1
|
van Velzen MJM, Pape M, Dijksterhuis WPM, Slingerland M, van Voorthuizen T, Beerepoot LV, Creemers GJ, Derks S, Mohammad NH, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. The association between effectiveness of first-line treatment and second-line treatment in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2021; 156:60-69. [PMID: 34425405 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population-based predictive factors for the effectiveness of second-line palliative systemic therapy in gastro-oesophageal cancer are not available. This study investigates the predictive value of effectiveness of first-line treatment for second-line treatment outcomes in gastro-oesophageal cancer in a real-world setting. METHODS Patients with metastatic gastro-oesophageal cancer diagnosed in 2010-2017 who were treated with second-line therapy after disease progression on first-line therapy were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were divided into four groups as per duration of time to treatment failure (TTF) of the first line (0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and >9 months), and the association with overall survival (OS) and second-line TTF was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and two-sided multivariable regression models. RESULTS Median OS since the start of the second line of patients (n = 611) with first-line TTF of 0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and >9 months was 4.0, 4.1, 5.5 and 7.1 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Median second-line TTF of patients with first-line TTF of 0-3, 3-6, 6-9 and >9 months was 2.8, 2.4, 3.0 and 4.5 months, respectively (P < 0.001). Patients with first-line TTF of >9 months showed a longer OS than patients with first-line TTF of 0-3 months (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.90; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-2.47), 3-6 months (adjusted HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.47-2.39) and 6-9 months (adjusted HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.04-1.65). Results for second-line TTF were similar. CONCLUSIONS This study shows a positive correlation between effectiveness of first-line therapy and outcomes of second-line therapy in gastro-oesophageal cancer. Physicians should take duration of the first line into account when considering second-line palliative systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merel J M van Velzen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Marieke Pape
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willemieke P M Dijksterhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | | | - Laurens V Beerepoot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah Derks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia H Mohammad
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Novel Cytotoxic Chemotherapies in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051152. [PMID: 33800236 PMCID: PMC7962524 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Small cell lung cancer is a subtype of lung cancer and one of the deadliest thoracic tumours. Historically, chemotherapy consisting of either platinum plus etoposide or anthracycline-based regimens have been associated with a high response rate and rapid development of acquired resistance, contributing to the poor overall prognosis. Only a fraction of patients with local or early disease can be cured, whilst the treatment is palliative in those with extensive disease. In recent decades, few novel drugs have been developed, which are herein described. Abstract Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the deadliest thoracic neoplasms, in part due to its fast doubling time and early metastatic spread. Historically, cytotoxic chemotherapy consisting of platinum–etoposide or anthracycline-based regimens has demonstrated a high response rate, but early chemoresistance leads to a poor prognosis in advanced SCLC. Only a fraction of patients with limited-disease can be cured by chemo-radiotherapy. Given the disappointing survival rates in advanced SCLC, new cytotoxic agents are eagerly awaited. Unfortunately, few novel chemotherapy drugs have been developed in the latest decades. This review describes the results and potential application in the clinical practice of novel chemotherapy agents for SCLC.
Collapse
|
3
|
Baize N, Monnet I, Greillier L, Quere G, Kerjouan M, Janicot H, Vergnenegre A, Auliac JB, Chouaid C. Second-line treatments of small-cell lung cancers. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:1033-1043. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1372198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Baize
- UTTIOM (Unité Transversale de Thérapeutiques Innovantes en Oncologie Médicale), CHU Angers, France
| | - Isabelle Monnet
- Department of Pulmonology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| | - Laurent Greillier
- Service d’Oncologie Multidisciplinaire et Innovations Thérapeutiques, AP-HM, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Gilles Quere
- Respiratory Disease Department, Brest University Brest, Brest, France
| | - Mallorie Kerjouan
- Respiratory Disease Department, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Henri Janicot
- Service de pneumologie, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Alain Vergnenegre
- UOTC (Unité d’Oncologie Thoracique et Cutanée), CHU Limoges, Limoges, France
| | | | - Christos Chouaid
- Department of Pulmonology, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gray JE, Heist RS, Starodub AN, Camidge DR, Kio EA, Masters GA, Purcell WT, Guarino MJ, Misleh J, Schneider CJ, Schneider BJ, Ocean A, Johnson T, Gandhi L, Kalinsky K, Scheff R, Messersmith WA, Govindan SV, Maliakal PP, Mudenda B, Wegener WA, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM. Therapy of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) with a Topoisomerase-I-inhibiting Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) Targeting Trop-2, Sacituzumab Govitecan. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23:5711-5719. [PMID: 28679770 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-0933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Revised: 05/22/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: We evaluated a Trop-2-targeting antibody conjugated with SN-38 in metastatic small cell lung cancer (mSCLC) patients.Experimental Design: Sacituzumab govitecan was studied in patients with pretreated (median, 2; range, 1-7) mSCLC who received either 8 or 10 mg/kg i.v. on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoints were safety and objective response rate (ORR); duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were secondary endpoints.Results: Sixty percent of patients showed tumor shrinkage from baseline CTs. On an intention-to-treat basis (N = 50), the ORR was 14% (17% for the 10-mg/kg group); the median response duration, 5.7 months; the clinical benefit rate (CBR ≥4 months), 34%; median PFS, 3.7 months; and median OS, 7.5 months. There was a suggested improvement in PR, CBR, and PFS with sacituzumab govitecan in second-line patients who were sensitive to first-line therapy, but no difference between first-line chemosensitive versus chemoresistant patients in the overall population. There was a statistically significant higher OS in those patients who received prior topotecan versus no topotecan therapy in a small subgroup. Grade ≥3 adverse events included neutropenia (34%), fatigue (13%), diarrhea (9%), and anemia (6%). Trop-2 tumor staining was not required for patient selection. No antibodies to the drug conjugate or its components were detected on serial blood collections.Conclusions: Sacituzumab govitecan appears to have a safe and effective therapeutic profile in heavily pretreated mSCLC patients, including those who are chemosensitive or chemoresistant to first-line chemotherapy. Additional studies as a monotherapy or combination therapy are warranted. Clin Cancer Res; 23(19); 5711-9. ©2017 AACR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jhanelle E Gray
