Identification of non-small-cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations in malignant effusion and cerebrospinal fluid: rapid and sensitive detection of exon 19 deletion E746-A750 and exon 21 L858R mutation by immunocytochemistry

Advances in diagnostic liquid-based cytology

Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has changed the landscape of gynaecological cytology. A growing demand exists for LBC in diagnostic cytology, particularly for ancillary testing, such as immunocytochemistry and molecular testing. Ancillary testing solely based on conventional preparation (CP) methods remains challenging. Recently, the increased demand for specialist testing and minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasonography fine-needle aspiration, to obtain cellular samples has led to an increasing demand for ancillary testing on cytology LBC supernatant, slides and cell block (CB). This facilitates the diagnosis and prognosis in cytology samples enabling personalized treatment. An understanding of the history and future prospects of LBC is crucial for its application in routine diagnostics by cytopathologists and cytotechnologists. In this review, we initiated an internet search using the keyword 'liquid-based cytology', and we conducted a literature review to discuss the usefulness of combined diagnosis of LBC and CP, immunocytochemistry and molecular testing and assessed the quality of nucleic acids in diagnostic LBC. High-quality and cell-rich diagnostic LBC surpassed the CP method alone in terms of reliability and versatility of ancillary testing in cytological diagnosis. Conclusively, diagnostic LBC lends itself to various new technologies and is expected to continue evolving with innovations in the future.

Recent advances in non-small cell lung cancer targeted therapy; an update review

Lung cancer continues to be the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In the last decade, significant advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer, particularly NSCLC, have been achieved with the help of molecular translational research. Among the hopeful breakthroughs in therapeutic approaches, advances in targeted therapy have brought the most successful outcomes in NSCLC treatment. In targeted therapy, antagonists target the specific genes, proteins, or the microenvironment of tumors supporting cancer growth and survival. Indeed, cancer can be managed by blocking the target genes related to tumor cell progression without causing noticeable damage to normal cells. Currently, efforts have been focused on improving the targeted therapy aspects regarding the encouraging outcomes in cancer treatment and the quality of life of patients. Treatment with targeted therapy for NSCLC is changing rapidly due to the pace of scientific research. Accordingly, this updated study aimed to discuss the tumor target antigens comprehensively and targeted therapy-related agents in NSCLC. The current study also summarized the available clinical trial studies for NSCLC patients.

One-step determination of deletion mutation based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification

Deletion mutation has been proved as the important factor for occurrence and development of disease, especially those with cancer. With the popularity of precision medicine, the individual cancer therapeutic strategy has highlighted the requirement to develop a straightforward and competent strategy for deletion mutation determination. Hence, the present study is dedicated to develop a one-step assay to identify deletion mutation with sequence specificity for clinical practice. Taking advantage of loop-mediated isothermal amplification, an ultrasensitive and rapid deletion mutation determination method is established, which allow as low as 30 copies or 0.1% target variants under strong interferential background can be accurately distinguished in 30 min dispensing with professional operation and complex data interpretation. As a demonstration, the epidermal growth factor receptor p.E746-A750del, a crucial factor for the susceptibility of tyrosine kinase inhibitor in non-small-cell lung cancer treatment, has been accurately identified by this method with both cell lines and real clinical samples. By tailor-made primer set, this method can be extended for other deletion mutants, making it a molecular diagnostic tool and could be readily adapted for cancer diagnosis, therapy and prognosis in point of care diagnostic test scenario.

Immunocytochemistry of cytology specimens for predictive biomarkers in lung cancer

With a growing number of predictive biomarkers that have emerged in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), there has been a paradigm shift in the management of these patients. Of the various predictive biomarker testing methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most widely available, cost-effective, and commonly used methods. However, most predictive IHC assays are validated primarily on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) histologic tissue samples and translating these assays to cytologic specimens requires additional and rigorous validation. This is part due to the lack of standardized processing protocols in cytology resulting in a variety of preanalytic variables that can impact the antigenicity of antibodies used for predictive biomarker testing. The review article discusses the various preanalytical and analytical factors that impact immunocytochemistry (ICC) in cytologic specimens and summarizes the current published literature on ALK, ROS1, PD-L1, and other predictive biomarker ICC in cytology.

Analysis of EGFR mutation status in malignant pleural effusion and plasma from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Background

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is emerging as a surrogate sample type for mutation analyses. We investigated the suitability of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and plasma as a biomaterial for analyzing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation by peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping-assisted fluorescence melting curve (PANAMutyper™) analysis.

Methods

Matched tissue, MPE cell block (MPE-CB), MPE supernatant, and plasma samples were collected from patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who had a MPE at the time of diagnosis. EGFR mutation was assessed by PANAMutyper™.

Results

Mutation analyses in matched tumor tissues, MPE-CB, MPE supernatant, and/or plasma samples were available for 67 patients. In comparison with tumor tissue and MPE-CB, MPE supernatant exhibited 84.4% sensitivity, 97.1% specificity, 96.4% positive predictive value (PPV), and 87.2% negative predictive value (NPV). In the same comparison, plasma exhibited 70.6% sensitivity, 100.0% specificity, 100.0% PPV, and 73.7% NPV. When sorted by mutation type, MPE supernatant had better sensitivity than plasma for the detection of two major EGFR mutations: 93.8% vs. 75.0% for exon 19 deletion and 73.3% vs. 60.0% for L858R.

Conclusions

In this cohort of patients with MPEs, MPE supernatant demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared with plasma using a PNA-based real-time PCR method.

Comparison of next-generation sequencing and immunohistochemistry analysis for targeted therapy-related genomic status in lung cancer patients

Background

Some drugs that target molecular pathways are available for the targeted treatment of lung cancer. Multiple tests are needed to detect the status of the known molecular targets to determine whether the patients can respond to the drugs. An integrated platform for various gene alteration detection including both mutations and rearrangements is necessary for patients, especially those without enough tissue.

Methods

In our study, detections of EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangement, ROS1 rearrangement, and alterations of other nine important lung cancer-related genes were integrated into a single next-generation sequencing (NGS) platform. The NGS analysis was performed in 107 cases of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Meanwhile, hot spots such as EGFR L858R, EGFR E746-A750Del mutations and gene rearrangement of ALK and ROS1 were detected by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining.

Results

NGS could explore various gene mutations and gene rearrangements with a reduced experiment time and lower amounts of tumor tissues than multiple IHC staining experiments. NGS results were more informative and reliable than IHC staining for EGFR gene alterations, especially for the exon 19 region. NGS could also increase the positive rate of ALK rearrangement and decrease the false positive results of ROS1 rearrangements detected by IHC staining.

