Pemetrexed, oxaliplatin and bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer

The Efficacy of Drug-eluting Bead Transarterial Chemoembolization Loaded With Oxaliplatin for the Treatment of Stage III-IV Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the safety and efficacy of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) loaded with oxaliplatin for stage III-IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From October 2018 to May 2021, a total of 31 patients with stage III-IV NSCLC received DEB-TACE loaded with oxaliplatin. Demographic characteristics, adverse events (AEs), and treatment responses were collected. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

All 31 patients successfully received DEB-TACE loaded with oxaliplatin. No procedure-related severe adverse events occurred. Hemoptysis symptoms presented in 8 patients but disappeared within 1-3 days. After DEB-TACE for 1, 2, and 6 months, the objective response rate (ORR) was 42%, 35%, and 26%, while the disease control rate (DCR) was 90%, 84% and 61%, respectively. The median PFS was 7 months (range 1-31 months), and the PFS rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 87%, 71% and 29%, respectively. The median OS was 11 months (range 1-31 months), with OS rates of 87%, 77%, and 39% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin-loaded DEB-TACE is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for patients with advanced refractory non-small-cell lung cancer.

Progress in Research on Tumor Metastasis Inhibitors

Tumor metastasis is a significant cause of malignant cancer-related death. Therefore, inhibiting tumor metastasis is an effective means of treating malignant tumors. Increasing our understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern tumor metastasis can reveal new anti-cancer targets. This article will discuss the breakthroughs in this area and the corresponding recent developments in anti-cancer drug discovery.

Acquired resistance to oxaliplatin is not directly associated with increased resistance to DNA damage in SK-N-ASrOXALI4000, a newly established oxaliplatin-resistant sub-line of the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-AS

The formation of acquired drug resistance is a major reason for the failure of anti-cancer therapies after initial response. Here, we introduce a novel model of acquired oxaliplatin resistance, a sub-line of the non-MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-AS that was adapted to growth in the presence of 4000 ng/mL oxaliplatin (SK-N-AS^rOXALI⁴⁰⁰⁰). SK-N-AS^rOXALI⁴⁰⁰⁰ cells displayed enhanced chromosomal aberrations compared to SK-N-AS, as indicated by 24-chromosome fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Moreover, SK-N-AS^rOXALI⁴⁰⁰⁰ cells were resistant not only to oxaliplatin but also to the two other commonly used anti-cancer platinum agents cisplatin and carboplatin. SK-N-AS^rOXALI⁴⁰⁰⁰ cells exhibited a stable resistance phenotype that was not affected by culturing the cells for 10 weeks in the absence of oxaliplatin. Interestingly, SK-N-AS^rOXALI⁴⁰⁰⁰ cells showed no cross resistance to gemcitabine and increased sensitivity to doxorubicin and UVC radiation, alternative treatments that like platinum drugs target DNA integrity. Notably, UVC-induced DNA damage is thought to be predominantly repaired by nucleotide excision repair and nucleotide excision repair has been described as the main oxaliplatin-induced DNA damage repair system. SK-N-AS^rOXALI⁴⁰⁰⁰ cells were also more sensitive to lysis by influenza A virus, a candidate for oncolytic therapy, than SK-N-AS cells. In conclusion, we introduce a novel oxaliplatin resistance model. The oxaliplatin resistance mechanisms in SK-N-AS^rOXALI⁴⁰⁰⁰ cells appear to be complex and not to directly depend on enhanced DNA repair capacity. Models of oxaliplatin resistance are of particular relevance since research on platinum drugs has so far predominantly focused on cisplatin and carboplatin.

Efficacy of cisplatin/pemetrexed with bevacizumab to treat advanced lung adenocarcinoma with different drive genes: case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy has become the first-line therapy in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few studies have focused on cisplatin/pemetrexed with bevacizumab as the first-line therapy to treat advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. Importantly, whether the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements can influence the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is very interesting. Herein, we report three cases with different types of gene drives in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

CASE PRESENTATION

In the first case, a patient presented with wild-type EGFR and negative ALK rearrangement. In the second case, a patient presented with wild-type EGFR and positive ALK rearrangement. In the third case, a patient presented with negative ALK rearrangement and mutated EGFR in exon 19.

