1
|
Ferreira IM, Homem BGC, Oliveira KA, Cidrini IA, Abreu MJI, Batista LHC, Rodrigues AN, Queiroz ACM, Bisio GHM, Prados LF, Moretti MH, Siqueira GR, Resende FD. Replacement Nellore heifers receiving supplementation under different herbage allowance: effects on forage characteristics, performance, physiology, and reproduction. Animal 2024; 18:101260. [PMID: 39116470 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Revised: 07/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
In Brazil, heifers typically calve at 36-48 months. Due to the high demand for meat and the need to reduce slaughter age, high supplementation has become commonly used in beef cattle farming. However, the literature remains scarce on studies that explore the impact of grazing management during the background phase on the productivity and reproductive efficiency of young Nellore heifers. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two-herbage allowances (HA) on forage characteristics, performance, physiology and reproductive parameters of replacement Nellore heifers. Ninety weaned heifers [169 ± 19 kg of shrunk body weight (SBW); 210 ± 28 days of age] were blocked by initial BW and randomly assigned to receive different HA: (1) High herbage allowance (HHA: 7.2 kg DM/kg BW) and (2) Low herbage allowance (LHA: 3.3 kg DM/kg BW); and divided into six paddocks, totaling 12 paddocks. The experimental period was divided into the growing phase (D173) and the reproductive season (D83). Continuous stocking with a variable stocking rate was used. The supplement was provided daily with expected intake of around 10 g/kg of BW. The HHA pasture showed greater values of canopy height, greater HA, and lower values of CP and CP: in vitro digestible DM ratio than the LHA pasture over the days of the study (P ≤ 0.05). Herbage mass and the green stem proportion were lower in LHA pasture (P < 0.01), while the green leaf (g/kg DM) and senescent stem proportions (g/kg DM) were higher (P = 0.080) when compared to HHA pasture. Heifers maintained on HHA pasture had a higher average daily gain (P < 0.01), forage intake (P < 0.003), higher SBW (P < 0.01), Longissimus area (P < 0.01), and 12th-rib fat thickness (P < 0.01) than those kept in the LHA pasture. The proportion of heifers that reached the weight at maturity on D173 (P = 0.027) and the proportion of pubertal pregnancy heifers (P = 0.042) were greatest in the HHA treatment. The blood urea nitrogen (P = 0.002) was higher in heifers maintained in the LHA pasture. Heifers maintained in HHA pasture showed higher values of relative abundance of mRNA for UGT1A6 (P = 0.004) and IGFBP3 (P = 0.072). The use of HHA criteria increased forage intake, body gain, and carcass attributes of animals, which led to better reproductive performance of Nellore heifers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I M Ferreira
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - B G C Homem
- Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - K A Oliveira
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - I A Cidrini
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M J I Abreu
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - L H C Batista
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A N Rodrigues
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - A C M Queiroz
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - G H M Bisio
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - L F Prados
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - M H Moretti
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - G R Siqueira
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - F D Resende
- Department of Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pereira MDA, Bungenstab DJ, Euclides VPB, Malafaia GC, Biscola PHN, Menezes GRO, de Abreu UGP, Laura VA, Nogueira É, Mauro RDA, da Silva MP, Nicacio AC, de Almeida RG, Gomes RDC, Silva JCB, de Souza VF. From Traditionally Extensive to Sustainably Intensive: A Review on the Path to a Sustainable and Inclusive Beef Farming in Brazil. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:2340. [PMID: 39199874 PMCID: PMC11350875 DOI: 10.3390/ani14162340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2024] [Revised: 08/05/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Brazil is the second largest beef producer and a leading exporter, contributing to some 3000 t CWE in global markets (27.7% of market share). The sector has experienced substantial development, but yields remain far below potential, and there are growing concerns regarding land use change and greenhouse gas emissions. The need for sustainable technologies, such as sound pasture management and integrated farming systems, is evident, but adoption may be low amongst farmers unable to keep up with technological advances. This article describes the historical developments of Brazilian beef farming towards sustainability and discusses possible