Managing menopausal symptoms and depression in tamoxifen users: implications of drug and medicinal interactions

Differential effects of desvenlafaxine on hot flashes in women with breast cancer taking tamoxifen: a randomized controlled trial

Hot flashes (HF) are a common adverse event of prolonged tamoxifen use in women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, impacting psychiatric health and quality of life. While desvenlafaxine does not interact with tamoxifen, its efficacy and safety in breast cancer patients remain unstudied. This phase 3, four-week, multi-center, three-arm, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigated the efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine for treating HF in women with breast cancer taking tamoxifen, assessing potential differential effects in patients with psychiatric and inflammatory conditions. Between December 2017 and February 2019, 57 women aged 19 or older, regularly taking tamoxifen as adjuvant therapy, experiencing moderate-to-severe HFs for more than a month, were randomized to receive desvenlafaxine 50 mg/day (D-50), desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day (D-100), or placebo for four weeks. The primary endpoint was the change rate in HF scores over four weeks, with adverse events as a secondary endpoint. Both desvenlafaxine arms demonstrated greater HF score reductions compared to placebo: D-50 (2.20 points/week, 95% CI: 0.71, 3.68) and D-100 (2.34 points/week, 95% CI: 0.92, 3.76). Notably, D-50 arm showed significantly greater efficacy in patients with depression or elevated inflammation. Desvenlafaxine offers an effective and safe treatment regimen for HF in women with breast cancer taking tamoxifen. The presence of depression and inflammation may guide optimal desvenlafaxine dosing. (Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02819921).

Vasomotor Symptoms During Menopause: A Practical Guide on Current Treatments and Future Perspectives

Vasomotor symptoms affect as many as 80% of midlife women, but only about one in four women receive treatment due to many factors. Menopausal hormone therapy remains the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms, and current professional guidelines conclude that the benefits of treatment typically outweigh the risks for healthy, symptomatic women under age 60 years and those within 10 years from their final menstrual period. For women with medical comorbidities, an individualized approach to treatment is recommended. For women who cannot use or choose not to use menopausal hormone therapy, there are many evidence-based non-hormonal options available including pharmacologic therapies. This review aims to summarize treatment options for bothersome vasomotor symptoms to guide clinicians caring for midlife women.

[Non-hormonal alternatives for the management of menopausal hot flushes. Postmenopausal women management: CNGOF and GEMVi clinical practice guidelines]

One of the major symptoms of climacteric syndrome is hot flushes (HF). They are most often experienced as very disabling. Estrogen therapy is the most effective treatment. However, it may be contraindicated in some women. The aim of this article is to provide a review of the scientific literature on pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives in this context. Only randomized trials and meta-analyses of randomized trials were considered. This review shows that some treatments usually used in non-gynecological or endocrinological disease have significant effect in reducing the frequency and/or severity of HF. Hence, some selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (paroxetine, citalopram and escitalopram), serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine, desvenlafaxine) gabapentin, pregabalin and clonidine have a statistically effect as compared with placebo in reducing, the frequency and/or severity of HF. Some phytoestrogens, such as genistein, may also reduce the frequency of HF. Regarding non-pharmacological interventions, hypnosis, acupuncture or yoga have been analyzed with significant beneficial results, even if their evaluation is difficult by the absence of a good placebo group in most trials. By contrast, other approaches, both pharmacological or non-pharmacological, appear to be ineffective in the management of HT. These include homeopathy, vitamin E, alanine, omega 3, numerous phytoestrogens (red clover, black cohosh…), primrose oil, physical activity. In women suffering from breast cancer, several additional problems are added. On the one hand because all phytoestrogens are contraindicated and on the other hand, in patients using tamoxifen, because the molecules, that interact with CYP2D6, are to be formally avoided because of potential interaction with this anti-estrogen treatment. In conclusion, several pharmacological and non-pharmacological alternatives have significant efficacy in the management of severe HF.

