Gefitinib (ZD1839): therapy in selected patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)?

Osimertinib for Previously Treated Patients With Advanced EGFR T790M Mutation-Positive NSCLC: Tolerability and Diagnostic Methods From an Expanded Access Program

Introduction

The osimertinib (AZD9291) US Expanded Access Program (EAP) provided compassionate access to osimertinib prior to US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for patients with advanced/metastatic epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following progression on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting EGFR. Here, we report the patient demographics, safety and tolerability, and diagnostic methods used for T790M testing in the EAP.

Methods

Adult patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC following progression on prior EGFR-TKI therapy (irrespective of line of therapy) were enrolled in the EAP and treated with 80 mg osimertinib once daily until dose reduction, discontinuation, or completion of the EAP following FDA approval (November 2015). Various testing methods were allowed for the required T790M testing.

Results

In total, 248 patients from 25 centers throughout the USA were enrolled in the EAP. The starting dose of 80 mg osimertinib once daily was maintained for 96% (n = 238) of patients over the duration of the EAP (median duration of exposure 84 days). Most patients (overall 83% [n = 205/238]; patients aged ≥ 75 years 83% [n = 48/58]) completed the EAP and transitioned to commercially available osimertinib following FDA approval. Serious adverse events considered to be treatment related by investigators were reported in five patients (2%), all aged ≥ 65 years, and were dyspnea, deep vein thrombosis, femur fracture, alanine aminotransferase increase, and pneumonitis, respectively. A variety of biospecimen types were collected: solid tumor tissue (73%), blood (20%), cytology (6%), and urine (2%). PCR-based methods were most commonly used for determining EGFR mutation status (47%) followed by next-generation sequencing (33%).

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, osimertinib was well tolerated, and most patients, including patients aged ≥ 75 years, transitioned to commercially available osimertinib following FDA approval. The EAP suggests there has been an uptake of minimally invasive T790M testing methods at some centers.

Funding

AstraZeneca (Wilmington, DE, USA).

EGFR gene copy number as a predictive/biomarker for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number has been proposed as a candidate biomarker for predicting treatment response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were searched until October 21, 2015 using the following search terms: lung neoplasms/lung cancer/non-small cell lung cancer/NSCLC, EGFR, gene amplification, copy number, erlotinib, gefitinib, tyrosine-kinase inhibitor/TKI, predictor. 17 studies were included in the analysis with a total of 2047 patients. The overall analysis found that increased EGFR gene copy number was associated with higher overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS; p values ≤0.008) compared with patients without a high EGFR gene copy number. Subgroup analysis found that in a population of patients who were primarily Caucasian, a higher EGFR gene copy number was also associated with increased ORR, OS, and PFS (p values ≤0.018). The results were similar in a population of Asian patients, except that a higher EGFR gene copy number was not associated with improved OS (p=0.248). Sensitivity analysis indicated that no one study overly influenced the results and that the findings are robust. The result of the analysis found that EGFR gene copy number was associated with increased OS and PFS, supporting the idea that EGFR gene copy number is a biomarker for response to EGFR-TKI therapy in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Phase II Clinical Trial of Gefitinib for the Treatment of Chemonaïve Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer with Poor Performance Status

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have no curative treatment options; therefore, improving their quality of life (QOL) is an important goal. Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor, is a safe oral agent that may be of benefit to a specific population of NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A Phase II clinical trial included chemonaïve patients with advanced NSCLC and poor performance status (PS). Response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, QOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire, and Trial Outcome Index (TOI) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twelve out of 19 enrolled patients were evaluable. The median age for the evaluable patients was 68.8 years (59.7–74.6). Out of all the patients, 7 (58.3%) had adenocarcinoma and 5 (41.7%) had squamous cell carcinoma. The median duration of treatment was 62.5 days (26.5–115.0) in the evaluable patients. Grade 3/4 toxicities included fatigue, rash, diarrhea, and nausea. One patient had partial response, eight patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients progressed. The median overall survival for the evaluable population was 4.9 months (2.3–16). The median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (1.9–6.6). TOI was marginally associated with the overall survival, with a hazard ratio of 0.92 (95% confidence interval: 0.84, 1.0) (P = 0.061). FACT-L score and the TOI were highly correlated (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001). TOI scores were higher in African Americans compared to Caucasians and increased with age.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that gefitinib use in patients with NSCLC and poor PS may improve the QOL of older patients and African American patients.

