1
|
Pan H, Zhu H, Tian Y, Gu Z, Ning J, Chen H, Ge Z, Zou N, Zhang J, Tao Y, Kong W, Jiang L, Hu Y, Huang J, Luo Q. Quality of lymph node dissection and early recurrence in robotic versus thoracoscopic lobectomy for stage N1-2 non-small cell lung cancer: Eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108496. [PMID: 38968856 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 06/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of lymph node dissection (LND) and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted (RL) versus video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy (VL) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with nodal involvement remains controversial. This study aims to compare LND quality and early recurrence (ER) rate between RL and VL for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients based on eleven-year real-world data from a high-volume center. METHODS Pathologic stage IIB-IIIB (T1-3N1-2) NSCLC patients undergoing RL or VL in Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2010 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity-score matching (PSM, 1:4 RL versus VL) was performed to mitigate baseline differences. LND quality was evaluated by adequate (≥16) LND and nodal upstaging rates. ER was defined as recurrence occurring within 24 months post-surgery. RESULTS Out of 1578 cases reviewed, PSM yielded 200 RL and 800 VL cases. Without compromising perioperative outcomes, RL assessed more N1 and N2 LNs and N1 stations, and led to higher incidences of adequate LND (58.5 % vs. 42.0 %, p < 0.001) and nodal upstaging (p = 0.026), compared to VL. Notably, RL improved perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing adequate LND than VL. Finally, RL notably reduced ER rate (22.0 % vs. 29.6 %, p = 0.032), especially LN ER rate (15.0 % vs. 21.5 %, p = 0.041), and prolonged disease-free survival (DFS; hazard ratio = 0.837, p = 0.040) compared with VL. Further subgroup analysis of ER and DFS within the cN1-2-stage cohort verified this survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS RL surpasses VL in enhancing LND quality, reducing ER rates, and improving perioperative outcomes when adequate LND is performed for stage N1-2 NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanbo Pan
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Hongda Zhu
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Yu Tian
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Zenan Gu
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Junwei Ning
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Hang Chen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Lihuili Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315040, China
| | - Zhen Ge
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315010, China
| | - Ningyuan Zou
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Jiaqi Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Yixing Tao
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Weicheng Kong
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhoushan Putuo District People's Hospital, Zhoushan, 316100, China
| | - Long Jiang
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China
| | - Yingjie Hu
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China.
| | - Jia Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China.
| | - Qingquan Luo
- Department of Thoracic Surgical Oncology, Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200300, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shahin GMM, Vos PPWK, Hutteman M, Stigt JA, Braun J. Robot-assisted thoracic surgery for stages IIB-IVA non-small cell lung cancer: retrospective study of feasibility and outcome. J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01549-3. [PMID: 36928749 PMCID: PMC10374818 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01549-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) for higher stages non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains controversial. This study reports the feasibility of RATS in patients with stages IIB-IVA NSCLC. A single-institute, retrospective study was conducted with patients undergoing RATS for stages IIB-IVA NSCLC, from January 2015 until January 2020. Unforeseen N2 disease was excluded. Data were collected from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit database. Conversion rate, radical (R0) resection rate, local recurrence rate and complications were analyzed, as were risk factors for conversion. RATS was performed in 95 patients with NSCLC clinical or pathological stages IIB (N = 51), IIIA (N = 39), IIIB (N = 2) and IVA (N = 3). 10.5% had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Pathological staging was T3 in 33.7% and T4 in 34.7%. RATS was completed in 77.9% with a radical resection rate of 94.8%. Lobectomy was performed in 67.4% of the total resections. Conversion was for strategic (18.9%) and emergency (3.2%) reasons. Pneumonectomy (p = 0.001), squamous cell carcinoma (p < 0.001), additional resection of adjacent structures (p = 0.025) and neoadjuvant chemoradiation (p = 0.017) were independent risk factors for conversion. Major post-operative complications occurred in ten patients (10.5%) including an in-hospital mortality of 2.1% (n = 2). Median recurrence-free survival was estimated at 39.4 months (CI 16.4-62.5). Two- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 53.8% and 36.7%, respectively. This study concludes that RATS is safe and feasible in higher staged NSCLC tumors after exclusion of unforeseen N2 disease. It brings new perspective on the potential of RATS in higher stages, dealing with larger and more invasive tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghada M M Shahin
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Peter-Paul W K Vos
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Merlijn Hutteman
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jos A Stigt
- Department of Pulmonology, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Jerry Braun
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Uniportal VATS for Diagnosis and Staging in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13050826. [PMID: 36899970 PMCID: PMC10001247 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13050826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Uniportal VATS has become an accepted approach in minimally invasive thoracic surgery since its first report for lobectomy in 2011. Since the initial restrictions in indications, it has been used in almost all procedures, from conventional lobectomies to sublobar resections, bronchial and vascular sleeve procedures and even tracheal and carinal resections. In addition to its use for treatment, it provides an excellent approach for suspicious solitary undiagnosed nodules after bronchoscopic or transthoracic image-guided biopsy. Uniportal VATS is also used as a surgical staging method in NSCLC due to its low invasiveness in terms of chest tube duration, hospital stay and postoperative pain. In this article, we review the evidence of uniportal VATS accuracy for NSCLC diagnosis and staging and provide technical details and recommendations for its safe performance for that purpose.
Collapse
|
4
|
Popat S, Liu SV, Scheuer N, Hsu GG, Lockhart A, Ramagopalan SV, Griesinger F, Subbiah V. Addressing challenges with real-world synthetic control arms to demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of Pralsetinib in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat Commun 2022; 13:3500. [PMID: 35715405 PMCID: PMC9205915 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30908-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
As advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) is being increasingly divided into rare oncogene-driven subsets, conducting randomised trials becomes challenging. Using real-world data (RWD) to construct control arms for single-arm trials provides an option for comparative data. However, non-randomised treatment comparisons have the potential to be biased and cause concern for decision-makers. Using the example of pralsetinib from a RET fusion-positive aNSCLC single-arm trial (NCT03037385), we demonstrate a relative survival benefit when compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy RWD cohorts. Quantitative bias analyses show that results for the RWD-trial comparisons are robust to data missingness, potential poorer outcomes in RWD and residual confounding. Overall, the study provides evidence in favour of pralsetinib as a first-line treatment for RET fusion-positive aNSCLC. The quantification of potential bias performed in this study can be used as a template for future studies of this nature. Real-world data (RWD) based control arms provide an option to compare the effectiveness of single-arm trials. By performing multiple quantitative bias analyses to alleviate concerns about trial-RWD comparability, here the authors show that the RET inhibitor pralsetinib provides survival benefit in patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer from the ARROW single-arm trial, (NCT03037385) when compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy and pembrolizumab with chemotherapy RWD cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Popat
- Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Stephen V Liu
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Frank Griesinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|