Targeting un-MET needs in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Macrocyclization strategy for improving candidate profiles in medicinal chemistry

Macrocycles are defined as cyclic compounds with 12 or more members. In medicinal chemistry, they are categorized based on their core chemistry into cyclic peptides and macrocycles. Macrocycles are advantageous because of their structural diversity and ability to achieve high affinity and selectivity towards challenging targets that are often not addressable by conventional small molecules. The potential of macrocyclization to optimize drug-like properties while maintaining adequate bioavailability and permeability has been emphasized as a key innovation in medicinal chemistry. This review provides a detailed case study of the application of macrocyclization over the past 5 years, starting from the initial analysis of acyclic active compounds to optimization of the resulting macrocycles for improved efficacy and drug-like properties. Additionally, it illustrates the strategic value of macrocyclization in contemporary drug discovery efforts.

Challenges and opportunities in the immunotherapy era: balancing expectations with hope in small-cell lung cancer

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a biologically aggressive subtype of lung cancer, a lethal disease characterized by rapid tumor growth, early relapse, a strong tendency for early widespread metastasis, and high genomic instability, making it a formidable foe in modern oncology practice. While the management of non-SCLC has been revolutionized in the era of immunotherapy, progress in SCLC has been more muted. Recent randomized phase III clinical trials have combined programmed death ligand-1 inhibitors to a chemotherapy backbone and demonstrated improved survival; however, the absolute benefit observed is short months. There is an undeniable urgent need for better responses, better agents, novel therapeutic approaches, and more rational, biomarker-driven clinical trials in SCLC. In this review, we discuss the rationale and current understanding of the biology of SCLC in the modern era of immunotherapy, discuss recent advances in front-line immunotherapeutic approaches that have changed clinical practice globally, provide an overview of some of the challenges and limitations that have staggered immune checkpoint blockade in SCLC, and explore some of the novel immunotherapeutic approaches currently being investigated.

Real-world analysis of MET exon 14 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study from two Swedish hospitals

BACKGROUND

Real-World evidence on mesenchymal-epithelial transition exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14) in lung cancer remains limited. With an incidence of 3-4% across histological subtypes, METex14 is now an actionable target for MET inhibitors (METi) in advanced lung cancer, demonstrating response rates between 30-70%. Yet, its role in early stages and sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is still under exploration.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of lung cancer patients presenting with METex14 across all stages. These patients were treated at two Swedish University Hospitals: Karolinska and Skåne, between the years 2014 and 2022.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 63 patients, of which 50 met the inclusion criteria. The median overall survival (OS) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) according to the stage was not reached (NR) for stage I, NR for stage II, 15 months (95% CI, 5.4-24.6) for stage III, and 17 months (95% CI, 9.2-NR) for stage IV. The median OS for stage IV patients who received a METi was 17 months (95% CI, 9.5-NR) vs. 10 months (95% CI, 6.2-NR) in patients without METi (p = 0.92; Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.07). The median OS for stage IV patients who received ICIs was 18 months (95% CI, 16.5-NR) vs. 6 months (95% CI, 2.5-NR) in patients without ICIs (p = 0.15; HR = 0.47). The median OS for stage IV patients who received chemotherapy was 17 months (95% CI, 9.7-NR) vs. 10 months (95% CI, 4.5-NR) in patients without (p = 0.97; HR = 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest limited survival benefits from METi, ICIs, and chemotherapy for METex14 lung cancer patients. While not statistically significant, these findings underscore the need for larger trials for validation. Identifying effective treatments for this challenging lung cancer subtype remains a priority.

Savolitinib: A Promising Targeting Agent for Cancer

Savolitinib is a highly selective small molecule inhibitor of the mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) tyrosine kinase, primarily developed for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET mutations. It is also being investigated as a treatment for breast, head and neck, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, and other gastrointestinal cancers. In both preclinical and clinical studies, it has demonstrated efficacy in lung, kidney, and stomach cancers. Savolitinib is an oral anti-cancer medication taken as a 600 mg dose once daily. It can be used as a monotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with MET mutations and in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for patients who have developed resistance to them. Furthermore, savolitinib has shown positive results in gastric cancer treatment, particularly in combination with docetaxel. As a result, this review aims to validate its efficacy in NSCLC and suggests its potential application in other gastrointestinal cancers, such as pancreatic cancer, based on related research in gastric and renal cancer.

