Decreased mortality risk due to first acute coronary syndrome in women with postmenopausal hormone therapy use

[Menopausal hormone therapy: internal-endocrine point of view]

The history of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) started in 1942 in the US and became very popular in the 1960s worldwide because of the beneficial effects on vasomotor-vegetative and vulvovaginal symptoms. These symptoms may begin already in the premenopausal period, and can last for more than 10 years with reduced quality of life. Many women with vasomotor-vegetative symptoms do not visit a gynaecologist first but primarily a general physician or cardiologist because of instable blood pressure and palpitations, leading to the focus on the heart. To avoid unnecessary examinations and treatment with ß-blockers or antidepressants, an interdisciplinary look is necessary. In most cases, appropriate and low dose hormone replacement will relieve the symptoms and restore quality of life. In addition, it is worthwhile to know about the long-term effect of hormone deficiency as well as replacement on the different organ systems and the possible influences of hormone replacement therapy including contra indications. This is especially necessary after the uncertainties raised after the first deleterious announcements of the currently corrected results of the WHI (women's health initiative) study.

Use of postmenopausal hormone therapy and risk of Alzheimer's disease in Finland: nationwide case-control study

OBJECTIVES

To compare the use of hormone therapy between Finnish postmenopausal women with and without a diagnosis for Alzheimer's disease.

DESIGN

Nationwide case-control study.

SETTING

Finnish national population and drug register, between 1999 and 2013.

PARTICIPANTS

All postmenopausal women (n=84 739) in Finland who, between 1999 and 2013, received a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease from a neurologist or geriatrician, and who were identified from a national drug register. Control women without a diagnosis (n=84 739), matched by age and hospital district, were traced from the Finnish national population register.

INTERVENTIONS

Data on hormone therapy use were obtained from the Finnish national drug reimbursement register.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for Alzheimer's disease, calculated with conditional logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In 83 688 (98.8%) women, a diagnosis for Alzheimer's disease was made at the age of 60 years or older, and 47 239 (55.7%) women had been over 80 years of age at diagnosis. Use of systemic hormone therapy was associated with a 9-17% increased risk of Alzheimer's disease. The risk of the disease did not differ significantly between users of estradiol only (odds ratio 1.09, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.14) and those of oestrogen-progestogen (1.17, 1.13 to 1.21). The risk increases in users of oestrogen-progestogen therapy were not related to different progestogens (norethisterone acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, or other progestogens); but in women younger than 60 at hormone therapy initiation, these risk increases were associated with hormone therapy exposure over 10 years. Furthermore, the age at initiation of systemic hormone therapy was not a decisive determinant for the increase in risk of Alzheimer's disease. The exclusive use of vaginal estradiol did not affect the risk of the disease (0.99, 0.96 to 1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Long term use of systemic hormone therapy might be accompanied with an overall increased risk of Alzheimer's disease, which is not related to the type of progestogen or the age at initiation of systemic hormone therapy. By contrast, use of vaginal estradiol shows no such risk. Even though the absolute risk increase for Alzheimer's disease is small, our data should be implemented into information for present and future users of hormone therapy.