Prognostic factors for cases with no extracranial metastasis in whom brain metastasis is detected after resection of non-small cell lung cancer

Survival benefits of primary tumor surgery for synchronous brain metastases: A SEER-based population study with propensity-matched comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence about the prognostic value of primary tumor surgery (PTS) in patients with brain metastatic malignancies is ambiguous and controversial. This study assessed the survival benefits of primary tumor surgery in patients with brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

Adults patients with BMs that originated from lung, breast, kidney, skin, colon, and liver diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 were derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the bias between patients with or without PTS. Then the prognostic value of PTS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 32,760 patients with BMs secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), breast cancer, renal cancer, melanoma, colorectal cancer, and liver cancer were identified from the database. After PSM at 1:1 ratio, PTS appeared to significantly prolong cause-specific survival (CSS) time for patients with BMs secondary to NSCLC, breast cancer, renal cancer, and colorectal cancer (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.60 [0.53-0.68], 0.56 [0.43-0.73], 0.47 [0.37-0.60], and 0.59 [0.37-0.95], respectively, all p < 0.05). Patients with earlier T and N classifications, no extracranial metastasis, and cancer-specific subtypes (adenocarcinoma in NSCLC, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer) may derive more survival benefits from PTS when suffering from BMs.

CONCLUSION

This population-based study supported PTS could provide survival benefits for patients with BMs secondary to NSCLC, breast cancer, renal cancer, and colorectal cancer. More emphasis should be put on PTS of selected patients with BMs.

Prognostic value of surgical intervention in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a population-based study

Background

Surgical intervention is generally not considered as a treatment option in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Accumulating data suggest that surgery may have beneficial effects for these advanced patients. However, no evidence supports the significance of primary tumor resection (PTR) and metastatic tumor resection (MTR) in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods

A total of 32,497 patients diagnosed with primary stage IV LUAD were selected through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Possible confounders were eliminated by propensity score matching (PSM). The overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were estimated as the primary endpoints. Furthermore, the independent prognostic factors of patients with the surgical intervention were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Patients underwent surgical intervention had better OS and LCSS than those who did not (P=0.001 for OS; P<0.001 for LCSS). Meanwhile, patients who underwent surgery combined with lymph node dissection had better survival outcomes (P<0.001 for OS and LCSS) in the K-M analysis. For different metastatic sites, PTR was beneficial to the survival of patients with isolated lung metastases (LUM) and multiple organ metastases (MOM) (LUM: P=0.041; MOM: P=0.003). As for metastatic surgery, no patients were found to benefit from resection of metastatic tumor [bone metastasis (BOM): P=0.696; brain metastasis (BRM): P=0.951; LUM: P=0.402; MOM: P=0.365].

Conclusions

Surgical intervention strategies can prolong survival to some extent, depending on different sites of metastasis and highly selected patients.

Research Progress and Challenges in the Treatment of Central Nervous System Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and has high morbidity and mortality rates. Central nervous system (CNS) metastasis is one of the most frequent complications in patients with NSCLC and seriously affects the quality of life (QOL) and overall survival (OS) of patients, with a median OS of untreated patients of only 1-3 months. There are various treatment methods for NSCLC CNS metastasis, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, which do not meet the requirements of patients in terms of improving OS and QOL. There are still many problems in the treatment of NSCLC CNS metastasis that need to be solved urgently. This review summarizes the research progress in the treatment of NSCLC CNS metastasis to provide a reference for clinical practice.

In Spite of Curative Radical Pulmonary Procedures, Lesser Pulmonary Resection Shows More Favorable Prognosis in Surgically Treated NSCLC With Synchronous Isolated Cranial Oligometastases

