“Diagnostic and prognostic implications of tumor expression of the GATA-3 gene in nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (nPTCL): retrospective data from a Latin American cohort.”

Tumor mutation burden involving epigenetic regulatory genes and the RhoA GTPase predicts overall survival in nodal mature T-cell lymphomas

Nodal mature T-cell lymphomas (nMTCL) comprises a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies with aggressive biological behavior and poor prognosis. Epigenetic phenomena, including mutations in genes that control DNA methylation and histone deacetylation, in addition to inactivating mutations in the RhoA GTPase, play a central role in its pathogenesis and constitute potential new targets for therapeutic intervention. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) reflects the process of clonal evolution, predicts response to anti-cancer therapies and has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in several solid neoplasms; however, its potential prognostic impact remains unknown in nMTCL. In this study, we conducted Sanger sequencing of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) diagnostic tumor samples using a target-panel to search for recurrent mutations involving the IDH-1/IDH-2, TET-2, DNMT3A and RhoA genes in 59 cases of nMTCL. For the first time, we demonstrated that high-TMB, defined by the presence of ≥ two mutations involving the aforementioned genes, was associated with decreased overall survival in nMTCL patients treated with CHOP-like regimens. Additionally, high-TMB was correlated with bulky disease, lower overall response rate, and higher mortality. Future studies using larger cohorts may validate our preliminary results that indicate TMB as a potential molecular biomarker associated with adverse prognosis in nMTCL.

Up-front Therapy With CHOP Plus Etoposide in Brazilian nodal PTCL Patients: Increased Toxicity and No Survival Benefit Compared to CHOP Regimen-Results of a Real-Life Study From a Middle-Income Country

BACKGROUND

Nodal peripheral T-cell lymphoma (nPTCL) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms with aggressive behavior and poor-survival. They are more prevalent in Latin America and Asia, although data from Brazil are scarce. Its primary therapy is still controversial and ineffective. Therefore, we aim to describe clinical-epidemiological characteristics, outcomes, predictors factors for survival and compare the results of patients treated with CHOP and CHOEP regimens.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational and single-center study involving 124 nPTCL patients from Brazil treated from 2000 to 2019.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 23.7 months, the estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 59.2% and 37.3%, respectively. The median age was 48.5 years and 57.3% (71/124) were male, 81.5% (101/124) had B-symptoms, 88.7% (110/124) had advanced disease (stage III/IV) and 58.1% (72/124) presented International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥3, reflecting a real-life cohort. ORR to first-line therapy was 58.9%, 37.9% (N = 47) received CHOP-21 and 35.5% (N = 44) were treated with CHOEP-21; 30.1% (37/124) underwent to consolidation with involved field radiotherapy (IF-RT) and 32.3% (40/124) were consolidated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The overall response rate (ORR) was similar for CHOP-21 (76.6%) and CHOEP-21 (65.9%), P = .259. Refractory disease was less frequent in the CHOEP-21 group (4.5% vs. 21.2%, P = .018). However, few patients were able to complete 6-cycles of CHOEP-21 (31.8%) than to CHOP-21 (61.7%), P = .003. Delays ≥2 weeks among the cycles of chemotherapy were more frequent for patients receiving CHOEP-21 (43.1% vs. 10.6%), P = .0004, as well as the toxicities, including G3-4 neutropenia (88% vs. 57%, P = .001), febrile neutropenia (70% vs. 38%, P = .003) and G3-4 thrombocytopenia (63% vs. 27%, P = .0007). The 2-year OS was higher for CHOP (78.7%) than CHOEP group (61.4%), P = .05, as well as 2-year PFS (69.7% vs. 25.0%, P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, high LDH (HR 3.38, P = .007) was associated with decreased OS. CR at first line (HR: 0.09, P < .001) and consolidation with ASCT (HR: 0.08, P = .015) were predictors of increased OS.

CONCLUSION

In the largest cohort of nPTCL from Latin America, patients had poor survival and high rate of chemo-resistance. In our cohort, the addition of etoposide to the CHOP-21 backbone showed no survival benefit and was associated with high-toxicity and frequent treatment interruptions. Normal LDH values, obtaintion of CR and consolidation with ASCT were independent factors associated with better outcomes.

TET-2 mutations predict poor outcomes and are associated with unfavorable clinical-biological features in PTCL, not otherwise specified and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma in Brazilian patients

INTRODUCTION

Nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas [nPTCL] constitute a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies with aggressive biological behavior and poor prognosis. Epigenetic phenomena involving genes that control DNA-methylation and histone deacetylation play a central role in their pathogenesis. However, the mutational landscape involving epigenetic regulators has never been reported in Latin American patients and their prognostic impact remains controversial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2000 to 2019, 59-Brazilian patients with nPTCL were eligible for screening mutations in the IDH-1, IDH-2, RHOA, TET-2 and DNMT3A genes by Sanger sequencing at Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded samples [FFPE] of diagnosis. We reported the frequency, distribution and potential prognosis of these mutations.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 3.70 years, estimate 2-year OS and PFS were 57.1% and 49.2%, respectively. Mutations in the IDH-1 gene were not found, mutations in the IDH-2 occurred in 3.4% (2/59), RHOA in 23.7% (14/59), TET-2 in 50.8% (30/59) and DNMT3A in 62.7% (37/59). RHOA gene mutations were more frequent in PTCL, NOS and AITL (p= 0.06). Almost half of the patients had more than one mutation in concomitance, particularly RHOA-mut and TET-2-mut. Mutations in RHOA (p= 0.030) and TET-2 (p= 0.046) were associated with high-tumor burden. In the non-ALCL subgroup (PTCL, NOS and AITL) TET-2 mutations were associated with decreased 2-year PFS [HR: 2.22, p= 0.048]. Likewise with lower overall response rate [ORR] (p= 0.048) and unfavorable clinical features, as bulky disease (p= 0.012), ECOG ⩾ 2 (p= 0.032), B-symptoms (p= 0.012), ⩾ 2 extranodal sites compromised (p= 0.022) and high-risk Prognostic Index for T-cell lymphoma (p= 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Mutations in RHOA, TET-2 and DNMT3A were frequent in Brazilian patients with nPTCL. TET-2 mutations were associated with lower ORR for CHOP-like chemotherapy, decreased PFS and unfavorable clinical-biological characteristics in non-ALCL (PTCL, NOS and AITL). Further studies using a larger cohort may validate our findings.