Radiation therapy alone in elderly with early stage non-small cell lung cancer

Radiofrequency ablation vs. stereotactic body radiotherapy for stage IA non-small cell lung cancer in nonsurgical patients

Background: Approximately 20% resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are treated non-surgically due to various reasons. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with stage IA NSCLC who were ineligible for surgery using the surveillance, epidemiology and end-results (SEER) Database.

Methods: Using the SEER registry, we identified a total of 6,195 IA NSCLC patients who received SBRT or RFA between 2004 and 2015 because of ineligibility for surgical resection due to various reasons. Complete clinical information was available in all these patients. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared between RFA and SBRT groups by using propensity score matching (PSM), inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW), and overlap weighting analysis. Additionally, an exploratory analysis was conducted to determine the effectiveness of RFA treatment based on the subsets of clinically relevant patients.

Results: Of the 6,195 nonsurgical IA NSCLC patients, 191 patients (3.1%) received RFA and the other 6,004 patients (96.9%) received SBRT. The one-, three- and five-year OS in the unmatched RFA and SBRT groups were 83.3%, 48.5%and 29.1% vs. 83.8%, 48.3% and 27.4%, respectively, there was similar results in the PSM, IPTW, overlap weighing analysis. Nonsurgical IA NSCLC patients receiving RFA seemed to have better five-year survival than those receiving SBRT, though the difference was not statistically significant (OS, HR; 0.986; 95% CI, 0.827-1.175, P=0.8738; CSS, HR; 0.965; 95% CI, 0.765-1.219, P=0.7663). We found that the odds of receiving RFA decreased with larger tumor size (>2, <3 cm, OR; 0.303; 95% CI, 0.191-0.479; >3 cm, OR; 0.153; 95% CI, 0.093-0.251) compared with tumor size <1 cm. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving RFA seemed to have better OS than those receiving SBRT, though the difference was not statistically significant. This specific trend was even more obvious in patients with tumors <1cm in diameter (P=0.1577).

Conclusion: In comparison with SBRT, RFA did not seem to adversely affect CSS and OS of IA NSCLC patients who were not suitable for surgical treatment. In addition, RFA seemed to offer better survival to IA NSCLC patients, especially those with tumors <1 cm.

Population-based analysis of curative therapies in stage II non-small cell lung cancer: the role of radiotherapy in medically inoperable patients

OBJECTIVES

Curative intent therapy of stage II NSCLC may include surgical resection or definitive radiotherapy. Primary management with surgery or radiotherapy may be influenced by patient and disease characteristics. We sought to perform a comparison of patients receiving surgery or radical radiation therapy as their curative treatment, and explore the impact of known prognostic factors on outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was completed of all patients with stage II NSCLC referred to the BC Cancer Agency from 2005 to 2012. Cases were filtered to identify those receiving curative intent therapy including surgery or radiotherapy. Information was collected on known prognostic and predictive factors. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. We compared survival among patients receiving curative intent radiotherapy versus surgical intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 535 patients were referred. Of these, 245 (46%) received curative intent surgery, 132 (25%) curative intent radiotherapy, and 158 (30%) did not receive curative therapy. There were significant differences between cohorts with respect to median age, histology, ECOG PS, smoking status, and weight loss. Median OS was significantly different between cohorts: 61.4 m surgery, 26.5 m curative RT, and 13.1 m non-curative therapy. In a case-matched analysis, median OS remained superior for surgery at 101.6 m vs 28.1 m for curative RT. In a multivariate analysis, ECOG PS, weight loss, and treatment cohort all influenced survival. Among patients receiving curative intent radiotherapy, the use of concurrent chemotherapy and RT dose > = 60Gy were associated with improved outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with stage II NSCLC, many are unable to undergo standard of care surgical resection. Radiotherapy provides an inferior yet still curative option in the management of inoperable patients. Further work is needed to optimize outcomes in this population.

Long-term results of radiofrequency ablation treatment of stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective intention-to-treat study

INTRODUCTION

About one-fifth of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are unsuitable for surgical treatment. Radiofrequency ablation offers an alternative minimally invasive option. We report the result of an intention-to-treat study with long-term follow-up.

METHODS

From 2001 to 2009, we performed 80 percutaneous radiofrequency ablations of 59 stage I NSCLC in 57 inoperable patients. Two patients were treated for two separate lesions. The study group consisted of 45 males and 12 females, with mean age of 74 years (range, 40-88 years). All patients had pathological evidence of NSCLC, which was in stage IA in 44 cases and in stage IB in the other 15 cases. The mean size of the lesions was 2.6 cm (range, 1.1-5 cm). Fourteen lesions were retreated up to five times. The procedure was always performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Most of the procedures were performed under computed tomography guidance, with nine under ultrasonography guidance.

RESULTS

In all cases, the procedure was technically successful. No mortality was recorded, and major morbidity consisted of four cases of pneumothorax requiring pleural drainage. At a mean follow-up of 47 months, the complete response rate was 59.3% (stage Ia 65.9%, stage Ib 40%, p = 0.01), with a mean local recurrence interval of 25.9 months. Median overall survival and cancer-specific survival were 33.4 and 41.4 months, respectively. Cancer-specific actuarial survival was 89% at 1 year, 59% at 3 years, and 40% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiofrequency ablation treatment of early-stage NSCLC seems to be a effective minimally invasive therapy even in the long-term period, particularly for stage Ia tumors.

