Lung cancer following lung transplant: single institution 10 year experience

Lung transplantation for lung cancer: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant (LTx) is an accepted treatment for end-stage pulmonary failure. A small proportion of explanted lungs harbor incidentally identified nonsmall cell lung cancers (NSCLC). We review the literature on studies assessing LTx patients found to have NSCLC lung cancer in their explanted lungs, and perform a pooled analysis of outcomes.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. We included studies assessing outcomes of patients with incidentally identified NSCLC following LTx, or following LTx for diffuse lepidic adenocarcinoma as a primary indication.

RESULTS

A total of 1404 articles were reviewed. 17 eligible studies were identified: 14 studies on incidental NSCLC (N = 169), 4 on diffuse lepidic adenocarcinoma (N = 70). Overall survival (OS) for patients with incidentally identified lung cancer at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year was 60.8% (95%CI 43.7%-77.9%, I2 =81.8%), 25.5% (95%CI 1.6%-49.5%, I2 =93.6%), and 23.0% (95%CI 2.0%-44.0%, I2 =92.0%) respectively. When restricted to those with earlier stage disease, those with stage I or II NSCLC had better 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS at 72.7% (95%CI 57.2%-88.2%, I2 =67.3%), 41.6% (95%CI 14.0%-69.1%, I2 =89.1%), and 34.5% (95%CI 8.1%-61.0%, I2 =89.8%), respectively. A sensitivity analysis limited to stage I showed 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival of 73.0% (95%CI 56.3%-89.7%), 40.4% (95%CI 110.3%-70.6%), and 35.4% (95%CI 6.2%-64.5%), respectively. The 4 studies on diffuse lepidic adenocarcinoma were too heterogeneous for pooled analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We present a review and pooled analysis examining survival following LTx with incidentally identified NSCLC. Patients with earlier stage incidentally explanted NSCLC had better survival outcomes. OS in the stage I population approximates that of LTx without incidental NSCLC.

Influence of De Novo Malignancies on Long-Term Survival after Lung Transplantation

(1) Background: Malignancies are an important cause of mortality after solid organ transplantation. The purpose of this study was to analyze the incidence of malignancies in patients receiving lung transplants (LT) and their influence on patients' survival. (2) Methods: Review of consecutive LT from 1994 to 2021. Patients with and without malignancies were compared by univariable and multivariable analyses. Survival was compared with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis. (3) Results: There were 731 LT malignancies developed in 91 patients (12.4%) with related mortality of 47% (n = 43). Native lung cancer, digestive and hematological malignancies were associated with higher lethality. Malignancies were more frequent in males (81%; p = 0.005), transplanted for emphysema (55%; p = 0.003), with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (58%; p < 0.001), and receiving single LT (65%; p = 0.011). Survival was worse in patients with malignancies (overall) and with native lung cancer. Risk factors for mortality were cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (OR 1.8; 95%CI: 1.3-2.4; p < 0.001) and de novo lung cancer (OR 2.6; 95%CI: 1.5-4.4; p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: Malignancies are an important source of morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation that should not be neglected. Patients undergoing single LT for emphysema are especially at higher risk of mortality due to lung cancer in the native lung.

Lung Cancer in Lung Transplant Recipients: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Characteristics and Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate clinical and radiologic characteristics of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients and evaluate the treatment course and prognosis.