Pooled analysis of clinical outcome for EGFR TKI-treated patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) appear to gain particular benefit from treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI) if their disease tests positive for EGFR activating mutations. Recently, several large, controlled, phase III studies have been published in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumours. Given the increased patient dataset now available, a comprehensive literature search for EGFR TKIs or chemotherapy in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC was undertaken to update the results of a previously published pooled analysis. Pooling eligible progression-free survival (PFS) data from 27 erlotinib studies (n = 731), 54 gefitinib studies (n = 1802) and 20 chemotherapy studies (n = 984) provided median PFS values for each treatment. The pooled median PFS was: 12.4 months (95% accuracy intervals [AI] 11.6-13.4) for erlotinib-treated patients; 9.4 months (95% AI 9.0-9.8) for gefitinib-treated patients; and 5.6 months (95% AI 5.3-6.0) for chemotherapy. Both erlotinib and gefitinib resulted in significantly longer PFS than chemotherapy (permutation testing; P = 0.000 and P = 0.000, respectively). Data on more recent TKIs (afatinib, dacomitinib and icotinib) were insufficient at this time-point to carry out a pooled PFS analysis on these compounds. The results of this updated pooled analysis suggest a substantial clear PFS benefit of treating patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC with erlotinib or gefitinib compared with chemotherapy.

Continuous tissue microarray based identification of cancers with homogeneous target expression for successful targeted therapy in clinical routine practice

In cancer therapy, the number of drugs targeting cells with characteristic molecular aberrations is continuously rising. However, application of these new drugs still is limited to a few tumor entities. The aim of this study was to test the concept of routinely identifying all possible cancer patients who might eventually benefit from targeted therapy. Therefore, all malignant tumors routinely submitted to our Institute of Pathology over a period of 4 months were brought into a tissue microarray format. Using "in situ" methods, tumors were analyzed for HER2, EGFR, and KIT status as examples for potential therapeutic target genes. In positive cases, target heterogeneity was excluded by analyzing all available large sections. Outside of tumor entities for which targeted drugs are already approved, the study revealed six tumors with homogeneously distributed HER2 overexpression/amplification (bladder, esophageal and colorectal) and seven tumors with homogeneous EGFR amplification (vulvar, ovarian, breast, esophageal and laryngeal, and adenocarcinoma of unknown primary). A total of 151 tumors showed KIT overexpression but none of seven sequenced cases showed KIT mutations. We furthermore report on a 69-year-old patient with homogeneously HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer who is successfully treated by trastuzumab monotherapy. This study demonstrates that tissue microarray based screening for therapeutic target genes in tumors outside established indications represents a feasible approach suitable for routine application. The successful treatment of one patient with homogeneously HER2 positive metastatic colorectal cancer argues for the clinical utility of this approach at least in carefully selected, homogeneous cancers.

Gefitinib: re-emerging from the shadows

SUMMARY In the past decade, the identification of mutations in the EGFR gene and the sensitivity of activating mutations to EGF receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitors has improved survival in a subset of non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Over 70% of patients with EGFR mutations have a response to gefitinib therapy. Gefitinib, a first-generation EGF receptor–tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is well tolerated and continues to be widely used. However, eventually most patients develop resistance to gefitinib. This article reviews the pharmacology of gefitinib and summarizes the clinical trials that have resulted in its current day indications.