Lung cancer in octogenarians

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer has progressively become a disease of older people, with the median age at diagnosis now exceeding 70 years. Octogenarians represent a rapidly growing proportion of patients diagnosed with lung cancer and can present distinct challenges. Nevertheless, current literature that has set the evidence-based standards of care in this disease does not include significant numbers of patients older than 80 years.

METHODS

We have compiled and reviewed the available literature on the specific management and treatment of lung cancer in patients older than 80 years.

RESULTS

Retrospective series suggest that surgery is safe and effective in treating early-stage non-small cell lung cancer in selected patients older than 80 years. There is minimal data to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in this group. In addition, no data exist on the use of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In advanced or metastatic disease, similar to younger elderly populations, single-agent chemotherapy is feasible and seems to offer benefit in terms of symptoms and outcomes. Small cell lung cancer in this population is not well characterized, but small studies suggest symptom improvement and prolongation of survival with the use of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Based on retrospective series, octogenarians with lung cancer can derive benefit from many of the treatment modalities used for younger patients including surgery for early-stage disease and single-agent chemotherapy for advanced disease. More elderly specific trials are needed to better refine treatment decisions and improve the care of lung cancer in this group.

Radiochemotherapy in the elderly with lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality with the median age of incidence being 69 years in males and 67 years in females. Radiochemotherapy (RT-CHT) is indicated in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and limited-stage small-cell lung cancer; however, a significant under-representation of the elderly has been observed in patient recruitment in cancer treatment trials. In the last decades of the 20th Century, studies showed that elderly patients achieved the best quality-adjusted survival with radiotherapy alone, but recent trials have found that fit elderly patients benefit from concurrent RT-CHT, although with more short-term toxicity. Age alone should not exclude fit patients and deprive them of the standard treatment. Using tools, such as comprehensive geriatric assessment, a patient's tolerance to therapy can be assessed and monitoring can be performed. This review will focus on RT-CHT treatment in elderly patients with nonoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer and limited-stage small-cell lung cancer exclusively.

Identifying patients with peripheral-type early non-small cell lung cancer (T1N0M0) for whom irradiation of the primary focus alone could lead to successful treatment

We investigated the indication of radiotherapy in operable patients with peripheral-type early non-small cell lung cancer (T1N0M0 (TNM staging in 1997)). The subjects comprised 396 patients with non-small cell lung cancer in whom the clinical stage was evaluated as IA. We examined age, gender, Brinkmann's index, histopathological type, the grade of histopathological differentiation, tumour diameter and the level of carcinoembryonic antigen as factors involved in lymph node metastasis. Lymph node metastasis was detected in 79 patients (20%). Factors such as the grade of histopathological differentiation and tumour diameter were involved in lymph node metastasis. In well-differentiated lesions, the probability of metastasis was <10% even when the tumour diameter exceeded 2 cm. However, the probability rapidly increased with tumour size in moderately and poorly differentiated lesions. Among the patients with peripheral-type early non-small cell lung cancer (T1N0M0), the risk of lymph node metastasis was low in those with well-differentiated carcinoma and those with moderately differentiated lesions measuring </=1.5 cm in diameter. The proportion of our patients fitting these criteria was approximately 30%. For these patients, stereotactic body radiotherapy and particle therapy may be indicated.

[Therapy in elderly patients]

The treatment of elderly patients with thoracic tumours poses a huge challenge. Apart from a decreased functional reserve, many patients already suffer from several,partially relevant comorbidities on the date of the initial diagnosis. In the past, this often resulted in the fact that elderly patients were underrepresented in clinical studies but were often undertreated in clinical routine. Retrospective sub-group analyses and studies especially performed in elderly patients, however, show that elderly patients with thoracic tumours, too, may benefit from surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy.

Multidisciplinary approach to the geriatric oncology patient

Given the dramatic demographic shift observed in developed countries, the medical community, especially oncologists, geriatricians, and primary care providers, are confronted with the expanding challenge of the management of elderly people with cancer. Ageing is associated with the accumulation of multiple and various medical and social problems. With a prevalence comparable to that of other chronic conditions in this age group, such as diabetes or dementia, cancer holds a prominent place among diseases of the elderly. The care of elderly cancer patients is fundamentally interdisciplinary. Communication and collaboration between geriatricians/primary care providers and oncologists represent key features of effective care in geriatric oncology. The combination of the disease-oriented approach of oncologists and the patient-oriented approach of geriatricians is the most powerful way to better serve this specific population. The medical approach of elderly cancer patients should ideally be under the lead of geriatricians or primary care providers sensitive to geriatric issues. Oncologists should manage the biologic consequences of the interplay between cancer and ageing. Close collaboration between clinicians will help promote active dedicated clinical research and the development of guidelines on the management of elderly people with cancer.