socioenvironmental outcomes. We combined an extensive literature review, public data, and our own insights as senior researchers to achieve that. The trajectory shown here evidenced the technological intensification of Brazilian beef farming, with strong support of public policies for decarbonizing agriculture. Nonetheless, the pace of this transition may affect small to medium farmers with limited access to information, technologies, and credit. Our recommendations involve a broad program of technical assistance and training on sustainable technologies, including financial and digital literacy. A novel approach to financing farmers is suggested to support a sustainable and inclusive transition in beef farming in Brazil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana de A. Pereira
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Davi J. Bungenstab
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Valeria P. B. Euclides
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Guilherme C. Malafaia
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Paulo H. N. Biscola
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Gilberto R. O. Menezes
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Urbano G. P. de Abreu
- Embrapa Pantanal, Rua 21 de Setembro, 1880, Aeroporto, Corumbá 79320-900, MS, Brazil;
| | - Valdemir A. Laura
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Ériklis Nogueira
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Rodiney de A. Mauro
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Marta P. da Silva
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Alessandra C. Nicacio
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Roberto G. de Almeida
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Rodrigo da C. Gomes
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Juliana C. B. Silva
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| | - Vanessa F. de Souza
- Embrapa Beef Cattle, Av. Radio Maia, 830, Vila Popular, Campo Grande 79106-550, MS, Brazil; (D.J.B.); (V.P.B.E.); (G.C.M.); (P.H.N.B.); (G.R.O.M.); (V.A.L.); (É.N.); (R.d.A.M.); (M.P.d.S.); (A.C.N.); (R.G.d.A.); (R.d.C.G.); (J.C.B.S.); (V.F.d.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Catussi BLC, Ferreira JR, Lo Turco EG, Morgulis SCF, Baruselli PS. Metabolic imprinting in beef calves supplemented with creep feeding on performance, reproductive efficiency and metabolome profile. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9702. [PMID: 38678099 PMCID: PMC11055875 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60216-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
This experiment evaluated the influence of creep feeding supplementation on productive and reproductive performance and on serum metabolome profile in Nelore (Bos indicus) heifers. Female calves were assigned to treatments: Creep (n = 190), with ad libitum access to a nutritional supplement from 70 to 220 days after birth, or Control (n = 140), without supplementation. After weaning (Day 220), both groups followed the same pasture and nutritional management. Body weight (BW) and backfat thickness (BFAT) were measured over time. Blood samples were collected at 220 and 360 days for LC-MS/MS targeted metabolomics. On day 408, during the synchronization timed artificial insemination (TAI) protocol, reproductive status (RS: diameter of uterine horn and largest follicle, and presence of CL) was assessed. Creep feeding increased BW and BFAT at weaning, but no differences in BW, BFAT, or RS after weaning were observed. Nonetheless, the pregnancy per AI (P/AI) for 1st service was 28.9% higher in the Creep group. On day 220, 11 significant metabolites influenced five metabolic pathways: Glucose-alanine cycle, alanine, glutathione, phenylalanine and tyrosine metabolism, and urea cycle. On day 360, 14 significant metabolites influenced eight metabolic pathways: Malate-aspartate shuttle, arginine and proline metabolism, urea cycle, aspartate, beta-alanine, glutamate metabolism, ammonia recycling and citric acid cycle. In conclusion, creep feeding supplementation improved calf performance and induced metabolic changes at weaning and 360 days of age. Although heifers had similar productive performance and reproductive status, when submitted to TAI, those supplemented with creep feeding had greater P/AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna Lima Chechin Catussi
- Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | - Pietro Sampaio Baruselli
