Breast cancer treatment in women over the age of 80: A tailored approach

Postoperative Course and Supportive Care in Very Elderly Cecum Cancer Patients

In developed countries like Japan, the size of the older population is rapidly increasing. Malignant neoplasms rank as the leading cause of death among the geriatric population of Japan, emphasizing the rising demand for cancer care in this demographic. Older patients, besides facing physical and cognitive challenges, are also affected by their social environment, necessitating tailored interventions. Few case reports have detailed the progress of cancer treatment in nonagenarian patients. This study presents the progress of two very old patients with cancer. The first case, a 95-year-old female with chronic constipation underwent emergency surgery for a cecal tumor. Despite initial improvements, her mobility declined after surgery, leading to institutionalization. Recurrent hospitalizations ensued with complications culminating in her death approximately 20 months after surgery. In the second case, a 94-year-old male, initially declining aggressive treatment for a suspected ileocecal malignancy, later opted for supportive care. Despite stable conditions, he eventually died at home after experiencing progressive weakness, which was approximately 20 months after the initial diagnosis. These cases shed light on the management of elderly patients with ileocecal cancer, illustrating the divergent trajectories between surgical intervention and supportive care. The tumor did not recur in the patient who underwent surgery; however, the independence in performing daily living activities declined significantly. In the case managed with the best-supportive care, progression was slow; however, severe anemia became a concern toward the end of life.

Adjuvant therapeutic strategy decision support for an elderly population with localized breast cancer: A monocentric cohort retrospective study

Guidelines for the management of elderly patients with early breast cancer are scarce. Additional adjuvant systemic treatment to surgery for early breast cancer in elderly populations is challenged by increasing comorbidities with age. In non-metastatic settings, treatment decisions are often made under considerable uncertainty; this commonly leads to undertreatment and, consequently, poorer outcomes. This study aimed to develop a decision support tool that can help to identify candidate adjuvant post-surgery treatment schemes for elderly breast cancer patients based on tumor and patient characteristics. Our approach was to generate predictions of patient outcomes for different courses of action; these predictions can, in turn, be used to inform clinical decisions for new patients. We used a cohort of elderly patients (≥ 70 years) who underwent surgery with curative intent for early breast cancer to train the models. We tested seven classification algorithms using 5-fold cross-validation, with 80% of the data being randomly selected for training and the remaining 20% for testing. We assessed model performance using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC score. We used an autoencoder to perform dimensionality reduction prior to classification. We observed consistently better performance using logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis models when compared to the other models we tested. Classification performance generally improved when an autoencoder was used, except for when we predicted the need for adjuvant treatment. We obtained overall best results using a logistic regression model without autoencoding to predict the need for adjuvant treatment (F1-score = 0.869).

Surgery for Metastatic Spinal Disease in Octogenarians and Above: Analysis of 78 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE

Octogenarians living with spinal metastases are a challenging population to treat. Our objective was to identify the rate, types, management, and predictors of complications and survival in octogenarians following surgery for spinal metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected cohort of patients aged 80 years or older who underwent surgery for metastatic spinal tumor treatment between 2008 and 2019 were included. Demographic, intraoperative, complications, and postoperative follow-up data was collected. Cox proportional hazards regression and logistic regression were used to associate variables with overall survival and postoperative complications, respectively.

RESULTS

78 patients (mean 83.6 years) met inclusion criteria. Average operative time and blood loss were 157 minutes and 615 mL, respectively. The median length of stay was 7 days. The overall complication rate was 31% (N = 24), with 21% considered major and 7% considered life-threatening or fatal. Blood loss was significantly associated with postoperative complications (OR = 1.002; P = 0.02) and mortality (HR = 1.0007; P = 0.04). Significant associations of increased risk of death were also noted with surgeries with decompression, and cervical/cervicothoracic index level of disease. For deceased patients, median time to death was 4.5 months. For living patients, median follow-up was 14.5 months. The Kaplan-Meier based median overall survival for the cohort was 11.6 months (95% CI: 6.2-19.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In octogenarians undergoing surgery with instrumentation for spinal metastases, the median overall survival is 11.6 months. There is an increased complication rate, but only 7% are life-threatening or fatal. Patients are at increased risk for complications and mortality particularly when performing decompression with stabilization, with increasing intraoperative blood loss, and with cervical/cervicothoracic tumors.

