[Carpal injuries in children]

Paediatric fractures of carpal bones other than the scaphoid

OBJECTIVES

Fractures of carpal bones other than the scaphoid are rare in children. The aim of this study was to analyze results and identify risk factors for an unfavorable outcome.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Children and adolescents up to the age of 16 years who sustained a carpal fracture other than in the scaphoid between 2004 and 2021 were reviewed in this single-center retrospective study.

RESULTS

In a series of 209 children and adolescents with carpal fractures, 22 had fractures other than the scaphoid. Mean age was 13 years (range 8-16) years, with a total of 41 fractures, with highest incidences for the capitate (10), trapezium (6), triquetrum (4) and pisiform (4). Twenty-nine of these 41 fractures were missed on initial X-ray. Non-displaced fractures were treated with a short arm spica cast including the thumb. Four patients were operated on for displacement fracture or carpometacarpal subluxation. All fractures united, and patients returned to full activities. At the final consultation at a median 14 months (range 6-89) post-injury, all patients with non-displaced fractures were free of symptoms, with excellent Mayo Wrist Scores (MWS). However, three patients with operated trapezium fractures developed early radiological signs of osteoarthritis, two of them with residual pain and MWS rated only good.

CONCLUSION

Non-displaced pediatric carpal fractures treated by forearm cast have excellent prognosis. Fractures of the trapezium with displacement or first carpometacarpal subluxation incur a risk of osteoarthritis despite anatomical reduction and internal fixation.

Implementation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules

BACKGROUND

The Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules have been developed and validated to reduce wrist radiographs following wrist trauma in pediatric patients. However, the actual impact should be evaluated in an implementation study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of implementation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules at the emergency department.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A before-and-after comparative prospective cohort study was conducted, including all consecutive patients aged 3 to 18 years presenting at the emergency department with acute wrist trauma. The primary outcome was the difference in the number of wrist radiographs before and after implementation. Secondary outcomes were the number of clinically relevant missed fractures of the distal forearm, the difference in length of stay at the emergency department and physician compliance with the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules.

RESULTS

A total of 408 patients were included. The absolute reduction in radiographs was 19% compared to before implementation (chi-square test, P<0.001). Non-fracture patients who were discharged without a wrist radiograph had a 26-min shorter stay at the emergency department compared to patients who received a wrist radiograph (68 min vs. 94 min; Mann-Whitney U test, P=0.004). Eight fractures were missed following the recommendation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules. However, only four of them were clinically relevant.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules resulted in a significant reduction in wrist radiographs and time spent at the emergency department. The Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules were able to correctly identify 98% of all clinically relevant distal forearm fractures.

External validation of clinical decision rules for children with wrist trauma

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision rules help to avoid potentially unnecessary radiographs of the wrist, reduce waiting times and save costs.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to provide an overview of all existing non-validated clinical decision rules for wrist trauma in children and to externally validate these rules in a different cohort of patients. Secondarily, we aimed to compare the performance of these rules with the validated Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included all studies that proposed a clinical prediction or decision rule in children presenting at the emergency department with acute wrist trauma. We performed external validation within a cohort of 379 children. We also calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value of each decision rule.

RESULTS

We included three clinical decision rules. The sensitivity and specificity of all clinical decision rules after external validation were between 94% and 99%, and 11% and 26%, respectively. After external validation 7% to 17% less radiographs would be ordered and 1.4% to 5.7% of all fractures would be missed. Compared to the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules only one of the three other rules had a higher sensitivity; however both the specificity and the reduction in requested radiographs were lower in the other three rules.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of the three non-validated clinical decision rules is high. However the specificity and the reduction in number of requested radiographs are low. In contrast, the validated Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules has an acceptable sensitivity and the greatest reduction in radiographs, at 22%, without missing any clinically relevant fractures.

A clinical decision rule for the use of plain radiography in children after acute wrist injury: development and external validation of the Amsterdam Pediatric Wrist Rules

BACKGROUND

In most hospitals, children with acute wrist trauma are routinely referred for radiography.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a clinical decision rule to decide whether radiography in children with wrist trauma is required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively developed and validated a clinical decision rule in two study populations. All children who presented in the emergency department of four hospitals with pain following wrist trauma were included and evaluated for 18 clinical variables. The outcome was a wrist fracture diagnosed by plain radiography.

RESULTS

Included in the study were 787 children. The prediction model consisted of six variables: age, swelling of the distal radius, visible deformation, distal radius tender to palpation, anatomical snuffbox tender to palpation, and painful or abnormal supination. The model showed an area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.83). The sensitivity and specificity were 95.9% and 37.3%, respectively. The use of this model would have resulted in a 22% absolute reduction of radiographic examinations. In a validation study, 7/170 fractures (4.1%, 95% CI: 1.7-8.3%) would have been missed using the decision model.

CONCLUSION

The decision model may be a valuable tool to decide whether radiography in children after wrist trauma is required.