- Department of Animal Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferreira IM, Oliveira KA, Cidrini IA, de Abreu MJI, Sousa LM, Batista LHC, Homem BGC, Prados LF, Siqueira GR, Resende FDD. Performance, Intake, Feed Efficiency, and Carcass Characteristics of Young Nellore Heifers under Different Days on Feed in the Feedlot. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:2238. [PMID: 37444036 DOI: 10.3390/ani13132238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Two studies evaluated the productive characteristics of young Nellore heifers receiving different days on feed (DOF) to determine the biological slaughter endpoint. In Experiment 1 (Exp. 1), fifty-one Nellore heifers [324 ± 19.3 kg of body weight (BW); 16 ± 1 months] were split into three DOF lengths (45, 75, or 105 days), while in Experiment 2 (Exp. 2), thirty-six Nellore heifers (362 ± 25.5 kg of BW; 18 ± 1 months of age) were split into three DOF lengths (45, 90, or 135 days). In both studies, all animals were distributed in complete randomized blocks according to initial BW and stratified via carcass ultrasound. The diet was supplied ad libitum, allowing 3% of refusals. The point at which the animals achieved 25% of ether extract of shrunk body weight (EESBW) was defined as the biological endpoint. Thus, relationships were made between some characteristics obtained in both studies. Positive linear relationships were found between backfat thickness (BFT) vs. EESBW (p < 0.001, r = 0.84) and BFT vs. body weight (p < 0.001, r = 0.77). Our results suggest that the biological slaughter endpoint for young Nellore heifers is 6.97 mm of backfat thickness or 402 kg shrunk body weight, corresponding to around 75 DOF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Machado Ferreira
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karla Alves Oliveira
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Iorrano Andrade Cidrini
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Mateus José Inácio de Abreu
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luciana Melo Sousa
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luis Henrique Cursino Batista
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Laura Franco Prados
- Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina 14770-000, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gustavo Rezende Siqueira
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina 14770-000, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Flávio Dutra de Resende
- Departament of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Veterinary Science, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14884-900, São Paulo, Brazil
- Agência Paulista de Tecnologia dos Agronegócios (APTA), Colina 14770-000, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ramírez-Restrepo CA, Vera-Infanzón RR, Rao IM. The carbon footprint of young-beef cattle finishing systems in the Eastern Plains of the Orinoco River Basin of Colombia. FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE 2023. [DOI: 10.3389/fanim.2023.1103826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
IntroductionPrevious research has shown increased productivity amongst sown grass pastures compared to native savanna pastures by year-round grazing for fattening of adult and young Brahman (Bos indicus)-bred cattle in the well-drained native savanna ecosystem of the Colombian Orinoquía. But there is limited information on the carbon footprint (CF) of commercial young-Brahman heifers and steers reared throughout life on well-managed Brachiaria decumbens Stapf pastures.MethodsThe present study characterized growth, lifetime enteric methane (CH4) emissions, carcass carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-eq) CH4 efficiency intensities (i.e., emissions per kg of product), and estimated the overall CF of young cattle grazing B. decumbens pastures subject to a range of daily liveweight gains (DLWGs; 0.428 – 0.516 kg) and fattening framework (405 – 574 kg). Weaning data from seven consecutive calving seasons in a commercial Brahman breeding herd continuously grazed on B. decumbens were integrated with a Microsoft Excel® dynamic greenhouse gas emission (GHGE) simulation of stockers-yearlings, and seven fattening, and processing scenarios.ResultsThe model predicted that heifers subject to low and high DLWGs (0.428 vs 0.516 kg) and steers (0.516 kg) may be successfully fattened without supplementation assuming that animals had access to a well-managed grass pasture. Depending on the fattening strategy, kg CO2-eq CH4/kg edible protein values ranged from 66.843 to 87.488 ± 0.497 for heifers and from 69.689 to 91.291 ± 0.446 for steers.DiscussionAssuming that forage on offer is at least 1,500-2,000 kg of dry matter/ha during the rainy season, all the simulated systems showed potential for C neutrality and net-zero C emission when considering GHGEs from the soil, pasture, and animal components vs the estimated soil C capture over seven seasons. However, under a more optimistic scenario, these beef systems could accomplish substantial net gains of soil C, over the period for which field data are available. Overall, this study projects the positive impact of the design of plausible fattening strategies on grasslands for improving cattle productivity and reducing emission intensities with concomitant increases in technical efficiency.