Conclusions

NGS is effective for confirmation the status of various important lung cancer-related gene alterations. Furthermore, NGS is necessary for the confirmation of the IHC results of ALK and ROS1 rearrangements.

Cytological-negative pleural effusion can be an alternative liquid biopsy media for detection of EGFR mutation in NSCLC patients

OBJECTIVE

Though the possibility of using malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) as alternatives for tumor tissues in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation test has been examined, the diagnosis of MPE is often clinically challenging, especially if the cytology is negative for malignancy. The aim of this study was to examine whether cytological-negative PE (CNPE) is useful in detecting EGFR mutation and evaluated its feasibility for predicting clinical outcomes.

METHOD

In this study, we performed capture-based targeted sequencing using a panel consisting of 520 lung cancer-related genes to detect EGFR mutation status in 121 MPEs and 40 CNPE samples from 161 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients. Patients underwent TKI treatment with gefitinib, icotinib or erlotinib if EGFR sensitizing mutations were detected at their tumor biopsies or pleural effusion sediment.

RESULTS

We revealed a mutation detection rate of 99.2% and 100% for MPE and CNPE, respectively (p = 1). The maximum allelic fraction (maxAF) of MPE and CNPE were 57.4% and 56.8%, respectively (p = 0.77). CNPE supernatant is comparable to MPE in reflecting the mutational profile of lung adenocarcinoma. EGFR activating mutations were detected in 47.5% (19/40) of CNPE supernatant sample and 32.5% (13/40) of matched tumor biopsies. CNPE sample is superior to tumor tissues in identifying EFGR mutation. Among the 72 EGFR-TKI treated patients, 51 were cytology positive and the remaining 21 were cytology negative. Our data showed that MPE patients exhibited comparable PFS (p = 0.41) and OS (p = 0.26) with CNPE patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Among the 21 CNPE patients received TKI treatment, patients harboring either L858R or exon 19 deletion had longer PFS than patients without a detectable mutation (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Collectively, we demonstrated that CNPE supernatant provided a comprehensive profile of NSCLC, and can serve as a reliable lipid biopsy media for EGFR mutational detection.

Comparison of PNA Clamping-assisted Fluorescence Melting Curve Analysis and PNA Clamping in Detecting EGFR Mutations in Matched Tumor Tissue, Cell Block, Pleural Effusion and Blood of Lung Cancer Patients With Malignant Pleural Effusion

BACKGROUND/AIM

This study compared the efficacy of PANAMutyper™, a novel technology that integrates PNAClamp™ and PANA S-Melting™, and PNAClamp™ alone for the detection of EGFR mutations in lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PANAMutyper™ and PNAClamp™ were used to assess the EGFR mutation status in tissue, cell block, pleural effusion, and blood samples of 90 lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion.

RESULTS

PANAMutyper™ detected more EGFR mutations than PNAClamp™, especially in body fluids (pleural effusion and serum). Patients with additional EGFR mutations detected using PANAMutyper™ had a favorable response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic performance of PANAMutyper™ was superior to that of PNAClamp™ for the detection of EGFR mutations. It was also better at identifying lung cancer patients with malignant pleural effusion who were likely to benefit from EGFR-TKI treatment.

Immunocytochemistry for predictive biomarker testing in lung cancer cytology

With an escalating number of predictive biomarkers emerging in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), immunohistochemistry (IHC) is being used as a rapid and cost-effective tool for the screening and detection of many of these markers. In particular, robust IHC assays performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue are widely used as surrogate markers for ALK and ROS1 rearrangements and for detecting programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in patients with advanced NSCLC; in addition, they have become essential for treatment decisions. Cytology samples represent the only source of tumor in a significant proportion of patients with inoperable NSCLC, and there is increasing demand for predictive biomarker testing on them. However, the wide variation in the types of cytology samples and their preparatory methods, the use of alcohol-based fixatives that interfere with immunochemistry results, the difficulty in procurement of cytology-specific controls, and the uncertainty regarding test validity have resulted in underutilization of cytology material for predictive immunocytochemistry (ICC), and most cytopathologists limit such testing to FFPE cell blocks (CBs). The purpose of this review is to: 1) analyze various preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical factors influencing ICC results; 2) discuss measures for validation of ICC protocols; and 3) summarize published data on predictive ICC for ALK, ROS1, EGFR gene alterations and PD-L1 expression on lung cancer cytology. Based on our experience and from a review of the literature, we conclude that cytology specimens are in principal suitable for predictive ICC, but proper optimization and rigorous quality control for high-quality staining are essential, particularly for non-CB preparations.

The Role of Ancillary Techniques in Pulmonary Cytopathology

Ancillary techniques play an essential role in pulmonary cytopathology. Immunoperoxidase and special stains are by far the most common ancillary techniques used in cytopathology; however, the role of molecular diagnosis is growing, especially in the fields of pulmonary oncology and infectious disease. In this article, we review the uses of ancillary techniques in lung tumor diagnosis, lung tumor classification, predictive marker determination, primary versus metastasis differential diagnosis, and infectious organism detection.

A Combined test using both cell sediment and supernatant cell-free DNA in pleural effusion shows increased sensitivity in detecting activating EGFR mutation in lung cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to examine whether a combined test using both cell sediment and supernatant cytology cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) is more useful in detecting EGFR mutation than using cell sediment DNA or supernatant ccfDNA alone in pleural effusion of lung cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 74 lung adenocarcinoma patients with paired samples between primary tumour and corresponding metastatic tumour with both cell sediment and supernatant ccfDNA of pleural effusion cytology were enrolled in this study. Cell sediment and supernatant ccfDNA were analysed separately for EGFR mutations by polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Out of 45 patients with mutant EGFR in primary tumours, EGFR mutations were detected in 23 cell sediments of corresponding metastases (sensitivity; 51.1%) and 20 supernatant ccfDNA corresponding metastases (sensitivity; 44.4%). By contrast, the combined test detected EGFR mutations in 27 corresponding metastases (sensitivity; 60.0%), and had a higher sensitivity than the cell sediment or the supernatant ccfDNA alone (P < .05). Out of 45 patients with mutant EGFR, 24, three and 18 were cytologically diagnosed as positive, atypical or negative, respectively. The detection rate in the combined test was highest (95.8%) in the positive group, and mutant EGFR was also detected in four of 18 samples (22.2%) in the negative group.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined test using both cell sediment DNA and supernatant ccfDNA samples increases the concordance rate of EGFR mutations between primary tumour and corresponding metastases. Our findings indicate that supernatant ccfDNA is useful even in cases where the cytological diagnosis is negative.

Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung adenocarcinoma cytological specimens by immunocytochemistry

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) improve the survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, and determine the EGFR mutation status before treatment is necessary. In contrast to biopsy samples, cytological specimens are obtained less invasively and are useful for EGFR mutation analyses. Recently, novel antibodies against two major EGFR mutations were developed: SP111, which is specific for the E746-A750 deletion in exon 19; and SP125, which is specific for the L858R mutation. To the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated cytological specimens using the two novel antibodies, thus their specificity and sensitivity were examined in surgical resection, and cytological lung adenocarcinoma samples in the present study. Previous screening for EGFR mutation status by molecular testing identified delE746-A750 in 3 cases and the L858R mutation in 7 cases; the other cases did not have the L858R or the delE746-A750 mutation. Using a four-grade scoring system (score 0 to 3+), the immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunocytochemistry (ICC) results were compared with those of molecular testing. Using a score of ≥2 as positive, IHC and ICC using SP111 demonstrated sensitivities of 100 and 33.3%, and specificities of 100 and 100%, respectively. IHC and ICC using SP125 revealed sensitivities of 100 and 71.4%, and specificities of 100 and 100%, respectively. Therefore, screening for EGFR mutations by ICC may facilitate therapeutic decision-making, particularly in medical centers that are unable to perform molecular testing.

Evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations based on mutation specific immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Studies have shown that immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation specific antibodies, is an easy and cost-effective, screening method compared with molecular techniques. The purpose of present study was to assess the percentage positivity of IHC using EGFR mutation specific antibodies in lung biopsy samples from patients with primary lung adenocarcinoma (ADC).

METHODS

Two hundred and six biopsies of primary lung ADC were subjected to EGFR mutation specific antibodies against del E746-A750 and L858R. Detection of EGFR mutation done by high resolution melting analysis (HRM) was used as gold standard. A concordance was established between molecular and IHC results. Frequency of IHC positivity was assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 206 patients, 129 were male and 77 were female patients, with a mean age of 54.1 yr. Fifty five (26.6%) patients (36 men; 19 women) showed positivity for IHC of del E746-A750 (33) and L858R (22). HRM results were available in 14 patients which showed EGFR mutations in correspondence with del E746-750 or L858R in 64.2 per cent cases. Positive cases on HRM were further confirmed by DNA sequencing and fragment analysis. Three patients showed exon[20] variation. Two cases were negative for mutation. The genotype of del E746-750 mutation was more common than L858R. A concordance was established between molecular mutation and IHC in 85.7 per cent cases.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study from India mutation specific IHC was used for assessment of mutation status of EGFR. Although the number tested was small, a good concordance was observed between molecular EGFR mutation and IHC expression. IHC methodology is a potentially useful tool to guide clinicians for personalized treatment in lung ADC, especially where facilities for molecular analysis are not readily available and for use in small biopsies where material is scant for molecular tests.

Cross-Platform Comparison of Four Leading Technologies for Detecting EGFR Mutations in Circulating Tumor DNA from Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Patient Plasma

Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is emerging as a powerful tool for guiding targeted therapy and monitoring tumor evolution in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially when representative tissue biopsies are not available. Here, we have compared the ability of four leading technology platforms to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletion, T790M and G719X) in ctDNA from NSCLC patients. Two amplification refractory mutation systems (cobas-ARMS and ADx-ARMS), a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) and a next-generation sequencing (Firefly NGS) platform were included in the comparison. Fifteen EGFR mutations across twenty NSCLC patients were identified. Firefly NGS, cobas-ARMS and ddPCR all displayed superior sensitivity while ADx-ARMS was better suited for the qualitative detection of EGFR mutations with allele frequency higher than 1% in plasma and tissue samples. We observed high coincidence between the plasma and tissue EGFR mutational profiles for three driver mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletion and G719X) that are known targets of first generation EGFR-TKI therapies among patients who relapsed. Discrepancies between tissue and plasma EGFR mutational profiles were mainly attributable to spatial and temporal tumor heterogeneity, mutation inhibition due to therapy response and drug resistance (T790M). This study illustrates the challenges associated with selection of a technology platform for EGFR ctDNA analysis in the context of treatment evaluation and drug resistance detection.

Immunohistochemistry for EGFR Mutation Detection in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry (IHC) was compared with the standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based method for detecting common activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Additionally, we evaluated predictive value of IHC EGFR mutation-positive status for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment outcome and estimated cost-effectiveness for the upfront IHC testing.

METHODS

The trial included 79 consecutive EGFR mutation-positive and 29 EGFR mutation-negative NSCLC cases diagnosed with reflex PCR-based testing. Two mutation-specific antibodies against the most common exon 19 deletion, namely E746-A750del (clone SP111) and L858R mutation (clone SP125) were tested by using automated immunostainer. Sixty of 79 EGFR mutation-positive cases were treated with EGFR TKIs for advanced disease and included in treatment outcome analysis. A decision tree was used for the cost-effectiveness analysis.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity and specificity of the IHC-based method compared with the PCR-based method were 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.6-91.6) and 100% (95% CI 85.4-100), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with IHC-positive EGFR mutation status were highly comparable to the total cohort (PFS: 14.3 vs. 14.0 months; OS: 34.4 vs. 34.4 months). The PCR and IHC cost ratio needs to be approximately 8-to-1 and 4-to-1 in White and Asian populations, respectively, to economically justify upfront use of IHC.

CONCLUSION

The trial confirmed an excellent specificity with fairly good sensitivity of IHC with mutation-specific antibodies for common EGFR mutations and the accuracy of IHC testing for predicting response to EGFR TKIs. The use of upfront IHC depends mainly on the population EGFR mutation positivity probability.

Lung Carcinoma Predictive Biomarker Testing by Immunoperoxidase Stains in Cytology and Small Biopsy Specimens: Advantages and Limitations

CONTEXT

- In the burgeoning era of molecular genomics, immunoperoxidase (IPOX) testing grows increasingly relevant as an efficient and effective molecular screening tool. Patients with lung carcinoma may especially benefit from the use of IPOX because most lung carcinomas are inoperable at diagnosis and only diagnosed by small tissue biopsy or fine-needle sampling. When such small specimens are at times inadequate for molecular testing, positive IPOX results still provide actionable information.

OBJECTIVE

- To describe the benefits and pitfalls of IPOX in the detection of biomarkers in lung carcinoma cytology specimens and small biopsies by summarizing the currently available commercial antibodies, preanalytic variables, and analytic considerations.

DATA SOURCES

- PubMed.

