Low incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease with short-term tacrolimus in haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Current status and prospects of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in China

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a highly effective and unique medical procedure for the treatment of most hematological malignancies. The first allogeneic transplantation was performed by E. Donnall Thomas in 1957. Since then, the field has evolved and expanded worldwide. The first successful allogenic HSCT (allo-HSCT) in China was conducted in 1981. Although the development of allo-HSCT in China lagged, China has since made considerable contributions to the process of HSCT worldwide, with more than 10,000 HSCTs performed annually. In particular, haploid HSCT (haplo-HSCT) technology represented in the Beijing Protocol has demonstrated similar efficacy to human leukocyte antigen-matched HSCT and has gradually become the pre-dominant choice for allo-HSCT in China. Currently, the number of haplo-HSCT procedures exceeds 5000 per year, and the Beijing Protocol has been greatly improved by implementing updated individualized strategies for controlling complications, relapse, and infection management. In addition, innovative haplo-HSCT technologies developed by different medical transplantation centers, such as Soochow, Zhejiang, Fujian, Chongqing, and Anhui, have emerged, providing inspiration for the refinement of global practice. This review will focus on the current activity in this field and highlight important trends that are vital in China's allo-HSCT process, examining the current viewpoint and future directions.

Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Avatrombopag Combined With MSCs for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Platelet graft failure (PGF) is a frequent and serious complication after Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and lacks effective treatment strategies, which could affect the prognosis of patients and even cause death. The exact underlying mechanism of PGF remains unclear, and lacks standard treatment. Here, we conduct a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of avatrombopag combined with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in 16 patients with thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT. Patients were administered the following treatment regimen: 20 mg/d avatrombopag; if the PLT count was less than 50×10^{^}9/L for at least 2 weeks, the dose was increased to 40 mg/d; if the PLT count was 200-400×10^{^}9/L, the dose was reduced; and if the PLT count was greater than 400×10^9/L, avatrombopag was terminated. Umbilical cord MSCs (1×10^{^}6 cells/kg) infusion was performed every week for 4-6 weeks. Among the 16 patients, 13 patients (81.3%) achieved a complete response (CR), 2 patients (12.5%) got a partial response (PR), and 1 patient (6.3%) had no response (NR). The median time to obtain CR was 32 (7-426) days after treatment with avatrombopag combined with umbilical cord MSCs. The time to reach 20×10^{^}9/L≤ PLT <50×10^{^}9/L in the 2 patients with PR was 52 and 230 days after treatment, respectively. One patient had a severe pulmonary infection and died of cytomegalovirus pneumonia. Overall, our results indicated that combination of avatrombopag with MSCs can promote platelet recovery after transplantation, thereby improving the survival rate of patients and improving the quality of life of patients after transplantation, and providing a new method and strategy for the treatment of thrombocytopenia after allo-HSCT.

CMV Infection and CMV-Specific Immune Reconstitution Following Haploidentical Stem Cell Transplantation: An Update

Haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haploSCT) has advanced to a common procedure for treating patients with hematological malignancies and immunodeficiency diseases. However, cure is seriously hampered by cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections and delayed immune reconstitution for the majority of haploidentical transplant recipients compared to HLA-matched stem cell transplantation. Three major approaches, including in vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) using antithymocyte globulin for haploSCT (in vivo TCD-haploSCT), ex vivo TCD using CD34 + positive selection for haploSCT (ex vivo TCD-haploSCT), and T-cell replete haploSCT using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haploSCT), are currently used worldwide. We provide an update on CMV infection and CMV-specific immune recovery in this fast-evolving field. The progress made in cellular immunotherapy of CMV infection after haploSCT is also addressed. Groundwork has been prepared for the creation of personalized avenues to enhance immune reconstitution and decrease the incidence of CMV infection after haploSCT.

Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) involves the infusion of hematopoietic progenitor cells into patients with hematologic disorders with the goal of re-establishing normal hematopoietic and immune function. HCT is classified as autologous or allogeneic based on the origin of hematopoietic cells. Autologous HCT uses the patient's own cells while allogeneic HCT uses hematopoietic cells from a human leukocyte antigen-compatible donor. Allogeneic HCT is a potentially curative treatment option for patients with certain types of hematologic malignancies, and autologous HCT is primarily used to support patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Advances in HCT methods and supportive care in recent decades have led to improved survival after HCT; however, disease relapse and posttransplant complications still commonly occur in both autologous and allogeneic HCT recipients. Allogeneic HCT recipients may also develop acute and/or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), which results in immune-mediated cellular injury of several organs. The NCCN Guidelines for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation focus on recommendations for pretransplant recipient evaluation and the management of GVHD in adult patients with malignant disease.

The Role of Tacrolimus Nanomicelles in Acute Rejection After Liver Transplantation in Rats

Although there is some progress in immunosuppressive therapy of acute rejection, there is still a lack of standardized diagnosis and treatment. For the acute rejection after liver transplantation, there is still a lack of an exact treatment at this stage. Tacrolimus (TAC) side effects will also affect the survival rate and quality of life of recipients after transplantation to a large extent. Rat orthotopic liver transplantation model was established and divided into three groups. In the tolerance group, Brown Norway (BN) to Lewis liver transplantation was used; in the rejection group, Lewis to BN liver transplantation was used; in the TAC group, TAC was injected after operation on the basis of establishing rejection model. The expression of GITRL in Kupffer cells and the change of cytokines were detected 7 days after operation. In this study, the animal model of acute rejection of rat liver transplantation was established to simulate the clinical allogeneic liver transplantation, and the important role of TAC in the acute rejection of rat liver transplantation was evaluated.

