Rituximab monotherapy become an optimal treatment for primary pulmonary malt lymphoma

Evaluation of CT features for differentiating consolidation pattern of pulmonary MALT lymphoma from pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma

Purpose

In clinical practice, the consolidation pattern of pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (C-MALT) was often misdiagnosed as pneumonic-type lung adenocarcinoma (P-LADC). However, the mainstay of treatment and prognosis of these two diseases are different. The purpose of this study was to distinguish C-MALT from P-LADC by pre-treatment chest computed tomography (CT) features.

Patients and methods

A total of 31 patients with C-MALT (15 men and 16 women; mean age, 61.1 ± 11.2 years) and 58 patients with P-LADC (34 men and 24 women; mean age, 68.6 ± 7.4 years) confirmed by pathology who underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT were retrospectively enrolled from September 2014 to February 2023. Detailed clinical and CT characteristics of the two groups were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effectiveness of statistically significant variables in distinguishing C-MALT from P-LADC.

Results

The average age of C-MALT was younger than P-LADC patients (p<0.001). With regard to CT features, bronchiectasis within the consolidation was more common in the C-MALT group than the P-LADC group [83.87% (26 of 31) vs 20.69% (12 of 58), p<0.001]; whereas lymph nodes enlargement [75.86% (44 of 58) vs 9.68% (3 of 31), p<0.001] and pleural effusion [43.10% (25of 58) vs 19.35% (6 of 31), p=0.025] were more frequently observed in the P-LADC group than C-MALT group. The predictors with p<0.05 (age, bronchiectasis, lymph node enlargement, and pleural effusion) were used to construct a logistic regression model in discriminating C-MALT from P-LADC, the area under curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy were 0.9555, 86.67%, 91.53%, 83.87%, 93.10%, and 89.89%, respectively.

Conclusion

C-MALT and P-LADC have differential clinical and CT features. An adequate understanding of these different characteristics can contribute to the early accurate diagnosis of C-MALT and provide an appropriate therapeutic strategy.

Watch-and-wait or immediate immunotherapy/immunochemotherapy in patients with phase IE primary pulmonary MALT lymphoma? A multicenter retrospective study

Primary pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is rare, and the optimal frontline treatment has not taken shape so far. It is still debatable whether the watch-and-wait (W&W) policy is beneficial to patients, especially in the early stage. This study was to compare the efficacy of W&W with rituximab single agent or combined chemotherapy (R/R-Chemo) on primary pulmonary MALT patients with localized disease. Clinical characters and effect on 28 patients with primary pulmonary MALT (IE phase) were analyzed. Among the 28 patients, 14 were grouped into W&W cohort, and 14 were immediately treated with R/R-Chemo. The median follow-up duration was 62 months. The estimated median time to treatment failure (TTF) in the W&W cohort and immediate R/R-Chemo cohort was 29 months and 59 months, which were not significantly different (P = 0.667). The estimated median time of overall survival (OS) in the W&W cohort and immediate R/R-Chemo cohort was 78 months and 76 months, which were also not statistically significant (P = 0.696). Concerning prognosis, there is no difference between patients with primary pulmonary MALT (IE phase) treated with W&W and with timely R/R-Chemo.