CONCLUSIONS

- Commercial antibodies exist for IPOX detection of aberrant protein expression due to EGFR L858R mutation, EGFR E746_A750 deletion, ALK rearrangement, ROS1 rearrangement, and BRAF V600E mutation, as well as PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Automated IPOX protocols for ALK and PD-L1 detection were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration as companion diagnostics for targeted therapies, but consistent interpretive criteria remain to be elucidated, and such protocols do not yet exist for other biomarkers. The inclusion of cytology specimens in clinical trials would expand patients' access to testing and treatment, yet there is a scarcity of clinical trial data regarding the application of IPOX to cytology, which can be attributed to trial designers' lack of familiarity with the advantages and limitations of cytology. The content of this review may be used to inform clinical trial design and advance IPOX validation studies.

Diamond: immunohistochemistry versus sequencing in EGFR analysis of lung adenocarcinomas

AIMS

Identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung adenocarcinomas is the single most important predictor of clinical response and outcome using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). EGFR E746-A750del and L858R mutations are the most common gene alterations, also predicting the best clinical response to TKIs. We evaluated the accuracy of EGFR mutation-specific antibodies in a large cohort of lung adenocarcinomas, with different molecular settings and types of tissue samples.

METHODS

300 lung adenocarcinomas diagnosed on cytology (48 cell blocks), biopsy (157 cases) and surgical resections (95 cases) were selected. All cases were investigated for EGFR by sequencing and two mutation-specific antibodies (clone 6B6 for E746-A750del; clone 43B2 for L858R) were tested using an automated immunostainer. Discordant results were investigated by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity and specificity of mutant-specific antibodies were 58.6% and 98.0%, respectively, and they increased up to 84% and 100% if only tumours harbouring E746-A750del were considered. In 13 discordant cases, NGS confirmed immunohistochemistry results in eight samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGFR mutation-specific antibodies have a fair/good sensitivity and good/high specificity in identifying classic mutations, but they cannot replace molecular tests. The antibodies work equally well on biopsies and cell blocks, possibly permitting a rapid screening in cases with poor material.

[Value of Cell Block in the Diagnosis of Malignant Pleural Effusion]

背景与目的  恶性胸腔积液(malignant pleural effusion, MPE)是由原发于胸膜的恶性肿瘤或者是转移至胸膜的恶性肿瘤造成的胸腔积液。对于不明原因的单侧胸腔积液, 首要任务是排除或者是确诊恶性胸腔积液。胸腔积液沉淀物是将送检胸腔积液细胞学剩余的胸腔积液进行离心或者是自然静置所获得的细胞块。此技术具有操作简单、有创性小、重复性高、对恶性胸腔积液的诊断率相对较高等特点, 在恶性胸腔积液的诊断、治疗等方面起着重要的作用。本文主要从沉淀物的制作方法、免疫组织化学染色检查的鉴别诊断价值、沉淀物的诊断优势及沉淀物行基因检测的临床应用价值等方面来论述胸腔积液沉淀物对恶性胸腔积液的诊断价值。

Comparison of EGFR mutation detection between the tissue and cytology using direct sequencing, pyrosequencing and peptide nucleic acid clamping in lung adenocarcinoma: Korean multicentre study

BACKGROUND

The importance of sensitive methods for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is emphasized. The aim of this study is to perform comparative and concordance analyses of direct sequencing, pyrosequencing and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) clamping for detecting EGFR gene mutations using archived tissue and cytology specimens.

METHODS

Samples from a total of 112 cases, which were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the lung at nine hospitals in Korea were collected. Using the above three methods, the concordance rates of EGFR mutations in exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 were analysed and validated in comparative tissue and cytology specimens.

RESULTS

Comparison of EGFR mutation detection between the tissue and cytology had a high concordance rate. The diagnostic performance of pyrosequencing and PNA clamping in tissue was higher than that of direct sequencing as well as cytology. Additionally, among some of the patients who had EGFR wild type by single method, EGFR mutations were detected by other methods. Cytology specimens had a diagnostic performance for the detection of EGFR mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytology specimens had a diagnostic performance for the detection of EGFR mutations that was comparable to that of tissues. For detecting EGFR mutations, pyrosequencing or PNA clamping was more sensitive than direct sequencing. In EGFR mutation negative patients who are difficult to obtain tissue, repeating test using pyrosequencing or PNA clamping is recommended to improve the detection rate of EGFR mutation than only one, especially in cytology.

Detection of EGFR-TK domain-activating mutations in NSCLC with generic PCR-based methods

Somatic mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) domain of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) influence the responsiveness of these tumors to EGFR-TK inhibitors, indicating their usefulness as a predictive molecular marker. However, for mutation analysis, the amount of clinical material available from NSCLC patients is often very limited, suboptimally preserved, and composed of both normal and tumor cells. As a consequence, the total amount of recovered DNA is frequently very limited, with mutant alleles being often strongly underrepresented, and thus requiring highly sensitive methods for the detection of mutations. In the present study, EGFR mutation screening was performed on 210 NSCLC clinical samples by heminested polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Candidate mutations were further characterized by sequencing. Seventeen different types of pathogenic EGFR-TK domain mutations were detected in 55 of the 210 samples (26%). We reanalyzed 149 of the 155 samples in which no mutation was found by real-time PCR for the presence of recurrent exon 21 and exon 19 mutations using peptide nucleic acid probes in the PCR mix to increase sensitivity by mutant allele enrichment. Four additional samples with exon 19 mutations were detected. Thus, it is found that the relatively simple and inexpensive PCR-DGGE assay is already very sensitive for the detection of mutations in clinical samples, including samples with low tumor cellularity (10% or higher tumor cell content), although the sensitivity and speed of the assay can be further increased for a restricted panel of mutations by introducing peptide nucleic acid probes in the DGGE or real-time PCR-based assay.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in cell-free DNA supernatant of bronchial washings and brushings

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to examine whether it would be possible to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in cytology cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) from the supernatant fluids of bronchial cytology samples.

METHODS

This study investigated cell damage via immunostaining with a cleaved caspase 3 antibody and the quantity of cell-free DNA in supernatant fluid from 2 cancer cell lines, and the EGFR mutation status was evaluated via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. EGFR mutations were also evaluated via PCR analysis in 74 clinical samples of ccfDNA from bronchial washing samples with physiological saline or from bronchial brushing liquid-based cytology samples with CytoRich Red.

