comprehensive view of the genome, while fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detects targeted abnormalities. The aim of this study was to compare the utility of karyotyping and FISH in adult AML.

METHODS

We studied 250 adult AML cases with concurrent karyotyping and FISH testing. Karyotyping was considered adequate when 20 or more metaphases were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 220 cases had adequate karyotyping and were classified as normal karyotype/normal FISH (n = 92), normal karyotype/abnormal FISH (n = 4), abnormal karyotype/normal FISH (n = 8), and abnormal karyotype/abnormal FISH (n = 116). The overall karyotype/FISH concordance rate was 97.7% with five discordant cases identified, four from the normal karyotype/abnormal FISH group and one from the abnormal karyotype/abnormal FISH group. No karyotype/FISH discordance was seen in the abnormal karyotype/normal FISH group for the FISH probes evaluated. FISH lent prognostic information in one (0.5%) of 220 cases with normal karyotype/abnormal FISH: CBFB-MYH11 fusion, indicating favorable prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult AML, FISH rarely provides additional information when karyotyping is adequate. We therefore propose an evidence-based, cost-effective algorithmic approach for routine conventional karyotype and FISH testing in adult AML workup.

Standardized fluorescence in situ hybridization testing based on an appropriate panel of probes more effectively identifies common cytogenetic abnormalities in myelodysplastic syndromes than conventional cytogenetic analysis: a multicenter prospective study of 2302 patients in China

In an attempt to establish the advantages of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) studies over conventional cytogenetic (CC) analysis, a total of 2302 de novo MDS patients from 31 Chinese institutions were prospectively selected in the present study for both CC and standardized FISH analysis for +8, -7/7q-, -5/5q-, 20q- and-Y chromosomal abnormalities. CC analysis was successful in 94.0% of the patients; of these patients, 35.9% of the cases were abnormal. FISH analysis was successful in all 2302 patients and detected at least one type of common cytogenetic abnormality in 42.7% of the cases. The incidences of +8, -7/7q-, -5/5q-, 20q- and-Y chromosomal abnormalities by FISH were 4.1% to 8.7% higher than those by CC. FISH identified abnormalities in 23.6% of the patients exhibiting normal CC results and revealed that 20.7% of the patients with adequate normal metaphases (≥20) had abnormal clones. FISH identified cytogenetic abnormalities in 50.4% of the patients with failed CC analysis. In summary, our multicenter studies emphasised and confirmed the importance of applying standardized FISH testing based on an appropriate panel of probes to detect common cytogenetic abnormalities in Chinese de novo MDS patients, particularly those with normal or failed CC results.

Validation of cytogenetic risk groups according to International Prognostic Scoring Systems by peripheral blood CD34+FISH: results from a German diagnostic study in comparison with an international control group

International Prognostic Scoring Systems are used to determine the individual risk profile of myelodysplastic syndrome patients. For the assessment of International Prognostic Scoring Systems, an adequate chromosome banding analysis of the bone marrow is essential. Cytogenetic information is not available for a substantial number of patients (5%-20%) with dry marrow or an insufficient number of metaphase cells. For these patients, a valid risk classification is impossible. In the study presented here, the International Prognostic Scoring Systems were validated based on fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses using extended probe panels applied to cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34(+)) peripheral blood cells of 328 MDS patients of our prospective multicenter German diagnostic study and compared to chromosome banding results of 2902 previously published patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. For cytogenetic risk classification by fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of CD34(+) peripheral blood cells, the groups differed significantly for overall and leukemia-free survival by uni- and multivariate analyses without discrepancies between treated and untreated patients. Including cytogenetic data of fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses of peripheral CD34(+) blood cells (instead of bone marrow banding analysis) into the complete International Prognostic Scoring System assessment, the prognostic risk groups separated significantly for overall and leukemia-free survival. Our data show that a reliable stratification to the risk groups of the International Prognostic Scoring Systems is possible from peripheral blood in patients with missing chromosome banding analysis by using a comprehensive probe panel (clinicaltrials.gov identifier:01355913).

The genetic basis and expanding role of molecular analysis in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic design for myelodysplastic syndromes

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders of ineffective hematopoiesis that characteristically demonstrate peripheral blood cytopenia, bone marrow hypercellularity, and morphologically defined dysplasia of one or more hematopoietic lineages. Classical metaphase cytogenetics and judicious use of fluorescence in situ hybridization play central roles in the contemporary diagnosis and classification of MDS. An abundance of recent molecular studies are beginning to delineate additional genetic and epigenetic aberrations associated with these disorders. These alterations affect diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy, and with this understanding classification systems are evolving from a primarily hematological and morphological basis toward a multifactorial appreciation that includes histomorphology, metaphase cytogenetics, and directed molecular studies. In the present health-care environment, it is critical to develop a cost-effective, efficient testing strategy that maximizes the diagnostic potential of even limited specimens. Here, we briefly review the classical genetic approach to MDS, outline exciting new advances in the molecular understanding of this heterogeneous group of hematological neoplasms, and discuss how these advances are driving the evolution of classification and prognostic systems. Rapidly growing understanding of the genetic basis of MDS holds much promise for testing, and here we provide a frame of reference for discussion of current testing protocols and for addressing testing modalities likely to enter clinical practice in the near future.