Oligometastatic disease in lung cancer is not a rare condition as previously thought. Among 812 non-small cell lung cancer patients treated surgically with lung resection between October 2011 and October 2018 at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Florence Nightingale Hospitals, Turkey, 28 patients (3.4%) had synchronous cranial metastases. We analyzed synchronous isolated cranial metastases patients treated by locally ablative treatments (surgery, radiotherapy, or both). Metastases existing at the diagnosis of primary cancer were considered as synchronous, and their treatment was performed before (at least 1 month) or after (for maximum 1 month) surgery of the primary lung lesion. Prognostic factors affecting survival are evaluated retrospectively to identify clinical factors predicting survival in an effort to better select patients for surgery. Patients having T1-T2 primary lung tumors, no mediastinal lymph node metastasis, receiving minor anatomical lung resection, receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, having single cranial metastasis, and receiving surgical cranial metastasectomy were found to have better survival. According to tumor histology, having adenocarcinoma, and not having lymphovascular or visceral pleura invasion correlated with better survival. Average survival time was 52.1 months and median survival was 32 months. The last mortality during the follow-up was at 24 months; cumulative survival was 48.3% at that time. Our study was designed to define the criteria for patients with oligometastatic disease who may benefit from lung resection.

Stereotactic radiosurgery combined with anlotinib for limited brain metastases with perilesional edema in non-small cell lung cancer: Rvision-001 study protocol

INTRODUCTION

About 50% of patients with non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) are diagnosed with brain metastases during treatment, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an important treatment for brain oligometastasis. Some patients with brain metastases have cerebral edema before treatment, and radiation therapy may also cause, or aggravate brain edema. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) promotes angiogenesis and increase vascular permeability, and previous studies have shown that anti-VEGF treatment can reduce brain edema. We hypothesized that anlotinib hydrochloride can reduce perilesional edema around brain metastases, create conditions for subsequent SRS, increase local control rate and improve patient prognosis.

METHODS

From one week before stereotactic radiosurgery, patients begin to receive anlotinib once a day (12 mg) from day 1-14 of a 21 day cycle, with two cycles in total. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is taken before treatment, one week and one month after medication. A total of 50 patients will be included in this study. The primary endpoint is the Edema Index, and the secondary endpoints are intracranial objective response rate (iORR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety, and the rate of SRS after anlotinib treatment.

DISCUSSION

This study is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical study, and explores the efficacy and tolerability of SRS with anlotinib in NSCLC patients with limited brain metastases. The aim of the study is to provide new treatment options for NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

Effects of primary tumor resection on the survival of patients with stage IV extrathoracic metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A population-based study

BACKGROUND

Selected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with extrathoracic metastases might benefit from surgical intervention; however, the evidence is limited. We investigated the benefit of surgery in these patients regarding the extent of the metastatic disease.

METHODS

Patients with extrathoracic metastatic NSCLC were identified in the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015). Survival was compared before and after matching. Multivariate Cox regression models were built to identify factors associated with survival and to adjust for covariates in subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 39,655 patients, 1206 underwent primary tumor resection, and 630 patients were identified 1:1 in surgical and nonsurgical groups after matching. In the entire cohort, patients who underwent surgery had significant prolonged overall survival (OS) in both unmatched (median survival time, [MST]: 14 vs. 6 months, p < 0.001) and matched (MST: 11 vs. 7 months, p < 0.001) cohorts. In the highly selected surgery-recommended cohort, surgical group still had a significantly longer OS (MST: 14 vs. 6 months, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression showed that surgery was independently associated with improved OS and lung cancer-specific mortality (LCSM) (OS: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.64, p < 0.001; LCSM: subhazard ratio [SHR]: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.57-0.66, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that surgery was an independent favorable predictor to survival in all cohorts except patients with N3 disease, and patients with single-organ metastasis were associated with the most prominent survival benefit from surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumor resection was associated with improved survival in extrathoracic metastatic NSCLC patients, particularly for those with single-organ metastasis.

Surgical approach in the oligometastatic patient

In the setting of a stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), oligometastatic patients represent a heterogeneous group whose incidence is increasing as far as with the adoption of new therapeutic regimens, the improvement of the molecular characterization assays and the increasing number of long-survivor patients. The oligometastatic state undergone a major revision with the introduction of the new TNM lung cancer staging system, being characterized by a different prognosis compared to multi-metastatic patients. Furthermore, the presence of a limited number of metastases imposes a local control especially when clonal selections occur during adjuvant therapy. In this regard, the review seeks to clarify the indications for surgical treatment by organ according to recent guidelines, by analyzing prognostic factors and outcome of patients. Although accurate patient stratification is mandatory, aggressive local control strategies represent a valid therapeutic approach in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. At the same time, persevering with ablative strategies raises both medical and ethical issues about limits and reiteration, which certainly requires a deep reflection, being, on the other hand, in front of a metastatic disease.