RESULTS

The quantity and fragmentation of cell-free DNA in the supernatant fluid and the cell damage and cleaved caspase 3 expression in the sediment gradually increased in a time-dependent manner in the cell lines. In the 74 clinical samples, the quantity of ccfDNA extracted from the supernatant was adequate to perform the PCR assay, whereas the quality of ccfDNA in physiological saline was often decreased. The detection of EGFR mutations with ccfDNA showed a sensitivity of 88.0%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 89.7%, and an accuracy of 94.1% in samples with malignant or atypical cells.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that activating EGFR mutations can be detected with ccfDNA extracted from the supernatant fluid of liquid-based samples via a PCR assay. This could be a rapid and sensitive method for achieving a parallel diagnosis by both morphology and DNA analysis in non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Targeted therapies for patients with advanced NSCLC harboring wild-type EGFR: what's new and what's enough

Historically, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is divided into squamous and nonsquamous subtypes based on histologic features. With a growing number of oncogenic drivers being identified in squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, this malignancy has been recently divided into several distinct subtypes according to the specific molecular alterations. This new paradigm has substantially highlighted the treatment of advanced NSCLC, shifting it from standard chemotherapy according to specific histologic subtypes to targeted therapy according to specific oncogenic drivers. The application of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR mutations has been a representative model of precise medicine in the treatment of NSCLC. As the role of EGFR-TKIs in routine management of patients with advanced NSCLC has been well established, this review provides an overview of alternative targeted therapy in the treatment of NSCLC, including EGFR-TKIs for patients with wild-type EGFR NSCLC, as well as other targeted agents either clinical available or in early- to late-stage development.

EGFR testing and the CAP/IASLC/AMP lung cancer biomarker testing guidelines: knowledge gaps and future directions

SUMMARY 

Developments in predictive molecular testing and personalized therapy of lung cancer have recently called for a major change in the histological and cytological activity requiring the pathologist to strictly connect with pulmonologists, oncologists and molecular biologists to improve patient management. Different clinical trials established that tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy is superior to chemotherapy, when patients harbor EGFR mutations. Similarly, the patients whose lung carcinoma carries ALK fusion genes consistently respond to ALK inhibitors. These improvements have led to the understanding that the morphological diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma requires a multidisciplinary approach; even more recently the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Association for Molecular Pathology encouraged to develop international guidelines for lung cancer biomarker testing. This paper summarizes the practical impact of these guidelines, focusing on the pathologist's role in daily EGFR testing practice.

Identification of EGFR Mutations by Immunohistochemistry with EGFR Mutation-Specific Antibodies in Biopsy and Resection Specimens from Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma

Purpose

Mutation-specific antibodies have recently been developed for identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations by immunohistochemistry (IHC). This study was designed to investigate whether the type of specimen (biopsy vs. resection) would make a difference in determining mutation status by IHC, and to evaluate whether biopsies are suitable for detection of mutant EGFR protein.

Materials and Methods

IHC was performed using mutation-specific antibodies for E746-A750 deletion (DEL) and L858R point mutation (L858R) in biopsies and tissue microarrays of resected tumors from 154 patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Results were then compared with DNA sequencing data.

Results

Molecular-based assays detected EGFR mutations in 62 patients (40.3%), including 14 (9.1%) with DEL, and 31 (20.1%) with L858R. IHC with two mutation-specific antibodies showed a homogeneous staining pattern, and correctly identified EGFR mutation status in 89% (137/154). Overall (biopsy/resection) sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 75.6% (78.3%/72.7%), 94.5% (90.9%/96.3%), 85% (78.3%/88.9%), and 90.4% (90.9%/89.7%), respectively.

Conclusion

Our data showed that IHC using EGFR mutation–specific antibodies is useful for detection of EGFR mutations with high specificity and good sensitivity not only for resection specimens but also for biopsy materials. Therefore, IHC using EGFR mutation–specific antibodies may preclude a second biopsy procedure to obtain additional tissues for identification of EGFR mutations by molecular assays in biopsies from advanced cancer, particularly when tumor cells in the samples are limited.

An analysis of the prognostic value of IDH1 (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1) mutation in Polish glioma patients

Background and Objective

IDH1 (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1) is a potential biomarker and drug target. Genomic and epigenetic data on astrocytoma have demonstrated that the IDH1 mutation is sufficient to establish the glioma hypermethylator phenotype. Furthermore, recent studies have also indicated that a mutant IDH1 inhibitor induced demethylation of histone H3K9me3 and expression of genes associated with gliogenic differentiation. As the presence of the p.R132H mutation in the IDH1 gene seems to be a more powerful prognostic marker than O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter status, we evaluated the presence of IDH1 mutation in Polish patients with astrocytoma, glioblastoma, oligoastrocytoma, ganglioglioma, oligodendroglioma, and ependymoma.

Methods

The IDH1 mutation status at codon 132 was determined using a mouse monoclonal antibody specific for the R132H mutation, direct sequencing, and Co-amplification at Lower Denaturation Temperature (COLD) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) high-resolution melting-curve analysis (HRM).

Results

Wild-type (WT) IDH1 was detected in cases with a World Health Organization (WHO) grade I astrocytoma. The IDH1 c.G395A; p.R132H mutation was observed in 56 and 94 % of grade II and grade III astrocytoma cases, respectively. Significant differences in the median overall survival were observed in astrocytoma patients grouped on the basis of the presence of IDH1 mutation: survival was 24 months longer in grade II astrocytoma and 12 months longer in glioblastoma. Overall survival was compared between grade II astrocytoma patients with low or high expression of the mutant protein. Interestingly, lower R132H expression correlated with better overall survival.

Conclusion

Our results indicate the usefulness of assessing the R132H IDH1 mutation in glioma patients: the presence or absence of the R132H mutation can help pathologists to distinguish pilocytic astrocytomas (IDH1 WT) from diffuse ones (R132H IDH1/WT). Moreover, low IDH1 p.R132H expression was related to better prognosis. This clinical implication appears to be important for personalization of prognosis and treatment by oncologists.

The role of molecular analyses in the diagnosis and treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinomas

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtyping has recently been a key factor in determining patient management with novel drugs. In addition, the identification of distinct oncogenic driver mutations frequently associated with NSCLC histotype and coupled to the clinical responses to targeted therapies have revolutionized the impact of histologic type and molecular biomarkers in lung cancer. Several molecular alterations involving different genes (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, BRAF, and HER2) seem to have a remarkable predilection for adenocarcinoma and specific inhibitors of EGFR and ALK are now available for patients with adenocarcinoma harboring the relevant gene alterations. The efficacy of histology-based and molecular-targeted therapies had a deep impact in (1) re-defining classification of lung cancer (particularly adenocarcinomas) and (2) routine clinical practice of pathologists involved in optimization of handling of tissue samples in order to guarantee NSCLC subtyping with the help of immunohistochemistry and adequately preserve tumor cells for molecular analysis. In agreement with the modern multidisciplinary approach to lung cancer, we reviewed here the diagnostic and predictive value of molecular biomarkers according to the clinical, pathologic, and molecular biologist viewpoints.