Prevalence of the co-prescription of tamoxifen and CYP2D6 inhibitors in Saudi population: A cross sectional study

Consumption of Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) inhibiting drugs along with tamoxifen treatment results in decrease in plasma concentration of endoxifen, the major active tamoxifen metabolite. Simultaneous use of CYP2D6 inhibitors, such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSIs), as well as lesser tamoxifen adherence may negatively impact tamoxifen efficacy in patients with breast cancer. The objective of our study was to assess the co-prescription of CYP2D6 inhibitors and tamoxifen use and also to relate concomitant CYP2D6 inhibitor use and tamoxifen adherence to breast cancer in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. All patients treated for breast cancer who had at least one tamoxifen prescription in their electronic medical records (EMRs) from June 2015 to June 2017 were included. Patients who had other adjuvant hormonal therapy were excluded from the study. In total, 499 patients (25 males and 474 females) with breast cancer using tamoxifen were included. Our study was purely observational study revealed that prescription of weak inhibitors with tamoxifen increased in the second year as opposed to decrease in the prescription of strong inhibitors. Also, a substantial percentage of patient population were found to be non-adherent to the tamoxifen therapy in this study.

European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) and International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS) position statement on managing the menopause after gynecological cancer: focus on menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis

Worldwide, it is estimated that about 1.3 million new gynecological cancer cases are diagnosed each year. For 2018, the predicted annual totals were cervix uteri 569 847, corpus uteri 382 069, ovary 295 414, vulva 44 235, and va​gina 17 600. Treatments include hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. These can result in loss of ovarian function and, in women under the age of 45 years, early menopause. The aim of this position statement is to set out an individualized approach to the management, with or without menopausal hormone therapy, of menopausal symptoms and the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in women with gynecological cancer. Our methods comprised a literature review and consensus of expert opinion. The limited data suggest that women with low-grade, early-stage endometrial cancer may consider systemic or topical estrogens. However, menopausal hormone therapy may stimulate tumor growth in patients with more advanced disease, and non-hormonal approaches are recommended. Uterine sarcomas may be hormone dependent, and therefore estrogen and progesterone receptor testing should be undertaken to guide decisions as to whether menopausal hormone therapy or non-hormonal strategies should be used. The limited evidence available suggests that menopausal hormone therapy, either systemic or topical, does not appear to be associated with harm and does not decrease overall or disease-free survival in women with non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer and germ cell tumors. Caution is required with both systemic and topical menopausal hormone therapy in women with serous and granulosa cell tumors because of their hormone dependence, and non-hormonal options are recommended as initial therapy. There is no evidence to contraindicate the use of systemic or topical menopausal hormone therapy by women with cervical, vaginal, or vulvar cancer, as these tumors are not considered to be hormone dependent.

European Menopause and Andropause Society (EMAS) and International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS) position statement on managing the menopause after gynecological cancer: focus on menopausal symptoms and osteoporosis

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, it is estimated that about 1.3 million new gynecological cancer cases are diagnosed each year. For 2018, the predicted annual totals were cervix uteri 569,847, corpus uteri 382,069, ovary 295,414, vulva 44,235 and va​gina 17,600. Treatments include hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. These can result in loss of ovarian function and, in women under the age of 45, early menopause.

AIM

The aim of this position statement is to set out an individualized approach to the management, with or without menopausal hormone therapy, of menopausal symptoms and the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in women with gynecological cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature review and consensus of expert opinion.

SUMMARY RECOMMENDATIONS

The limited data suggest that women with low-grade, early-stage endometrial cancer may consider systemic or topical estrogens. However, menopausal hormone therapy may stimulate tumor growth in patients with more advanced disease, and non-hormonal approaches are recommended. Uterine sarcomas may be hormone dependent, and therefore estrogen and progesterone receptor testing should be undertaken to guide decisions as to whether menopausal hormone therapy or non-hormonal strategies should be used. The limited evidence available suggests that menopausal hormone therapy, either systemic or topical, does not appear to be associated with harm and does not decrease overall or disease-free survival in women with non-serous epithelial ovarian cancer and germ cell tumors. Caution is required with both systemic and topical menopausal hormone therapy in women with serous and granulosa cell tumors because of their hormone dependence, and non-hormonal options are recommended as initial therapy. There is no evidence to contraindicate the use of systemic or topical menopausal hormone therapy by women with cervical, vaginal or vulvar cancer, as these tumors are not considered to be hormone dependent.

