[Social vulnerability is more frequent in victims of interpersonal violence: value of the EPICES score]

Healthcare itinerary of women undergoing an abortion according to their vulnerability

CONTEXT

Precariousness is increasing among all populations and especially among women. The access to healthcare is increasingly unequal upon the population and particularly in access to contraception methods or abortion according to their vulnerability level.

OBJECTIVE

Our main object is to describe the socio-demographic specifications, the different steps involved in the healthcare itinerary to contraception and abortion, according to the level of social vulnerability for a woman population sample requesting an abortion. The secondary objects are to detect the existence of a difficult healthcare itinerary and to describe the exposure to risky situations or behaviors according to their vulnerability level.

METHOD

It is an observational cross-sectional survey to women having recourse to induced abortion in centers providing them, during 3 month in 2014, in the Aquitaine area. The validated tool to evaluate this situation in a psycho-social approach is the "EPICES score".

RESULTS

Our sample identifies 49% of women in a precariousness situation. These women are younger and more often less employed. They benefit less often from a regular gynecology follow-up, do not use contraception as often and resort to abortion more often. They relate more often risky behavior for the health, conflict with the partner and psychological, physical violence.

CONCLUSION

Special attention should be brought to all women in request of an abortion, for half of them are in a precarious situation and this physical might be a rare occasion of access to healthcare. Violence screening should be systematic and the choice of a long term birth control method should be encouraged.

Psychosocial deprivation in women with gestational diabetes mellitus is associated with poor fetomaternal prognoses: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognoses associated with psychosocial deprivation in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

DESIGN

Observational study considering the 1498 multiethnic women with GDM who gave birth between January 2009 and February 2012.

SETTING

Four largest maternity units in the northeastern suburban area of Paris.

PARTICIPANTS

The 994 women who completed the Evaluation of Precarity and Inequalities in Health Examination Centers (EPICES) questionnaire.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Main complications of GDM (large infant for gestational age (LGA), shoulder dystocia, caesarean section, pre-eclampsia).

RESULTS

Psychosocial deprivation (EPICES score ≥30.17) affected 577 women (56%) and was positively associated with overweight/obesity, parity and non-European origin, and negatively associated with family history of diabetes, fruit and vegetable consumption and working status. The psychosocially deprived women were diagnosed with GDM earlier, received insulin treatment during pregnancy more often and were more likely to have LGA infants (15.1% vs 10.6%, OR=1.5 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.2), p<0.05) and shoulder dystocia (3.1% vs 1.2%, OR=2.7 (0.97 to 7.2), p<0.05). In addition to psychosocial deprivation, LGA was associated with greater parity, obesity, history of GDM, ethnicity, excessive gestational weight gain and insulin therapy. A multivariate analysis using these covariates revealed that the EPICES score was independently associated with LGA infants (per 10 units, OR=1.12 (1.03 to 1.20), p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our area, psychosocial deprivation is common in women with GDM and is associated with earlier GDM diagnoses and greater insulin treatment, an increased likelihood of shoulder dystocia and, independently of obesity, gestational weight gain and other confounders with LGA infants.

Adherence with immunosuppressive treatment after transplantation: results from the French trial PREDICT

Although immunosuppressive therapy after organ transplantation is paramount for long-term outcomes, patients do not comply with their immunosuppressive treatment as much as might be expected. In this observational study, patients having undergone a kidney or liver transplantation were enrolled. Adherence was evaluated by patients using the compliance evaluation test and by physicians using a visual analogic scale. A linear regression was performed to identify determinants of adherence. Less patients having undergone kidney transplantation (27%) described themselves as good compliers than liver transplanted patients (40%). Discrepancy was noted between the physician and patient assessments. Rates of good adherence were significantly different depending on gender, age at transplantation, retransplantation, and time elapsed since transplantation, in at least one of the groups evaluated (whole cohort, kidney liver transplantation groups). In all three groups, adherence decreased with the number of immunosuppressants prescribed. In the whole cohort, the rate of good adherence was significantly higher in patients taking lower number of immunosuppressive drugs (45% for 1 vs. 24% for 3 immunosuppressants; p = 0.02). In this study, which is the first study of this scale in France, we confirmed that adherence with immunosuppressant treatment was low and that simpler treatment regimens may favor adherence.