Eribulin inhibits the growth of small cell lung cancer cell lines alone and with radiotherapy

Eribulin in breast cancer: Current insights and therapeutic perspectives

Eribulin is a non-taxane synthetic analogue approved in many countries as third-line treatment for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to its mitotic property, eribulin has non-mitotic properties including but not limited to, its ability to induce phenotypic reversal of epithelial to mesenchymal transition, vascular remodelling, reduction in immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment. Since approval, there has been a surge in studies investigating the application of eribulin as an earlier-line treatment and also in combination with other agents such as immunotherapy and targeted therapy across all breast cancer sub-types, including hormone receptor positive, HER2 positive and triple negative breast cancer, many demonstrating promising activity. This review will focus on the application of eribulin in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer across all subtypes including its role as an earlier-line agent, its toxicity profile, and potential future directions.

TP53 Null Mutations Identify Lung Cancer Cell Lines with Highest Sensitivity to the Nontaxane Microtubule Inhibitor Eribulin

The nontaxane microtubule inhibitor eribulin is an approved therapeutic for metastatic breast cancer and liposarcoma. Eribulin was previously tested in unselected patients with lung cancer and yielded a modest objective response rate of ∼5%-12%. Because lung cancers represent diverse histologies and driving oncogenic mutations, we postulated that eribulin may exhibit properties of a precision oncology agent with a previously undefined specificity for a molecularly distinct subset of lung cancers. Herein, we screened a panel of 44 non-small cell and small-cell lung cancer cell lines for in vitro growth sensitivity to eribulin. The results revealed a greater than 15,000-fold range in eribulin sensitivity (IC50 = 0.005-89 nM) among the cell lines that was not correlated with their sensitivity to the taxane-based inhibitor paclitaxel. The quartile of cell lines exhibiting the lowest eribulin IC50 values was not enriched for specific histologies, epithelial-mesenchymal differentiation, or specific oncogene drivers but was significantly enriched for nonsense/frameshift TP53 mutations and low-TP53 mRNA but not missense TP53 mutations. By comparison, the mutation status of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A, STK11, and KEAP1 was not associated with eribulin sensitivity. Finally, the highest eribulin IC50 quartile (>1 nM) exhibited significantly elevated mRNA expression of the drug pump, ATP binding cassette B1, defined resistance mechanism to eribulin, and paclitaxel. The findings support further investigations into basic mechanisms by which complete lack of TP53 function regulates anticancer activity of eribulin and the potential utility of TP53 null phenotypes distinct from TP53 missense mutations as a biomarker of response in patients with lung cancer. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Distinct from precision oncology agents that are matched to cancers bearing oncogenically activated versions of their targets, microtubule inhibitors, such as eribulin, are deployed in an unselected manner. The results in this study demonstrate that lung cancer cell lines exhibiting the highest sensitivity to eribulin bear TP53 null phenotypes, supporting a rationale to consider the status of this tumor suppressor in the clinical setting.