METHODS

The study included 448 patients who underwent lung transplant between 2005 and 2021. All patients had pretransplant chest computed tomography (CT), 429 patients had posttransplant CT, whereas 19 had no posttransplant CT (median number of posttransplant CT, 6; range, 0-24). Medical records of these patients were reviewed to identify patients who developed lung cancer after lung transplant. Computed tomography and positron emission tomography/CT at the time of lung cancer diagnoses were reviewed to obtain imaging features. Demographics, tumor histology, stages, and survival were compared using Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Among 448 lung transplant recipients with a median follow-up of 71.3 months after lung transplant, 15 patients (3.3%) developed posttransplant lung cancer (13 unilateral, 2 bilateral; 10 men, 5 women; median age, 63.1 years; median time from transplantation to cancer diagnosis, 3.1 years). Twelve cancers were in native lung, and 3 were in transplanted lung. The incidence of lung cancer was higher in single lung transplant recipients than in bilateral lung transplant recipients (10.3% vs 0.6%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Imaging manifestations varied according to tumor stages. Among 12 patients treated for lung cancer, 2 patients developed posttreatment acute respiratory distress syndrome. The median survival from cancer diagnosis of cancer was 6.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Posttransplant lung cancer was noted in 3% of lung transplant recipients and was more common in unilateral transplant recipients. The prognosis upon diagnosis was poor with rapid clinical deterioration and serious posttreatment complications.

Lung cancer in recipients after lung transplant: single-centre experience and literature review

Introduction

Lung cancer is a major challenge facing modern medicine. It is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the USA. Little is known of the incidence, prevalence and disease characteristics in lung transplant recipients, a population unique in its vulnerability and exposure to carcinogenic risk factors. We aimed to elaborate these characteristics of lung cancer in our population through a retrospective cohort study.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed our institution’s 8-year experience with lung transplantation and searched for patients with a post-transplant diagnosis of lung cancer, neoplasia or mass. We focused on patient demographics, indication for transplant, smoking history, stage at diagnosis, location of the tumour, length of time between transplant and diagnosis, the treatment offered and length of time from diagnosis to death or last follow-up. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis standard Kaplan-Meier method was conducted from the date of cancer diagnosis to death from all-cause mortality or last follow-up as of August 2021.

Results

We identified 24 patients with de novo lung cancer postlung transplant in 905 recipients. More patients with an underlying diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis developed lung cancer. Twenty-one patients were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and three had small cell lung cancer. The remaining native lung was involved most in single lung recipients with 17 patients. Patients with a diagnosis of lung cancer had a mean survival of 17.6 months after diagnosis.

Discussion

The incidence rate of lung cancer in our cohort was higher than reported for smokers from the general population in previous studies. In this study, we compare our findings with available literature. We also explore screening strategies, treatment modalities, survival and postulated mechanisms for the development of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients.

Incidentally Detected Malignancies in Lung Transplant Explants

Active malignancy diagnosed within 5 years is an absolute contraindication for lung transplantation. In this study, we evaluated the rate of incidental malignancies detected in explanted lungs at our institution and assessed the posttransplant survival in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A retrospective chart review of lung transplant recipients at our institution from February 1999 to June 2017 was conducted. A literature review was performed to evaluate the prevalence and survival outcomes in patients with unexpected malignancies.

Results

From 407 patients who underwent lung transplantation, 9 (2.2%) were discovered to have malignant neoplasms. There were 3 cases of adenocarcinoma, 3 cases of adenocarcinoma in situ, 2 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, and 1 case of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. An extensive literature review found 12 case reports or case series reporting malignancy discovered at the time of lung transplantation. The overall prevalence of incidental neoplasms among 6746 recipients is around 1.5% (n = 103). The most common neoplasms discovered included adenocarcinoma (n = 56, 54%) and squamous cell carcinoma (n = 29, 28%). The overall 3-year survival was 54.4% for patients with localized NSCLC compared to 5.7% for those with nonlocalized disease.

Conclusions

Unidentified malignancies occur despite aggressive radiographic surveillance with poor posttransplant outcomes in patients with advanced malignancy. Malignancy-related radiographic findings may be missed pretransplant secondary to architectural distortion of lung parenchyma related to end-stage lung disease or because of the critical timing of surgery when donor lungs are available.

