Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of Novel Agent Therapy

Single-Center Experience of Patients with Plasma Cell Leukemia in the Era of New Therapeutics

INTRODUCTION

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) can occur de novo as primary PCL (pPCL), or in patients with prior diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) as secondary PCL (sPCL). In 2021, the diagnostic criteria have been revised, establishing a new cut-off of ≥5% plasma cells in the peripheral blood. Lacking specific clinical trials, PCL is treated similarly to MM; however, outcome for patients with PCL remains poor. Here, we report outcomes for patients with pPCL and sPCL in the era of novel agents.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis and identified 19 patients (11 pPCL, 8 sPCL) who have been treated for PCL between 2010 and 2022 at University Hospital Essen.

RESULTS

Patients with pPCL had a median overall survival (OS) of 37.8 months (95% CI: [15.4; 52.3] months) from diagnosis, with a median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 18.4 (2.0; 22.9) months. All patients were treated with a proteasome-inhibitor (PI)-based induction therapy, and the majority was consolidated with an autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Five of these patients received a tandem transplantation. Patients with sPCL had a median OS of only 1.5 months after diagnosis of PCL. Only 1 patient achieved a remission with daratumumab and subsequent allogenic SCT.

CONCLUSION

With our study, we add evidence for a PI-based induction therapy followed by a consolidating autologous SCT for patients with pPCL and give further evidence that a tandem transplant concept might be beneficial. The diagnosis of sPCL remains devastating and needs new therapeutic approaches.

Prognostic Implications of Circulating Plasma Cell Percentage in Multiple Myeloma and Primary Plasma Cell Leukemia Defined by New Criteria

INTRODUCTION

The definition of primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) has been revised from ≥20% to ≥5% circulating plasma cells (CPC). However, the precise prognosis associated with CPC remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate prognostic biomarkers for myeloma patients based on CPC presence.

METHODS

A comprehensive analysis was conducted on 309 consecutive patients diagnosed with either multiple myeloma or pPCL, utilizing peripheral blood smears stained with Wright-Giemsa.

RESULTS

Patients were grouped by CPC percentage: 0% (221, 71.5%), 1-4% (49, 15.9%), 5-19% (16, 5.2%), ≥20% (23, 7.4%). CPC >5% correlated with unfavorable characteristics, including anemia, renal dysfunction, and advanced International Staging System. Common cytogenetic abnormalities such as 1q21 amplification, 17p deletion, and Myc rearrangement were prevalent among CPC-positive patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were shorter in patients with CPC ≥5% (29.47 vs. 10.03 months; 64.10 vs. 12.30 months). Additionally, PFS and OS were shorter in CPC-positive patients without autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and those with response < partial remission to the first-line regimen. Furthermore, an association emerged between soft tissue-related extramedullary disease and inferior PFS, while Myc rearrangement correlated with abbreviated OS.

CONCLUSION

Biological characteristics displayed greater aggressiveness in patients with positive CPC, leading to significantly shorter PFS and OS. The presence of CPC, ASCT, and overall response rate were independent prognostic factors. While no new threshold for pPCL with CPCs is proposed, Myc rearrangements and CPC positivity could serve as ultra-high-risk factors for multiple myeloma.

Clinical and cytogenetic characteristics of primary and secondary plasma cell leukemia under the new IMWG definition criteria: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder, exhibiting a more unfavorable prognosis than multiple myeloma. PCL is classified into pPCL and sPCL. Recently, the IMWG has recommended new PCL definition criteria, which require the presence of ≥5% circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears. Due to its low incidence, research on pPCL and sPCL is limited.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study and analyzed clinical and cytogenetic data of pPCL and sPCL patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and survival distributions were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

This is a small cohort comprising 23 pPCL and 9 sPCL patients. Notably, sPCL patients showed a higher incidence of extramedullary infiltration and a higher percentage of bone marrow plasma cells (p = 0.015 and 0.025, respectively). Although no significant difference was found between the two groups in OS and PFS, a trend emerged suggesting a superior survival outcome for pPCL patients, with a higher cumulative 1-year PFS rate (38.3% vs. 13.3%) and a lower early mortality rate (mortality rate at 3 months: 15% vs. 33%). We also suggested that pPCL patients carrying t(11;14) may have a longer median survival time than individuals with other cytogenetic abnormalities, but this was not confirmed due to the small sample size.