Survival outcomes and prognostic factors of lung cancer patients with the MET exon 14 skipping mutation: A single-center real-world study

Introduction

The MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) mutation is an important oncogenic driver in lung cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of clinical data from lung cancer patients with the METex14 mutation to analyze their survival outcomes and associated prognostic factors.

Methods

A one-step reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction to examine the presence of the METex14 mutation was performed using RNA samples from 1374 lung cancer patients with no detected EGFR and ALK mutations. Pathological features and immunohistochemistry (IHC) results for c-MET were analyzed in patients with METex14-positive tumors.

Results

METex14 was identified in 69 patients with lung cancer, including 53 adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 16 non-ADC patients. In comparison with patients without the METex14 mutation, lung cancer patients harboring the METex14 mutation were generally elderly individuals, never-smokers, and had poor performance scores. A higher frequency of METex14 mutations was detected in pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) patients (24.3%, n = 9/37). However, stage IV PSC patients with or without the METex14 mutations showed similarly poor overall survival (OS) (p = 0.429). For all 36 METex14-positive lung ADCs, multivariate analysis showed several poor prognostic factors, including strong c-MET IHC staining (p = 0.006), initial brain metastasis (p = 0.005), and administration of only supportive care (p < 0.001). After excluding seven patients who received only supportive care, we further analyzed 29 stage IV lung ADC patients with METex14 mutations who received anti-cancer treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that pemetrexed treatment (p = 0.003), lung radiotherapy (p = 0.020), initial brain metastasis (p = 0.005), and strong c-MET IHC staining (p = 0.012) were independent prognostic factors for OS in these patients.

Conclusions

A higher frequency of METex14 mutations was detected in PSC patients. Stage IV PSC patients with or without the METex14 mutations had similarly poor overall survival. Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, strong c-MET ICH staining, initial brain metastasis, and lung radiotherapy, may help predict survival outcomes in patients with advanced lung ADCs harboring the METex14 mutation.

MET alterations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Targeting the MET pathway in advanced NSCLC has been of particular interest due to its role as both a primary oncogenic driver and secondary oncogenic driver of acquired resistance. Activation of the MET pathway can occur through several mechanisms, which can complicate the diagnostic and treatment approach. Recently, several MET-directed therapies have been developed with promising results. In this narrative review, we summarize the biology and mechanism of MET as a clinically relevant driver mutation, distinct MET alterations including diagnostic challenges, significance in the setting of acquired resistance, and novel treatment strategies in advanced NSCLC.

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with driver mutations: current applications and future directions

With the improved understanding of driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), expanding the targeted therapeutic options improved the survival and safety. However, responses to these agents are commonly temporary and incomplete. Moreover, even patients with the same oncogenic driver gene can respond diversely to the same agent. Furthermore, the therapeutic role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in oncogene-driven NSCLC remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to classify the management of NSCLC with driver mutations based on the gene subtype, concomitant mutation, and dynamic alternation. Then, we provide an overview of the resistant mechanism of target therapy occurring in targeted alternations ("target-dependent resistance") and in the parallel and downstream pathways ("target-independent resistance"). Thirdly, we discuss the effectiveness of ICIs for NSCLC with driver mutations and the combined therapeutic approaches that might reverse the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment. Finally, we listed the emerging treatment strategies for the new oncogenic alternations, and proposed the perspective of NSCLC with driver mutations. This review will guide clinicians to design tailored treatments for NSCLC with driver mutations.

