Lessons to learn from EORTC study 08981: A feasibility study of induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection for stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

Accurate and safe mediastinal restaging by combined endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle aspiration performed by single ultrasound bronchoscope

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this prospective trial was to assess the diagnostic utility of combined endobronchial (EBUS) and endoscopic (EUS) ultrasound-guided needle aspiration by use of a single ultrasound bronchoscope (CUSb-NA) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) restaging in patients after induction therapy.

METHODS

In a consecutive group of NSCLC patients with pathologically confirmed N2 disease (clinical stage IIIa and IIIb) who underwent induction chemotherapy, CUSb-NA was performed. All of the patients with negative or suspected for metastases (uncertain) diagnosed by endoscopy underwent subsequently transcervical extended mediastinal lymphadenectomy (TEMLA) as a confirmatory test.

RESULTS

From January 2009 to December 2012, 106 patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent restaging CUSb-NA under mild sedation, in whom 286 (mean 2.7, range 2-5) lymph node stations were biopsied, 127 (mean 1.2, range 1-3) by EBUS-transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) and 159 (mean 1.5, range 1-4) by EUS-fine needle aspiration (FNA). The CUSb-NA revealed metastatic lymph node involvement in 37/106 patients (34.9%). In 69 (65.1%) patients with negative and uncertain CUSb-NA in 4 (3.8%) out of them, who underwent subsequent TEMLA metastatic nodes were found in 18 patients (17.0%) and there were single lymph nodes found only in one mediastinal station (minimal N2) in 10 (9.4%) out of them. False-positive results were found in 2 (1.9%) patients. In 9 (8.5%) patients CUSb-NA occurred to be false negative in Stations 2R and 4R (only accessible for EBUS), exclusively in small nodes and in 4 (3.8%) patients in Station 5-not accessible for CUSb-NA. The prevalence of mediastinal lymph node metastases in the present study was 51.9%. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, total accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of the restaging CUSb-NA were 67.3% (95% CI [confidence interval]-53-79), 96.0% (95% CI-86-99), 81.0% (95% CI-73-87), 95.0% (95% CI-83-99) and 73.0% (95% CI-61-83), respectively. The sensitivity, accuracy and NPV of CUSb-NA were higher compared with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-FNA alone. No complications of CUSb-NA were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The CUSb-NA is a reasonable and safe technique in mediastinal restaging in NSCLC patients after induction therapy. Following our data, in patients with negative result of CUSb-NA, a surgical restaging of the mediastinum should be considered.

Survival after surgery following chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

A retrospective study was carried out on 74 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (52 in stage IIIA, 22 in stage IIIB) who received platinum-based induction chemotherapy in doublets and triplets, followed by tumor resection. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 5.4% (4 patients); 5 patients in stage IIIB and 17 in stage IIIA did not respond, but the other 47 (63.5%) were downstaged to < IIIA (26 were downstaged to stage I, 20 to stage II, and 1 had complete remission). There was no change in T factor in 22 (30%) patients, nor in N factor in 21 (28%). The actuarial 5-year survival rate for patients in postoperative stages IIIA and IIIB was 0.496; survival was significantly longer in patients who responded to therapy. Parallel improvement in both T and N status predicted worse survival than a multistage regression in any single factor. N status was found to be a stronger survival indicator than T status. Cell type did not influence the response rate or outcome. Induction chemotherapy significantly improved survival in patients who responded, despite a poor prognosis.

Induction chemotherapy with cisplatin, vinorelbine, and mitomycin-C followed by surgery for patients with pathologic N2 non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The treatment strategy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) involving ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes is still controversial. We performed a phase II feasibility study of induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for patients with pathologic N2 NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with mediastinoscopy- positive stage IIIA N2 NSCLC received 2 cycles of cisplatin 80 mg/m2, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2, and mitomycin-C 8 mg/m2. Patients without progressive disease underwent thoracotomy and lobectomy with lymph node dissections 2-4 weeks later.

RESULTS

From January 2000 to July 2004, 24 eligible patients (15 men, 9 women) were enrolled. Induction chemotherapy was completed as planned in 23 patients (95.8%). Hematological toxicity was the primary grade 3/4 toxicity. Twelve (50%) patients achieved a partial response. Twenty-three patients underwent surgical resection, and complete resection was achieved in 22 patients (95.7%). There were no surgery-related deaths. Pathologic complete response in metastatic lymph nodes was achieved in 5 patients. With a median follow-up of 5.4 years (range, 2.88-7.7 years), the estimated 5-year survival was 51.8% (95% CI, 41.3-62.3) and progression-free survival was 46.6% (95% CI, 36-57.2).

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery for patients with pathologic N2 NSCLC was feasible and associated with high response to lymph node metastasis and good survival.

Sequencing chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery in combined modality treatment of stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Combined modality treatment is nowadays the standard of care in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer, but the overall survival is still poor. Therefore, the challenge for clinicians is to optimize the combination of the treatment modalities. The review will focus on bimodality and trimodality approaches in stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer. Although the role of surgical resection in combined modality treatment is unclear, surgery will be discussed as a potential part of the treatment approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has proven to be more effective than chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. Full-dose consolidation chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation showed an improvement of survival in some studies. Consolidation chemotherapy is, however, difficult to administer owing to its toxicity in these complex regimens. Both the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group showed similar survival after surgery compared to sequential or concurrent chemoradiotherapy; however, pneumonectomies and residual malignant mediastinal disease after induction treatment had a negative impact on survival.

SUMMARY

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in combination with full-dose chemotherapy should be the standard of care for nonsmall cell lung cancer stage IIIA/B. Surgery is still experimental, but seems to be promising for certain subgroups of patients. More research has to be done in optimizing radiotherapy schedules and chemotherapy schemes in order to minimize toxicity. Novel therapeutics have to be introduced in the combined modality approach of stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer.