Advances in laparoscopic techniques in pelvic reconstructive surgery for prolapse and incontinence

High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Post-Hysterectomy Vaginal Vault Prolapse Repair

Background and Objectives: Uterosacral ligaments (USLs) suspension is a well-studied, safe, and long-lasting technique for central compartment correction. Preliminary clinical experiences showed encouraging data for this technique, also for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse surgical treatment. However, up-to-date evidence for post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse repair through high uterosacral ligaments suspension is limited. Consequently, with this study, we aimed to assess the efficiency, complications frequency, and functional results of native-tissue repair through USLs in vaginal vault prolapse. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study. Women with symptomatic vaginal vault prolapse (≥stage 2) who underwent surgery with transvaginal native-tissue repair by high uterosacral ligaments were included. Patient characteristics, preoperative assessment, operative data, postoperative follow-up visits, and re-interventions were collected from the hospital's record files. High uterosacral ligament suspension was performed according to the technique previously described by Shull. A transverse apical colpotomy at the level of the post-hysterectomy scar was performed in order to enter the peritoneal cavity. USLs were identified and transfixed from ventral to dorsal with three absorbable sutures. Sutures were then passed through the vaginal apex and tightened to close the transverse colpotomy and suspend the vaginal cuff. At the end of the surgical time, a diagnostic cystoscopy was performed in order to evaluate ureteral bilateral patency. Using the POP-Q classification system, we considered an objective recurrence as the descensus of at least one compartment ≥ II stage, or the need for a subsequent surgery for POP. The complaint of bulging symptoms was considered the item to define a subjective recurrence. We employed PGI-I scores to assess patients' satisfaction. Results: Forty-seven consecutive patients corresponding to the given period were analyzed. No intraoperative complications were observed. We observed one postoperative hematoma that required surgical evacuation. Thirty-three patients completed a minimum of one-year follow-up (mean follow-up 21.7 ± 14.6 months). Objective cure rate was observed in 25 patients (75.8%). No patients required reintervention. The most frequent site of recurrence was the anterior compartment (21.2%), while apical compartment prolapse relapsed only in 6% of patients. An improvement in all POP-Q parameters was recorded except TVL which resulted in a mean 0.5 cm shorter. Subjective recurrence was referred by 4 (12.1%) patients. The mean satisfaction assessed by PGI-I score was 1.6 ± 0.8. Conclusion: This analysis demonstrated that native-tissue repair through high USL suspension is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Objective, subjective, functional, and quality of life outcomes were satisfactory, with minimal complications.

Laparoscopic Mesh-Less Cervicosacropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate surgical and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic mesh-less cervicosacropexy for the treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

METHODS

This single institutional review board-approved prospective cohort study enrolled 46 consecutive, sexually active symptomatic women requiring surgical correction of uterovaginal prolapse, from July 2013 to March 2016. After supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy, the cervix was suspended to the anterior longitudinal ligament of the sacral promontory through a continuous suture with plication and shortening of the right uterosacral ligament. Pelvic organs' function was evaluated through validated questionnaires during preoperative and postoperative follow-up evaluations. The anatomical recurrences of genital prolapse with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative stage 2 or higher, in particular of central compartment (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative score C ≥-1), were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean ± SD age was 55.5 ± 10.9 years. Mean ± SD operating time was 97.4 ± 25.6 (range, 60-180) minutes. Mean ± SD hospitalization length was 3.6 ± 0.9 (range, 2-6) days. No intraoperative complications were recorded. Median length of follow-up was 24 (range, 12-38) months. During the follow-up period, the objective success rates for central compartment prolapse and for all compartments were 93.5% and 89.1%, respectively. No woman presented dyspareunia at follow-up. Thirty-nine women (84.8%) reported very high satisfaction related to surgery and 6 (13%) a moderate satisfaction. Overall Female Sexual Function Index, Knowles-Eccersley-Scott Symptom, and Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract scores improved significantly after surgery, except for incontinence score domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic mesh-less cervicosacropexy represents an effective and feasible option for the surgical treatment of uterovaginal prolapse in sexually active women, avoiding postoperative complications due to the mesh use.