Target therapy in NSCLC patients: Relevant clinical agents and tumour molecular characterisation

In recent years, a number of new agents that target specific molecular pathways in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been investigated. Much effort has been focused on identifying specific markers that are predictive of treatment response, given that a tailored approach would maximise the therapeutic index and cost-effectiveness. Gefitinib and erlotinib are selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and have produced good results in selected cases in terms of objective response rate and overall survival. At present, EGFR gene mutations are considered the most important predictors of clinical response to TKI therapy and tumour characterisation for these alterations is mandatory prior to any decision making. Echinoderm microtubule-like protein 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) translocation is another alteration capable of predicting the efficacy of anti-ALK agents, such as crizotinib. Moreover, emerging target agents, such as MET inhibitors, are likely to increase the amount of molecular characterisation required before a decision is made on treatment. The main limiting factor for adequate characterisation of metastatic NSCLC patients is the small quantity of tumour cells available for molecular analysis. In this study, we provided an overview of the most important and clinically relevant target agents in NSCLC patients as well as the most important mechanisms of resistance. The issue of the scant amount of biological samples available for analysis as well as alternative sampling approaches such as plasma- or serum-derived DNA were also examined.

A cross-country review of data collected on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in cancer registries, databases, retrospective and non-randomized prospective studies

INTRODUCTION

An increased number of pharmacotherapies exist to treat advanced NSCLC. This necessitates a review of the available information on routine-care treatment patterns, the outcome of treatment, and resource utilization for patients diagnosed and treated with advanced NSCLC that could inform evidence-based treatment decisions and aid decisions on the most cost-effective treatment alternatives.

METHODS

PubMed and the Health Economic Evaluations Database were searched for retrospective or non-randomized prospective studies between January 2000 and May 2012 that included information on treatment patterns, treatment outcomes including health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), and resource utilization. In addition, registries and databases were identified from retrieved publications and internet searches. Data collected in registries and databases was summarized for eight European countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Turkey, the Netherlands, the UK), Australia, and Canada.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 410 studies, whereof 87 studies met the study inclusion criteria. In total, 49 were retrospective chart reviews or database analyses, 30 non-randomized prospective studies, and eight HRQoL studies. Two studies compared treatment patterns and/or treatment outcomes across countries. Altogether, 181 cancer registries in the countries studied were identified. Clinical cancer-specific patient registries were identified in Australia and Germany. Databases or linkage systems that enable retrieval of complete information of patient disease history were found in Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK. Cancer registries and databases were found to collect information on NSCLC patient demographics, NSCLC or lung cancer diagnosis, disease stage, performance status, treatment, treatment outcomes, and resource use. Differences existed between country registries and databases in whether information was collected on each of these data points.

CONCLUSION

The literature review revealed few published NSCLC studies on treatment, treatment outcomes, and resource use in routine clinical practice and on HRQoL. Registries and databases were found to collect some of this information, however not systematically.

Recent understanding of the molecular mechanisms for the efficacy and resistance of EGF receptor-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and its family members are involved in many aspects of tumor biological processes. Aberrant activation of the EGFR tyrosine kinase by mutations or protein overexpression is observed in various types of human cancer, including lung cancer. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), such as gefitinib and erlotinib, are highly effective in lung cancer patients who harbor active mutations in the EGFR gene. However, patients who are initially sensitive to EGFR-TKIs eventually relapse within few years.

AREAS COVERED

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer and is associated with a high frequency of EGFR mutations. This review describes the EGFR mutations that determine the sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs and the current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC. Furthermore, the authors describe recent strategies developed to overcome acquired resistance using second-generation EGFR-TKIs and combination therapies with several molecular-targeting drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Although recent findings have contributed to our understanding of the mechanism of acquired resistance and helped the development of novel strategies to overcome such resistance, the underlying mechanisms are complex and additional research is necessary to develop effective therapeutic strategies for individual patients with lung cancer.

EGFR gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene copy number as a potential biomarker of survival for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving single-agent treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

We systematically identified articles investigating EGFR gene copy number by fluorescent or chromogenic in situ hybridization in patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC treated with the TKIs erlotinib or gefitinib, (last search: 31 June 2009). Eligible studies had to report on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) or time-to-progression (TTP), stratified by EGFR gene copy number. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Among 255 identified studies, 20 (1689 patients, 594 with increased gene copy number), 10 (822 patients, 290 with increased gene copy number) and 5 (294 patients, 129 with increased gene copy number) were eligible for the OS, PFS and TTP meta-analyses, respectively. Increased EGFR gene copy number was associated with increased OS (HR = 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.89; P = 0.001), PFS (HR = 0.60; 95% CI 0.46-0.79; P<0.001) and TTP (HR = 0.50; 95% CI 0.28-0.91; P = 0.02). Among predominantly white populations, increased EGFR gene copy number was strongly associated with improved survival (HR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.59-0.82; P<0.001), whereas it did not influence survival in East Asians (HR = 1.11; 95% CI 0.82-1.50; P=0.50). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.02).

