A hemophagocytosis syndrome attributed to phenobarbital

Iatrogenic HLH

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) can be categorized as either primary (familial, generally occurring in infants) or secondary (sHLH, occurring at any age in association with a variety of conditions) and is mainly triggered by infections, autoimmune diseases, and malignant conditions. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of sHLH is still evolving, and among the causes and associations with the syndrome, those putatively associated with iatrogenic causes remain among the most poorly understood due to the rarity of these entities and the multiple confounders so often present in the patients in whom they are reported. Herein, we present a review of the literature to describe the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of sHLH associated with iatrogenic causes and discuss some of the challenges and future directions in our efforts to better understand these complex conditions for the advancement of patient outcomes.

Analysis of the clinical characteristics of lamotrigine-induced haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Lamotrigine is currently known to be related to haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Knowledge regarding the association between HLH and lamotrigine is mainly based on case reports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics of lamotrigine-induced HLH.

METHODS

We collected literature from 1994 to 31 August 2020 in Chinese and English on HLH induced by lamotrigine for retrospective analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 17 patients (12 men and 5 women) from 15 studies were included, with a median age of 29 years old (range 4-47). Symptoms of lamotrigine-induced HLH were reported to have occurred within 6-24 days following treatment initiation. Six cases reported doses that ranged from 25 mg every other day to 800 mg once daily. The major clinical features of lamotrigine-induced HLH are fever, cytopenia, rash and hyperferritinaemia. Bone marrow showed haemophagocytosis. Fifteen patients improved with drug discontinuation, and 2 patients eventually died.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is a potentially serious adverse reaction to lamotrigine (LTG). Patients should be informed that if they experience any symptoms of HLH while taking lamotrigine, they should immediately seek medical attention.

Bone marrow, blood, and clinical findings in dogs treated with phenobarbital

BACKGROUND

Cytopenias have been reported in dogs treated with phenobarbital, but detailed descriptions of bone marrow findings and response to treatment are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to characterize the hematologic findings and clinical outcomes of dogs that had been receiving phenobarbital at the time of marrow evaluation.

METHODS

Archived bone marrow slides and clinicopathologic data were reviewed in dogs undergoing marrow evaluation for any hematologic problems that developed while receiving phenobarbital (2008-2020). Dogs were excluded if marrow samples lacked diagnostic value, phenobarbital was withdrawn >1 day before marrow collection, a same-day complete blood count (CBC) was lacking, or dogs had concurrent illness or therapy known to cause cytopenias.

RESULTS

Thirteen dogs met inclusion criteria: eight pancytopenic, three anemic/thrombocytopenic, one neutropenic/thrombocytopenic, and one nearly neutropenic. Neutropenia was marked (<700/µL) in eight dogs; all neutrophil concentrations were low or low-normal. Of the 11 anemic dogs (Hct = 12%-42%, median = 29%), three had mild reticulocytosis (eight were tested). One dog had erythroid dysplasia in blood and marrow. All nine neutropenic dogs had evidence of ineffective neutropoiesis: neutrophilic hyperplasia with left shift (9) ± neutrophagocytosis (5). Eight of the 11 anemic dogs had evidence of ineffective erythropoiesis: erythroid hyperplasia (7), left shift (3), and/or rubriphagocytosis (6). No thrombocytopenic dog had megakaryocytic hypoplasia; seven dogs had megakaryocytic hyperplasia. One anemic/thrombocytopenic dog had marked collagen myelofibrosis. The noncytopenic dog had equivocal myeloid hypoplasia with neutrophagocytosis. Median maximal responses and resolution times for neutropenia (n = 6) were 14 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Phenobarbital-induced cytopenias should be considered in dogs with multilineage ineffective hematopoiesis, particularly when neutropenia and myeloid hyperplasia are present. However, findings in dogs with immune-mediated neutropenia or precursor-targeted immune-mediated anemia might be indistinguishable.

Overlap between hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and drug reaction and eosinophilia with systemic symptoms: a review

Drug reaction and eosinophilia with systemic symptoms (DRESS), also known as drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS), shares features with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), most notably fever, rash, and internal organ involvement. However, there is increasing recognition of drug-induced (secondary) HLH and biopsy-proven hemophagocytosis in DRESS, suggesting that HLH and DRESS not only overlap but also may be diseases on the same spectrum of immune dysfunction. To characterize existing literature on HLH/DRESS overlap, we queried the PubMed/MEDLINE database for 23 cases of HLH-DRESS codiagnosis. Average time-to-onset of rash after exposure to inciting drug was 2.7 weeks. Fourteen cases (61%) clinically worsened despite initial therapy, prompting a workup with diagnosis of HLH on average 2.3 weeks after diagnosing DRESS. Nine cases met HLH diagnostic criteria and had a RegiSCAR score ≥4. Nine cases met one set of criteria with a presentation suggestive of the other. Five cases met neither criteria. A patient presenting with fever, generalized rash, bicytopenia, and internal organ involvement after drug exposure was most predictive of meeting diagnostic criteria for both HLH and DRESS. Treatment was highly variable, although most initiated systemic corticosteroids with/without IVIG, plasmapheresis, or etoposide. Patients with poor outcomes in this review were treated using steroid monotherapy and had viral reactivation. Dermatologists should consider the possibility of HLH in any patient presenting with fever, rash, internal organ involvement, and cytopenia. Additional studies will be necessary to further characterize HLH and DRESS overlap and determine optimal management.

Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: analysis of WHO global database of individual case safety reports

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) use in clinical practice has unravelled a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) due to immune system hyper-activation. ICI-related haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) has been recently outlined in single case reports, raising a concern about the need of increasing our knowledge on this rare yet life threatening ICI haematological toxicity.

METHODS

To determine ICI-related HLH clinical, haematological, and coagulation features, its timing and outcome, concurrent irAEs and concomitant infections, we performed a retrospective observational cross-sectional study and queried VigiBase, the WHO global database of suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs), on September 30th, 2018. We retrieved the individual case safety reports reporting HLH in association with ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, avelumab or durvalumab, gathered in the database starting from the ICIs' approval dates by the US Food and Drug Administration. The main outcome measures were co-suspected drugs, concurrent irAEs, HLH clinical, haematological and coagulation features, concomitant infections, HLH median time to onset and outcome.

RESULTS

Among 49'883 ICI-related ADRs collated in VigiBase as of September 30th, 2018, HLH was reported in 38 cases of which 34 (90%) mentioned ICIs as the solely suspected drugs. ICI-related HLH showed clinical, haematological and coagulation features similar to those of HLH with different etiology. Concurrent irAEs occurred in 5 (13%) patients and 6 (16%) reported concomitant viral infections. 31 (82%) cases defined ICI-related HLH outcome, which resolved in 19 (61%) cases. HLH developed a median of 6.7 weeks after initiation of ICI treatment (IQR 2.9-15.4, n = 18, 47%).

CONCLUSIONS

By evaluating the largest cohort of ICI-related HLH cases, we observed that ICI-related HLH arises with a delayed timing with respect to initiation of ICI treatment, and usually presents without other irAEs and concomitant infections. Keeping in mind these findings, clinicians should consider ICIs' involvement in the onset of HLH whenever they diagnose a disease of this group of syndromes in cancer patients treated with ICIs.