Characterizing immune-mediated adverse events with durvalumab in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC: a post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial

Novel radiogenomics approach to predict and characterize pneumonitis in stage III NSCLC

Unresectable stage III NSCLC is now treated with chemoradiation (CRT) followed by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Pneumonitis, a common CRT complication, has heightened risk with ICI, potentially causing severe outcomes. Currently, there are no biomarkers to predict pneumonitis risk or differentiate between radiation-induced pneumonitis (RTP) and ICI-induced pneumonitis (IIP). This study analyzed 293 patients from two institutions, with 140 experiencing pneumonitis (RTP: 84, IIP: 56). Two models were developed: M1 predicted pneumonitis risk using seven radiomic features, achieving high accuracy across internal and external datasets (AUCs: 0.76 and 0.85). M2 differentiated RTP from IIP, with strong performance (AUCs: 0.86 and 0.81). Gene set enrichment analysis linked high pneumonitis risk to pathways such as ECM-receptor interaction and T-cell signaling, while high IIP risk correlated with MAPK and JAK-STAT pathways. Radiomic models show promise in early pneumonitis risk stratification and distinguishing pneumonitis types, potentially guiding personalized NSCLC treatment.

Esophagitis and Pneumonitis Related to Concurrent Chemoradiation ± Durvalumab Consolidation in Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Risk Assessment and Management Recommendations Based on a Modified Delphi Process

The addition of durvalumab consolidation to concurrent chemoradiation therapy (cCRT) has fundamentally changed the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nevertheless, concerns related to esophagitis and pneumonitis potentially impact the broad application of all regimen components. A Canadian expert working group (EWG) was convened to provide guidance to healthcare professionals (HCPs) managing these adverse events (AEs) and to help optimize the patient experience. Integrating literature review findings and real-world clinical experience, the EWG used a modified Delphi process to develop 12 clinical questions, 30 recommendations, and a risk-stratification guide. The recommendations address risk factors associated with developing esophagitis and pneumonitis, approaches to risk mitigation and optimal management, and considerations related to initiation and re-initiation of durvalumab consolidation therapy. For both AEs, the EWG emphasized the importance of upfront risk assessment to inform the treatment approach, integration of preventative measures, and prompt initiation of suitable therapy in alignment with AE grade. The EWG also underscored the need for timely, effective communication between multidisciplinary team members and clarity on responsibilities. These recommendations will help support HCP decision-making related to esophagitis and pneumonitis arising from cCRT ± durvalumab and improve outcomes for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Navigating the Complexities of Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Real-World Data Collection for Oncology Pharmacovigilance

This new editorial discusses the promise and challenges of successful integration of natural language processing methods into electronic health records for timely, robust, and fair oncology pharmacovigilance.

The role of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in stage III NSCLC

Locally advanced non-small lung cancer encompasses a diverse range of tumors. In the last few years, the treatment of stage III unresectable non-small lung cancer has evolved significantly. The PACIFIC trial opened a new therapeutic era in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC, establishing durvalumab consolidation therapy as the new standard of care worldwide. A careful evaluation of this type of lung cancer and a discussion of the management of these patients within a multidisciplinary team represents a crucial step in defining the best treatment strategy for each patient. For unresectable stage III NSCLC, definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was historically recommended as a treatment with a 5-year survival rate ranging from 20% to 30%. The PACIFIC study conducted in 2017 compared the use of chemoradiotherapy and maintenance therapy with the anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody durvalumab to a placebo in patients with locally advanced NSCLC who had not experienced disease progression. The study was prospective, randomized, and phase III. The administration of this medication in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated a notable improvement in overall survival. Multiple clinical trials are currently exploring various immune checkpoint inhibition regimens to enhance the treatment efficacy in patients with stage III cancer. Our goal is to offer an up-to-date summary of the planned clinical trials for treatment options, focusing on the significant obstacles and prospects in the post-PACIFIC era.

Durvalumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from the phase 1 CLOVER study

INTRODUCTION

For patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current standard of care is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab. However, earlier initiation of durvalumab simultaneously with cCRT may increase antitumor activity relative to initiation after cCRT. The phase 1 CLOVER study (NCT03509012) evaluated durvalumab combined with cCRT in patients with advanced solid tumors; we report findings from the NSCLC cohort.

METHODS

CLOVER comprised a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment part, followed by an expansion part. In the NSCLC cohort, patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage III NSCLC were enrolled in three treatment arms: durvalumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) + cisplatin + etoposide + radiotherapy (Arm 1); durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin + paclitaxel + radiotherapy (Arm 2); or durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin or cisplatin + pemetrexed + radiotherapy (non-squamous histology only; Arm 3). Patients received durvalumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled: 21, 22, and 21 in Arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One patient in Arm 1 had DLT (grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase increase and grade 4 alanine aminotransferase increase); no DLTs were observed in Arms 2 or 3. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 76.6 % of patients overall; the most common were neutropenia (51.6 %), leukopenia (20.3 %), and anemia (17.2 %). In a post-hoc analysis, 7.8 % of patients had grade 3 pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis (grouped term) events. Overall, the objective response rate was 60.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 47.9-72.9); median duration of response was 15.8 months (95 % CI, 9.0-not estimable [NE]). Median progression-free survival was 13.4 months (95 % CI, 8.8-20.1) and median overall survival was not reached (95 % CI, 21.9-NE).