A 68-Year-Old Lung Transplant Recipient With Shortness of Breath, Weight Loss, and Abnormal Chest CT

A 68-year-old man presented to our ED with shortness of breath, weakness, and a 25-lb unintentional weight loss. He had undergone bilateral lung transplantation (cytomegalovirus [CMV]: donor+, recipient+; Epstein-Barr virus: donor+; recipient+) for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) 18 months prior. His posttransplant course was fairly unremarkable until 1 month earlier, when he was admitted for breathlessness and weakness. CT of the chest during that admission revealed mild intralobular and interlobular septal thickening. A bronchoscopy with BAL and transbronchial biopsies did not show acute cellular rejection, but the BAL fluid was positive for coronavirus. His cortisol level was undetectable; he was diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency and fludrocortisone was initiated. He was taking prednisone, tacrolimus, and everolimus for immunosuppression and valganciclovir, itraconazole, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for antimicrobial prophylaxis. His 25-lb weight loss occurred over the span of just one month.

Metachronous Pulmonary Neoplasms in Lung Transplantation-When They Arise in the Donor Lung: A Case Report

Lung cancer (LC) is uncommon among lung transplant recipients, being most often described in the native lung of single-lung transplant recipients. Its appearance in the transplanted lung is a very uncommon phenomenon, in which donor and recipient factors appear to be involved. We present a case of 2 distinct metachronous lung neoplasms diagnosed in the transplanted lung of a non-smoker patient with progressive massive silicosis (PMS), who underwent left unipulmonary transplantation at 39 years. The donor was a smoker and thoracic computed tomography (CT) performed before the organ collection showed no abnormalities. Thirty months after transplantation, a new node with significant avidity in positron emission tomography (PET)-CT was diagnosed in the upper left lobe (ULL). The Thoracic Surgery team chose to proceed directly to surgery with atypical resection of the nodule. Anatomopathologic study revealed an epidermoid carcinoma (pT1aNx). Multidisciplinary group decided clinical surveillance; however, 2 years later, the appearance of 2 new nodules in the ULL (PET-CT positive) was observed. It was again decided to proceed to the surgery with a second atypical resection. The anatomopathologic study of one nodule revealed pulmonary adenocarcinoma (pT1aNx), and the other was compatible with epidermoid carcinoma (pT1aNx). One month later, the patient was hospitalized with a pulmonary abscess and posteriorly developed a probable acute allograft rejection, eventually dying at the age of 44, 51 months after transplantation. This case raises relevant questions regarding the donor selection criteria and the approach to LC diagnosed in the post-transplantation period.

Incidental extensive adenocarcinoma in lungs explanted from a transplant recipient with an idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis flare-up: A clinical dilemma

Patients under consideration for lung transplantation as treatment for end-stage lung diseases such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) often have risk factors such as a history of smoking or concomitant emphysema, both of which can predispose the patient to lung cancer. In fact, IPF itself increases the risk of lung cancer development by 6.8% to 20%. Solid organ malignancy (non-skin) is an established contraindication for lung transplantation. We encountered a clinical dilemma in a patient who presented with an IPF flare-up and underwent urgent evaluation for lung transplantation. After transplant, the patient's explanted lungs showed extensive adenocarcinoma in situ, with the foci of invasion and metastatic adenocarcinoma in N1-level lymph nodes, as well as usual interstitial pneumonia. Retrospectively, we saw no evidence to suggest malignancy in addition to the IPF flare-up. Clinical diagnostic dilemmas such as this emphasize the need for new noninvasive testing that would facilitate malignancy diagnosis in patients too sick to undergo invasive tissue biopsy for diagnosis. Careful pathological examination of explanted lungs in patients with IPF is critical, as it can majorly influence immunosuppressive regimens, surveillance imaging, and overall prognosis after lung transplant.

Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Individuals with cystic fibrosis are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared with the general population, and risk is higher among those who received an organ transplant. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine optimal CRC screening strategies for patients with cystic fibrosis.