The Interdisciplinary Management of Brain Metastases

BACKGROUND

20-40% of patients with malignant tumors have one or more brain metastases in the course of their illness. Brain metastases are the first manifestation of cancer in 5-10%. Manifestations such as intracranial hypertension or focal neurologic deficits are seen in over 80% of patients with brain metastases. Uncertainty surrounds the treatment of patients with intracranial metastases, as the existing data are derived from trials with low levels of evidence.

METHODS

This article is based on a selective literature review and on the authors' own experience of 100 consecutive patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Neurosurgery at Ruhr University Bochum (RUB), Germany.

RESULTS

Multimodal treatment enables successful surgery for an increasing number of patients with brain metastases. The modalities and goals of treatment are established for each patient individually by an interdisciplinary tumor board. Drug therapy is usually indicated. Surgical resection followed by stereotactic radiotherapy prolongs mean survival by 3-6 months and lowers the risk of recurrence from 40% to 12.5%. In the authors' own experience, even seriously ill patients can benefit from the resection of brain metastases. The 30-day morbidity was 29%, accounted for mainly by medical complications such as pulmonary embolism, renal failure, and sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Through the close interdisciplinary collaboration of neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists, the symptomatic state and the prognosis of patients with brain metastases can be improved. Longer overall survival implies that further studies will have to pay special attention to the toxicity of treatment.

The Role of Thoracic Surgery in the Therapeutic Management of Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

In most patients with NSCLC, the disease is diagnosed in an advanced stage, the prognosis is poor, and survival is typically measured in months. Standard therapeutic treatment regimens for patients with stage IV NSCLC typically include chemotherapy and palliative radiation. Despite newer regimens that may include molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy, the overall 5-year survival for stage IV disease remains low at 4% to 6%. Although therapeutic surgery is performed in a minority of cases, accumulating data suggest that thoracic surgery may play several beneficial roles for these patients.

METHODS

In this narrative review, we summarize the literature on surgical intervention in the multimodality management of stage IV NSCLC, focusing on the potential evidence for and against therapeutic or curative intent procedures to affect outcomes for patients with oligometastatic disease and pleural metastasis.

RESULTS

In selected patients, surgical resection can result in a 5-year survival rate of 30% to 50%, but this is heavily influenced by the presence of mediastinal nodal disease, which should be evaluated before therapeutic surgical procedures are undertaken. Additionally, diagnostic or palliative surgical procedures can play an important role in the personalized management of stage IV disease. These data suggest that for carefully selected patients with advanced stage NSCLC, surgical intervention can be an important component of combined modality treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the advances in molecular targeted therapy and immunotherapy, further studies should focus on the possible use of surgery as a strategy of therapeutic "consolidation" for appropriately selected patients with stage IV NSCLC who are receiving combined modality care.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement predicts better prognosis in NSCLC patients: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

For non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are predictive markers of the treatment benefit from selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). However, their prognostic roles remained uncertain. Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the prognosis of ALK+ NSCLC patients in the treatment of surgery, chemotherapy, and/or EGFR-TKI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were thoroughly searched to identify relevant studies. Primary endpoints of this study included overall survival (OS), recurrence/progression free survival (RFS/PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). All statistical analyses were performed via REVIEW MANAGER (version 5.3).

