Validation of EORTC QLQ-LC43 for Chinese patients with lung cancer

Patient-reported outcomes in lung cancer surgery: A narrative review

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, profoundly affecting patients' quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide essential insights from the patients' perspective, a crucial aspect often overlooked by traditional clinical outcomes. This review synthesizes research on the role of PROs in lung cancer surgery to enhance patient care and outcomes. We conducted a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to March 2024, using terms such as "lung cancer," "Patient Reported Outcome," "lobectomy," "segmentectomy," and "lung surgery." The criteria included original studies on lung cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment and reported on PROs. After screening and removing duplicates, reviews, non-English articles, and irrelevant studies, 36 research articles were selected, supported by an additional 53 publications, totaling 89 references. The findings highlight the utility of PROs in assessing post-surgical outcomes, informing clinical decisions, and facilitating patient-centered care. However, challenges in standardization, patient burden, and integration into clinical workflows remain, underscoring the need for further research and methodological refinement. PROs are indispensable for understanding the quality-of-life post-surgery and enhancing communication and decision-making in clinical practice. Their integration into routine care is vital for a holistic approach to lung cancer treatment, promising significant improvements in patient outcomes and quality of care.

Symptom clusters and their impacts on the quality of life of patients with lung cancer receiving immunotherapy: A cross-sectional study

AIM

The objective of this study was to identify symptom clusters in lung cancer patients receiving immunotherapy and explore their impact on the quality of life of patients.

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is widely used in lung cancer; however, there is little understanding of symptom clusters and their impacts on the quality of life of this population.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

METHODS

The survey contained the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS), Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 43 and a self-designed General Information Evaluation Form. Symptom clusters were identified using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) based on the symptom scores. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between each symptom cluster and the patients' quality of life. Multiple linear regression analysis was employed to examine the impact of the symptom clusters on quality of life. This study adhered to the STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

In total, 240 participants completed the survey. Five symptom clusters were identified and named according to their characteristics: emotional-related symptom cluster, lung cancer-related symptom cluster, physical symptom cluster, skin symptom cluster and neural symptom cluster. All symptom clusters, except for the neural symptom cluster, had a significantly detrimental impact on patient quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy experience a range of symptoms, which can be categorized into five clusters. These symptom clusters have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Future research should focus on developing interventions for each symptom cluster and their influencing factors.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

In the data collection phase, lung cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy were recruited to participate in the survey.

Oral Decoctions Based on Qi-Yin Syndrome Differentiation After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Resected Stage ΙΙΙA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Powerful adjuvant strategies are required to improve the survival of patients with completely resected stage ΙΙΙA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment versus observation after adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation (TCM group) or observation (observation group). The intervention lasted for 12 months. The primary endpoint was 1-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints were DFS, quality of life, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) on the surface of Tregs in peripheral blood. We used EORTC QLQ-LC43 to evaluate quality of life.

RESULTS

Between Apr 29, 2019, and Nov 11, 2021, 75 patients were randomly assigned to oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation (n = 38) or observation (n = 37). The full analysis set included 35 patients in the TCM group and 35 in the observation group. After a median follow-up of 24.2 months, oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation improved DFS compared with observation (HR 0.378, 95% CI: 0.157-0.912; P = .03). One-year DFS was 82.1% in the TCM group and 61.9% in the observation group (P = .06). Three months after randomization, scores of total health, role function, emotional function, and social function in the TCM group were higher than those in the observation group (P < .01 for all), scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, cough, and chest pain were lower than those in the observation group (P < .05 for all); there was no significant difference in the proportion of Tregs between the TCM group and the observation group (P = .58); the proportion of CTLA-4+Tregs in the TCM group was lower than that in the observation group (P = .046). There were no adverse events that occurred in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation after adjuvant chemotherapy prolonged DFS, reduced the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis, improved quality of life, and down-regulated the proportion of CTLA-4+Tregs in completely resected stage ΙΙΙA NSCLC patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Register, No. ChiCTR1800019396. Date of registration: 9 November 2018.

The quality of life in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy: A longitudinal study

Objective

This article aims to longitudinally compare nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients' quality of life (QoL) during radiotherapy (RT) and identify QoL correlates.

Methods

This study included 98 patients, with 85 completing full follow-up. Data were collected at baseline (T₁), midpoint of RT (T₂), and RT completion (T₃), between October 2021 and November 2022. QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). RIOM severity was evaluated by the toxicity criteria of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). The nutritional status was evaluated using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), body mass index (BMI), and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA). The generalized estimating equation described the QoL evolution and correlated it with RIOM, nutritional status, and other influential factors.

Results

Significant deterioration was observed in various subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30 during RT, including global health status (GHS), physical function, role function, emotional function, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, and constipation (all P ​< ​0.05). Substantial deterioration was also observed in RIOM, nutritional status, and part of hematological indexes (all P ​< ​0.05). The decline of QoL was associated with gender, age, education level, chemotherapy regimen, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score, RIOM severity, NRS 2002 score, PG-SGA score, and lymphocyte level (all P ​< ​0.05).

Conclusions

QoL declined during RT and were associated with certain factors. Healthcare professionals should focus on alleviating treatment-related complications and identifying individuals at high risk of malnutrition early to improve outcomes for patients with NPC.