MET alterations in advanced pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subset of NSCLC that accounts for about 0.5-1% of all primary lung carcinoma, and its malignant biological behavior is more aggressive than other pathological types of lung cancer. Recent studies have reported a variety of gene mutations associated with the occurrence, development and treatment of PSC, especially the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) proto-oncogene alterations, including the exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations as well as the amplification and overexpression of MET gene, which are associated with molecularly targeted therapy for PSC. METex14 skipping mutation is the most common and well-studied mutation type, occurring in about 22-31.8% of PSC patients, while the prevalence of MET amplification is reported as 4.8-13.6% and MET ovexpression is about 20.2%. Molecular pathology tests, including IHC and NGS, are valuable in determining the prognosis of patients with PSC and helping to determine the treatment. The existing clinical data have confirmed the efficacy of MET-TKI in PSC patients with MET alteration, among which the clinical study of Savolitinib has enrolled the largest proportion of PSC patients and achieved relatively good efficacy, but more clinical researches are still needed. The multi-disciplinary team may maximize the optimal treatment options for patients with the advanced PSC.

Case report: Salvage capmatinib therapy in KIF5B-MET fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma with resistance to telisotuzumab vedotin

Telisotuzumab vedotin is a MET-targeting antibody–drug conjugate that has demonstrated a good treatment response in patients with EGFR wild-type MET-overexpressing non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, patients have been reported to acquire resistance to this drug, and the subsequent therapy has not been standardized. Here, we present a case of a 56-year-old woman diagnosed with KIF5B-MET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer who had a durable response to capmatinib after acquired resistance to telisotuzumab vedotin.

CNTN-1 Upregulation Induced by Low-Dose Cisplatin Promotes Malignant Progression of Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells via Activation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition

Tumor metastasis and invasion are the main impediments to lung adenocarcinoma successful treatment. Previous studies demonstrate that chemotherapeutic agents can elevate the malignancy of cancer cells other than their therapeutic effects. In this study, the effects of transient low-dose cisplatin treatment on the malignant development of lung adenocarcinoma cells (A549) were detected, and the underlying epigenetic mechanisms were investigated. The findings showed that A549 cells exhibited epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like phenotype along with malignant progression under the transient low-dose cisplatin treatment. Meanwhile, low-dose cisplatin was found to induce contactin-1 (CNTN-1) upregulation in A549 cells. Subsequently, we found that further overexpressing CNTN-1 in A549 cells obviously activated the EMT process in vitro and in vivo, and caused malignant development of A549 cells in vitro. Taken together, we conclude that low-dose cisplatin can activate the EMT process and resulting malignant progression through upregulating CNTN-1 in A549 cells. The findings provided new evidence that a low concentration of chemotherapeutic agents could facilitate the malignancy of carcinoma cells via activating the EMT process other than their therapeutic effects.

Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison (MAIC) of Tepotinib with Other MET Inhibitors for the Treatment of Advanced NSCLC with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations

INTRODUCTION

MET exon 14 skipping in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), can be targeted with MET inhibitors including tepotinib, capmatinib, savolitinib, and crizotinib. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) methodology was used to compare outcomes data between agents and to address bias from differences in baseline characteristics.

METHODS

Patient-level data from the VISION study (tepotinib) were weighted for comparison with aggregate data from the GEOMETRY mono-1 (capmatinib), NCT02897479 (savolitinib) and PROFILE 1001 (crizotinib) studies in patients with aNSCLC, using baseline characteristics prognostic for overall survival (OS) in VISION. Overall response rate (ORR), OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DOR) were compared. Patients were stratified by line of therapy: overall (all lines), previously treated, and treatment-naïve.

RESULTS

Improvements in ORR and all time-to-event endpoints were predicted for tepotinib compared with crizotinib and savolitinib in the different populations, although comparisons with savolitinib were hindered by considerable differences in baseline patient populations. Tepotinib appeared to be associated with prolonged PFS and OS compared with capmatinib in previously treated patients (PFS HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.36-0.83; OS HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.42-1.06) and the overall populations (PFS HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.43-0.86; OS HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.49-1.05), with smaller improvements in DOR. The ORR comparisons between tepotinib and capmatinib identified a swing of up to ± 6 percentage points in the weighted tepotinib ORR depending on the population studied (treatment-naïve vs. previously treated patients).

CONCLUSIONS

The MAIC identified potential differences in efficacy endpoints with the different MET inhibitors, and predicted prolonged PFS and OS with tepotinib compared with capmatinib and crizotinib. Although MAIC cannot balance for unobserved factors, it remains an informative method to contextualize single-arm studies, where head-to-head trials are unlikely to be feasible.