Comparative analyses of nilotinib versus high-dose imatinib versus sustained standard-dose imatinib in patients with chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia following suboptimal molecular response to first-line imatinib

Comparison of 3-month cytogenetic and molecular assays for early assessment of long-term clinical impact after BCR-ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia

To compare the clinical significance of 3-month cytogenetic and molecular monitoring, we analyzed 1,410 paired cytogenetic and molecular data from 705 chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Based on early cytogenetic response (ECyR, Ph+≤35 %) and molecular response (EMR, BCR-ABL1^IS≤10 %) at 3 months, the patients were divided into four groups (group 1: ECyR + EMR, n = 560; group 2: no ECyR + EMR, n = 27; group 3: ECyR + no EMR, n = 55; group 4: no ECyR + no EMR, n = 63). By 10 years, major molecular response (MMR), deep molecular response (MR4.5), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were significantly high in group 1 (P < 0.001). Comparing groups 2 and 3, the MMR (P = 0.096), MR4.5 (P = 0.945), OS (P = 0.832), and PFS (P = 0.627) rates tended to be higher in group 2, although not significantly. Thus, the cytogenetic assay can not only be useful but its addition may also provide a more precise prediction of MR4.5.

Feasibility Study of Switching to Nilotinib After First-line Imatinib in the Chronic Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND

We investigated the real-life choice of first-line treatment in the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) and the feasibility of switching to nilotinib after first-line imatinib.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of imatinib versus nilotinib as first-line therapy for patients with CML-CP. We also performed a comparative analysis of the efficacy of sustained imatinib versus a switch to nilotinib for patients with CML-CP with a warning or failure response or intolerance to imatinib. We also comparatively analyzed the efficacy between first-line nilotinib and first-line imatinib after standardized management in accordance with the European Leukemia Network (ELN) recommendations. A total of 344 patients were included in the present study.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients achieving a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), and molecular response 4.0 (MR4.0) was greater with first-line nilotinib than with first-line imatinib at 0 to 24 and 0 to 36 months (P < .05). Of the 344 patients, 174 did not achieve an optimal response to first-line imatinib. A greater proportion of those patients who had switch to nilotinib had achieved a CCyR, MMR, and MR4.0 compared with those continuing imatinib for 12 months of subsequent treatment (P < .005). No difference was found in the proportion of patients with a CCyR, MMR, and MR4.0 between first-line nilotinib and first-line imatinib after standardized management in accordance with the ELN recommendations at 0 to 24 and 0 to 36 months (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

First-line imatinib can result in efficacy similar to that with first-line nilotinib after standardized management in accordance with the ELN recommendations. Treatment with imatinib as first-line treatment, with a switch to nilotinib after standardized management is feasible and effective.