RESULTS

In total, 15 studies involving 4981 NSCLC patients were included. This study demonstrated that smoking status profoundly influenced prognosis of ALK related NSCLC. In the general population with NSCLC, compared with ALK- arm, ALK+ arm obtained a significantly better prognosis (HR=0.81 for OS, 95% CI=0.72-0.91; 0.80 for RFS/PFS, 95% CI=0.70-0.90), even after further stratification analysis according to disease stage. However, in the non-smoking population with NSCLC, compared with ALK- arm, those in the ALK+ arm had a worse prognosis (HR=1.65 for OS, 95% CI=1.28-2.12; 1.23 for RFS/PFS, 95% CI=1.05-1.44). Furthermore, ALK+ patients experienced a significantly higher ORR in pemetrexed-based chemotherapy but not in EGFR-TKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking status had a profound influence on the ALK-related prognosis of NSCLC. ALK rearrangement predicted a better prognosis in the general population with NSCLC, but a poor survival in the non-smoking population. Therefore, stratification according to smoking status is strongly recommended for future studies exploring ALK-related prognosis.

Automatic metastatic brain tumor segmentation for stereotactic radiosurgery applications

The objective of this study is to develop an automatic segmentation strategy for efficient and accurate metastatic brain tumor delineation on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) magnetic resonance images (MRI) for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) applications. The proposed four-step automatic brain metastases segmentation strategy is comprised of pre-processing, initial contouring, contour evolution, and contour triage. First, T1c brain images are preprocessed to remove the skull. Second, an initial tumor contour is created using a multi-scaled adaptive threshold-based bounding box and a super-voxel clustering technique. Third, the initial contours are evolved to the tumor boundary using a regional active contour technique. Fourth, all detected false-positive contours are removed with geometric characterization. The segmentation process was validated on a realistic virtual phantom containing Gaussian or Rician noise. For each type of noise distribution, five different noise levels were tested. Twenty-one cases from the multimodal brain tumor image segmentation (BRATS) challenge dataset and fifteen clinical metastases cases were also included in validation. Segmentation performance was quantified by the Dice coefficient (DC), normalized mutual information (NMI), structural similarity (SSIM), Hausdorff distance (HD), mean value of surface-to-surface distance (MSSD) and standard deviation of surface-to-surface distance (SDSSD). In the numerical phantom study, the evaluation yielded a DC of 0.98  ±  0.01, an NMI of 0.97  ±  0.01, an SSIM of 0.999  ±  0.001, an HD of 2.2  ±  0.8 mm, an MSSD of 0.1  ±  0.1 mm, and an SDSSD of 0.3  ±  0.1 mm. The validation on the BRATS data resulted in a DC of 0.89  ±  0.08, which outperform the BRATS challenge algorithms. Evaluation on clinical datasets gave a DC of 0.86  ±  0.09, an NMI of 0.80  ±  0.11, an SSIM of 0.999  ±  0.001, an HD of 8.8  ±  12.6 mm, an MSSD of 1.5  ±  3.2 mm, and an SDSSD of 1.8  ±  3.4 mm when comparing to the physician drawn ground truth. The result indicated that the developed automatic segmentation strategy yielded accurate brain tumor delineation and presented as a useful clinical tool for SRS applications.

Surgical management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer

The oligometastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) offers a new surgical opportunity. New reported data is showing that surgery can offer a reasonable benefit, in terms of long-term survival, to some patients. The advantages of surgical treatment rely on a more adequate patient selection and a better understanding of the biology of these tumors. Currently, mediastinal involvement of the primary tumor can be identified as the most important prognostic variable after curative-intent of synchronous or metachronous metastasis. It seems clear that the routine use of combined FDG-PET and CT will help to detect the more favorable cohort of oligometastatic patients. As expected, pathological T staging of the primary tumor and the completeness of its resection are also crucial factors influencing final results. The real benefit of the local treatment over synchronous or metachronous metastasis is controversial with series showing better outcomes for metachronous lesions than for synchronous and others offering equal results. Also non conclusive results appear when analyzing different sites of metastasis. Retrospective series tend to show different outcomes depending on the affected organ while usually no differences are found in prospective ones. Most of the current evidence is based on retrospective studies on patients collected along extended periods of time. That represents a great limitation to the knowledge on this topic. Some prospective analyses have added some insight, but still the quality of the evidence is too low to allow drawing robust conclusions. As frequently concluded, prospective well designed investigation is requested to ascertain the value of surgery in this specific population of patients with extended NSCLC.