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed clinical and cytogenetic features of pPCL and sPCL patients according to the new diagnostic criteria. The findings suggested a generally better prognosis for pPCL than sPCL and the likelihood of t(11;14) translocation acting as a favorable prognostic factor in pPCL. It is important to note that our study had a limited sample size, which may lead to bias. We hope well-designed studies can be conducted to provide more results.

Treatment of primary plasma cell leukaemia with carfilzomib and lenalidomide-based therapy (EMN12/HOVON-129): final analysis of a non-randomised, multicentre, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Primary plasma cell leukaemia is a rare and aggressive plasma cell disorder with a poor prognosis. The aim of the EMN12/HOVON-129 study was to improve the outcomes of patients with primary plasma cell leukaemia by incorporating carfilzomib and lenalidomide in induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy.

METHODS

The EMN12/HOVON-129 study is a non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study conducted at 19 academic centres and hospitals in seven European countries (Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Italy, Norway, The Netherlands, and the UK) for previously untreated patients with primary plasma cell leukaemia aged 18 years or older. Inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed primary plasma cell leukaemia (defined as >2 ×109 cells per L circulating monoclonal plasma cells or plasmacytosis >20% of the differential white cell count) and WHO performance status 0-3. Patients aged 18-65 years (younger patients) and 66 years or older (older patients) were treated in age-specific cohorts and were analysed separately. Younger patients were treated with four 28-day cycles of carfilzomib (36 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16), lenalidomide (25 mg orally on days 1-21), and dexamethasone (20 mg orally on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23). Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) induction was followed by double autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT), four cycles of KRd consolidation, and then maintenance with carfilzomib (27 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 for the first 12 28-day cycles, and then 56 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 in all subsequent cycles) and lenalidomide (10 mg orally on days 1-21) until progression. Patients who were eligible for allogeneic HSCT, could also receive a single autologous HSCT followed by reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic HSCT and then carfilzomib-lenalidomide maintenance. Older patients received eight cycles of KRd induction followed by maintenance therapy with carfilzomib and lenalidomide until progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The primary analysis population was the intention-to-treat population, irrespective of the actual treatment received. Data from all participants who received any study drug were included in the safety analyses. The trial was registered at www.trialregister.nl (until June 2022) and https://trialsearch.who.int/ as NTR5350; recruitment is complete and this is the final analysis.

FINDINGS

Between Oct 23, 2015, and Aug 5, 2021, 61 patients were enrolled and received KRd induction treatment (36 patients aged 18-65 years [20 (56%) were male and 16 (44%) female], and 25 aged ≥66 years [12 (48%) were male and 13 (52%) female]). With a median follow-up of 43·5 months (IQR 27·7-67·8), the median progression-free survival was 15·5 months (95% CI 9·4-38·4) for younger patients. For older patients, median follow-up was 32·0 months (IQR 24·7-34·6), and median progression-free survival was 13·8 months (95% CI 9·2-35·5). Adverse events were most frequently observed directly after treatment initiation, with infections (two of 36 (6%) younger patients and eight of 25 (32%) older patients) and respiratory events (two of 36 [6%] younger patients and four of 25 [16%] older patients) being the most common grade 3 or greater events during the first four KRd cycles. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 26 (72%) of 36 younger patients and in 19 (76%) of 25 older patients, with infections being the most common. Treatment-related deaths were reported in none of the younger patients and three (12%) of the older patients (two infections and one unknown cause of death).