The Management of Menopausal Symptoms in Women Following Breast Cancer: An Overview

The improved detection and successful treatment of breast cancer, resulting in better survival rates, has led to an increasing number of women living with the effects of treatment modalities and their long-term consequences. Menopausal symptoms following breast cancer can occur at an earlier age, be more severe and significantly influence a woman's overall wellbeing, in particular, sexual function, quality of life and adherence to treatment. There is a dearth of good quality evidence on the safest and most effective treatment options available for these women, and this article aims to summarize the current available treatments. Pertinent to these women is general advice, such as avoidance of triggers, and lifestyle modifications. Following which, non-pharmacological interventions, including cognitive behavior therapy (CBT), hypnosis, acupuncture, stellate ganglion nerve block and complementary agents, are discussed. Pharmacological therapies and their safety profile in these high-risk women are then examined; namely, menopausal hormone therapy, progestogens, antidepressants (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors), gabapentin, clonidine and intra-vaginal dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Finally, neurokinin 3 receptor antagonists, promising new agents for the treatment of troublesome menopausal vasomotor symptoms, are discussed.

Consensus statement for non-hormonal-based treatments for menopausal symptoms

Since the June 2014 consensus statement published in Post Reproductive Health we have had definitive guidelines on menopause treatment from the National Institute for Clinical Excellence in November 2015. These included robust and evidence based information about many non-estrogen based treatments, which are particularly useful for patients who do not wish to take hormone replacement therapy, or who have medical contraindications to hormonal therapy such as hormone dependent cancers. Whilst none of these therapies is as effective as hormones, we must be able to advise patients about them and recommend which treatments may be helpful for individual women.

Menopause Symptom Management in the United Kingdom

Menopause is a complex time in a woman's life. It is an increasingly a midlife event, when health care professionals should be aiming to optimize a woman's health for the next 30 years or so. Nurses need to be able to give up-to-date information and evidence for all forms of treatment based on a background of complex and ever-changing research. This article covers the main presenting complaints and treatments, from lifestyle to hormone replacement therapy, by drawing on guidelines from national bodies.

Pharmacogenomics toward personalized tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer

Tamoxifen has been used not only for the treatment or prevention of recurrence in patients with estrogen receptor positive breast cancers but also for recurrent breast cancer. Because CYP2D6 is known to be an important enzyme responsible for the generation of the potent tamoxifen metabolite, ‘endoxifen’, lots of studies reported that genetic variation which reduced its enzyme activity were associated with poor clinical outcome of breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. However, there are some discrepant reports questioning the association between CYP2D6 genotype and clinical outcome after tamoxifen therapy. Dose-adjustment study of tamoxifen based on CYP2D6 genotypes provides the evidence that dose adjustment is useful for the patients carrying reduced or null allele of CYP2D6 to maintain the effective endoxifen level. This review describes critical issues in pharmacogenomic studies as well as summarizes the results of the association of CYP2D6 genotype with tamoxifen efficacy.

A systematic review of non-hormonal treatments of vasomotor symptoms in climacteric and cancer patients

The cardinal climacteric symptoms of hot flushes and night sweats affect 24-93% of all women during the physiological transition from reproductive to post-reproductive life. Though efficacious, hormonal therapy and partial oestrogenic compounds are linked to a significant increase in breast cancer. Non-hormonal treatments are thus greatly appreciated.

This systematic review of published hormonal and non-hormonal treatments for climacteric, and breast and prostate cancer-associated hot flushes, examines clinical efficacy and therapy-related cancer risk modulation.

A PubMed search included literature up to June 19, 2014 without limits for initial dates or language, with the search terms, (hot flush* OR hot flash*) AND (clinical trial* OR clinical stud*) AND (randomi* OR observational) NOT review). Retrieved references identified further papers. The focus was on hot flushes; other symptoms (night sweats, irritability, etc.) were not specifically screened. Included were some 610 clinical studies where a measured effect of the intervention, intensity and severity were documented, and where patients received treatment of pharmaceutical quality. Only 147 of these references described studies with alternative non-hormonal treatments in post-menopausal women and in breast and prostate cancer survivors; these results are presented in Additional file 1.

The most effective hot flush treatment is oestrogenic hormones, or a combination of oestrogen and progestins, though benefits are partially outweighed by a significantly increased risk for breast cancer development.

