The anti-diabetic drug trelagliptin induces vasodilation via activation of Kv channels and SERCA pumps

Vasorelaxant mechanisms of the antidiabetic anagliptin in rabbit aorta: roles of Kv channels and SERCA pump

AIMS

The present study investigated the vasorelaxant mechanisms of an oral antidiabetic drug, anagliptin, using phenylephrine (Phe)-induced pre-contracted rabbit aortic rings.

METHODS

Arterial tone measurement was performed in rabbit thoracic aortic rings.

RESULTS

Anagliptin induced vasorelaxation in a dose-dependent manner. Pre-treatment with the classical voltagedependent K+ (Kv) channel inhibitors 4-aminopyridine and tetraethylammonium significantly decreased the vasorelaxant effect of anagliptin, whereas pre-treatment with the inwardly rectifying K+ (Kir) channel inhibitor Ba2+, the ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel inhibitor glibenclamide, and the large-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ (BKCa) channel inhibitor paxilline did not attenuate the vasorelaxant effect. Furthermore, the vasorelaxant response of anagliptin was effectively inhibited by pre-treatment with the sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) pump inhibitors thapsigargin and cyclopiazonic acid. Neither cAMP/protein kinase A (PKA)-related signaling pathway inhibitors (adenylyl cyclase inhibitor SQ 22536 and PKA inhibitor KT 5720) nor cGMP/protein kinase G (PKG)-related signaling pathway inhibitors (guanylyl cyclase inhibitor ODQ and PKG inhibitor KT 5823) reduced the vasorelaxant effect of anagliptin. Similarly, the anagliptin-induced vasorelaxation was independent of the endothelium.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on these results, we suggest that anagliptin-induced vasorelaxation in rabbit aortic smooth muscle occurs by activating Kv channels and the SERCA pump, independent of other vascular K+ channels, cAMP/PKA- or cGMP/PKG-related signaling pathways, and the endothelium.

Does DPP-IV Inhibition Offer New Avenues for Therapeutic Intervention in Malignant Disease?

Simple Summary

There is growing interest in identifying the effects of antidiabetic agents on cancer risk, progression, and anti-cancer treatment due to the long-term use of these medications and the inherently increased risk of malignancies in diabetic patients. Tumor development and progression are affected by multiple mediators in the tumor microenvironment, several of which may be proteolytically modified by the multifunctional protease dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV, CD26). Currently, low-molecular-weight DPP-IV inhibitors (gliptins) are used in patients with type 2 diabetes based on the observation that DPP-IV inhibition enhances insulin secretion by increasing the bioavailability of incretins. However, the DPP-IV-mediated cleavage of other biopeptides and chemokines is also prevented by gliptins. The potential utility of gliptins in other areas of medicine, including cancer, is therefore being evaluated. Here, we critically review the existing evidence on the role of DPP-IV inhibitors in cancer pathogenesis, their potential to be used in anti-cancer treatment, and the possible perils associated with this approach.

Abstract

Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV, CD26) is frequently dysregulated in cancer and plays an important role in regulating multiple bioactive peptides with the potential to influence cancer progression and the recruitment of immune cells. Therefore, it represents a potential contributing factor to cancer pathogenesis and an attractive therapeutic target. Specific DPP-IV inhibitors (gliptins) are currently used in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to promote insulin secretion by prolonging the activity of the incretins glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Nevertheless, the modulation of the bioavailability and function of other DPP-IV substrates, including chemokines, raises the possibility that the use of these orally administered drugs with favorable side-effect profiles might be extended beyond the treatment of hyperglycemia. In this review, we critically examine the possible utilization of DPP-IV inhibition in cancer prevention and various aspects of cancer treatment and discuss the potential perils associated with the inhibition of DPP-IV in cancer. The current literature is summarized regarding the possible chemopreventive and cytotoxic effects of gliptins and their potential utility in modulating the anti-tumor immune response, enhancing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, preventing acute graft-versus-host disease, and alleviating the side-effects of conventional anti-tumor treatments.