Fixation effect of SurePath preservative fluids using epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-specific antibodies for immunocytochemistry

BACKGROUND

Cytological diagnosis of respiratory disease has become important, not only for histological typing using immunocytochemistry (ICC) but also for molecular DNA analysis of cytological material. The aim of this study was to investigate the fixation effect of SurePath preservative fluids.

METHODS

Human lung cancer PC9 and 11-18 cell lines, and lung adenocarcinoma cells in pleural effusion, were fixed in CytoRich Blue, CytoRich Red, 15% neutral-buffered formalin, and 95% ethanol, respectively. PC9 and 11-18 cell lines were examined by ICC with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-specific antibodies, the EGFR mutation DNA assay, and fluorescence in situ hybridization. The effect of antigenic storage time was investigated in lung adenocarcinoma cells in pleural effusion by ICC using the lung cancer detection markers.

RESULTS

PC9 and 11-18 cell lines in formalin-based fixatives showed strong staining of EGFR mutation-specific antibodies and lung cancer detection markers by ICC as compared with ethanol-based fixatives. DNA preservation with CytoRich Blue and CytoRich Red was superior to that achieved with 95% ethanol and 15% neutral-buffered formalin fixatives, whereas EGFR mutations by DNA assay and EGFR gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization were successfully identified in all fixative samples. Although cytoplasmic antigens maintained high expression levels, expression levels in nuclear antigens fell as storage time increased.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that CytoRich Red is not only suitable for ICC with EGFR mutation-specific antibodies, but also for DNA analysis of cytological material, and is useful in molecular testing of lung cancer, for which various types of analyses will be needed in future.

Molecular alterations of EGFR in small intestinal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Molecular testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations has recently become a standard practice for the management of patients with non-squamous none small cell lung cancer. Primary small intestine adenocarcinoma (SIA) is an uncommon malignancy, and EGFR mutation in the cancer has not been well characterized due to its rarity.

METHODS

A micro-tissue array with 53 SIAs and 24 surgically resected primary non-ampullary SIAs were studied. EGFR mutations were analyzed by DNA sequencing in 24 cases with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks. All 77 cases were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using antibodies specific for the EGFR E746-A750 deletion in exon 19 (DEL), L858R point mutation in exon 21 (L858R), and total EGFR. EGFR amplifications were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

A positive reaction of DEL-specific, L858R-specific, and total EGFR antibodies was detected in seven (9.1%), 5 (6.5%) and 35 (45.5%) of 77 SIAs by IHC, respectively. Positive reaction of the three antibodies was not significantly correlated with patient's age, gender, differentiation, and stage. EGFR gene amplification was assayed in 77 SIAs in micro-tissue array. Of 24 SIA samples that had DNA sequencing, two (8.3%) harbored exon 19 deletion and one (4.2%) harbored L858R point mutation. Only one case with EGFR amplification and two cases with polysomy were shown.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that mutations and amplification in EGFR genes are minor events, and most of SIAs may be unsuitable to EGFR-TKIs treatment.

Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology

OBJECTIVE

To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed.

PARTICIPANTS

Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies.

EVIDENCE

Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture published articles from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. EVIDENCE was formally graded for each recommendation.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.

Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology

OBJECTIVE

To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed.

PARTICIPANTS

Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies.

EVIDENCE

Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.

Application of PCR methods to evaluate EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutations in a small number of tumor cells in cytological material from lung cancer patients

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status in the tyrosine kinase domain is known to be a predictor of the response to gefitinib or erlotinib in lung cancer; thus, a non-surgical procedure of tumor specimen collection is critical for mutation analysis. The aim of the present study was to analyze the EGFR, KRAS and BRAF status in limited cytological material. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that the quantitative scale of tumor cells and the percentage of tumor cells in cytological material were evaluated at the early stages of pathomorphological material qualification for EGFR, KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis. Our results revealed that even 100-1,000 tumor cells from fine needle aspiration (FNA) samples provided reliable results of mutation analysis when sensitive real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods were used. EGFR mutations were detected in 10% (7/71) and KRAS mutations were detected in 35% (19/54) of the lung adenocarcinoma cases. In addition, we reported the most common inhibiting mutation (p.T790M) found in coexistence with p.L858R in an FNA sample from a patient, for whom short-term improvement after erlotinib treatment was observed before further progression of the disease. Subsequently, mutual exclusion of EGFR and KRAS mutations was observed. Cytological samples with a small number of tumor cells obtained via FNA, endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) or brushing are suggested to be used for diagnostic purposes after careful selection by cytopathologists and analysis using a validated, sensitive real-time PCR method.

EGFR mutant-specific immunohistochemistry has high specificity and sensitivity for detecting targeted activating EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma

AIM

We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant-specific antibodies for detecting two common activating EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical expression of mutation-specific antibodies against EGFR exon 19 deletion E746-A750 ((c.2235_2249del15 or c.2236_2250del15, p. Glu746_Ala750del) and exon 21 L858R point mutation (c.2573T>G, p.Leu858Arg) were assessed in a cohort of 204 resected early stage node negative lung adenocarcinomas, and protein expression was compared with DNA analysis results from mass spectrometry analysis.

RESULTS

Of seven cases with L858R point mutation, six were positive by immunohistochemistry (IHC). There were three false positive cases using L858R IHC (sensitivity 85.7%, specificity 98.5%, positive predictive value 66.7%, negative predictive value 99.5%). All seven E746-A750 exon 19 deletions identified by mutation analysis were positive by IHC. Four additional cases were positive for exon 19 IHC but negative by mutation analysis. The sensitivity of exon 19 IHC for E746-A750 was 100%, specificity 98.0%, positive predictive value 63.6% and negative predictive value 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Mutant-specific EGFR IHC has good specificity and sensitivity for identifying targeted activating EGFR mutations. Although inferior to molecular genetic analysis of the EGFR gene, IHC is highly specific and sensitive for the targeted EGFR mutations. The antibodies are likely to be of clinical value in cases where limited tumour material is available, or in situations where molecular genetic analysis is not readily available.

Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology

OBJECTIVE

To establish evidence-based recommendations for the molecular analysis of lung cancers that are required to guide EGFR- and ALK-directed therapies, addressing which patients and samples should be tested, and when and how testing should be performed.

PARTICIPANTS

Three cochairs without conflicts of interest were selected, one from each of the 3 sponsoring professional societies: College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. Writing and advisory panels were constituted from additional experts from these societies.

EVIDENCE

Three unbiased literature searches of electronic databases were performed to capture articles published from January 2004 through February 2012, yielding 1533 articles whose abstracts were screened to identify 521 pertinent articles that were then reviewed in detail for their relevance to the recommendations. Evidence was formally graded for each recommendation.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

Initial recommendations were formulated by the cochairs and panel members at a public meeting. Each guideline section was assigned to at least 2 panelists. Drafts were circulated to the writing panel (version 1), advisory panel (version 2), and the public (version 3) before submission (version 4).