This review illustrates that certain non-hormonal treatments, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, gabapentin/pregabalin, and Cimicifuga racemosa extracts, show a positive risk-benefit ratio.

Key points

Several non-hormonal alternatives to hormonal therapy have been established and registered for the treatment of vasomotor climacteric symptoms in peri- and post-menopausal women.

There are indications that non-hormonal treatments are useful alternatives in patients with a history of breast and prostate cancer. However, confirmation by larger clinical trials is required.

Hormonal and nonhormonal treatment of vasomotor symptoms

This article focuses on the cause, pathophysiology, differential diagnosis of, and treatment options for vasomotor symptoms. In addition, it summarizes important points for health care providers caring for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with regard to health maintenance, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and vaginal atrophy. Treatment options for hot flashes with variable effectiveness include systemic hormone therapy (estrogen/progestogen), nonhormonal pharmacologic therapies (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, clonidine, gabapentin), and nonpharmacologic therapy options (behavioral changes, acupuncture). Risks and benefits as well as contraindications for hormone therapy are further discussed.

Prescribing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in older age

Apart from commercial reasons, two motivations have led to the introduction of SSRIs to replace the first and second generation antidepressants already available. One was the search for a more rational treatment, based on specific mechanisms, the other the development of effective treatments with fewer side effects, particularly for older patients, who have a greater sensitivity to cardio-vascular and central nervous system effects. The first has been frustrated up to a point, in that SSRIs and other single mechanism drugs do not appear to be more effective than the earliest relatively non-specific antidepressants. The second has been fulfilled, in that SSRIs generally are better tolerated in older patients and in overdose. However, there is a spectrum of other side effects that are particularly relevant in older age and that need attention when treating depression in this particular patient group.

Effects of cytochrome P450 inhibitors and inducers on the metabolism and pharmacokinetics of ospemifene

PURPOSE

The objectives were to determine the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes involved in the metabolism of ospemifene and its main hydroxylated metabolites and to examine the effects of CYP inhibitors and inducers on ospemifene pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

In vitro metabolism studies were conducted using human liver microsomes; CYP-selective inhibitors and CYP-specific substrates were used to determine the roles of nine CYP isoforms in ospemifene metabolism. Two Phase 1 clinical trials were conducted in healthy postmenopausal women; crossover designs examined the effects of pretreatment with the CYP modulators rifampicin, ketoconazole, fluconazole and omeprazole on ospemifene pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Although several CYP inhibitors decreased the in vitro formation of ospemifene metabolites, none of them completely blocked metabolism. Roles for CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP2B6 in the metabolism of ospemifene and its two main metabolites, 4--hydroxyospemifene and 4'-hydroxyospemifene, were confirmed. The in vivo experiments demonstrated that ospemifene serum concentrations were decreased by rifampicin pretreatment, increased by ketoconazole or fluconazole pretreatment, and minimally affected by omeprazole pretreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical pharmacokinetic findings and in vitro data suggest that CYP3A4 is important for ospemifene metabolism, but other CYP isoforms and metabolic pathways also contribute. Strong CYP3A or CYP2C9 inducers (e.g. rifampicin) would be expected to decrease the exposure to ospemifene. Ospemifene should be used with caution when coadministered with the modest CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole and should not be coadministered with the potent CYP3A/CYP2C9/CYP2C19 inhibitor fluconazole. The potent CYP2C19 inhibitor omeprazole is unlikely to cause clinically significant changes in ospemifene pharmacokinetics.

New generation nonhormonal management for hot flashes

Hot flashes are very common in women in menopause and can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. Hormone therapy (estrogen with or without progestin) remains the gold standard treatment for hot flashes, but concerns for the risk of hormone therapy have resulted in its decline and a demand for nonhormonal treatments with demonstrated efficacy for hot flashes. Several nonhormonal therapies have been tested in randomized placebo-controlled trials including nonpharmacologic approaches and pharmacologic nonhormonal agents. Among them, two classes of nonhormonal medications have been demonstrated to effectively alleviate hot flashes: γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogs and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). This article discusses the superior efficacy of the newer nonhormonal prescriptions for the treatment of hot flashes when compared with estrogen replacement therapy, and provides some recommendations regarding use of them in peri- and postmenopausal women.