A Prospective Study of Minimally Invasive Paravaginal Repair of Cystocele and Associated Pelvic Floor Defects: Our Experience

Aims and objectives

To assess the outcome of minimally invasive paravaginal repair of symptomatic cystocele and to correlate postoperative outcome with preoperative presentation. The primary outcome was the anatomical outcome measured by postoperative physical examination and the functional outcome was assessed by subjective symptoms and questionnaires. The secondary outcomes were perioperative and postoperative complications.

Materials and methods

In this longitudinal prospective observational study, 44 women underwent laparoscopic or robotic paravaginal cystocele repair from January 2016 to July 2016 and they were followed up to 1 year after surgery in a tertiary advanced laparoscopic center. All patients had a symptomatic lateral cystocele ≥ grade 2 according to Baden-Walker classification. Other coexisting defects like apical cystocele or combined defects were corrected concomitantly. The anatomical outcome was measured by physical examination and functional outcome was assessed by questionnaires-Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 and Urinary Distress Inventory 6 preoperatively and during postoperative follow-up.

Results

All 44 patients were followed up to 12 months after surgery. The anatomical cure rate for cystocele was 97.7%. There were no major complications. All subjective symptoms and quality of life scores improved significantly during postoperative follow-up. The anatomical recurrence rate in our study was 2.3%.

Conclusion

Minimally invasive paravaginal repair of cystocele is an effective advanced laparoscopic procedure. It can be concomitantly performed with other surgical procedures to correct coexisting defects. The anatomical and functional results were outstanding with minimum perioperative morbidity and encouraging long-term outcome.

Prevalence of the genital tract bacterial infections after vaginal reconstructive surgery

Due to frequent childbirth, heavy lifting and the structure of the lives of rural women in Shahrekord region, Iran, cystocele and rectocele are of the main medical problems of the women in this area and for its correction, vaginal reconstructive surgery is needed which causes infection. The purpose of this study was to identify the bacteria causing infection after vaginal reconstructive surgery and performing antibiogram to help these patients for faster recovery. Patients enrolled this study were 92 who had undergone previous vaginal reconstructive surgery and now had infection. After examination, the group of patients taking antibiotics (n = 26) were excluded and the remaining 66 completed the study questionnaire. A gynecologist performed sampling; related tests (aerobic and anaerobic culture using an anaerobic culture gas pack jar and type A which provides absolute anaerobic conditions) were performed; antimicrobial susceptibility testing using Disk Diffusion Method was carried out; and the results were recorded. All the positive samples were polymicrobial. Gardnerella vaginalis in 20 cases (31%), peptostreptococci and anaerobic cocci in 9 cases (13.6%), staphylococcus aureus in 8 cases (9.1%), bacteroides and fusobacterium in 7 cases (10.6%), streptococcus group B in 4 cases (6%), yeast cells in 11 cases (16.6%) and Trichomonas vaginalis in wet mount of 4 (6%) existed. Anaerobic bacteria showed 85% sensitivity to clindamycin, 82% to chloramphenicol, 85% sensitivity to ceftizoxime and 45% to penicillin. Facultative anaerobic bacteria showed a sensitivity rate of 90% to ceftizoxime, chloramphenicol and cephalothin. According to our findings, the rate of vaginal bacterial infection in women with vaginal reconstructive surgery has increased; from which, infections with anaerobic bacteria origins have increased dramatically. We recommend antibiotic prophylaxis prior to genital reconstructive surgeries.