Quality of life between home-based and outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after surgical resection for lung cancer: protocol for a prospective, single-blind, randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer remains a highly fatal disease. Surgical resection has been proven to be the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer. The conventional hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is shown to reduce symptoms, improve exercise capacity and impact the quality of life (QoL) for lung cancer patients. To date, scientific evidence on the effectiveness of home-based PR for patients with lung cancer following surgery is scarce. We aim to explore if home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study is a two-arm, parallel-group, assessor-blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. Participants will be recruited from West China Hospital, Sichuan University and randomly allocated to either an outpatient group or a home-based group at a ratio of 1:1. The PR programme involves self-management and exercises. The exercise includes warm-up (10 min), aerobic training (20 min), resistance training (15 min) and cool-down (10 min), lasting 4 weeks, with two sessions per week either at home or in the outpatient setting. The intensity will be adjusted according to the modified Borg rating of perceived exertion and heart rate before and after each exercise session. The primary outcome is QoL measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 & LC 13 after an intervention. Secondary outcomes include physical fitness measured by a 6 min walk test and stair-climbing test and symptom severity measured by patient-reported questionnaires and pulmonary function. The main hypothesis is that home-based PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR for patients with lung cancer following surgical resection.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The trial has been approved by the Ethical Committee of West China Hospital and is also registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national and international conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100053714.

Subxiphoid uniportal thoracoscopic pulmonary segmentectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: Feasibility, quality of life and financial worthiness

Background

Subxiphoid uniportal video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SVATS) is more technically challenging than intercostal uniportal video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UVATS), especially in more complex procedures such as segmentectomy. We therefore aimed to investigate the worthiness of undertaking the more demanding subxiphoid approach in patients who had undergone anatomical segmentectomy for stage IA non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 491 patients were included in our study who had undergone anatomical segmentectomy for stage IA non‐small cell lung cancer from September 2014 to April 2018. They were divided into two groups; 278 patients in the UVATS group and 213 patients in the SVATS group. Different perioperative variables, postoperative pain, quality of life and cost were analyzed and compared between both groups.

Results

The SVATS group showed a significantly longer operative time (P = 0.007) and more operative blood loss than the intercostal group (P = 0.004). There was no significant difference between both groups regarding postoperative drainage, duration of chest tube, postoperative hospital stay, operative conversion or postoperative complications. The SVATS group showed a significantly lower pain score postoperatively (P < 0.001). In addition, the SVATS group showed a significantly better postoperative quality of life score along the first postoperative year (P < 0.001). UVATS segmentectomy appeared to be significantly cheaper than SVATS segmentectomy (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SVATS segmentectomy for stage IA lung cancer is a safe procedure that is worth proceeding with as it is associated with better postoperative pain and better quality of life in the first postoperative year. Further studies are recommended to evaluate the actual cost‐effectiveness of SVATS segmentectomy.

Key points

• Significant findings of the study

Subxiphoid uniportal approach for pulmonary segmentectomy is safe and feasible approach. It has better postoperative pain and better quality of life than the uniportal intercostal approach; however, it is more expensive.

• What this study adds

Subxiphoid uniportal approach for pulmonary segmentectomy gives a better quality of life in Chinese patients than the intercostal approach; however, it is more expensive.

Validation of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-BN20 for patients with brain cancer

This is a single centre study in mainland China aiming to evaluate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ-BN20, designed by The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Group to evaluate the life quality of patients with brain tumour, cancer or metastases. One hundred and eighty-eight patients with primary or secondary brain cancer from Hunan Provincial Tumor Hospital during September 2013 to June 2014 completed the Chinese EORTC QLQ-C30/BN20 questionnaires developed by translation, back translation and cultural adaptation. Results were statistically analysed using SPSS17.0. The internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient) was between .753 and .869, the correlation coefficients among items and its own dimension were bigger than .4, and all items had a better correlation with its own dimension. The Spearman was used to analyse the correlation of each dimension between EORTC QLQ-BN20 and EORTC QLQ-C30, and the result showed that individual dimensions were moderately correlated, other dimensions were weakly correlated. In conclusion, the Chinese version of EORTC QLQ BN20 questionnaire had great relevance, reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity. It provides a valuable tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical studies of Chinese patients with primary or secondary brain cancer.

Psycho-oncology assessment in Chinese populations: a systematic review of quality of life and psychosocial measures

This systematic review describes psychosocial and quality of life (QOL) measures used in psycho-oncology research with cancer patients and caregivers in China. Medline and PsycINFO databases were searched (1980-2014). Studies reviewed met the following criteria: English language; peer-reviewed; sampled Chinese cancer patients/caregivers; developed, validated or assessed psychometric properties of psychosocial or QOL outcome measures; and reported validation data. The review examined characteristics of measures and participants, translation and cultural adaptation processes and psychometric properties of the measures. Ninety five studies met review criteria. Common characteristics of studies reviewed were they: assessed primarily QOL measures, sampled patients with breast, colorectal, or head and neck cancer, and validated existing measures (>80%) originating in North America or Europe. Few studies reported difficulties translating measures. Regarding psychometric properties of the measures >50% of studies reported subscale reliabilities <α = 0.70, <50% reported test-retest reliability, and <30% reported divergent validity. Few reported sensitivity, specificity or responsiveness. Improved accuracy and transparency of reporting for translation, cultural adaptation and psychometric testing of psychosocial measures is needed. Developing support structures for translating and validating psychosocial measures would enable this and ensure Chinese psycho-oncology clinical practice and research keeps pace with international focus on patient reported outcome measures and data management.