Comparison of Tacrolimus and Cyclosporine Combined With Methotrexate for Graft Versus Host Disease Prophylaxis After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

After patients receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), both cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination with methotrexate (MTX) are recommended as the standard prophylaxis strategy for graft versus host disease (GVHD) by the European Group of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. However, the advantage of TAC combined with MTX lacks conclusive evidence.

METHODS

We searched online databases for studies comparing CsA + MTX and TAC + MTX in patients who received HSCT. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied to compare the pooled data.

RESULTS

We found a significant reduction in the grade II to IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) rate (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.28-0.61; P < 0.00001), grade III to IV aGVHD rate (OR, 0.59; CI, 0.38-0.92; P = 0.02), chronic GVHD rate (OR, 0.79; CI, 0.62-1.00; P = 0.05), and nonrelapse mortality rate (OR, 0.62; CI, 0.40-0.95; P = 0.03) and an increase in the overall survival (OS) rate (only in those received from unrelated donor) (OR, 1.30; CI, 1.15-1.48; P < 0.0001) in the TAC + MTX group. Similar outcomes occurred for the relapse rate and disease-free survival rate in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

TAC + MTX has a superior effect in the prevention of aGVHD in patients who received HSCT and further prolongs the OS in patients who received from unrelated donor transplants. CsA + MTX prolongs the OS in patients who received HSCT from HLA-identical sibling donors. The leukemic relapse and disease-free survival rate were not different between the 2 regimens. Thus, we conclude that TAC + MTX was superior to CsA + MTX, especially for HSCT patients with nonmalignant disorders. Further studies are still required to evaluate the effect of TAC or CsA combined with other suppressors in the treatment regimen following HSCT.

Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion for relapse prevention: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Primary disease relapse (PDR) of malignant hematologic conditions after standard hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is one of the most challenging diseases; therefore ongoing researches are aiming at relapse prevention and minimizing the transplant-related side effects. Prophylactic donor lymphocytes (pDLI) had been proposed as a valuable strategy for PDR prevention, but early studies had been discouraging due to the limited benefit and possible association with acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD). Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

METHOD

We performed a comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Embase database from inception to May 2019 for studies that evaluated the association between pDLI and PDR. We conducted a random effect meta-analysis of 9 studies involving a total of 748 participants (pDLI = 398, non-pDLI = 350) and reported the pooled odd ratio (OR) for association of pDLI use, PDR, aGVHD and OS.

RESULT

We found a significant decreased odd of PDR in the pDLI group (pooled OR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.58, I2 = 0%), but there was no significant increased odd of aGVHD (pooled OR of 0.98, 95% CI 0.56-1.72, I2 = 0.8%). We also found that there was an increased odd of overall survival (OS) (pooled OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.85-5.45, I2 = 50.2%).

CONCLUSION

There are significantly decreased odd of PDR and increased odd of OS in the pDLI group compared to the control group, but there is no statistically significant increased odd of aGVHD as suggested by previous studies. We concluded that pDLI is a potentially valuable method for post-transplant PDR prevention.

Efficacy, Safety, and Practicality of Tacrolimus Monitoring after Bone Marrow Transplant: Assessment of a Change in Practice

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no standardized approach to the frequency of monitoring tacrolimus levels in patients who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Previously, the practice at the study hospital was to monitor tacrolimus levels daily throughout a patient's admission. A recent institutional study suggested that measurement of tacrolimus level is more frequent than needed to achieve consistent time in the therapeutic range (TTR), particularly after the first 7 days. As a result, tacrolimus monitoring was changed to daily measurement for the initial week of therapy, followed by measurements on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday in subsequent weeks.

OBJECTIVE

To confirm the safety and efficacy of the recent practice change.

METHODS

This retrospective chart review of HSCT patients admitted to The Ottawa Hospital involved 68 patients in the pre-practice change group and 43 patients in the post-practice change group. Data on tacrolimus measurement were collected for up to 21 days after initiation of this medication. The proportion of TTR was compared between the 2 groups. Differences in the incidence and severity of renal dysfunction and the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) were determined and described.

RESULTS

In the pre-practice change cohort, the median proportion of TTR for tacrolimus was 40.5% for days 1-7, 65.1% for days 8-14, and 78.9% for days 15-21, similar to the values for the post-practice change group (46.6% [p = 0.09], 62.9% [p = 0.93], and 70.0% [p = 0.22], respectively, for the same periods). The incidence of acute GVHD within 100 days after HSCT was 24% and 33% for the pre- and post-practice change cohorts, respectively. The incidence and severity of renal dysfunction were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of TTR for tacrolimus was not significantly affected by the recent practice change. Similarly, the incidence and severity of renal dysfunction and the incidence of acute GVHD did not appear to differ between the pre- and post-practice change groups.

Tacrolimus: A Review of Laboratory Detection Methods and Indications for Use

Tacrolimus (Tac) is an immunosuppressive drug that is used in preventing organ and tissue rejection in patients after transplantation. Tac administration requires frequent and diligent monitoring by physicians to ensure proper dosage and to limit the potential for harmful adverse effects, which can include renal damage, neurotoxicity, and other serious adverse events. Tac is a calcineurin inhibitor, which suppresses the function of T-cells. Its success as an immunosuppressive agent has been well documented in preventing graft-vs-host disease in several types of organ transplants. This literature review will discuss Tac metabolism and its role in preventing tissue and organ transplant rejection. A variety of detection techniques used in the clinical laboratory, including dried-blood-spot analysis, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and immunoassay also will be discussed.