METHODS

We adjusted the existing Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon model to reflect increased CRC risk and lower life expectancy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Modeling was performed separately for individuals who never received an organ transplant and patients who had received an organ transplant. We modeled 76 colonoscopy screening strategies that varied the age range and screening interval. The optimal screening strategy was determined based on a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per life-year gained. Sensitivity and supplementary analyses were performed, including fecal immunochemical test (FIT) as an alternative test, earlier ages of transplantation, and increased rates of colonoscopy complications, to assess if optimal screening strategies would change.

RESULTS

Colonoscopy every 5 years, starting at an age of 40 years, was the optimal colonoscopy strategy for patients with cystic fibrosis who never received an organ transplant; this strategy prevented 79% of deaths from CRC. Among patients with cystic fibrosis who had received an organ transplant, optimal colonoscopy screening should start at an age of 30 or 35 years, depending on the patient's age at time of transplantation. Annual FIT screening was predicted to be cost-effective for patients with cystic fibrosis. However, the level of accuracy of the FIT in this population is not clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon model, we found screening of patients with cystic fibrosis for CRC to be cost effective. Because of the higher risk of CRC in these patients, screening should start at an earlier age with a shorter screening interval. The findings of this study (especially those on FIT screening) may be limited by restricted evidence available for patients with cystic fibrosis.

Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Individuals with cystic fibrosis are at increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population, and risk is higher among those who received an organ transplant. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to determine optimal CRC screening strategies for patients with cystic fibrosis.

METHODS

We adjusted the existing Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon microsimulation model to reflect increased CRC risk and lower life expectancy in patients with cystic fibrosis. Modeling was performed separately for individuals who never received an organ transplant and patients who had received an organ transplant. We modeled 76 colonoscopy screening strategies that varied the age range and screening interval. The optimal screening strategy was determined based on a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000 per life-year gained. Sensitivity and supplementary analyses were performed, including fecal immunochemical test (FIT) as an alternative test, earlier ages of transplantation, and increased rates of colonoscopy complications, to assess whether optimal screening strategies would change.

RESULTS

Colonoscopy every 5 years, starting at age 40 years, was the optimal colonoscopy strategy for patients with cystic fibrosis who never received an organ transplant; this strategy prevented 79% of deaths from CRC. Among patients with cystic fibrosis who had received an organ transplant, optimal colonoscopy screening should start at an age of 30 or 35 years, depending on the patient's age at time of transplantation. Annual FIT screening was predicted to be cost-effective for patients with cystic fibrosis. However, the level of accuracy of the FIT in population is not clear.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a Microsimulation Screening Analysis-Colon microsimulation model, we found screening of patients with cystic fibrosis for CRC to be cost-effective. Due to the higher risk in these patients for CRC, screening should start at an earlier age with a shorter screening interval. The findings of this study (especially those on FIT screening) may be limited by restricted evidence available for patients with cystic fibrosis.

Devastating fast-growing lung cancer after single lung transplantation

Patients receiving lung transplantation are at increasing risk for the development of cancer due to the administration of immunosuppressive drugs. We hereby report the case of a patient with a devastating fast-growing lung cancer after single lung transplantation for pulmonary fibrosis.