CONCLUSION

We speculate that bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin/pemetrexed as the first-line therapy is well tolerated and results in a clinically meaningful treatment benefit, irrespective of the gene drive type in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. However, more data are needed to confirm the relationship.

Pemetrexed With Platinum Combination as a Backbone for Targeted Therapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Standard platinum-based chemotherapy combinations for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have reached a plateau in terms of the survival benefit they offer for patients. In addition, the emerging clinical trend of tailored treatment based on patient characteristics has led to the development of therapeutic strategies that target specific cancer-related molecular pathways, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), angiogenesis, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors. Current research is focused on combining targeted therapy with platinum-based chemotherapy in an endeavor to achieve an additional benefit in specific patient populations. Currently, pemetrexed is indicated for use in the first-line, maintenance, and second-line settings for the treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC. The combination of pemetrexed and cisplatin is well tolerated and is the approved standard first-line therapy. Thus, the pemetrexed-platinum backbone provides an attractive option for combination with targeted therapies. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge and future prospects of the use of pemetrexed-platinum as a backbone for combination with targeted therapies for NSCLC.

Safety profile of combined therapy inhibiting EFGR and VEGF pathways in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of 15 phase II/III randomized trials

The efficacy of combined vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was well studied. However, few studies focused on the risk and adverse events (AEs) of combined targeted therapy. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety profile of combined targeted therapy against EFGR and VEGF in patients with advanced NSCLC. A comprehensive literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ASCO Abstracts and ESMO Abstracts was conducted. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared safety profile of combined therapy inhibiting EFGR and VEGF pathways with control groups (placebo, single EGFR or VEGF inhibition therapy, chemotherapy or a combination of them) in patients with advanced NSCLC. The endpoints included treatment discontinuation, treatment-related deaths and AEs. The search identified 15 RCTs involving 6,919 patients. The outcomes showed that three of four pairwise comparisons detected more discontinuation due to AEs in combined targeted therapy, with odds ratio (OR) compared with the control groups ranged from 1.97 to 2.29. Treatment with combined inhibition therapy was associated with several all-grade and grade 3 or 4 AEs (e.g. rash, diarrhea and hypertension). Also, there was a significantly higher incidence of treatment-related deaths in combined inhibition using vandetanib versus single EGFR inhibition therapy (OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.19-3.28). In conclusion, combined inhibition therapy against EGFR and VEGF in patients with advanced NSCLC was associated with increased toxicity. Increased AEs hinder patient compliance and reduce their quality of life, leading to dose reduction or discontinuation.

Phase II study of carboplatin, docetaxel and bevacizumab for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate a 3-drug combination of carboplatin, docetaxel and bevacizumab as a front-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC), a single arm phase II study was conducted.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrent non-squamous NSCLC were treated with carboplatin (targeted area under the curve of 6 mg h/L), docetaxel (60 mg/m(2)), and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks for 4 to 6 cycles, followed by maintenance with bevacizumab every 3 weeks until disease progression or occurrence of predefined toxicity. The planned patient number was 40, and the primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) as assessed by independent reviewers.

RESULTS

One patient refused the treatment after enrollment; thus, 39 patients were treated and analyzed. The 3-drug therapy was delivered for a median of 4 cycles, and 54 % of the patients proceeded to the maintenance therapy for a median of 4 cycles. The overall response rate was 74.4 % (29/39), with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) of 60.0 to 88.7 %. The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 6.2 months (95 % CI, 4.8-8.5 months) and 22.4 months (95 % CI, 11.3-26.2 months), respectively. Toxicities of grade 3 or higher included neutropenia in 71.8 %, febrile neutropenia in 23.1 %, and hypertension in 38.5 % of the patients, but they were transient and manageable.

CONCLUSION

The primary endpoint was met. The regimen yielded promising results with an excellent overall response rate, PFS, and OS for chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC. Further studies are warranted.