CONCLUSION

Among TKI-treated patients, increased EGFR gene copy number appears to be associated with improved survival outcomes. The effect on OS appears to be limited to patients of non-Asian descent.

Gender difference in bone metastasis of human small cell lung cancer, SBC-5 cells in natural killer-cell depleted severe combined immunodeficient mice

Lung cancer frequently develops multiple organ metastases, which thus makes this disease a leading cause of malignancy-related death worldwide. A gender difference is reported to affect the incidence and mortality of lung cancer; however, whether and how the gender difference is involved in lung cancer metastasis is unclear. This study evaluated the gender difference in multiple organ metastases in human small cell lung cancer (SBC-5) cells by using natural killer cell-depleted severe combined immunodeficient mice. Among multiple organ metastases, only bone metastasis formation significantly increased in female mice in comparison to males, while no significant difference was observed in the metastases to the liver and lungs. The suppression of androgen by castration or androgen receptor antagonist treatment in male mice also induced a significant increase of bone metastases. The number of osteoclasts in the bone metastatic lesions was greater in female mice and in mice with androgen suppression than in control male. However, there was no significant difference in the serum concentration of parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) associated with gender or androgen suppression. An in vitro study also indicated that sex steroid treatment had no effect on the proliferation or PTHrP production in SBC-5 cells. These results indicate that the balance of sex steroids therefore plays an important role in the formation of bone metastasis in small cell lung cancer, and suggests diverse mechanisms of interaction between cancer cells and host cells in the bone microenvironment.

Clinical outcomes in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations: pooled analysis

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a distinct subgroup of NSCLCs that is particularly responsive to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs). A weighted pooled analysis of available studies was performed to evaluate clinical outcome in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were treated with chemotherapy or EGFR TKIs. Median progression-free survival (PFS) times were pooled from prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated chemotherapy or single-agent EGFR TKIs (erlotinib or gefitinib) in patients with NSCLC and EGFR mutations. Among the studies identified for inclusion in the analysis, 12 evaluated erlotinib (365 patients), 39 evaluated gefitinib (1069 patients) and 9 evaluated chemotherapy (375 patients). Across all studies, the most common EGFR mutations were deletions in exon 19 and the L858R substitution in exon 21. In the weighted pooled analysis, the overall median PFS was 13.2 months with erlotinib, 9.8 months with gefitinib and 5.9 months with chemotherapy. Using a two-sided permutation, erlotinib and gefitinib produced a longer median PFS versus chemotherapy, both individually (P= 0.000 and P= 0.002, respectively) and as a combined group (EGFR TKI versus chemotherapy, P= 0.000). EGFR TKIs appear to be the most effective treatment for patients with advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Ongoing prospective trials comparing the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy and EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant disease should provide further insight into the most appropriate way to treat this specific group of patients.

Theme: Oncology - Molecular mechanisms determining the efficacy of EGF receptor-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors help to identify biomarker candidates

Non-small-cell lung cancer is a major subtype of lung cancer, which is the most common and fatal cancer in the world. Gefitinib (Iressa™) and later erlotinib (Tarceva™), specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors for EGF receptors (EGFRs), have been demonstrated to be effective for some non-small-cell lung cancer patients and used in clinics as pioneers of molecule-based targeted drugs for cancer. There has been an urgent need to develop biomarkers and to select appropriate patients who should benefit from treatment with these drugs because of the high sensitivity of target cancer cells. However, problems of acquired resistance after long-term treatment with these drugs have been recognized. Emerging evidence indicates that the efficacy of these drugs is partly dependent on somatic mutations in the EGFR. In this review, we summarize recent understandings of the molecular mechanisms that determine the efficacy of EGFR–tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Towards the end of this article, we discuss recent ongoing projects validating potential biomarkers and future prospects.