Trends in co-prescribing of antidepressants and tamoxifen among women with breast cancer, 2004-2010

Nearly a decade ago, researchers identified a potential interaction between tamoxifen and strong CYP2D6 inhibitors, including several frequently used antidepressants. Based on evidence available at that time, a United States Food and Drug Administration advisory committee recommended tamoxifen's label be changed in October 2006, noting that postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer who are poor CYP2D6 metabolizers by genotype or drug interactions may be at increased risk of cancer recurrence. The impact of accumulating drug risk information on antidepressant use is unknown. We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of 13,205 women aged 50-95 with breast cancer initiating tamoxifen between July 2004 and December 2009. We evaluated trends in strong, moderate, and weak CYP2D6-inhibitor antidepressants and tamoxifen co-prescribing and factors associated with ongoing strong inhibitor use. A propensity score matched control group (aromatase inhibitor initiators) was used to estimate changes in co-prescribing, accounting for secular trends. In each month, approximately 24 % of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor users were prescribed antidepressants. Among women using tamoxifen and antidepressants, 34 % used strong inhibitors between 2004 and 2006 versus 15 % in 2010. Strong inhibitor use decreased more among tamoxifen users than aromatase inhibitor users (difference-in-differences [DD] -0.09; 95 % confidence interval [CI] -0.15, -0.03). Weak inhibitor use increased among tamoxifen users from 32 % between 2004 and 2006 to 52 % in 2010, more rapidly than among aromatase inhibitor users (DD 0.15; CI 0.08, 0.23). The factor most strongly associated with strong inhibitor and tamoxifen co-prescribing after 2006 was prior strong inhibitor use (RR 4.73; CI 3.62-6.18). In conclusion, there were substantial declines in strong CYP2D6-inhibitor use among tamoxifen users following dissemination of information suggesting a potential for increased risk with co-prescribing. Whether patients and providers will continue to avoid strong inhibitor antidepressants is yet to be seen, but clinicians appear to be responsive to drug interaction risk information in this setting.

The management of menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors: case-based approach

INTRODUCTION

The intensified treatment of breast cancer improves survival but has a price in terms of side-effects. The main side-effects, such as vasomotor symptoms and impaired sexual functioning, are related to premature menopause due to chemotherapy and/or anti-hormonal therapy. Though for some women these symptoms are bearable, for others they have a large impact on their quality of life. The paper discusses the menopausal symptoms most frequently reported by breast cancer survivors and current treatment options.

METHODS

A literature review is presented of menopausal symptoms after breast cancer and management strategies, illustrated by two cases.

SUMMARY

Vasomotor symptoms can be relieved by lifestyle adaptation, acupuncture and non-hormonal agents such as venlafaxine, gabapentin or clonidine. Impaired sexual functioning can be treated by couple-based sexual counselling or psycho-educational therapy. Painful intercourse due to vaginal dryness can be alleviated by vaginal lubricants and moisturizers, but is most effectively treated by vaginal estriol. Local estriol seems safe if used for a short period (less than six weeks). Because of proven increased risk of recurrence with hormone replacement therapy (HRT), it should not be prescribed for breast cancer survivors, although exceptions could be made of selected cases of fully informed BRCA mutation carriers after ER-negative breast cancer and with severe menopausal symptoms due to prophylactic oophorectomy at a young age and (preferably) after mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

The management of vasomotor symptoms and impaired sexual functioning in breast cancer survivors should focus on lifestyle and, if necessary, non-hormonal pharmacological interventions.

Challenges in the treatment of younger women with breast cancer

SUMMARY Breast cancer in the younger patient is a perplexing issue for many clinicians because the topic is fraught with so much uncertainty. While most clinicians know that young women unfortunately fare worse after a breast cancer diagnosis, it is not clear how to best improve that outcome. Issues that are unique to young, premenopausal women regarding both local and systemic therapy will be discussed in this article. Additionally, the side effects of surgery, radiation, chemotherapy and hormonal therapy can be particularly damaging to a younger woman’s quality of life. In particular, sexual dysfunction and infertility are common problems that are extremely important to young patients, although many doctors actually avoid these topics because of unfamiliarity with their management. This article aims to shed light on these clinically relevant topics.

