Amrubicin at a lower-dose with routine prophylactic use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for relapsed small-cell lung cancer

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis to develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022

BACKGROUND

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly administered to cancer patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy, especially when incidence rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) surpasses 20%. While primary prophylaxis with G-CSF has been proven effective in preventing FN in patients with cancer, there is limited evidence regarding its efficacy in specifically, lung cancer. Our systematic review focused on the efficacy of G-CSF primary prophylaxis in lung cancer.

METHODS

We extracted studies on non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) using the PubMed, Ichushi Web, and Cochrane Library databases. Two reviewers assessed the extracted studies for each type of lung cancer and conducted quantitative and meta-analyses of preplanned outcomes, including overall survival, FN incidence, infection-related mortality, quality of life, and musculoskeletal pain.

RESULTS

A limited number of studies were extracted: two on NSCLC and six on SCLC. A meta-analysis was not conducted owing to insufficient data on NSCLC. Two case-control studies explored the efficacy of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF in patients with NSCLC (on docetaxel and ramucirumab therapy) and indicated a lower FN frequency with G-CSF. For SCLC, meta-analysis of five studies showed no significant reduction in FN incidence, with an odds ratio of 0.38 (95% confidence interval 0.03-5.56, P = 0.48). Outcomes other than FN incidence could not be evaluated due to low data availability.

CONCLUSION

Limited data are available on G-CSF prophylaxis in lung cancer. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF may be weakly recommended in Japanese patients with NSCLC undergoing docetaxel and ramucirumab combination therapy.

Modulation of immune function in the bovine uterus peripartum

There is a high risk of clinical or subclinical reproductive tract disease in the postpartum period in dairy cows. An integrated process of adaptive events should occur synchronously, including a robust but well-regulated immune response in the uterus. Failure of this process may result in reproductive tract inflammatory disease. Up to half of postpartum dairy cows are affected by metritis, purulent vaginal discharge (PVD), or subclinical endometritis. After parturition there is damage to the birth canal, the superficial layer of the endometrium is naturally wounded, and essentially all dairy cows have bacterial contamination in the uterus. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of inflammatory cell and the main line of defence against infection in the uterus. A prompt influx of neutrophils is associated with uterine health. Avoidance of clinical disease (metritis and PVD) depends in large part on how effective the immune response is at limiting the burden and effects of bacterial pathogens, while the occurrence of subclinical endometritis is more a function of avoiding excessive or persistent inflammation. Glucose supply, hypocalcemia, lipid mobilization from body fat, ketosis, and the flux of pro-inflammatory cytokines influence immune response and change rapidly and variably among individual cows. Effective but well-regulated inflammatory response will be favoured by best management practices for transition cows, but specific interventions to modulate immune response to prevent uterine disease remain developmental.

Safety and efficacy of amrubicin monotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a single cancer center retrospective study

Purpose

Patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma (GI-NEC) have poor prognoses. Although platinum-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used as first-line treatment, the benefit of amrubicin (AMR) and salvage chemotherapy in those who develop platinum-refractory GI-NEC remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AMR monotherapy in patients with platinum-refractory GI-NEC.

Patients and methods

Platinum-refractory GI-NEC patients who received AMR monotherapy between April 2012 and September 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were evaluated. PFS and OS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared using log-rank tests.

Results

In total, 16 patients were enrolled. Of them, 13 (81.3%), 1 (6.2%), and 2 (12.5%) received cisplatin plus irinotecan, cisplatin plus etoposide, and fluoropyrimidine plus platinum, respectively, before AMR monotherapy. The primary sites of NEC included the esophagus (N=3, 18.8%), stomach (N=10, 62.5%), duodenum (N=1, 6.2%) and colorectum (N=2, 12.5%). Patients were administered a median of 3 (range, 1–15) cycles of AMR. The ORR was 6.3%, and the median PFS and OS were 2.9 months (95% CI: 1.7–7.4) and 13.8 months (95% CI: 7.9–23.5), respectively. Neutropenia was the most serious adverse event. Grade 3 or higher neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 50.0% and 6.2% of patients, respectively. Other nonhematological toxicities were not severe, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The 10 patients who received subsequent chemotherapy after AMR had significantly longer OS than those who did not (17.3 months vs 8.9 months; p=0.018). The median PFS of those who received organ-specific subsequent chemotherapy after AMR was 3.8 months, which was longer than that of those who received prior AMR.

Conclusion

AMR is feasible with minimal side effects for platinum-refractory GI-NEC. Organ-specific subsequent chemotherapy after AMR may improve patient survival.

The efficacy of amrubicin third-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer: A retrospective and historical study in a single institute

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of amrubicin for relapsed small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) has been reported in previous studies. Few reports, however, describe the efficacy and survival benefit of third-line amrubicin chemotherapy in patients with extensive disease (ED)-SCLC.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of ED-SCLC patients treated with amrubicin salvage chemotherapy as a third-line chemotherapy between January 2005 and July 2016 (salvage amrubicin group). The efficacy and toxicities of amrubicin were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) in the amrubicin salvage group was compared with OS among ED-SCLC patients treated with at least second-line chemotherapy between May 2000 and July 2016 and without subsequent amrubicin salvage chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 18 patients with a median age of 70 years were analyzed in the amrubicin salvage group. The median number of treatment cycles of amrubicin was four. The response rate was 27.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.1%-48.5%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 66.7% (95% CI, 44.9%-88.4%). Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI, 1.0-4.9 months), and median OS after an initial chemotherapy was 18.1 months (95% CI, 10.2-26.0 months). OS in the amrubicin salvage group was significantly longer than in the no-amrubicin group (n = 19; 12.6 months, 95% CI, 11.5-13.8 months, P = 0.005). The frequency of neutropenia greater than grade 3 was 72.2%, with febrile neutropenia developing in 38.9% of patients in the amrubicin salvage group.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high frequency of febrile neutropenia, amrubicin salvage chemotherapy may improve OS in patients with relapsed ED-SCLC.

Amrubicin: potential in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin to treat small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive form of lung cancer characterized by early metastasis and high mortality. In recent years, monotherapy and combination therapy of amrubicin with cisplatin or carboplatin has been actively studied and shown promise for the treatment of extensive disease SCLC (ED-SCLC). In this article, we summarize clinical trials of both monotherapy and combination therapy with amrubicin conducted in Japan, the USA, and the European Union. The results suggest that the clinical outcome of amrubicin therapy may be associated with genetic variations in patients. Further study of combination regimens in patients of different ethnicities is warranted.