CONCLUSION

Durvalumab in combination with cCRT was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and showed encouraging antitumor activity in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC.

Symptomatic Pneumonitis With Durvalumab After Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC

Introduction

In the placebo-controlled, phase 3 PACIFIC trial, durvalumab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.00251) in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC and no progression after platinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT). Pneumonitis or radiation pneumonitis (PRP) was common in both arms. We report exploratory analyses evaluating the association of symptomatic (grade ≥2) PRP (G2+PRP) with baseline factors and clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients with WHO performance status of 0 or 1 were randomized (2:1) to 12 months of durvalumab or placebo, 1 to 42 days after cCRT. Associations between baseline factors and on-study G2+PRP in durvalumab-treated patients were investigated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. PFS and OS were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for time-dependent G2+PRP plus covariates for randomization stratification factors without and with additional baseline factors.

Results

On-study G2+PRP occurred in 94 of 475 (19.8%) and 33 of 234 patients (14.1%) on durvalumab and placebo, respectively (median follow-up, 25.2 mo); grade greater than or equal to 3 PRP was uncommon (4.6% and 4.7%, respectively). Time to onset and resolution of G2+PRP was similar with durvalumab and placebo. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified patients treated in Asia, those with stage IIIA disease, those with performance status of 1, and those who had not received induction chemotherapy as having a higher risk of G2+PRP. PFS and OS benefit favoring durvalumab versus placebo was maintained regardless of time-dependent G2+PRP.

Conclusions

Factors associated with higher risk of G2+PRP with durvalumab after cCRT were identified. Clinical benefit was maintained regardless of on-study G2+PRP, suggesting the risk of this event should not deter the use of durvalumab in eligible patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Durvalumab-Induced Myocarditis and Dilated Cardiomyopathy in a Patient With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Diagnostic Conundrum

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been a therapeutic oncological breakthrough in managing diverse malignancies. We present a 78-year-old male with stage IIIb non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) managed by concurrent chemotherapy with carboplatin/pemetrexed and radiotherapy followed by monthly durvalumab injections. He presented to the hospital with shortness of breath and fluid overload after eight months of starting durvalumab. Workup, including laboratory investigations, coronary angiography, and stress myocardial magnetic resonance imaging, increased our suspicion for the diagnosis of durvalumab-induced myocarditis and nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. He was managed with aggressive diuresis and pulse dose steroids with an improvement in his symptoms and his cardiac function. This case illustrates an under-reported clinical side effect in the era of advancement in oncological immunotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in randomized clinical trials among triple-negative breast cancer

Background: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy (CT) is a new strategy to explore cancer treatment in recent years, and it is also practiced in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, several published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported heterogeneous results. We conducted this meta-analysis to yield insights into the efficacy and safety of the combination of ICIs and CT for TNBC patients in both the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings.

Method: EMBASE, PUBMED, Cochrane, and www.clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched to determine potential eligible studies from the inception to 20 May 2022. Published RCTs on PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs combined with CT for TNBC patients were included.

Result: This meta-analysis included six double-blind RCTs comprising 4,081 TNBC patients treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 ICIs plus CT or placebo plus CT. The combination strategy benefited a better pathologic complete response (pCR) by 29% (RR = 1.29; 95% CI: 1.17–1.41; I² = 0%) and a better progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74–0.90; I² = 0%) in the neoadjuvant and the adjuvant settings, respectively, especially in PD-L1-positive population (HR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.62–0.81; I² = 13%). The safety profiles were generally tolerable in both settings but the combination treatment will increase the risk of severe adverse events in the adjuvant setting (RR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.08–1.62, I² = 0%). Additionally, the combination will increase the risk of any-grade hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pneumonia, and rash in the adjuvant setting, and the risk of any-grade hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, infusion-related reactions, and severe cutaneous reactions in the neoadjuvant setting.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated a significant pCR benefit and confirms the PFS benefit with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs plus CT in TNBC patients with tolerable safety events in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings.

Current challenges of unresectable stage III NSCLC: are we ready to break the glass ceiling of the PACIFIC trial?

Consolidation anti-programmed death-ligand 1 has become a new standard of care in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following chemo-radiotherapy (CTRT), based on the results of two phase III trials. Advances remain however needed, in particular to reduce the risk of distant relapse and for treatment personalization. Newer strategies are currently being tested, including consolidation with dual immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concurrent chemo-radioimmunotherapy and (chemo)-immunotherapy induction before CTRT. One randomized phase II reported better outcomes with a double ICI consolidation as compared with durvalumab alone. Three nonrandomized phase II trials also suggested that concurrent ICI-CTRT was feasible. Within this review, we summarize the current evidence, highlight ongoing trials and discuss challenges that will ideally lead to a cure for more patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.