Collapse
|
6
|
Mejía Tejada D, Díaz MF, Enciso Valencia KJ, Junca Paredes JJ, Sandoval DF, Burkart S. COVID-19 and the beef market in Latin America: An impact assessment by supply and demand. Front Public Health 2022; 10:1066168. [PMID: 36478714 PMCID: PMC9720381 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1066168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of COVID-19 on agricultural markets, especially the beef market, represents one of the greatest food security challenges the world is facing in the post-pandemic era and, for this reason, has been widely documented. This study contributes to the literature through a comprehensive impact analysis of the effects of COVID-19 on both the demand and supply of beef in Latin America and thus provides valuable information for two of the most important links of the beef value chain. Robust econometric methods and a graphic analysis were used that give solidity to the investigation. The analysis used a data panel of supply and demand variables between 2018 and 2022 derived from the US Department of Agriculture. The results suggest that the beef market was strongly affected by the pandemic related health emergency, presenting decreases in both consumption and production. These effects are transitory, however, since the analysis of the post-pandemic data revealed that consumption and production return to normal and seem to grow until smoothing out over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Stefan Burkart
- The Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, Cali, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Strategic Assessment of Cyber Security Contenders to the Brazilian Agribusiness in the Beef Sector. INFORMATION 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/info13090431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The current international commercial structure places Brazilian Agribusiness in constant conflict to protect its interests before other nations in the global market. Technological innovations are used in all stages from the simplest production tasks, up to the design of negotiation tactics at high-level affairs. This paper has the objective of finding Brazilian contenders in the beef market with cyber capabilities and commercial interest to act in favor of their interests. To construct such a list, a review of the literature on Threat and Cyber Threat Intelligence is presented, followed by a background presentation of how embedded technology is in nowadays agriculture and supply chains in general, and the real necessity for those sectors to be seen as critical infrastructure by governments in general. Also as background information recent cyber attack cases and attacker countries are shown. A Step-by-Step multidisciplinary method is presented that involves the extent of international trade, the interest on specific markets, and the intersection of country cyber capacity index. After applying the method and criteria generated a list of five contender countries. The method may be replicated and/or applied, considering adequate data source assessment and following specifics of each sector.
Collapse
|
8
|
Hötzel MJ, Vandresen B. Brazilians' attitudes to meat consumption and production: Present and future challenges to the sustainability of the meat industry. Meat Sci 2022; 192:108893. [PMID: 35760024 DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Brazil is a main global producer, exporter, and consumer of farm animal products. Information about the knowledge and attitudes of Brazilian citizens and consumers towards the different dimensions of meat production sustainability can support policy discussions and guide the industry to adopt production systems compatible with societal expectations. Here we provide a historical, social, and economic overview of meat production and consumption in Brazil, review the scientific literature on Brazilian public attitudes towards meat production and consumption, and discuss some actions Brazil is taking to develop more sustainable production systems. We show that Brazilians expect affordable meat products with high organoleptic, sanitary, nutritional qualities and produced under high ethical standards. The pace of discussions and changes in policies and in meat production systems needs to accelerate to follow domestic and international demands and the changes in ethical expectations of society. Constructive dialogue between all interested stakeholders, including citizens and consumers, needs to be fostered to design more sustainable meat production systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria José Hötzel
- Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada e Bem-Estar Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, Itacorubi, Florianópolis 88034-001, SC, Brazil.
| | - Bianca Vandresen
- Laboratório de Etologia Aplicada e Bem-Estar Animal, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Rod. Admar Gonzaga 1346, Itacorubi, Florianópolis 88034-001, SC, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|