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
| | - Rebecca S Heist
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Ebenezer A Kio
- Indiana University Health Center for Cancer Care, Goshen, Indiana
| | - Gregory A Masters
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Newark, Delaware
| | | | - Michael J Guarino
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Newark, Delaware
| | - Jamal Misleh
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Newark, Delaware
| | | | | | | | - Tirrell Johnson
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Orlando, Florida
| | - Leena Gandhi
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kevin Kalinsky
- Columbia University Medical Center-Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
|
6
|
Morise M, Niho S, Umemura S, Matsumoto S, Yoh K, Goto K, Ohmatsu H, Ohe Y. Low-dose irinotecan as a second-line chemotherapy for recurrent small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014; 44:846-51. [PMID: 25057092 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyu094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Irinotecan is a potent inhibitor of deoxyribonucleic acid topoisomerase 1 and the weekly schedule of 100-125 or 350 mg/m(2) administration on Day 1 every 3 weeks is recommended for recurrent small cell lung cancer. However, severe gastrointestinal toxic effects and myelosuppression are often observed in this dose setting. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose irinotecan monotherapy (60 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks) as second-line chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. METHODS The medical charts of small cell lung cancer patients who had received second-line chemotherapy at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between April 2003 and June 2012 were reviewed. Consecutive 57 patients who were treated with low dose of irinotecan (60 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks) were analyzed in this study. RESULTS Median age was 70 years (range, 51-83). Fifty-two (91%) were male, 36 (63%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1 and 26 (46%) were sensitive relapse. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 2. The objective response rate was 32% (95% confidence interval: 20-45%).The median progression-free survival and the median overall survival were 2.9 months (95% confidence interval: 1.9-3.4 months) and 5.3 months (95% confidence interval: 3.6-7.6 months), respectively. The incidence of Grade 3/4 neutropenia, diarrhea and nausea/vomiting was 21, 4 and 5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose irinotecan monotherapy for recurrent small cell lung cancer might be effective with favorable toxicity. Randomized trial of 60 mg/m(2) versus standard dose of irinotecan is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Morise
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Seiji Niho
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigeki Umemura
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shingo Matsumoto
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kiyotaka Yoh
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Koichi Goto
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hironobu Ohmatsu
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Ohe
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ding Q, Zhan J. Amrubicin: potential in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin to treat small-cell lung cancer. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY 2013; 7:681-9. [PMID: 23946645 PMCID: PMC3738252 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s41910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is the most aggressive form of lung cancer characterized by early metastasis and high mortality. In recent years, monotherapy and combination therapy of amrubicin with cisplatin or carboplatin has been actively studied and shown promise for the treatment of extensive disease SCLC (ED-SCLC). In this article, we summarize clinical trials of both monotherapy and combination therapy with amrubicin conducted in Japan, the USA, and the European Union. The results suggest that the clinical outcome of amrubicin therapy may be associated with genetic variations in patients. Further study of combination regimens in patients of different ethnicities is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qian Ding
- Department of Biochemistry, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Karim SM, Zekri J. Chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive review. Oncol Rev 2012; 6:e4. [PMID: 25992206 PMCID: PMC4419639 DOI: 10.4081/oncol.2012.e4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2011] [Revised: 03/18/2012] [Accepted: 03/27/2012] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Combination chemotherapy is the current strategy of choice for treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Platinum containing combination regimens are superior to non-platinum regimens in limited stage-SCLC and possibly also in extensive stage-SCLC as first and second-line treatments. The addition of ifosfamide to platinum containing regimens may improve the outcome but at the price of increased toxicity. Suboptimal doses of chemotherapy result in inferior survival. Early intensified, accelerated and high-dose chemotherapy gave conflicting results and is not considered a standard option outside of clinical trials. A number of newer agents have provided promising results when used in combination regimens, for example, gemcitabine, irinotecan and topotecan. However, more studies are required to appropriately evaluate them. There is a definitive role for radiotherapy in LD-SCLC. However, timing and schedule are subject to further research. Novel approaches are currently being investigated in the hope of improving outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jamal Zekri
- King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
王 敬, 张 树. [Advances on treatment of limited-disease small cell lung cancer]. ZHONGGUO FEI AI ZA ZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF LUNG CANCER 2011; 14:811-8. [PMID: 22008112 PMCID: PMC5999944 DOI: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2011.10.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2011] [Revised: 07/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- 敬慧 王
- />101149 北京,首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院肿瘤内科Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China
| | - 树才 张
- />101149 北京,首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院肿瘤内科Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Confined to one side of the chest, limited stage small cell lung cancer is treated with a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, yet has a long-term survival rate of only 15%. Extensive stage disease has initial response rates to chemotherapy exceeding 70%. However, the disease almost invariably progresses and becomes fatal. Many recent clinical trials have failed to show superiority of newer chemotherapeutics or targeted therapies compared with the standard chemotherapy backbone of platinum plus etoposide. Numerous promising targeted therapies and other agents are still in development.
Collapse
|