The addition of radiotherapy to breast-conserving surgery improves survival for elderly patients with early breast cancer

Purpose

To evaluate whether adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) was associated with better survival among elderly (≥70 years) breast cancer patients with T1-2N0 and estrogen receptor (ER) positive disease.

Methods

We included patients who met the inclusion criteria between 2010 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Patients were subdivided into three groups based on surgery and RT: BCS alone, BCS plus RT, and refusal of RT. The primary outcomes were breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). Chi-squared tests, Kaplan-Meier method, and Multivariate Cox regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize the potential selection bias.

Results

A total of 26586 patients were included in this analysis. The median follow-up was 66 months. Of these patients, 15591 (58.6%) patients received RT, RT was recommended but not performed due to patient refusal for 1270 (4.8%) patients, and RT was not recommended for 9725 (36.6%) patients. The 5-year BCSS was 98.3% for patients receiving RT, 97.1% for patients refusal of RT, and 96.4% for patients not recommended RT (P<0.001). The 5-year OS was 88.6% for patients receiving RT, 77.6% for patients who refused RT, and 72.1% for patients not recommended RT (P<0.001). Multivariate Cox regression analyses showed that patients who received adjuvant RT after BCS had significantly better BCSS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.523, 95%confidence interval [CI] 0.447-0.612, P<0.001) and OS (HR 0.589, 95%CI 0.558-0.622, P<0.001) compared to those without RT. A total of 7721 pairs of patients were matched successfully between those with and without RT using PSM. The results also showed that patients who received RT after BCS had significantly better BCSS (HR 562, 95%CI 0.467-0.676, P<0.001) and OS (HR 0.612, 95%CI 0.0.575-0.652, P<0.001) compared to those without RT.

Conclusions

These data suggest that individual counseling is important for treatment decision-making in elderly breast cancer patients with T1-2N0 and ER-positive disease. Given the relatively lower toxicity of modern RT techniques, adjuvant RT should be recommended in patients with high life expectancy.

The effect of chemotherapy on survival in oldest old patients with nonmetastatic triple negative breast cancer: A populationbased observational study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Chemotherapy is the primary pharmacotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). But the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in the oldest old TNBC patients remains controversial. Hence, we designed this population based observational study in order to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in oldest old TNBC patients with early-stage disease.

METHODS

TNBC patients aged 80 years and older that with stage I to III invasive disease were identified in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results cancer database from 2010 to 2016.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Of 1611 patients enrolled, 1356 (84.17%) did not receive chemotherapy. Age, race, histology, grade, T stage, N stage, and radiation were found to be strong predictors of chemotherapy recipient by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Chemotherapy significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.62, 95% CI: 0.49-0.79, p < 0.001), but did not significantly reduce breast cancer specific death (BCSD) (HR, 0.92, 95% CI: 0.63-1.35, p = 0.675). These results were further confirmed by propensity score matching analysis. Chemotherapy was associated with better OS in the subgroup of patients aged 80-84 years old (HR, 0.54, 95% CI: 0.40-0.74, p < 0.001), T2-4 stage disease (HR, 0.58, 95% CI: 0.44-0.76, p < 0.001), or grade 3-4 disease (HR, 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.71, p < 0.001). However, chemotherapy did not reduce the cumulative incidence of BCSD in any subgroup.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy should be considered for TNBC patients aged 80-84 years old, T2-4 disease, or grade 3-4 disease.