INTERPRETATION

Carfilzomib and lenalidomide-based therapy provides improved progression-free survival compared with previously published data. However, results remain inferior in primary plasma cell leukaemia compared with multiple myeloma, highlighting the need for new studies incorporating novel immunotherapies.

FUNDING

Dutch Cancer Society, Celgene (a BMS company), and AMGEN.

Sequential autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation for treatment of primary plasma cell leukemia: A case report

Primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) is a rare and aggressive form of plasma cell disorder, which accounts for ~70% of all PCL. Survival of pPCL remains poor, and is related with early mortality. There is no standard therapy for patients with pPCL. In the present study, a 26-year-old man who was diagnosed with pPCL was reported. The patient achieved stringent complete remission to the successful treatment of intensive chemotherapy combined with sequential autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) followed by maintenance therapy with oral administration of ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD regimen). Development of complex treatment algorithms that combine novel agents, SCT and post-transplantation remission strategies may translate into survival in patients with pPCL.

How We Manage Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Circulating Tumor Cells

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Careful evaluation of peripheral blood for the presence of circulating plasma cells by morphologic assessment or by flow cytometric analysis is an essential component of the diagnostic workup in all patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) to timely differentiate between MM and primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL), which is the most aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia. The improvement in survival over time is more modest in pPCL, compared with what has been achieved in MM. pPCL is currently defined by the presence of ≥ 5% circulating plasma cells. However, this cutoff is now challenged by new data, from three large cohorts of patients with newly diagnosed MM, showing that a threshold of 2% circulating tumor cells (CTCs) by flow cytometry can be used to identify a subset of patients with ultra-high-risk MM with comparable prognosis as patients with pPCL. These patients may benefit from more intensified first-line therapies, or from enrollment into specific clinical trials, designed for ultra-high-risk MM and pPCL. Apart from differentiating MM from pPCL, the quantification of CTCs is also useful for risk stratification in MM. The detection of CTCs above a threshold of 0.01%-0.07% (much lower than the threshold to define pPCL) appears to be an independent predictor of poor clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed MM. Additional studies, including transplant-ineligible patients or with incorporation of novel immunotherapies, are needed to identify a definitive prognostic CTC cutoff. The next step will be the incorporation of CTC detection into existing staging systems to improve risk stratification and treatment personalization.

More Than 2% of Circulating Tumor Plasma Cells Defines Plasma Cell Leukemia-Like Multiple Myeloma

PURPOSE

Primary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is the most aggressive monoclonal gammopathy. It was formerly characterized by ≥ 20% circulating plasma cells (CTCs) until 2021, when this threshold was decreased to ≥ 5%. We hypothesized that primary PCL is not a separate clinical entity, but rather that it represents ultra-high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) characterized by elevated CTC levels.

METHODS

We assessed the levels of CTCs by multiparameter flow cytometry in 395 patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible MM to establish a cutoff for CTCs that identifies the patients with ultra-high-risk PCL-like MM. We tested the cutoff on 185 transplant-eligible patients with MM and further validated on an independent cohort of 280 transplant-ineligible patients treated in the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. The largest published real-world cohort of patients with primary PCL was used for comparison of survival. Finally, we challenged the current 5% threshold for primary PCL diagnosis.

RESULTS

Newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with MM with 2%-20% CTCs had significantly shorter progression-free survival (3.1 v 15.6 months; P < .001) and overall survival (14.6 v 33.6 months; P = .023) than patients with < 2%. The 2% cutoff proved to be applicable also in transplant-eligible patients with MM and was successfully validated on an independent cohort of patients from the GEM-CLARIDEX trial. Most importantly, patients with 2%-20% CTCs had comparable dismal outcomes with primary PCL. Moreover, after revealing a low mean difference between flow cytometric and morphologic evaluation of CTCs, we showed that patients with 2%-5% CTCs have similar outcomes as those with 5%-20% CTCs.