Symptom management in metastatic breast cancer

Approximately 40,000 women die as a result of breast cancer each year and many more live with advanced disease. When breast cancer recurs, the goals of treatment often shift from one of cure to controlling the disease for as long as possible while palliating symptoms interfering with the patient's functional status and quality of life. This requires ongoing discussions with the patient and family about the goals of care. Many symptoms depend on the site of metastasis, with bone being the most frequent, and commonly occur with fatigue, depression, insomnia, and pain. The purpose of this paper is to identify and provide an overview of the management of the most common symptoms in patients with breast cancer metastases.

Non-hormonal treatment strategies for vasomotor symptoms: a critical review

Hot flashes (or flushes) are the most commonly reported symptoms during the menopause transition and early postmenopausal years, particularly in Western societies; they affect 60-90% of women and can lead to significant physical discomfort and functional impairment. The emergence of hot flashes and night sweats (also known as vasomotor symptoms [VMS]) coincide with a period in life that is also marked by dynamic changes in hormone and reproductive function that interconnect with the aging process, changes in metabolism, lifestyle behaviours and overall health. Estrogen-based therapies have long been the treatment of choice for women suffering from VMS. More recent concerns over long-term safety of menopausal hormone treatments, however, have led physicians and patients to pursue non-hormonal strategies to alleviate their symptoms. In this article, we review most of the efficacy and safety data on non-hormonal treatments for VMS published over the past 20 years. We discuss the evidence for treating symptomatic women in different clinical scenarios, e.g. VMS with and without concomitant depression or VMS following the use of anti-estrogen therapies. Overall, efficacy data support the use of some psychotropic medications, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and gabapentin. Complementary and alternative methods for VMS also showed limited but promising results, although more definitive studies are warranted. Clinicians should therefore be able to tailor treatment strategies for those who are unable or unwilling to use hormones to alleviate VMS and improve overall functioning and quality of life.

Duloxetine for the treatment of mood disorder in cancer patients: a 12-week case-control clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine in cancer patients with mood disorder (MD) by means of a comparison with a matched control group of patients with MD without medical illness.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients with MD were enrolled in this prospective case-control study and received duloxetine 60/120 mg per day for 12 weeks. Twenty-seven patients were affected by cancer, whereas 32 had an MD without cancer. All the patients were assessed by means of efficacy and effectiveness tolerability scales for depression (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), anxiety (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y1/Y2) and severity of symptoms (Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity) at baseline (T0), after 4 weeks (T1) and 12 weeks (T2). The CGI-Improvement, CGI-Effectiveness Index and Dosage Record Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale were administered at T1 and T2.

RESULTS

A significant global improvement in all the efficacy measures was found. The results showed no significant interaction 'Time X Group', suggesting a similar improvement in efficacy scores for cancer-depressed patients and depressed patients without cancer. No difference was found between the two groups with regard to drop-out percentage, effectiveness and tolerability.

CONCLUSION

Although the results of this case-control study are preliminary, they suggest that duloxetine can be considered a good option for the treatment of MD in cancer patients.

Adherence to oral endocrine treatments in women with breast cancer: can it be improved?

There is a perception that women on oral endocrine treatments for oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer will be adherent to these medicines, as they are facing a serious life-threatening disease, and the oral endocrine treatments are effective, easy to use and generally well tolerated. This is not in fact the case, and this is the basis of the first half of this review. The second half is of whether the changes/interventions to 'improve' adherence do actually increase adherence to the oral endocrine medicines. The review shows that better outcomes are achieved with good adherence to endocrine treatments in breast cancer. The rates of adherence to endocrine treatments range between 15 and 50%, and are influenced by a large number of factors (e.g. adverse effects, lack of belief in treatment, psychological problems and poor patient-health care provider relationship). Interventions to minimise the adverse effects have been used in an attempt to improve the adherence to the endocrine treatment therapies, but it is not known whether these do actually improve adherence. Similar, it has been assumed that interventions by health professionals (doctors, nurses and pharmacists) will improve the adherence, but this has not been tested. In conclusion, in women with breast cancer, we know there is a problem with adherence. There are also many approaches and suggestions about how to improve adherence to the oral endocrine treatments, but none of these approaches/suggestions have been scientifically tested, and they need to be.