Adequate Assessment Can Affect the Management of Breast Cancer in Geriatric Population

Breast cancer (BC) risk increases with age; about a third of patients are diagnosed in age older than 65. Treatment of this age group remains controversial, leading to inferior outcomes with lower survival rates than younger patients. We aimed to evaluate performance status tools as well as the outcome of management of breast cancer in the geriatric population. We have conducted a retrospective database analysis looking into the management of breast cancer patients older than 65 years old presenting to our unit during the period between June 2015 and June 2019. All patients had triple assessment as well as multimodality performance status assessment with their treatment modalities, and outcomes are recorded and assessed. We have included 578 patients, 0.8% male and 99.2% female, and our patients' mean age was 71 years. Most of our patients scored one or two on the WHO/ECOG performance status score and Clinical Frailty Score, as well as ASA-PS score. 3.2% had no treatment, 4.3% had endocrine therapy only, 0.5% had primary endocrine therapy followed by surgery, and 92.3% underwent surgery with 4.1% complication rate. Patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery had adjuvant breast radiotherapy, and 23.7% had adjuvant chest wall radiotherapy, 78.8% had adjuvant endocrine treatment, and 4.8% had adjuvant chemotherapy out of which 30.7% had adjuvant chemotherapy and Herceptin. Objective assessment tools should be used for patients older than 65 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer to be able to scarify patients' individualised treatment options to reach the optimum outcome.

Updates on the treatment of invasive breast cancer: Quo Vadimus?

Breast cancer is a common malignancy among women. Despite an increase in incidence, breast cancer mortality has drastically dropped over the last 20 years. This change has been attributed to advances in screening, diagnosis, and treatment. This review summarises recent updates in the clinical approach to breast cancer. Advances in genetics have facilitated the stratification of the risk of recurrence in early-stage breast cancer. Advances in biology have led to the development of novel therapies (poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, HER2 targeted agents). Their combination with endocrine (tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, GnRH-analogues, fulvestrant) and systematic therapy (anthracyclines, taxanes) in early and advanced disease have improved clinical outcomes. In the near future, neoadjuvant strategies in specific breast cancer subgroups (triple-negative breast cancers) and novel strategies (immune-modulatory agents) could further improve histopathological responses and survival. Radical mastectomies have been widely replaced by breast-conserving operations, while the traditional axillary dissection is being replaced with sentinel node techniques. Breast cancer therapeutics represents a great challenge due to patients' heterogeneous molecular and clinical characteristics, while the identification of reliable and easily reproducible predictive factors could further improve individualized treatment.

The Evolving Complexity of Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2)-Negative Breast Cancer: Special Considerations in Older Breast Cancer Patients-Part II: Metastatic Disease

Breast cancer is a disease of aging, and the incidence of breast cancer is projected to increase dramatically as the global population ages. The majority of breast cancers that occur in older adults are hormone-receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative phenotypes, with favorable tumor biology; yet, because of underrepresentation in clinical trials, less evidence is available to guide the complex care for this population. Providing care for older patients with metastatic breast cancer, with coexisting medical conditions, increased risk of treatment toxicity, and frailty, remains a clinical challenge in oncology. In this review, we provide an overview of the current evidence from clinical trials and subanalyses of older adults with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, highlighting data on the safety and efficacy of oral therapies, including endocrine therapy alone or in combination with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors. In addition, we note the significant underrepresentation of older and frail adults in these studies. Current and future directions in research for this special population, in order to address significant knowledge gaps, include the need to improve long-term adherence to hormonal and targeted therapy, prospective clinical trials that capture clinical and biological aging endpoints, and the need for a multidisciplinary approach with integration of geriatric and oncology principles.

Impact of pre-appointment contact and short message service alerts in reducing 'Did Not Attend' (DNA) rate on rapid access new patient breast clinics: a DGH perspective

Background

Failure to attend the clinic without prior intimation, known as “Did Not Attend” (DNA) is a significant global issue. There have been no published studies attempting to reduce DNA rates in breast clinics. We aimed to assess the impact of contacting patients prior to clinic attendance and Short Message Service (SMS) reminder on DNA rates in rapid access new patient breast clinics, evaluate ‘Could Not Attend’ (CNA) rate, and explore any correlation between age, sex, clinic days and sessions.