Molecular cytogenetic monitoring from CD34+ peripheral blood cells in myelodysplastic syndromes: first results from a prospective multicenter German diagnostic study

The gold standard of cytogenetic analysis in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is conventional chromosome banding (CCB) analysis of bone marrow (BM) metaphases. Most aberrations can also be detected by fluorescence-in situ-hybridization (FISH). For this prospective multicenter German diagnostic study (www.clinicaltrials.gov: #NCT01355913) 360 patients, as yet, were followed up to 3 years by sequential FISH analyses of immunomagnetically enriched CD34+ peripheral blood (PB) cells using comprehensive FISH probe panels, resulting in a total number of 19,516 FISH analyses. We demonstrate that CD34+ PB FISH correlates significantly with CCB analysis and represents a feasible method for a reliable non-invasive cytogenetic monitoring from PB.

Longitudinal bone marrow evaluations for myelodysplasia in patients with myeloma before and after treatment with lenalidomide

Lenalidomide (LEN) treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) results in a superior outcome. However, there is concern for increased myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia (MDS/AML) associated with LEN. Thus, bone marrow morphology and cytogenetics studies from 40 patients were evaluated for early signs of MDS prior to therapy, during therapy and at follow-up. Newly diagnosed patients with MM treated with LEN and dexamethasone (LD) alone or followed by autologous stem cell transplant (LD/ASCT), or patients with relapsed/refractory MM treated with LEN, bendamustine and dexamethasone (BLD) were included. One patient developed MDS. Baseline prevalence of mild morphologic myelodysplasia was highest in pretreated patients with MM (BLD, 71%), but was also seen in newly diagnosed patients (LD and LD/ASCT, 17%). The prevalence of myelodysplasia did not increase over time. Thus, this study did not reveal rapidly emerging MDS in 39 of 40 patients with MM treated with LEN. The development of MDS in one patient suggests that longer follow-up is needed for all.

Will a peripheral blood (PB) sample yield the same diagnostic and prognostic cytogenetic data as the concomitant bone marrow (BM) in myelodysplasia?

In patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chromosome anomalies are detected by conventional cytogenetic studies (CCS) and/or interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of bone marrow (BM) samples and provide prognostic and diagnostic information, which can direct therapy. Whether peripheral blood (PB) can be substituted for bone marrow in these cases and can provide the same information remains unknown. Concurrent BM and PB specimens collected from 100 patients with recently diagnosed MDS were studied using both CCS and FISH. While 68% of BM samples showed an abnormal karyotype by CCS, only 31% of PB samples were abnormal by CCS. In 12% of patients, FISH and CCS were discordant due to the inability of the FISH panel to detect all possible abnormalities. However, only one case (1%) had a cryptic abnormality detected by FISH. BM and PB FISH were discordant in 3% of cases, most likely due to the smaller clone size in PB vs. BM. While PB should not be substituted for BM at diagnosis, it is a viable alternative for monitoring patients using the appropriate FISH probe(s).

The utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis in diagnosing myelodysplastic syndromes is limited to cases with karyotype failure

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is being used increasingly in cytogenetic diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, the utility of FISH in this role has not been well-defined. A total of 249 de novo MDS patients were submitted to karyotyping and FISH analysis for -5/del(5)(q31), -7/del(7)(q31), +8, -17/i(17)(q10), del(20)(q12), and -Y. Of the 234 patients with available karyotypic data, 143 cases (60.9%) demonstrated normal karyotype and 91 cases (39.1%) showed abnormal karyotype. FISH confirmed R-banding findings in 96.6% (226/234) of samples with successful karyotyping and detected cytogenetic abnormalities in 46.7% (7/15) of cases with karyotype failure. Of the 3.4% (8/234) patients showing discrepancies between FISH and R-banding, FISH revealed cytogenetic abnormalities in four patients with normal karyotypes and four patients with complex karyotypes. These results highlight FISH analysis has limited value in MDS cases with successful karyotyping and is only informative in MDS cases with karyotype failure.

Clinical utility of FISH analysis in addition to G-banded karyotype in hematologic malignancies and proposal of a practical approach

Background

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis can provide important information in the management of patients with hematologic malignancies. However, FISH performed in addition to G-banded karyotype can be labor-intensive and expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether FISH gives additional information in the setting of adequate conventional cytogenetics in cases of hematologic malignancies.

Methods

Bone marrow aspirates were obtained from 135 patients at diagnosis (56 AML, 32 MDS, 20 ALL, and 27 MM) between 2005 and 2010. Interphase FISH was performed using the following probes: BCR/ABL1, AML1/ETO, PML/RARA, CBFB, MLL, EGR1, CEP8, and D7S486 for AML; CEP8, D20S108, EGR1, and D7S486 for MDS; BCR/ABL1, MLL, CDKN2A (p16), ETV6, and 6q21/c-myc for ALL; IgH, TP53, D13S25, IgH/CCND1, IgH/MAF, IgH/FGFR3, and 1q21/8p21 for MM. We compared the results of FISH with the corresponding aberrations identified by G-banded karyotype.

Results

Additional genetic aberrations detected by FISH (which were not identified by G-banded karyotype) were 4%, 9%, 50%, and 67% in AML, MDS, ALL, and MM, respectively. In ALL, CDKN2A and ETV6 FISH revealed additional genetic aberrations in 33% and 28% of cases, respectively. In MM, FISH was of benefit in detecting IgH, D13S25, TP53, and 1q21 rearrangements, not detected by G-banded karyotype (31%, 36%, 20%, and 40%, respectively).

Conclusion

These results suggest that performing FISH in addition to G-banded karyotype may contribute little additional genetic information in AML and MDS, whereas routine FISH analysis appears to be an efficient screening method in ALL and MM.