CONCLUSION

Our study uncovers that ≥ 2% CTCs is a biomarker of hidden primary PCL and supports the assessment of CTCs by flow cytometry during the diagnostic workup of MM.

The clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) according to the new IMWG definition criteria

Recently, the definition of primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) has been revised as the presence of circulating plasma cells (CPCs) ≥5% in peripheral blood smear. Consequently, the clinical features and prognosis of this aggressive disease can be truly identified by the larger patient cohort. Herein, we identified 158 new-defined pPCL patients among 2,266 MM patients (7.0%), and such prevalence doubled the previous estimate. Our study firstly provided solid support for the application of the new definition. We also found that cytopenias and adverse prognostic biomarkers were more common in new-defined pPCL compared with MM (p < 0.05). Besides, the patients receiving proteasome inhibitors based regimen in combination with stem cell transplantation could experience a considerable survival benefit. Strikingly, we showed that the presence of conventional high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in pPCL didn't exert a great prognostic effect like MM, while elevated LDH reflecting tumor cells proliferation rate was the only independent predictor.

Update on primary plasma cell leukemia

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and highly aggressive plasma cell neoplasm developing in 0.5?4% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). The diagnostic criteria were recently revised from 20% to ≥5% of circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood smears. PCL is classified as primary or secondary; primary PCL is when it presents in patients with no MM. Primary PCL shows clinical and laboratory features at presentation that differ from MM and exhibits a dismal prognosis even with the use of effective agents against MM. Therefore, intensive chemotherapy should be initiated immediately after diagnosis, and autologous stem cell transplantation is recommended for transplant-eligible patients. Maintenance therapy after transplantation may reduce the rate of early relapses. We reviewed the definitions of PCL, revised diagnostic criteria, clinical features, and appropriate initial treatments for primary PCL.

Genomics of Plasma Cell Leukemia

Simple Summary

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a very aggressive plasma cell disorder with a dismal prognosis, despite the therapeutic progress made in the last few years. The implementation of genomic high-throughput technologies in the clinical setting has revealed new insights into the genomic landscape of PCL, some of which may have an impact on the development of novel therapeutic approaches. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview and update of the genomic studies carried out in PCL.

Abstract

Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) is a rare and highly aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia characterized by the presence of clonal circulating plasma cells in peripheral blood. PCL accounts for approximately 2–4% of all multiple myeloma (MM) cases. PCL can be classified in primary PCL (pPCL) when it appears de novo and in secondary PCL (sPCL) when it arises from a pre-existing relapsed/refractory MM. Despite the improvement in treatment modalities, the prognosis remains very poor. There is growing evidence that pPCL is a different clinicopathological entity as compared to MM, although the mechanisms underlying its pathogenesis are not fully elucidated. The development of new high-throughput technologies, such as microarrays and new generation sequencing (NGS), has contributed to a better understanding of the peculiar biological and clinical features of this disease. Relevant information is now available on cytogenetic alterations, genetic variants, transcriptome, methylation patterns, and non-coding RNA profiles. Additionally, attempts have been made to integrate genomic alterations with gene expression data. However, given the low frequency of PCL, most of the genetic information comes from retrospective studies with a small number of patients, sometimes leading to inconsistent results.

Plasma cell leukemia: A review of the molecular classification, diagnosis, and evidenced-based treatment

Plasma cell leukemia is a rare and aggressive plasma cell dyscrasia associated with dismal outcomes. It may arise de novo, primary plasma cell leukemia, or evolve from an antecedent diagnosis of multiple myeloma, secondary plasma cell leukemia. Despite highly effective therapeutics, survival for plasma cell leukemia patients remains poor. Molecular knowledge of plasma cell leukemia has recently expanded with use of gene expression profiling and whole exome sequencing, lending new insights into prognosis and therapeutic development. In this review, we describe the molecular knowledge, clinical characteristics, evidenced-based therapeutic approaches and treatment outcomes of plasma cell leukemia.