Methods

Initially, DNAs at the rapid access new patient breast clinic between 01/04/2018 and 31/03/2019 at a district general hospital in the North-West of England was assessed (Cycle 1). Changes were introduced in terms of contacting patients prior to offering appointments, followed by SMS reminders nearer the clinic dates. Subsequently, DNA was reassessed between 01/10/2019 and 31/03/2020 (Cycle 2).

Results

Following implementation of changes, DNA rate reduced from 8.2 to 4.1% (p < 0.00001). CNA rates were 0.9% (Cycle 1) and 1.1% (Cycle 2) [p = 0.36]. Evening clinics had the lowest DNA rates throughout. DNA patients in cycle 2 were significantly older than those in cycle 1 (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Contacting patients prior to clinic appointments and sending SMS reminders helped reduce DNA rates significantly in rapid access new patient breast clinics. Scheduling clinic sessions with least DNA rates, such as evening clinics, should be contemplated. One should be cautious of mobile phone technology that conveys SMS, which can potentially disadvantage the older age group. This model could be considered across the board to improve DNA rates.

Development, validation and clinical impact of a prediction model for 6-month mortality in older cancer patients: the GRADE

Background: To develop, validate, and assess the clinical impact of a clinical score to predict a 6-month mortality risk among older cancer patients.

Results: The mean age was 81.2 ± 6.1 years (women: 54%, various cancers, metastatic cancer: 45%). The score, namely the GRADE, included two geriatric variables (unintentional weight loss, impaired mobility), two oncological variables (cancer site, cancer extension), and exclusively supportive care. Up to a 14% risk of early death, the decision curves suggest that cancer treatment should be instated.

Conclusion: We have developed and validated a simple score, easy to implement in daily oncological practice, to predict early death among older cancer patients which could guide oncologists in their treatment decisions.

Methods: 603 outpatients prospectively included in the Physical Frailty in Elderly Cancer patients cohort study. We created a multivariate prediction model by evaluating the strength of the individual components of the Geriatric Assessment regarding risk of death at 6 months. Each component was evaluated by univariate analysis and the significant variables (P ≤ 0.20) were carried on as covariates in the multivariate cox proportion hazard analysis. The beta coefficients from the model were used to build a point-based scoring system. Clinical impact was assessed using decision curves.

Variation in the management of elderly patients in two neighboring breast units is due to preferences and attitudes of health professionals

Introduction: Elderly breast cancer patients have been shown to be managed less aggressively than younger patients. There is evidence that their management varies between institutions. We audited the management of elderly patients in two neighboring units in Glasgow and aimed to identify reasons for any differences in practice found.

Methods: Patients aged ≥70 years, who were managed for a new diagnosis of breast cancer in the two units between 2009 and 2013, were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Tumor pathology, treatment details, postcode and consultant in charge of care were obtained from the same database. Comorbidities were obtained from each patient’s electronic clinical record. Questionnaires were distributed to members of each multidisciplinary teams.

Results: 487 elderly patients in Unit 1 and 467 in Unit 2 were identified. 76.2% patients in Unit 1 were managed surgically compared to 63.7% in Unit 2 (p<0.0001). There was no difference between the two units in patient age, tumor pathology, deprivation or comorbidity. 16.2% patients managed surgically in Unit 1 had a comorbidity score of 6 and above compared to 11% of surgically managed patients in Unit 2 (p=0.036). Responses to questionnaires suggested that staff at Unit 1 were more confident of the safety of general anesthetic in elderly patients and were more willing to consider local anesthetic procedures.

Conclusion: A higher proportion of patients aged >70 years with breast cancer were managed surgically in Unit 1 compared to Unit 2. Reasons for variation in practice seem to be related to attitudes of medical professionals toward surgery in the elderly, rather than patient or pathological factors.