CONCLUSIONS

The 37 guideline items address 14 subjects, including 15 recommendations (evidence grade A/B). The major recommendations are to use testing for EGFR mutations and ALK fusions to guide patient selection for therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, respectively, in all patients with advanced-stage adenocarcinoma, regardless of sex, race, smoking history, or other clinical risk factors, and to prioritize EGFR and ALK testing over other molecular predictive tests. As scientific discoveries and clinical practice outpace the completion of randomized clinical trials, evidence-based guidelines developed by expert practitioners are vital for communicating emerging clinical standards. Already, new treatments targeting genetic alterations in other, less common driver oncogenes are being evaluated in lung cancer, and testing for these may be addressed in future versions of these guidelines.

Detection and comparison of EGFR mutations in matched tumor tissues, cell blocks, pleural effusions, and sera from patients with NSCLC with malignant pleural effusion, by PNA clamping and direct sequencing

Peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated real-time PCR clamping has higher sensitivity than conventional direct sequencing for detecting mutations. Pleural effusion and serum may provide good samples in which to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We studied 37 NSCLC patients with malignant pleural effusion. EGFR mutations were assessed by PNA clamping and direct sequencing using tumor tissues, cell blocks, pleural effusion, and serum. Concordance between PNA clamping and direct sequencing results, and the diagnostic performance of pleural effusion were investigated. The κ coefficients for the two methods were 0.68 (p = 0.0007), 0.91 (p < 0.0001), 0.75 (p < 0.0001) and -0.01 (p = 0.8639) for tissues, cell blocks, pleural effusion, and serum, respectively. The diagnostic performance of pleural effusion compared with the combination of tumor tissue and cell blocks showed 89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 95% by PNA clamping, and 67% sensitivity, 90% specificity, positive predictive value of 75%, and negative predictive value of 86% by directing sequencing. A patient in whom an EGFR mutation was identified in pleural effusion only by PNA clamping showed a significant response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment. In contrast to the limited role of serum samples, pleural effusion had a diagnostic performance for the detection of EGFR mutations in NSCLC that was comparable to that of tumor tissues and cell blocks. The diagnostic performance of PNA clamping was good compared with that of direct sequencing. A more sensitive and accurate detection of EGFR mutations would benefit patients by allowing a better prediction of the response to EGFR-TKI treatment.

Ascertaining an appropriate diagnostic algorithm using EGFR mutation-specific antibodies to detect EGFR status in non-small-cell lung cancer

Background

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is the most valuable indicator in the screening of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Accurate, rapid and economical methods of detecting EGFR mutations have become important. The use of two mutation-specific antibodies targeting the delE746-A750 mutation in exon 19 and L858R mutation in exon 21 makes this task possible, but the lack of consensually acceptable criteria for positive results limits the application of this antibody based mutation detection.

Methods

We collected 399 specimens from NSCLC patients (145 resection specimens, 220 biopsy specimens, and 34 cytology specimens) whose EGFR mutation status had been detected by TaqMan PCR assay. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses using EGFR mutation-specific antibodies were employed for all samples. After staining and scoring, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated in accordance with different levels of positive grades in comparison with the results of PCR-based assay.

Results

In IHC-based analyses, 144 cases were scored 0, 104 cases were scored 1+, 103 cases were scored 2+, and 48 cases were scored 3+. With the molecular-based results were set as the “gold standard”, the prevalence of mutation was 6.94% (10/144), 23.08% (24/104), 67.96% (70/103) and 100% (48/48), respectively, for samples with scores 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+. When score 3+ was considered positive, the specificity and PPV were 100%; if only score 0 was considered negative, 93.06% NPV was obtained.

Conclusion

Patients with score 3+ have a perfect PPV (100%), and may accept TKI treatment directly without any molecular-based assays. Patients with score 0 had high NPV (93.06%), which could reach 97.22% when the detection of total EGFR was applied. However, samples with score 1+ or 2+ are unreliable and need further verification of EGFR mutation status by molecular-based assays.

Negative NKX2-1 (TTF-1) as temporary surrogate marker for treatment selection during EGFR-mutation analysis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In the past decade, major progress has been made toward personalized medical treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through the discovery of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. However, mutation analysis takes extra time and additional costs in the diagnostic evaluation of lung cancer patients. It has been hypothesized that EGFR mutations are restricted to terminal respiratory unit -type adenocarcinoma expressing thyroid transcription factor-1 (official symbol NKX2-1) as determined by immunohistochemistry. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the potential of NKX2-1 immunohistochemistry as a prescreening test for EGFR mutation analysis.

METHODS

From 2004 to December 2010, 810 consecutive NSCLC tumor specimens were tested for EGFR mutations in a routine diagnostic procedure. Immunohistochemistry for NKX2-1 was performed (clone 8G7G3/1 [Dako]) and the results were compared with tumor EGFR-mutation status and clinicopathological characteristics.

RESULTS

EGFR mutations were detected in 114 specimens (14%). NKX2-1 expression was present in 68%. In the cases with EGFR mutation, NKX2-1 staining was positive in 92%. NKX2-1 immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was significantly associated with the presence of EGFR mutations (p = 5.3×10). NKX2-1 increased the negative predictive value in NSCLC to more than 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of a negative NKX2-1 IHC staining, and only if clinically urgent, the high negative predictive value of more than 95% for EGFR mutations is a suitable temporary surrogate marker for the choice of starting with chemotherapy. In case of positive NKX2-1 IHC, the best strategy is to wait for the outcome of EGFR-mutation analysis and then choose the appropriate treatment.

Effective assessment of egfr mutation status in bronchoalveolar lavage and pleural fluids by next-generation sequencing

PURPOSE

The therapeutic choice for patients with lung adenocarcinoma depends on the presence of EGF receptor (EGFR) mutations. In many cases, only cytologic samples are available for molecular diagnosis. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and pleural fluid, which represent a considerable proportion of cytologic specimens, cannot always be used for molecular testing because of low rate of tumor cells.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We tested the feasibility of EGFR mutation analysis on BAL and pleural fluid samples by next-generation sequencing (NGS), an innovative and extremely sensitive platform. The study was devised to extend the EGFR test to those patients who could not get it due to the paucity of biologic material. A series of 830 lung cytology specimens was used to select 48 samples (BAL and pleural fluid) from patients with EGFR mutations in resected tumors. These samples included 36 cases with 0.3% to 9% of neoplastic cells (series A) and 12 cases without evidence of tumor (series B). All samples were analyzed by Sanger sequencing and NGS on 454 Roche platform. A mean of 21,130 ± 2,370 sequences per sample were obtained by NGS.