Tacrolimus Levels Are Not Associated with Risk of Malignancy in Lung Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND Lung transplant (LTx) recipients suffer from high rates of malignancy. Exposure to immunosuppressive medication such as tacrolimus has been proposed as a risk factor for tumorigenesis. We hypothesized that chronically high levels of tacrolimus would be associated with risk of malignancy. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was performed in a transplant center in Israel, with a nested case-control design. Cases were LTx recipients who were diagnosed with any solid or hematological malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer. Controls were tumor-free during their entire follow-up after LTx and had at least the same follow-up time as their matched case. Controls were matched to cases by age and type of transplant received (single/double). Tacrolimus levels were extracted and analyzed for median drug level and also integrated over time (area under the curve - AUC-tacrolimus). RESULTS We reviewed 412 LTx recipients in our registry. Thirty-nine cases of malignancy were diagnosed and 160 controls were matched, giving a crude tumor incidence rate of 26/100 000/year. Lung cancers were the commonest diagnosis. Cases and controls were well matched by age, smoking status, and LTx type. Median tacrolimus levels were 11.0 ng/ml and 11.3 ng/ml in cases and controls, respectively (p=0.88). The median log (AUC-tacrolimus) was 9.4 in the cases and 9.5 in the controls (p=0.59). CONCLUSIONS In this nested case-control study, exposure to tacrolimus was similar in tumor cases and non-tumor controls. These data, based on a cohort with modest size, suggest either that tumorigenesis in LTx recipients is unrelated to tacrolimus exposure or that levels in these patients are above an unknown threshold at which the dose-response effect is saturated.

Lung cancer in lung transplantation: incidence and outcome

Introduction

Malignancies are one of the causes of mortality after lung transplantation. However, little is known about lung cancer outcome after lung transplantation.

Methods

We performed a retrospective search of the lung transplantation database at our institution to identify patients diagnosed with lung cancer after lung transplantation.

Results

Out of 633 lung transplant patients, lung cancer was detected in 23 of them (3.63%). The most common causes for transplantation were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (47.8%) and emphysema (43.4%). A total of 18 patients were diagnosed during follow-up, 12 cases in the native lung (52.2%) and 6 cases in the donor lung (26.1%). The diagnosis was evidenced in the explanted lung in five patients (21.7%). The median of time from transplantation to cancer diagnosis was 39.7 months (24.356.6). Lung cancer was the cause of death in 16 patients. Survival rate at1year from diagnosis of lung cancer was 45.64% (95% CI 0.2431 to 0.6473).

Conclusions

Lung transplant recipients constitute a high-risk group for developing lung cancer. Among our patients, lung cancer was predominantly diagnosed in the native lung and at an advanced stage. The primary tumour was the main cause of death in most of these patients.

Posttransplant solid organ malignancies in lung transplant recipients: a single-center experience and review of the literature

PURPOSE

Solid-organ tumor incidences are higher in solid organ transplant patients than in the general population. The aim of this study was to analyze solid-organ tumor frequency and characteristics in a population of lung transplant patients and provide a brief review of the literature.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent a lung transplant in the Lung Transplant Program at the University Hospital of Siena, Italy, from 2001 to 2014 (n = 119). Patients' demographics, pretransplant characteristics, immunosuppressive therapy, and infectious factors were recorded.

RESULTS

Nine patients with a median age of 59.0 years (range 50-63) of our cohort developed a solid-organ tumor (7.5%). Most of the patients experienced nonmelanoma skin cancer (44.4%); the others were diagnosed with lung cancer (22.2%), breast cancer (22.2%), and colon-rectal cancer (11.2%). The median time from transplantation to tumor diagnosis was 895.0 days (range 321-2046). No differences in pretransplant characteristics, immunosuppressive therapy, or infectious factors were found between patients who developed solid organ tumors and those who did not.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study confirmed that de novo malignancies are a major issue in lung transplant patients; in particular, skin and lung cancers demonstrated a higher incidence rate. Oncologic treatment of these patients is complex, requiring close collaboration between the transplant team and oncologist. Strict screening programs are key factors for an early diagnosis and to allow for prompt treatment resulting in a better outcome.

Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration, an effective modality for sampling targeted thoracic lesions in adult lung transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation (LTx) is performed for end-stage lung diseases that would be otherwise fatal. Pulmonary allograft recipients are a unique patient population as they are at high risk for malignancy and infectious complications due to the need for immunosuppression. Endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a minimally invasive technique for evaluating abnormalities of the mediastinum/lungs. To our knowledge, this report is the first in the literature addressing targeted EBUS-FNA biopsies in patients who have undergone LTx.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

During 5 years from May 1, 2009 to May 1, 2014, 582 patients underwent LTx at the Cleveland Clinic. A review of records indicated that 14 of these patients later underwent EBUS-FNA. Demographic and diagnostic parameters were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients (mean age 64 years) underwent EBUS-FNA after LTx. The mean interval between LTx and EBUS-FNA was 15 months. EBUS-FNA yielded cytologic material diagnostic of malignancy in 10 patients (71%) with one-half of those cases being squamous carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

EBUS-FNA is a useful diagnostic modality in lung allograft recipients and is of value in confirming and staging thoracic malignancies in this population. Carcinoma subtyping is feasible by EBUS-FNA, and performance of ancillary studies to confirm clonality in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders is possible.

Lung transplantation: a treatment option in end-stage lung disease

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is the final treatment option in the end stage of certain lung diseases, once all possible conservative treatments have been exhausted. Depending on the indication for which lung transplantation is performed, it can improve the patient's quality of life (e.g., in emphysema) and/ or prolong life expectancy (e.g., in cystic fibrosis, pulmonary fibrosis, and pulmonary arterial hypertension). The main selection criteria for transplant candidates, aside from the underlying pulmonary or cardiopulmonary disease, are age, degree of mobility, nutritional and muscular condition, and concurrent extrapulmonary disease. The pool of willing organ donors is shrinking, and every sixth candidate for lung transplantation now dies while on the waiting list.

METHOD

We reviewed pertinent articles (up to October 2013) retrieved by a selective search in Medline and other German and international databases, including those of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), Eurotransplant, the German Institute for Applied Quality Promotion and Research in Health-Care (Institut für angewandte Qualitätsförderung und Forschung im Gesundheitswesen, AQUA-Institut), and the German Foundation for Organ Transplantation (Deutsche Stiftung Organtransplantation, DSO).

RESULTS

The short- and long-term results have markedly improved in recent years: the 1-year survival rate has risen from 70.9% to 82.9%, and the 5-year survival rate from 46.9% to 59.6%. The 90-day mortality is 10.0%. The postoperative complications include acute (3.4%) and chronic (29.0%) transplant rejection, infections (38.0%), transplant failure (24.7%), airway complications (15.0%), malignant tumors (15.0%), cardiovascular events (10.9%), and other secondary extrapulmonary diseases (29.8%). Bilateral lung transplantation is superior to unilateral transplantation (5-year survival rate 57.3% versus 47.4%).

CONCLUSION

Seamless integration of the various components of treatment will be essential for further improvements in outcome. In particular, the follow-up care of transplant recipients should always be provided in close cooperation with the transplant center.

Prevalence and outcome of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant is the only available therapy for patients with advanced lung disease. The goal of this study was to examine the prevalence, origin, management and outcome of lung cancer in recipients of lung transplant at our institution.

METHODS

After institutional review board approval, we conducted a retrospective chart review of all lung transplantations in our institution from January 1990 until June 2012.

RESULTS

The prevalence of lung cancer in the explanted lung was 6 (1.2%) of 462 and all cases were in subjects with lung fibrosis. All 4 subjects with lymph node involvement died of causes related to the malignancy. Nine (1.9%) of 462 patients were found to have bronchogenic carcinoma after lung transplant. The most common location was in the native lung in recipients of a single lung transplant (6 out of 9 patients). In one case, the tumor originated in the allograft and was potentially donor related. The median time to diagnosis after lung transplant was 28 months with a range from 9 months to 10 years. Median survival was 8 months, with tumors involving lymph nodes or distant metastases associated with a markedly worse prognosis (median survival 7 months) than stage I disease (median survival 27 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of lung cancer in lung transplant recipients is low. Using accepted donor screening criteria, donor derived malignancy is exceptionally rare. While stage I disease is associated with improved survival in this cohort, survival is still not comparable to that of the general population, likely influenced by the need for aggressive immune suppression.