Evaluation of indication-specific genuine stress urinary incontinence procedures in a pelvic floor center

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the indication-related safety, feasibility, and efficacy of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension (LBC), open Burch colposuspension (OB), and midurethral sling (MUS), retropubic vaginal tape (TVT) and transobturator vaginal tape (TOT) procedures for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

Perioperative outcome was assessed in 321 patients treated for SUI by a single surgeon (LBC, n = 120; OB, n = 23; TVT, n = 129; TOT, n = 49) between April 2001 and December 2007 at a single center. Follow-up was available for 115 patients at 30, 40, and 26 months for LBC, OB, and MUS, respectively. The primary outcome was the objective continence measured by a negative cough stress test. The secondary outcome was the subjective continence measured by subjective perception of cure, the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and visual analog score (VAS).

RESULTS

The LBC group had one (0.8%) intra-operative complication (bladder injury) and a mean operation time of 56.5 min. The objective and subjective cure rate associated with LBC was 90.3 and 71%, respectively. The OB group had three (13%) intra-operative complications and a mean procedure time of 44.6 min. The objective and subjective cure rate was 69.2 and 61.5%, respectively. MUS had 7 (TVT, n = 2; retropubic I-STOP, n = 5) procedure-related complications (5.4%) and an operation time of 19.8 min. The objective and subjective efficacy rate for MUS was 84.5 and 62%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

LBC was shown to be safe and feasible with a high objective and subjective success rate. Use of this minimally invasive procedure should be considered in patients with concomitant intra-abdominal pathology.

[Laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of urogenital prolapse. Current status]

Urogenital prolapse is an emerging problem because of the increasing life expectancy of populations. Nearly 42% of women between 15 and 97 years have a pelvic floor disorder (PFD). On the basis of Medline search, we present the main laparoscopical techniques to treat PFD: Burch, sacrocolpopexy, lateral suspension, uterosacral suspension, paravaginal repair, the benefits of laparoscopic surgery, its success rates and complications, and response to various questions that frequently arise about some techniques: should we perform a hysterectomy? Should we make a paravaginal repair? Should we treat prophylactically a stress urinary incontinence? What type of mesh should we use? What to prefer: staples or sutures? Is the posterior mesh necessary?

Prolapse surgery: which technique and when?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

More answers are nowadays available about certain aspects of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) treatment. In this overview some of those aspects are addressed that were considered important and published in 2010.

RECENT FINDINGS

When stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is present concomitant with POP the strategy is still to perform an additional procedure for SUI. If there is no SUI the tendency is only to correct the POP. With masked SUI no firm conclusions can be drawn.The studies that look at mesh for POP provide some careful conclusions. Absorbable biomeshes do not have many benefits over repairs without mesh in the long term. Nonresorbable mesh tends to give better results but also higher complication rates and should be applied with care.A last item is how to perform a sacrocolpopexy. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a well tolerated but time-consuming and difficult procedure to treat prolapse. Comparison with other conventional techniques is lacking. Robotic surgery has the potential of enhancing the widespread introduction of laparoscopic procedures.

SUMMARY

With these findings a better evidence-based choice for surgical technique can be made with regards to POP with or without SUI, the kind of mesh to use and which sacrocolpopexy technique should be chosen.

Laparoscopic management of genital prolapse

INTRODUCTION

Genital prolapse is one of the most common indications for gynaecological surgery. Surgery is performed traditionally via abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic approaches.

METHODS

A MEDLINE computer search was performed to explore the recent evidence behind laparoscopic surgery for female pelvic organ prolapse.

RESULTS

Advances in minimal access surgery have led to an increase in adoption of laparoscopic techniques. Current evidence supports the use of laparoscopy for sacrocolpopexy and colposuspension as an alternative to open surgery. However, the introduction of less invasive midurethral sling procedures for stress incontinence has reserved laparoscopic colposuspension for special indications. The scientific evidence regarding uterosacral suspension procedures and paravaginal and vaginal prolapse repairs are sparse.

CONCLUSION

The current evidence supports the outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as an alternative to open surgery. Further studies are required on the long-term efficiency in laparoscopic paravaginal repair and vaginal wall prolapse.