RESULTS

In series A, EGFR mutations were detected in 16% of cases by Sanger sequencing and in 81% of cases by NGS. Seventy-seven percent of cases found to be negative by Sanger sequencing showed mutations by NGS. In series B, all samples were negative for EGFR mutation by Sanger sequencing whereas 42% of them were positive by NGS.

CONCLUSIONS

The very sensitive EGFR-NGS assay may open up to the possibility of specific treatments for patients otherwise doomed to re-biopsies or nontargeted therapies.

EGFR mutation testing in lung cancer: a review of available methods and their use for analysis of tumour tissue and cytology samples

Aims

Activating mutations in the gene encoding epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) can confer sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Testing for mutations in EGFR is therefore an important step in the treatment-decision pathway. We reviewed reported methods for EGFR mutation testing in patients with lung cancer, initially focusing on studies involving standard tumour tissue samples. We also evaluated data on the use of cytology samples in order to determine their suitability for EGFR mutation analysis.

Methods

We searched the MEDLINE database for studies reporting on EGFR mutation testing methods in patients with lung cancer.

Results

Various methods have been investigated as potential alternatives to the historical standard for EGFR mutation testing, direct DNA sequencing. Many of these are targeted methods that specifically detect the most common EGFR mutations. The development of targeted mutation testing methods and commercially available test kits has enabled sensitive, rapid and robust analysis of clinical samples. The use of screening methods, subsequent to sample micro dissection, has also ensured that identification of more rare, uncommon mutations is now feasible. Cytology samples including fine needle aspirate and pleural effusion can be used successfully to determine EGFR mutation status provided that sensitive testing methods are employed.

Conclusions

Several different testing methods offer a more sensitive alternative to direct sequencing for the detection of common EGFR mutations. Evidence published to date suggests cytology samples are viable alternatives for mutation testing when tumour tissue samples are not available.

EGFR mutation-specific antibodies in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a comparison with DNA direct sequencing

INTRODUCTION

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations are usually detected by direct sequencing to identify patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinomas as candidates for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of EGFR mutation-specific antibodies in identifying EGFR-mutated adenocarcinomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive cases of pulmonary adenocarcinomas sequenced for EGFR mutations were retrieved from our files. Immunohistochemistry was performed with the rabbit monoclonal antibodies E746-A750del (6B6) and L858R (43B2). The results obtained using the 2 procedures were statistically compared by Coehn κ and by calculation of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

There were 21 women and 12 men, ranging in age from 48 to 78 years. All cases were lung adenocarcinomas, 23 primaries and 10 metastatic. The mutational spectrum was as follows: 12 cases mutated in exon 19 (9 with E746-A750del, 1 with homozygote L747-T751del, 1 with L747-P753del, 1 with E747-S752del), 6 in exon 21 (5 with L858R, 1 with L861Q+L862L), and 15 EGFR wild type. Immunohistochemistry detected 6/9 cases with an E746-A750del mutation (κ=0.744, sensitivity: 66.7%, specificity: 100%) and 5/5 cases with an L858R mutation (κ=1, sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 100%). Four cases showed faint and focal immunostaining and were interpreted as negative. All other cases were negative. Overall, the 2 antibodies had 61.1% sensitivity and 100% specificity for EGFR mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR mutation-specific antibodies may represent a first-line screening tool to identify patients as candidates for tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Loss of activating EGFR mutant gene contributes to acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in lung cancer cells

Non-small-cell lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations attains a meaningful response to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs could affect long-term outcome in almost all patients. To identify the potential mechanisms of resistance, we established cell lines resistant to EGFR-TKIs from the human lung cancer cell lines PC9 and11–18, which harbored activating EGFR mutations. One erlotinib-resistant cell line from PC9 and two erlotinib-resistant cell lines and two gefitinib-resistant cell lines from 11–18 were independently established. Almost complete loss of mutant delE746-A750 EGFR gene was observed in the erlotinib-resistant cells isolated from PC9, and partial loss of the mutant L858R EGFR gene copy was specifically observed in the erlotinib- and gefitinib-resistant cells from 11–18. However, constitutive activation of EGFR downstream signaling, PI3K/Akt, was observed even after loss of the mutated EGFR gene in all resistant cell lines even in the presence of the drug. In the erlotinib-resistant cells from PC9, constitutive PI3K/Akt activation was effectively inhibited by lapatinib (a dual TKI of EGFR and HER2) or BIBW2992 (pan-TKI of EGFR family proteins). Furthermore, erlotinib with either HER2 or HER3 knockdown by their cognate siRNAs also inhibited PI3K/Akt activation. Transfection of activating mutant EGFR complementary DNA restored drug sensitivity in the erlotinib-resistant cell line. Our study indicates that loss of addiction to mutant EGFR resulted in gain of addiction to both HER2/HER3 and PI3K/Akt signaling to acquire EGFR-TKI resistance.

Use of mutation specific antibodies to detect EGFR status in small biopsy and cytology specimens of lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

EGFR mutation status is the best predictor of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIS) in primary lung adenocarcinoma. Approximately 70% of lung cancers are diagnosed in advanced stages where small biopsies and cytological specimens are the only source of material for both diagnosis and mutation testing. Specific antibodies that can detect mutant EGFR protein were evaluated for the detection of EGFR mutation by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in cytology and small biopsy specimens.

METHODS

Assessment of EGFR mutation status was performed by using antibodies specific to the two major forms of mutant EGFR, exon 21 L858R and exon 19 deletion (15bp). The study was performed in 145 lung adenocarcinomas, including cytology material, core biopsy, and decalcified bone biopsy. Stains were scored as negative (0), 1+ (weak and focal), 2+ (moderate intensity and focal), and 3+ (strong and diffuse). The result of the IHC stains was correlated with mutations status determined by standard molecular methods.

RESULTS

Validation using clinical material showed deletions in exon 19 were detected in 35% and L858R mutation in 17.6% of all cases by standard molecular methods. A cutoff value of 2+ was used as positive by IHC. No wild type cases were immunoreactive. The positive predictive value (PPV) and specificity for both antibodies was 100%. The antibodies performed well in cytology, core biopsies and decalcified bone biopsies.

CONCLUSION

Immunostaining to detect specific mutant EGFR shows a good correlation with mutation analysis and can be used as a screening method to identify patients for TKI therapy. IHC methodology is potentially useful when molecular analysis is not available and for use in small biopsies when material is too scant for molecular tests. Importantly mutation specific antibodies are useful in determining EGFR status in tissues obtained from bone biopsy as decalcification processes used in molecular based studies often result in DNA degradation hindering mutation detection.