Pemetrexed plus dendritic cells as second-line treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer who had treatment with TKI

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of pemetrexed plus dendritic cells (DCs) in patients suffering from stage IIIB or IV lung adenocarcinoma, who had undergone maintenance treatment with gefitinib or erlotinib. Patients who had failed gefitinib or erlotinib maintenance treatment had ECOG performance statuses ranging from 0 to 2.27 patients received pemetrexed plus DCs as second-line treatment. Dosage: 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed was administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. DCs were given for one cycle of 21 days. Three patients (11.1 %) experienced a partial response and 14 patients (51.9 %) showed stable disease. Ten patients (37.0 %) had progressive disease. The median time to progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.8 months [95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.4-5.2], and the median overall survival was 10.7 months (95 % CI 10.3-11.2). In the subgroup analysis, PFS had a significant difference between the low ratio of CD4/CD8 and normal ratio of CD4/CD8, with 4.5 months (95 % CI 4.2-4.9) and 5.0 months (95 % CI 4.5-5.7), (Log Rank = 0.039), respectively. No one patient experienced grade 4 toxicity. A regimen of pemetrexed combined with DCs is marginally effective and well tolerated in patients with stage IIIB or IV lung adenocarcinoma who had received gefitinib or erlotinib first-line treatment.

Association between GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The association between glutathione-S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) Ile105Val polymorphism and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy has been investigated in a number of published studies. However, most of these studies were based on small sample sizes and the results remained inconsistent. To assess the relationship between GSTP1 gene Ile105Val polymorphism and its susceptibility to oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, a meta-analysis of previous studies was conducted.

METHODS

Two investigators independently searched studies published up to December 2012 from the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library. The pooled effect was calculated as odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed-effect or random-effect model.

RESULTS

Twelve prospective trials and two retrospective clinical trials involving 2,191 participants met the inclusion criteria. Combined analyses of these studies showed no significant associations between GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism and oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy, yielding OR of 1.08 (95 %CI 0.67-1.74, P = 0.754) in dominant model. Similar results were also obtained in recessive model (OR = 1.67, 95 %CI 0.56-4.93, P = 0.357) and allelic analysis (OR = 1.22, 95 %CI 0.67-2.24, P = 0.513). Since significant heterogeneity across studies, the pooled effects were calculated by random-effect model. No evidence of publication biases was identified in this meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis did not support the hypothesis that GSTP1 Ile105Val polymorphism was related to the occurrence of neurotoxicity in oxaliplatin-treated patients. Given the limited number of studies and potential bias, large-scale and well-designed clinical trials should be needed to confirm these hypotheses.

Treatment of stage IIIb/IV non-small cell lung cancer with Pemetrexed plus Oxaliplatin after failure of Erlotinib as second-line treatment

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of Pemetrexed plus Oxaliplatin in patients suffering from stage IIIb or IV lung adenocarcinoma and being treated with Erlotinib as second-line treatment, a total of 45 patients were randomly divided into two groups. One group was treated with 500 mg/m² Pemetrexed plus 100 mg/m² Oxaliplatin, and the other was treated with 500 mg/m² Pemetrexed plus 75 mg/m² Cisplatin. All drugs were administered on day one of a 21-day cycle. In the Oxaliplatin group, 3 patients (13.6 %) experienced partial response (PR), 9 patients (41.0 %) showed stable disease (SD), and 10 patients (45.5 %) had progressive disease (PD). In the Cisplatin group, 2 patients (8.7 %) experienced PR, 7 patients (30.4 %) showed SD, and 14 patients (60.9 %) had PD. The PFS of the Oxaliplatin group and the Cisplatin group was 4.45 months (95 % CI 4.10–4.80) and 3.96 months (95 % CI 3.68–4.24) (P = 0.03), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 10.8 months (95 % CI 10.2–11.5) and 10.7 months (95 % CI 10.2–11.3) (P = 0.72), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence rate of grades 3 and 4 myelotoxicity between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in the occurrence rate of grades 3 and 4 gastrointestinal reactions and peripheral neurotoxicity between the two groups (P < 0.05). A regime combining Pemetrexed and Oxaliplatin was marginally effective and well tolerated in patients with stage IIIb or IV lung adenocarcinoma who have received Erlotinib as second-line treatment.